After 2020 Loss, Trump's Tax Cuts Endure As Corporations Duck U.S. Debts | The Beat With Ari Melber - YouTube

Channel: MSNBC

[0]
if you're a girl from compton don't just
[2]
become a tennis player
[4]
become the greatest athlete ever money's
[7]
gotta be the shoes
[8]
shoe shoes shoes you sure it's not the
[10]
shoes i'm sure
[14]
nike is an iconic company for many
[16]
reasons and in 2020 it made nearly three
[19]
billion dollars in u.s
[20]
profits they did great during this
[22]
pandemic digital sales almost doubled
[24]
the company says they beat a quote
[26]
dynamic environment by staying on the
[28]
offense as ceo
[30]
john donahue put it now mr donahue took
[32]
over running nike after a successful
[34]
stint at bain capital where he worked
[35]
with mitt romney
[36]
and he oversees a nike workforce where
[38]
the median employee makes about
[40]
490 dollars a week or 25 thousand
[43]
dollars a year
[44]
to put that in perspective it means a
[46]
single parent of three kids with the
[48]
median nike salaries living below the
[50]
poverty line
[52]
half of nike's employees make less than
[53]
that meaning
[55]
many of them might work and still need
[57]
assistance to get by
[58]
like those food lines i mentioned
[60]
whether it's from a charity or a second
[62]
job or
[62]
government subsidies as for ceo donahue
[66]
very different story he makes
[70]
over 500 times the salary of his median
[73]
employee
[74]
and in what he called that quote dynamic
[76]
year of 2020 his overall compensation
[78]
was
[78]
53 million dollars this is mounting
[82]
inequality in pandemic america
[84]
and while nike benefits enormously from
[86]
the us government with regulating the
[88]
markets
[89]
systems the mail that ensures nike's
[91]
profitable that this
[92]
products go out companies not paying its
[95]
share at
[95]
all in that same dynamic year of 2020
[99]
nike paid zero federal taxes none
[103]
which is wild a company making billions
[106]
and paying its ceo millions
[108]
is paying our government less than a
[110]
single average taxpayer probably less
[112]
than you
[114]
so where are all those nike profits
[115]
going well
[117]
to paraphrase some rick ross lines about
[119]
the company's product
[120]
count the profits you could bring them
[122]
in a nike box
[124]
grinding in my jordans kick them off
[126]
they might be hot
[128]
ross is saying his own nikes might be
[130]
stolen or hot and his illicit profits
[133]
can be stored in a nike box but
[135]
when it comes to nike's tax money that
[137]
shoebox
[139]
would be empty that's not
[142]
fair to everyone else paying taxes now
[145]
for its part
[146]
nike says it follows the law and paid
[148]
quote significant taxes over the years
[151]
but my point here with you tonight is
[152]
not even to single out nike as some sort
[154]
of special case or outlier
[156]
it's actually the opposite what nike
[158]
does is common it's usually legal
[160]
which raises questions about whether any
[162]
of this should be legal
[163]
55 u.s companies paid zero federal taxes
[167]
on 2020 revenue with other big names in
[169]
that same crew like fedex and dish
[172]
and companies that have had their
[173]
businesses surge as customers face
[175]
limited options while quarantining under
[177]
government rules
[178]
these very figures are facts binding
[180]
cited in that big speech to congress
[184]
recent studies shows that 55 of the
[188]
nation's biggest corporations
[190]
paid zero federal tax last year
[194]
those 55 corporations made in excess
[198]
of 40 billion dollars in profit a lot of
[201]
companies
[202]
also evade taxes through tax havens in
[204]
switzerland and bermuda
[206]
and they benefit from tax loopholes and
[208]
deductions it's not right
[212]
it's a huge problem with customers
[214]
hurting and corporate taxes hitting an
[215]
effective rate of zero
[217]
you could imagine business leaders
[219]
treading carefully here but instead many
[220]
are demanding that whatever the us does
[222]
next corporate taxes shouldn't go up at
[224]
all
[225]
now economists debate all kinds of
[226]
things there aren't always simple
[228]
answers but here's one thing we do know
[230]
corporations pay less right now because
[231]
trump slashed their rates by about
[233]
40 as soon as he got into office moving
[236]
