Natural Gas and the European Green Deal - YouTube

Channel: Into Europe

[0]
in 2015 world leaders pledged to keep
[2]
the temperature from rising more than 2
[4]
degrees and in 2019 the european union
[8]
unveiled its response the european green
[10]
deal
[11]
it commits europe to carbon neutrality
[13]
by 2050
[14]
but it's not a concrete plan
[16]
instead it lays out the different pieces
[19]
of legislation that the eu needs to
[21]
produce to reach that transition
[24]
one of those pieces is about green
[26]
finance it's called the green finance
[28]
taxonomy it's more than 200 pages long
[31]
you don't need to read it
[33]
what it says is something about the way
[35]
the eu operates and how it plans to get
[37]
money from investors to sustainability
[40]
related projects
[41]
the document says something about the
[43]
way the european union is planning its
[45]
energy transition
[47]
and the role fossil fuels will play in
[49]
it
[50]
it raises questions of how green the eu
[52]
wants to be
[53]
but also can afford to be
[58]
the main focus of the european green
[60]
deal is to decarbonize the european
[62]
union's economy
[63]
the question of decarbonization focuses
[66]
on four aspects industry energy
[69]
transportation and agriculture which are
[71]
responsible for most of the eu's co2
[73]
emissions it means producing powering
[76]
moving and growing the same things as
[78]
before with less energy and without the
[81]
co2 emissions associated with it
[84]
but while we think of the sustainability
[86]
transition in terms of electricity
[88]
production
[89]
fossil fuels are ingrained in every part
[91]
of the economy whether it be the cars we
[94]
drive heating our homes shipping or
[96]
manufacturing industry building blocks
[98]
like steel cement they're everywhere
[101]
in a lot of ways decarbonizing the
[103]
economy means electrifying it
[106]
it means replacing fossil fuels in every
[108]
part of the economy
[110]
but that's expensive and the european
[112]
union needs to spend 2.8 trillion euros
[115]
up till 2030 to reach its climate goals
[117]
but only a fraction of that will come
[119]
from the eu budget the rest will come
[122]
from private investors
[124]
most of that money needs to go to
[126]
companies for decarbonization
[128]
that's where the idea of green finance
[130]
comes in to help get money from
[132]
investors to green projects
[135]
when a company wants to invest in a
[136]
project like building a wind park it
[139]
usually doesn't have the money for it up
[140]
front so it goes to financial markets
[143]
and investors companies can either take
[146]
on debts call bonds or sell part of
[148]
their company called shares to investors
[150]
to finance future activities but what
[153]
investors are looking for are two things
[155]
a high return on investment which means
[157]
they make money and lower risk which
[160]
means their investment is safe
[162]
green investments are seen as lower risk
[164]
because they are future proof
[166]
if a coal power plant is built today the
[168]
chances are it will be closed before the
[170]
end of its lifetime so it doesn't make
[172]
for a good investment
[174]
the problem up until now is that the
[176]
definition of what a green investment is
[178]
is still vague and there have been
[180]
accusations that green finance is green
[183]
washing that it was being used to fund
[185]
projects that aren't actually green
[188]
so that's where the green taxonomy comes
[190]
in it aims to filter out unsustainable
[193]
activities and prevent green washing
[195]
it's currently a list of criteria and of
[197]
70 activities that are considered to be
[199]
green
[200]
it tells companies how to manufacture
[202]
basic building blocks of the economy in
[205]
a carbon neutral and circular way it
[207]
includes renewable energy but also the
[209]
manufacturing of industry building
[211]
blocks like steel or cement
[213]
these activities get a green label which
[216]
makes them eligible for green finance it
[218]
means that they are low risk and
[220]
attractive investments so that's it the
[222]
green finance taxonomy is just a set of
[225]
rules for green finance
[227]
yes that's what it aims to do
[229]
but the challenge is that deciding what
[231]
is green is not only a scientific
[233]
decision but also a political one
[235]
it means making a trade-off between what
[237]
is sustainable and what is feasible it
[239]
tells us that the green transition the
[241]
eu ambitions may first start off grey
[245]
at the center of this debate is one type
[247]
of technology and the question of
[249]
whether to include them in the taxonomy
[251]
they're being called transitional
[253]
technologies and they're not exactly
[255]
green but they might be a necessary step
[257]
to make the european union's climate
[259]
goals affordable feasible and acceptable
[263]
a transitional technology is in a sense
[265]
not entirely green but greener and the
[268]
idea is that they would help speed the
[270]
eu's transition from the worst fossil
[272]
fuels before also being eventually
[274]
replaced by renewable energy
[277]
the main candidate for this status are
[278]
natural gas nuclear energy and carbon
[281]
