Gini Coefficient and Lorenz Curve - YouTube

Channel: Khan Academy

[0]
in this video we're going to discuss
[2]
income inequality which is something
[6]
that is often debated thinking about
[9]
comparing countries thinking about
[10]
whether it's an issue or not and how to
[12]
address it and to appreciate what income
[15]
inequality is let's imagine two
[17]
different countries let's imagine first
[20]
country a and there's two people in
[22]
country a so you have person one here
[25]
who makes $1000 a year that's their
[30]
income and then there's person two in
[32]
country a that makes 99 thousand dollars
[37]
a year so what is going to be the
[40]
average income in country a if these are
[43]
the only two people you could think of
[44]
it as the per capita national income
[46]
well the average income here average
[49]
income to figure that out you would just
[52]
have to average the 1000 and the 99
[55]
thousand so you have a total income of
[57]
one plus ninety-nine a hundred thousand
[59]
and divided by two folks we're going to
[61]
have an average income of $50,000 per
[65]
year now let me construct another
[68]
country that has the same average income
[71]
but the distribution is very different
[73]
so in country B let's say the first
[77]
citizen of country B they make $50,000 a
[81]
year and let's say there's a second
[83]
person in country B and they also make
[87]
$50,000 per year per year well what's
[94]
the average income now well this is even
[97]
easier to compute 50 plus 50 divided by
[100]
2 your average income is $50,000 per
[103]
year so what you see here is two
[106]
countries that if you just looked at the
[109]
average income they seemed similarly
[112]
wealthy but that doesn't give you they
[116]
seem to have similar average income so
[119]
you say oh maybe they're similarly
[121]
prosperous but when you go a step deeper
[124]
you see that they are very different
[126]
country a is a lot more unequal than
[130]
country B when it comes
[132]
to income so question is is above and
[135]
beyond looking at things like average
[137]
income or average GDP or per capita GDP
[140]
how do you measure inequality and this
[143]
is something that this Italian
[145]
statistician Corrado Gini tried to
[148]
address and he comes up with something
[150]
called a Gini coefficient to measure
[153]
income inequality for a nation and the
[156]
way he approached it is actually pretty
[157]
intuitive what he did is he sets up two
[160]
axes so this axis right over here is
[164]
going to be the cumulative percentage of
[166]
the population so you start at 0% and
[169]
then you get all the way to hundred
[171]
percent of the population so this is the
[174]
cumulative percent of the population in
[178]
a country and then on this axis on this
[182]
axis you have the cumulative percentage
[185]
of the income in a country so this would
[188]
be zero down here and then this would be
[190]
hundred up here and so this is
[192]
cumulative percent of income in a
[198]
country and then he said well what would
[200]
a perfectly equal society look like when
[203]
a perfectly equal society as you add a
[206]
percentage on your cumulative percentage
[208]
of population you should add that exact
[210]
same percentage to your cumulative
[212]
percentage of income so as you go up you
[215]
really should just have a slope of 1
[218]
going up like this so one way to think
[222]
about it is when you're at 0 percent of
[224]
the population you should have 0 percent
[226]
of the income if you have a total of 10
[229]
percent of the population they should
[231]
have 10 percent of the national income
[236]
if you were to go to 50 percent of the
[240]
population which looks like it's around
[242]
there if it was perfectly distributed
[245]
the income well then that should be 50
[247]
percent of the national income but no
[249]
nation is actually there and so then we
[252]
have to think compare that to the
[253]
reality so let's say you look at a
[256]
country and and what you do is when
[257]
you're looking at the cumulative
[258]
percentage of the population you start
[261]
at the left with the lowest income and
[262]
as you add percentage of the population
[264]
you get to higher
[265]
in higher income folks so let's say
[268]
we're looking at a country that for the
[270]
poorest folks as you add percentages to
[273]
the cumulative population you're not
[274]
adding the same percent to the
[277]
cumulative income and so it might you
[280]
might have a curve that looks like this
[281]
and then as you add percentages in the
[284]
wealthier population for every 1% you
[286]
add you're adding more than 1% of
[288]
national income and so this curve
[291]
variety over here which you could view
[293]
is describing the reality for certain
[295]
nation this is known as a Lorenz curve
[298]
Lorenz curve and what Jeany said is well
[302]
the difference between the Lorenz curve
[304]
and this line right over here that that
[308]
would be a measure of income inequality
[311]
and so he would look at this area right
[316]
over here and say what percentage is
[319]
this area between this line and the
[322]
Lorenz curve what percentage is this of
[325]
this total area under the line and this
[329]
percentage is called the Gini
[334]
coefficient and it's typically quoted as
[336]
being a value from 0 to 1 or sometimes
[341]
you might see the scale as being from 0
[344]
to 100 so what would a Gini coefficient
[348]
of 0 represent well if you have a Gini
[351]
coefficient of 0 that means that this
[353]
area right over here between the Lorenz
[355]
curve and this line is 0 so that means
[358]
that we are dealing with a perfectly
[360]
equal income distribution so at the 0
[364]
end this is perfect equality perfect
[369]
income equality and then what is one or
[374]
a hundred mean that means that the area
[377]
between the line and the Lawrence curve
[379]
is a hundred percent of the area under
[381]
this line so that would look like
[384]
something like this a country whose
[386]
Lorenz curve looks like something like
[388]
this where all of these people I keep
[390]
adding more and more and more population
[392]
but I'm not adding more and more income
[396]
and then all of a sudden you get to the
[397]
very last person and then that
[399]
and as all of the income so that person
[402]
has all of the income well in that case
[404]
the Gini coefficient would be the
[406]
percentage of this area which would be
[408]
100% which we could view as a one or a
[412]
hundred and so an interesting thing to
[414]
do is is look at Gini coefficients for
[417]
various countries and compare them and
[420]
that's exactly what we have here on this
[423]
map and you can see that the the
[426]
countries that are shaded red these are
[429]
countries that have high Gini
[431]
coefficients so this is where you have
[433]
more income inequality and the ones that
[436]
are shaded green are the ones where you
[437]
have relatively low Gini indices or Gini
[439]
coefficients and so that would be
[441]
indicative of reasonably low income
[444]
inequality now it's important to point
[447]
out you might think that red is always
[448]
bad and green is always good but this
[451]
just tells you inequality it does not
[453]
tell you on average how prosperous folks
[456]
are what average income is in that
[458]
country and so this is an indication
[461]
that in places like Latin America and
[464]
sub-saharan Africa you definitely have
[466]
very high inequality and places like
[468]
Canada and Europe you seem to have a
[470]
very low inequality but it doesn't tell
[473]
you that people for sure are better off
[475]
in Canada than say the United States for
[478]
example you could have a higher average
[480]
income in the United States than you
[482]
have in Canada and one can have a very
[484]
spirited debate which one you would
[486]
rather be would you rather be in a
[488]
country that has higher inequality and
[490]
higher average income or one that has
[492]
lower income and lower inequality