over a trillion dollars
[237]
off their corporate balance sheet so
[240]
that bill goes somewhere else it goes to
[242]
workers or some other part of the system
[244]
trump even told his millionaire donors
[245]
that all his tax reforms would help
[247]
them and he was blunt about how this was
[250]
a wild perk for corporations
[253]
corporations are literally going wild
[256]
over this
[257]
i think even beyond my expectations the
[259]
biggest tax cut
[260]
biggest reform of all time
[265]
going back to just before the aberration
[266]
of the trump presidency corporations
[268]
paid a tax rate above 30 percent
[270]
if you go back to the 50s and 60s many
[272]
paid half their profits in taxes which
[274]
finance roads and schools and the
[275]
military
[276]
but that norm has been slashed over time
[279]
corporate rate falling all the way down
[280]
to this trump rate of 21
[282]
percent now this change was led by
[284]
republicans and some democrats
[285]
supporting deregulation
[287]
it's also interesting to note that top
[288]
democratic leader back in the day warned
[290]
the republican tax crusade would not
[292]
magically save money it would cost so
[294]
much
[295]
that surplus money for the elderly in
[296]
health care would be rated
[299]
it will use social security and medicare
[302]
surpluses
[303]
it will create the same deficit
[305]
situation i promise you
[307]
as we have seen all through the 1980s
[309]
and early 90s
[312]
as corporate rates crash these are of
[315]
course maximum possible rates after
[316]
trump's plan passed the number of
[318]
companies paying zero
[319]
doubled many companies managed to pay
[321]
less than the 21 percent as biden was
[323]
talking about or they pay zero
[325]
with gimmicks employees and lawyer
[326]
tricks many of which are deemed legal
[328]
now some have a financial purpose like
[330]
honestly declaring your losses
[332]
others though are tricks designed for
[334]
tax dodging like moving shell companies
[336]
abroad to get lower foreign rates
[339]
while you benefit from america's rules
[340]
an issue many top democrats have
[342]
hammered
[344]
if anybody here thinks that corporate
[346]
america gives one damn about the average
[349]
american worker you're mistaken
[350]
companies like facebook have kept
[352]
billions of dollars in tax breaks
[354]
through tax tactics like offshore tax
[357]
evasion
[357]
you built something great in this
[359]
country good for you but you did it
[361]
using workers
[362]
all of us helped pay to educate if they
[364]
could save five cents by going to china
[366]
that's exactly what they would do
[368]
pitch in two cents so everybody else
[370]
gets a chance
[371]
unlike my opponent i will not let oil
[374]
companies elect another four billion
[376]
dollars
[376]
in corporate welfare from our taxpayers
[381]
we've got a better path
[385]
so why is this in the news now democrats
[387]
are pushing to fund this new
[388]
infrastructure bill by reforming
[390]
corporate tax inequity they want to
[393]
nudge the corporate tax rates up a bit
[395]
biden pushing for a rate of back to 28
[397]
percent
[398]
and i can tell you tonight most voters
[400]
already support that
[402]
some moderate democrats though are
[403]
saying it shouldn't even go back
[405]
up to pre-trump levels arguing for a
[407]
middle ground they call it of 25 percent
[410]
but here's the thing this entire debate
[413]
is still happening right now within the
[416]
narrow corporate terms set
[418]
basically by trump which came after
[420]
decades of corporate
[422]
giveaways in the 80s it was considered a
[424]
conservative wall street
[426]
victory when reagan slashed those
[427]
corporate rates from 46
[429]
to 34 percent and a sweeping law that
[433]
many democrats and then senator biden
[435]
supported
[436]
this was back in the days of an often
[437]
bipartisan attack on taxes
[442]
the american taxpayers must either bail
[444]
it out
[445]
or someone else will come in and buy it
[448]
out when i
[448]
argued that we should freeze federal
[450]
spending i meant social security as well
[453]
i meant medicare and medicaid i meant
[456]
veterans man i met
[457]
every single solitary thing in the
[459]
government
[460]
the liberals of my party said it's an
[462]
awful thing you're doing joe
[464]
