A Historic Whole Life Policy's Fluctuating Dividends - YouTube

Channel: Banking Truths

[6]
Hi this is Hutch with BankingTruths.com
[9]
and today we're going to discuss dividend interest rates
[12]
and how that affects whole life cash value
[15]
and death benefit performance on
[17]
an ongoing basis.
[18]
And we're going to do so by looking at one particular insurance company's
[21]
dividend history because
[23]
although most other quality carriers have nearly identical trends this particular mutual company has released actual
[29]
historic data from a sample policy issued in
[32]
1980.
[33]
Why this is important is because when you see an illustration it
[38]
assumes that the dividend interest rate stays exactly the same for the entire time.
[41]
However, the ongoing dividend interest rate
[45]
will most likely rise and fall throughout the life of the policy.
[47]
And since many of my clients believe that interest rates will rise in the future
[51]
I thought it would be useful to show how this affected policies
[54]
in the past.
[55]
Since we can't illustrate this kind of trend using
[59]
current policies.
[60]
So if we zero in on 1981 we see that the dividend interest
[63]
rate of this particular carrier was 8.27 percent
[67]
and it stayed that way for a few years before spiking dramatically
[71]
and staying very high for a number of years before starting to
[74]
subside and stabilize.
[77]
Now eventually around 2002 it dipped
[80]
below where it was originally illustrated
[82]
and it stayed that way all the way to present day 2017
[87]
where it's now at 6.7%.
[89]
And thankfully this carrier has provided actual historical performance
[93]
data since 1980, so we can see the effect of those
[96]
dividend interest rates on a hypothetical policy issued in 1980.
[100]
And we can see year by year how they affected total dividends
[104]
total cash value and total death benefit amounts.
[107]
Now keep in mind this is a male,
[109]
no spring chicken, age 50.
[111]
He's standard non-smoker meaning not a preferred rating not preferred
[114]
best. And these are using the 1958
[118]
census tables where people weren't living nearly as long
[121]
as they are today. So it entails that one of today's policies
[124]
should be a little bit more efficient at least from a mortality
[128]
standpoint.
[128]
And this is a 10 pay whole life policy,
[131]
meaning there's a lifetime worth of premium stuffed into
[134]
the first 10 years of this policy
[136]
and this is a lot closer to how we structure most of our banking policies,
[140]
although with certain carriers we can have them contractually paid
[143]
up in seven years (even as little as five years).
[147]
The premium on this policy is fourteen thousand four hundred
[150]
and forty five dollars is due once a year for 10 years
[153]
and then it's contractually paid up.
[154]
And if we look at the guaranteed cash value column,
[157]
you see at the end of 10 years you're not quite yet break even.
[161]
But you do break even somewhere between Year 11
[163]
and Year 12.
[164]
Now this assumes that no dividends are ever paid
[167]
and most quality companies including this one have
[171]
found a way to pay a dividend each
[173]
and every year for the last hundred and something years.
[175]
And so we're going to focus on the total dividends column now
[179]
and the total cash value.
[180]
What I'm gonna do is I'm going to overlap the dividend
[184]
interest rate so we can see the delta as we go
[187]
and if we look at the total dividends column in the total cash
[190]
value column there's an illustrated
[192]
and there's an actual column under it.
[195]
And for the first three years when the dividend rate is exactly the
[198]
same as what was originally illustrated there's no change
[202]
anywhere. What was illustrated is what actually appeared in
[205]
that policy.
[206]
Now 1984,
[208]
boom, we have a spike.
[209]
Our dividend rate goes from 8.27 to
[213]
11.6. And lo and behold the total dividend that got paid on
[216]
this policy instead of being two thousand
[219]
and forty dollars was thirty nine hundred
[221]
and forty eight dollars.
[223]
The next year the dividend increases again to 12.2.
[226]
So instead of twenty two hundred dollar dividend we're looking at a fifty
[230]
one hundred dollar dividend.
[232]
Now if we jumped down in 1991 we can see that the dividend
[235]
rate has fallen now from twelve point two to ten
[238]
and a half. But if we look at the total dividend that was paid instead
[241]
of a 43 hundred dollar dividend,
[243]
we have nearly a thirteen thousand dollar dividend that was
[246]
paid.
[247]
And if we look at the total cash value column you
[250]
can see that there's almost a 40000 thousand dollar difference.
[254]
Now the reason this is is because all those additional dividends you received
[258]
above what was illustrated continue to compound inside the
[261]
policy and with the mutual company where
[264]
there are no stockholders the policy holders actually
[268]
own the company - your shares of stock so to speak
[271]
are represented by how much cash value you have.
[273]
The more cash value you have,
[275]
the bigger cut of the dividend pool you get.
[277]
So even though the dividend decreased from twelve point two
[281]
to ten and a half your actual dividend is exponentially
[284]
bigger than what was originally illustrated.
[286]
Needless to say, your numbers will obviously be vastly different
[290]
and past performance is no indication of future returns.
[293]
So if we skip down to the year 2002 we can see that the dividend interest
[297]
rate finally dips below what was originally illustrated,
[300]
that eight point to seven percent.
[302]
The dividend was originally projected to be a seventy nine hundred
[305]
dollar dividend. However it would have worked out to be over a
[308]
twenty thousand dollar dividend
[310]
and the total cash value would be 50 percent higher
[314]
than what was originally projected inside this policy.
[317]
And if we just keep scrolling down you see that the dividend interest rate
[320]
just continues to drop.
[322]
Yet, the actual dividends being paid are far greater
[326]
than what was originally illustrated in the policy.
[329]
And this again has to do with that compounding effect.
[332]
All those additional dividends,
[333]
even though they were far smaller than what we're seeing in the later stages of the policy,
[337]
they just continue to grow and compound upon themselves
[340]
and demand a bigger cut of the dividend pool for the policyholder.
[344]
Now if we jump down and focus on the end game,
[347]
what you're going to see is the original IRR
[350]
or internal rate of return projected for this policy.
[353]
Cash value was just over 4 percent,
[356]
4.1 percent, and what it actually worked out to be was
[360]
over 6 percent.
[361]
So instead of over a half a million dollars
[365]
of total cash value there's actually well over 900000
[369]
of total cash value inside this policy
[372]
and the death benefit originally projected to be just over
[375]
600000 is well over one point
[378]
one million.
[380]
So if you believe that prevailing interest rates
[383]
and dividend interest rates are at
[384]
or near historic lows,
[386]
then what you want to do is start heavily funding a policy
[390]
now so that you can command a bigger cut of that dividend
[393]
pool on an ongoing basis
[395]
and continue to compound exponentially into the future.
[399]
Feel free to click the button below to schedule a phone appointment
[402]
with a license policy design specialist.
[404]
They just may be able to help you build something slightly more efficient
[407]
than a 10 pay policy for a 50 year old
[410]
with a standard rating using outdated mortality tables.
[413]
And there's a very good chance that you'll be pleasantly surprised by
[417]
the projections using today's low dividend rates not to mention
[420]
what's possible in the future.