Cost Accounting, Material and Labor Variances - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[5]
Welcome welcome. Cost accounting and performance measurement. We're just continuing on with
[10]
fun and exciting stuff. Quick review. Don�t forget to do your homework. Do one question
[15]
at a time, check the answer, one question, and check the answer. Make sure you understand
[19]
the key concepts. If you need homework help go to the homework help line, right online.
[23]
We can help you there. Otherwise, just keep powering through the material. We�re looking
[27]
at cost accounting and performance measurement, actually a pretty exciting and interesting
[32]
section. You may recall from the previous section we talked about manufacturing costs.
[37]
And we said with manufacturing costs, we�ve got direct materials, direct labor and factory
[44]
overhead, manufacturing overhead. Materials, labor and overhead. Now, we said material
[50]
and labor together are called what? Prime costs. And labor and overhead were called
[55]
what? Conversion costs. Good. Now, with materials, those are the materials that become an integral
[61]
part of the product. What can go wrong with materials? You either paid too much per pound
[67]
or you use too many pounds. Now let�s think about it logically. You paid too much...who
[73]
messed up? Purchasing or production? That would be purchasing. If you use too many pounds,
[80]
who messed up? Purchasing or production? That would be production. Alright. Direct labor.
[86]
With labor, that was the labor directly to convert a raw material to a finished good.
[91]
That was the labor that became an integral part of the product. Now what can go wrong
[95]
with labor? You pay too much, or you use too many hours, which is efficiency. Now as far
[101]
as paying too much, let's see. Is that personnel or production? That would be personnel. What
[108]
about efficiency? You use too many hours in the factory. That would be production. Now,
[115]
in looking at this, remember, we�ve also got our overhead. What is overhead? All other
[120]
factory costs except direct materials, direct labor, indirect materials, indirect labor,
[125]
factory insurance, rent, utilities, electricity, air conditioning, depreciation, property tax...everything
[132]
else in the factory except materials and labor. With materials and labor, with overhead rather,
[137]
what can go wrong? Here�s my little trick. What is four plus three? Even my videographer
[144]
goes, �Seven!� Right? S-E-V....spending, efficiency, volume. Spending, efficiency,
[150]
volume. And this is four plus three, S-E-V, spending, efficiency. With spending what does
[157]
it mean? Well, spending has both fixed and variable. In other words, you spent too much
[164]
on fixed overhead, like the rent, you spent too much on variable, like electricity. Efficiency...that
[171]
is all variable because it�s like electricity. Volume deals with production volume, production
[178]
capacity. This is fixed. So you can see that we�re going to have some fixed and variable
[184]
variances here in overhead. These are not too bad. These are ugly. Alright, you might
[190]
remember from school, or, �I don't even get this stuff.� Well, hopefully at the
[193]
end of lecture it makes a little more sense. So we got materials, labor and overhead. The
[197]
whole purpose of this first part of the section is, �Dude,� �What?�, �Dude! Who�s
[201]
got my car?� �Dude! What could go wrong?� The purpose of this is to aid in budget process,
[208]
pinpoint trouble areas and evaluate performance. It says in your notes in setting goals for
[215]
the efficient production of inventory, companies established standards for the components for
[218]
the components that determine materials labor and overhead. At the end of the period, these
[222]
standards are compared actual with variances in order to figure. So we�re going to compare
[227]
actual and standard, standard allowed for actual in some case and we�re going to look
[231]
at the differences or variance to see what went wrong. The main thing is you want to
[236]
not give the finger, but point the finger good job, bad job, good job, bad job, so we
[240]
got to go out here and say if this is good, �Hey purchasing! Good job!� But here�s
[244]
the problem: maybe they did a good job in purchasing when they bought cheaper materials,
[250]
but maybe they were so cheap that it took us more materials to get the quantity we needed.
[255]
So we�ve got to look not only at these but at the total variance as well. Same thing
[260]
here. We hired cheaper people, but they're lazy, they don't work as much, so it took
[264]
them longer to do it. We have to look at the total variances as well. So as we go through
[268]
this variance analysis, we�re trying to evaluate and see what can go wrong and who's
[274]
responsible. Who�s responsible? Purchasing production purchasing production. What could
[278]
go wrong? You pay too much, you use too many hours. What could go wrong? We spent too much,
[283]
we�re less efficient, and our production capacity is down. This one really means that
[287]
the factory stood idle for a while, like our...let�s say we can produce 100,000 units and we only
[294]
produce 90,000 units. What does that say? It says that we wasted production ability
[299]
of 100,000. Our production volume variance our production volume was down. That�s a
[303]
problem. Alright. Look at your notes on the first page there.