Fraternal Order of Police national president on why his union is endorsing Trump - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
um these guys are saying you know what
[2]
uh we still think law enforcement's
[4]
doing a good job we still think the
[5]
president
[6]
is doing a good job it's a point no
[8]
doubt echoed by my next guest patrick
[10]
goes is the fraternal order of police
[12]
he's the national president
[14]
so he's the big chief so we're honored
[15]
to have him um and he made
[17]
news by backing uh again this is the
[20]
nation's largest police union
[23]
uh donald trump they've not often done
[25]
that sort of thing
[26]
but they did patrick is here to tell us
[29]
why he did
[30]
very good to have you sir why did you
[32]
thank you throw your support behind the
[33]
president
[34]
you know thank you for having me uh you
[36]
know we've worked very closely with uh
[38]
president trump over the last four years
[40]
on on many initiatives uh one of them
[42]
was the first stepped act which is uh
[44]
the largest police reform act that has
[46]
happened in in recent time and we were
[48]
very proud to be the only labor
[50]
organization that stood
[51]
and recognized that we want to find ways
[53]
to improve in better the uh the criminal
[55]
justice system
[56]
uh we also worked with the uh president
[58]
closely on his executive order
[60]
and uh and also with congress on both
[61]
the house and the senate hoping that we
[63]
can find some
[64]
ways to improve have fact-based
[65]
discussions and improve the quality of
[67]
law enforcement
[68]
uh unfortunately we know what's
[70]
happening in congress and we're kind of
[72]
a stalemate there and
[73]
the president's executive order is
[74]
really the only police reform that has
[76]
come out of all of this uh
[77]
our members are are also members of our
[80]
communities as well we have concerns
[82]
and but we also have i think interesting
[84]
for us uh unlike
[86]
other organizations we have a process
[87]
where our members are actually part of
[89]
the decision in making our endorsement
[91]
and that's it's what happened yesterday
[93]
we've we completed our process with
[95]
uh polling our members across the
[96]
country in each one of the states where
[98]
we exist and uh
[99]
and i had a unanimous uh support uh to
[102]
to endorse president trump for our
[103]
second term
[105]
had any of the group made a pitch for
[107]
joe biden talked to joe biden that's
[109]
what he would do if he were president
[111]
anything like that
[112]
well you know on a local level i mean
[114]
it's very possible the way our our uh
[116]
our process works is each state uh
[118]
addresses or or has uh does their
[120]
polling of their members and each one
[122]
of their state representatives cast a
[124]
vote for their particular state so
[125]
i i would not by be naive to say that
[128]
there are not some that are supporters
[130]
for
[130]
for uh president obama there are some
[132]
that felt maybe no endorsement might be
[134]
but overwhelmingly of all the states it
[136]
was unanimous
[137]
uh in their decision to uh to support
[139]
president trump for a second term you
[142]
know a patrick i just had a
[144]
washington uh democratic congressman on
[146]
adam smith who was saying
[147]
the president has not been as beneficial
[150]
to either law enforcement effort or for
[152]
that matter keeping the peace ever that
[154]
is
[155]
his tone and his tenor has actually
[158]
sparked more unrest what do you think of
[161]
that
[162]
well you know what what i will say is
[163]
this uh you know it i think what we have
[165]
in america today is an
[166]
unwillingness to sit down and have a
[168]
meaningful discussion based on fact
[170]
uh and if when we do that there's no
[172]
solution i mean there's no problem we
[174]
can't find a solution to but
[175]
we're just not motivated on each side to
[177]
be able to do that i can tell you as an
[179]
organization
[180]
uh we have reached out to the president
[182]
on a number of occasions and talked
[183]
about important issues
[185]
with the stability of law enforcement
[186]
and not once have we not
[188]
walked away with that without a very
[190]
meaningful uh
[191]
dialogue in in results uh so
[194]
in that respect i have to say that i
[196]
have a different opinion and a different
[197]
experience than
[198]
than perhaps the congressman
[202]
what are your thoughts on this defund
[203]
police movement
[205]
or at least reallocate their funds which
[208]
i guess would be defunding
[209]
um what do you think of it well look
[211]
it's obvious uh it's it's obvious one
[213]
thing for sure
[214]
we defund police i i i wonder i wonder
[217]
if this is not just a narrative that has
[218]
run awry
[219]
and uh it has turned into a much
[223]
much larger discussion uh that maybe we
[226]
really don't
[227]
can't wrap our arms around it what does
[229]
a society look like without
[230]
without rules and rule of law uh you
[233]
know i if you look at every community
[235]
those who have are least likely to be
[237]
able to to help themselves are the ones
[239]
that are going to be hurt
[240]
the most if you start taking funds away
[242]
from law enforcement agencies
[243]
there are many things that give us the
[245]
uh you know give us the trust in the
[246]
community and one of them is being
[247]
properly trained
[249]
and the other one is is the
[250]
community-based programs we have that
[251]
builds that respect in the community
[253]
if you cut funding those are the two
[256]
things that are going to happen
[257]
that are going to be cut first so our
[258]
ability to be able to
[260]
to build those relationships that allow
[263]
us to have a you know
[264]
thriving communities are going to be
[266]
hampered even worse by by this whole
[268]
thought of taking funds away from law
[270]
enforcement
[273]
patrick rose i want to thank you very
[275]
much i should say uh the fraternal order
[277]
of police national
[278]
president uh following developments
[280]
right now across the country and saying
[282]
as far as his group is concerned the
[284]
president is the one to address this
[286]
not his opponent