Apple's Money Problem (& Why It Won't Buy Netflix) - YouTube

Every second, Apple makes $1,444 of profit.

That's more than any other company, and almost as much as Alphabet, Microsoft and Facebook combined.

A bank account of $285 billion makes it more country, than company.

Anyone else would kill for pockets so deep.

But Apple is wary.

And while most companies beg not to be taxed, countries beg not to tax Apple.

The strange story about Apple's finances explains how it got so wealthy, why this is a problem, and what they'll buy next.

Companies pay taxes to the country in which their money is made.

A toy might be invented and manufactured in Antarctica but if it's sold in Germany, that's where it pays taxes.

And because these taxes vary by country, so do the costs of products.

The iPhone X is $1000 in America but $1368 in India and $1455 in Hungary.

In fact, if it weren't for import taxes,

it'd be cheaper to fly to the US, buy an iPhone and fly back.

But there's an exception to every rule. And that exception is always America.

It's the only country that taxes based on citizenship.

That means a US citizen living and working abroad still owes taxes back to the US.

You could renounce your citizenship, but you'd be taxed for that too.

And for American companies this means paying the highest tax in the world on profit made everywhere.

So this won't fly.

When Apple pays tax overseas,

America subtracts that amount from its tax rate,

and then reaches out its hand.

This is where Apple, Google, almost every major company says, "Hmm..."

"Actually, I think we're gonna keep our money out here for now."

That money goes into a subsidiary:

a company that is legally different, but really just a foreign bank account.

These are located in countries like Ireland and Jersey.

Not for the cows, but the very generous tax code.

And Ireland's economy runs not despite being a tax shelter but because of it.

What they lose in taxes, they make back from the jobs these companies bring.

So when the European Union stepped in and said, "Hey Apple, you've been getting far too fair a deal."

"Time to pay your dues,"

Ireland rolled its eyes and shook its head,

passing up on 5% of its entire GDP.

But what about the 30% of revenue Apple makes in the US?

Well, one way to pay less taxes is to make less money.

At least on paper.

All of Apple's products depend on patents.

And unlike people, places, and things, patents have no precise value,

making them a handy way to move money. So they give

their patents to the Irish subsidiary, who then "rents" them back to Apple for a "fee."

When Apple makes money in the US, it can wink at the IRS and say

"This isn't profit, we owe it to the owner of the patent in Ireland."

"Sorry, America. It's just not our money to give."

This is how profit escapes its country whether it's

made in Spain or Maine, and technically Ireland taxes that money whether it

stays in the country or moves offshore. But where there's a will and $285 billion,

there's a way. If money is transferred to the Netherlands, a handy

loophole makes it nearly tax-free. So it briefly flashes in a Dutch bank account

owned by a non-existent company, with no employees to check a legal box. And then

it returns back to Ireland, this time a subsidiary located in the country but

legally a resident of Jersey, where it can finally retire to the cows and

castles in peace. The richest meal for a corporation isn't gold covered chocolate

or expensive caviar, but an Irish and Dutch subsidiary sandwich.

All of this is 100% legal and 100% common. But because Apple makes so much

more money, it's in an unusual position. No matter how big the pile grows, it's

all frozen just out of reach. It's like being given the world's largest bank

account with no ATMs to withdraw from. And the problem is actually much deeper than that.

To pay American bills, Apple takes American loans, money for which it

already has, just not as far as the US is concerned. But it can't keep up with

how fast the pile is growing. To you and I this would be the opposite of a

problem. Because it's easy to imagine Apple as a giant fat cat, swimming in

money and worrying only about how to spend it all. Giving away billions would

be mere pocket change to someone that wealthy. And maybe it should pay higher

taxes. But there is no singular Apple. The CEOs of the CEO are shareholders and

when someone buys a portion of the company, he does so in hopes of earning

more money tomorrow than he paid today. Stocks can cost pennies or hundreds of

thousands of dollars. But what matters is how much that number changes. And that's

the problem. To an individual, money in a bank account

is money it can use. But to a shareholder all that money means nothing, if it sits

watching grass grow. That's money not being invested in making twice as much

tomorrow. The desire to minimize taxes kept money

offshore. But that made it useless for what they care about most: investing back

in the business. But everything is about to change.

When the US lowers its corporate tax, Apple can finally bring back its money.

The question now is how to spend it all. It may research future products, acquire

small companies, and buy back shares. But why not acquire something big? Articles

like this one suggest Apple buy Tesla, Activision, and Netflix. And to an

investor, this makes perfect sense. Diversifying a business so dependent on

just one product, and without making too big a dent in its wallet. But implied in

this argument is another. If Microsoft and Google successfully acquire

companies left and right, but Apple rarely does, they must be sleeping on the job.

Microsoft just bought LinkedIn for eight

times more than Apple's ever paid for a single company, but never assumed the

world's most profitable company is bad with money.

Apple's strategy is to shop for talent and technologies, never trying to make a

quick buck. When it needed Touch ID it bought Authentec, when it needed a voice

assistant it bought Siri, and when it needed Steve Jobs,

it bought NeXT. Suggesting they buy Activision or Netflix is suggesting that

Apple stop being Apple. Because absorbing a company also means absorbing

its culture. And forever changing its most valuable asset: extreme focus. It's

the same reason they make so few products and design them so minimally.

Saying no to what every other company would say yes to

is exactly what makes Apple so successful.

If you have thoughts about Apple, how corporations should be

taxed, or anything else you want to share with the world, you might be interested

in learning how to express those thoughts with an animated video like

this one. And the best way to do that is with Skillshare, a community of online

courses on everything from design to business. For example, if you're

interested in animating your own videos, you might take a course like this one.

the best way to learn is by doing. And with Skillshare, you can practice by

following the course work of a professional, as they teach you how to

make graphics from scratch. I have absolutely no background or special

talent in design, but I got better by following courses like these, and slowly

adding in my own style. And I think you'd be surprised by how affordable it is. A

premium annual subscription costs less than $10/month. But even better,

the first 1,000 people to sign up at skl.sh/polymatter3 -link in the

description- will get their first two months for 99 cents. You could be well on

your way to making videos like mine, for 99 cents. In fact, if you use Skillshare

to start a channel, e-mail me a link and I'd be happy to take a look. Thanks to

Skillshare, and to everyone who gives it a try. If you enjoyed this video you'd

probably also like "The Grand Theory of Apple", where I explain Apple's overarching

philosophy, from why they removed the headphone jack to how they prioritize their products.

Captions By: joshuaktanki