capture technology which involves
[283]
capturing the co2 from polluting
[285]
activities and storing it underground
[287]
while activists have labeled this as
[289]
green washing and called it a watering
[291]
down of the transition it raises two
[293]
questions why is the european union
[296]
considering these technologies and if
[298]
decarbonization means full
[299]
electrification why are there fossil
[302]
fuels being included
[303]
but this goes down to three elements of
[305]
the sustainability transition industry
[308]
energy and transportation
[310]
will leave out agriculture which is the
[312]
focus of another piece of legislation
[315]
for these aspects the idea is to go from
[317]
a system where fossil fuels are used to
[319]
one where everything is produced powered
[321]
and moved with renewable energy but the
[323]
problem is that a lot of the
[325]
technologies needed to do this don't
[327]
exist or don't have the scale to allow a
[329]
direct switch from one to another
[332]
battery and green hydrogen production
[334]
the two technologies essential to full
[336]
decarbonization and electrification are
[339]
still in their infancy
[340]
so the idea with transitional
[342]
technologies is to add an extra step to
[344]
the energy transition
[346]
one where fossil fuels are used in a way
[348]
that will allow them to be replaced by
[350]
renewable energy later on
[352]
for industry it means using hydrogen
[354]
from natural gas instead of using
[356]
natural gas directly as an additional
[358]
step to manufacture goods
[360]
this can eventually be replaced by
[362]
renewably produced hydrogen in the
[363]
future
[365]
and in transportation it means using
[366]
electric cars that are powered by fossil
[368]
fuel power plants until renewables can
[371]
replace them
[372]
but most of the debate has taken place
[374]
around the use of natural gas and
[376]
nuclear for energy production where the
[379]
main goal is to phase out of coal
[381]
here renewables face their biggest
[382]
challenge it's called the duct curve
[385]
no not this duck
[387]
it's the idea that energy generated by
[389]
renewable energy doesn't match with when
[392]
it's used
[393]
this line represents when renewable
[395]
energy is being produced and this one
[397]
when it's being used and as the share of
[399]
solar energy increases that mismatch
[402]
will become worse
[403]
to solve this requires building a lot of
[405]
batteries cheaply or power plants which
[408]
unlike renewables can be turned on and
[410]
off the easiest solution would be to
[412]
build nuclear and natural gas power
[414]
plants to produce electricity and heat
[416]
when renewables can't
[418]
the difference here is that there is no
[420]
effective way to add an extra step to
[422]
the transition from transitional
[424]
technologies to renewables which can be
[426]
replaced later on and for that reason
[429]
energy production from natural gas has
[431]
been dropped from the taxonomy
[433]
what's important to note is that this
[435]
transition with an additional step is
[437]
only a partial one it requires the added
[439]
step of carbon capture to be
[441]
emissions-free
[442]
but at the same time it opens up the
[444]
door for full electrification when the
[447]
technologies needed to scale become
[449]
available
[450]
the problem is public opinion related to
[452]
the very challenges they pose
[455]
while natural gas emits less co2 than
[457]
coal one burnt it also emits methane
[459]
when extracted which contributes
[461]
extensively to the greenhouse
[463]
nuclear accidents while rare can happen
[466]
and there's still the problem of what to
[467]
do with radioactive waste
[469]
carbon capture despite being labeled as
[471]
necessary by the international panel on
[473]
climate change is mostly an untested
[476]
technology
[477]
this has been made worse by the fact
[478]
that there has been extensive lobbying
[480]
by the fossil fuel industry to give
[482]
natural gas a green label
[484]
in 2020 the eu came under fire for
[487]
allowing blackrock a financial firm
[489]
heavily invested in fossil fuels to give
[491]
financial advice about how to set up
[493]
green finance
[494]
the problem is that while these
[496]
transitional activities are seen as a
[498]
bridge to a low carbon economy and they
[500]
would ideally be phased out by 2050 they
[503]
could create lock-in mechanisms
[505]
if gas power plants are endorsed by the
[507]
green taxonomy and are built
[509]
infrastructure will also have to be
[511]
built to support them
[512]
it means building gas terminals and
[514]
equipping homes to be heated by it
[516]
money that could have instead been spent
[518]
on other aspects of the green transition
[521]
and once implemented it would make it
[522]
more expensive to switch away from it
[524]
later on
[526]
while the inclusion of these
[527]
technologies means europe's transition
[529]
may start off gray and it risks lock-ins
[531]
it is likely the only transition
[533]
countries will be willing to sign up for
[536]
and able to afford
[538]
this was into europe thanks for watching
[540]
if you like this video make sure to like
[542]
comment and subscribe for the latest
[544]
updates and analysis on european news