we had not had the reagan budgets that
[467]
we all
[468]
voted on i mean we we could have stopped
[470]
them we would uh
[472]
have a budget in balance right now and
[474]
the debt that's occurred as a
[475]
consequence of those
[477]
reagan additional deficits uh i
[479]
shouldn't say reagan the reagan and the
[481]
democratic congress
[482]
both facts
[486]
reagan and democrats and then senator
[489]
biden back those reagan rates bringing
[490]
corporate taxes down to
[492]
34 percent and remember this is why this
[494]
is so important right now
[496]
at the time wall street cheered that
[499]
as a big victory in a low rate here we
[502]
are
[502]
decades later in a pandemic recession
[506]
where the government has been literally
[507]
cutting these corporations new checks
[510]
and very favorable loans and vaccinating
[512]
their workers
[513]
and propping up the economy and
[516]
washington's entire frame of reference
[517]
is whether to
[519]
keep the trump tax rates in that 20
[521]
percent range
[522]
or bump them a bit it's literally this
[525]
narrow
[526]
most of congress isn't even looking at
[527]
going up to those reagan rates of 34
[530]
percent
[531]
and biden to be clear has changed his
[533]
tax approach for a new world
[534]
he used that big speech to make the case
[536]
for reforming these corporate taxes
[540]
we're going to reform corporate taxes so
[542]
they pay their fair share and help pay
[544]
for the public investments
[546]
their businesses will benefit from as
[548]
well
[550]
now when you see the billionaires who
[551]
run nike and amazon and these big
[553]
companies thriving
[554]
while people are suffering if you
[557]
remember nothing else
[558]
from this walk down tax lane remember
[562]
this
[563]
the billions they have while people
[566]
wait in line for food that's not just
[568]
the way the economy works
[571]
this is the way congress works it's the
[572]
way politicians
[574]
lock in gains for wall street donors
[576]
have been demanding that each new
[577]
administration
[578]
treat whatever past corporate welfare
[580]
they got as the baseline untouchable
[582]
for any new plans and it doesn't happen
[585]
by accident amazon gave 12
[587]
million dollars in political
[589]
contributions just last cycle
[592]
they did it to get something same for
[593]
bain capital that i mentioned they gave
[595]
21 million
[596]
or those big financial firms like
[598]
blackstone and citadel they each gave
[600]
over 40
[601]
million making them among the top 10
[603]
companies for highest
[604]
political donations in the whole country
[607]
they keep setting the terms with
[608]
congress
[609]
republican administrations often lock
[611]
them in these
[613]
companies though have found that it's
[614]
basically cheaper to lobby congress up
[616]
front
[617]
and then avoid paying sometimes any
[619]
taxes later
[620]
so here we are now with even a blue wave
[623]
election
[623]
that handed the senate and the white
[625]
house to democrats but the actual d.c
[628]
boundaries for corporations seem to
[629]
still be choosing between
[631]
the trump-era tax cuts or the reagan-air
[634]
tax rates
[635]
and not much else corporations have
[638]
narrowed the terms of this debate at
[640]
this
[640]
important time congress largely obliges
[643]
and then you have as i mentioned some
[645]
not all but some democratic senators
[646]
saying that even ending the entire trump
[648]
tax cuts
[649]
would be too much when a blue nation
[653]
and a blue government are stuck debating
[655]
on terms set by
[656]
trump and reagan something is seriously
[660]
off and you'll notice by contrast
[663]
debates over social issues aren't caught
[664]
this far
[665]
in the past but this one comes all the
[667]
way down to the money
[669]
and america has to ultimately decide
[671]
even beyond going back and forth
[673]
between parties and these elections at a
[674]
structural level
[676]
america has to decide if it can stick
[678]
with a tax and campaign finance system
[681]
that is this unequal
[683]
and yes this expensive
[686]
hey i'm ari melvin from msnbc you can
[688]
see more of our videos right here or
[690]
better yet
[690]
subscribe to our youtube channel below
[692]
you could have been anywhere in the
[693]
world but you're here with us
[695]
and we appreciate that