Exposing the Drag Race UK Contract: Not Much Betta! - YouTube

Channel: Bussy Queen

[0]
Hi Ugly, It’s me, Bussy! And welcome back to my channel.
[5]
In today’s video, we’ll be dissecting the Rupaul’s Drag Race UK Series 3 Contract
[9]
and comparing it to its US counterpart. We’ll be addressing topics like contestant pay,
[14]
exclusivity periods, NDAs and more
 OH MY! And at the end of the video, I’ll be doing
[19]
my best to address some of y’alls lingering questions and concerns about contract enforceability
[23]
and how we should proceed in supporting Drag Race as a franchise.
[27]
And a quick message from today’s video sponsor, The premium global brand for men’s grooming
[31]
and hygiene products: Manscaped.
[33]
Let’s be honest, Some of us have spent a little too much time at home alone recently
[37]
- myself included - and forgotten about the importance of “Garden Maintenance”.
[39]
But IT IS OFFICIALLY HOT GIRL SUMMER
. *ahh* A.K.A it's getting really hot outside and
[44]
extra hair (down there) makes me sweat a lot which isn’t pleasant and that’s TMI but
[50]
Manscaped is here to save the day. They’ve JUST launched the Lawn Mower 4.0 trimmer.
[54]
And the number one reason I love the lawn mower? It’s cordless AND waterproof.
[58]
Which means I can whack my weeds in the shower without worrying about the cleanup of a full
[63]
deforestation.
[64]
And, the Lawn Mower comes with multiple guard options,which means you can adjust to your
[68]
preferred trimming length.
[69]
Take care of yourself and Go from Bushy Queen to Bussy Queen this summer.
[73]
Click the link in the description to get 20% off plus FREE international shipping when
[77]
you use promo code BUSSY at manscaped.com.
[80]
Your family jewels will thank you.
[81]
Now, let’s get started. As a disclaimer, I’ll be doing my best to interpret the dense
[86]
legalese of this document BUT you’ve been warned, I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal
[92]
advice, so please do not construe my opinions as such.
[95]
General Overview The Drag Race Series UK Series 3 Contract
[97]
is 44 pages in length; 9 pages shorter than the US Season 14 Contract and is comprised
[103]
of the following sections which loosely align with the sections in the US contract:
[107]
[Drag Race UK Series 3 Contract Sections] The Rupaul’s Drag Race UK Participant Agreement
[110]
Form The Rupaul’s Drag Race Production Protocols
[112]
Document The BBC Editorial Policies & Protocol Document
[115]
An Emergency Medical Release Form An Assumption of Risk and Release of Liability
[119]
The Actual Rupaul’s Drag Race UK Application Questions
[122]
A Personal Disclosure Form - 2 Pages And finally, a Non-Disclosure Agreement - 4
[125]
Pages
[126]
And for this video, We’ll mostly be focusing on that Participant Agreement Form, as that’s
[129]
where the juicy details about signing your entire life away live.
[133]
There are basically no differences in the beginning of this contract besides highlight
[137]
that they are producing the show for the BBC and not VMN, Viacom Media Networks like in
[143]
the US. It also gives some basic definitions that I’ll be using in the rest of the video
[147]
“Producer” means World of Wonder “Series” means the potential reality television
[150]
program, sometimes referred to as the “Program” “Project” means the Program, Interviews,
[155]
Additional Series Materials, and all elements thereof and all ancillary and derivative materials
[156]
of any kid
 And the word option, in this contract, although
[158]
it sounds like it’s optional means an irrevocable requirement to require a contestant to appear
[163]
in a series or season of Drag Race.
[166]
One of the most shocking things we uncovered in my US contract video was the right for
[171]
the Producer to have participants appear in up to 5 additional seasons of drag race. That
[177]
same exact language exists in the UK contract.
[180]
“I hereby grant to producer five additional exclusive, irrevocable options to have me
[184]
appear as a participant, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement in five additional
[190]
cycles of the series or Rupaul’s Drag Race: All Stars - “Additional Series Options”.
[193]
And the most important thing in that little paragraph is that it can require them to appear
[197]
in “Rupaul’s Drag Race All Stars”, just like the US contract does.
[201]
It tells me world of wonder is potentially working on a way to incorporate contestants
[206]
from around the world in the same series, instead of making a spin-off of all stars
[211]
for every country.
[212]
I do want to highlight that this language appears to apply only to participation in
[213]
actual Cycles of the show, not guest appearances in episodes of other seasons.
[214]
In my last video, I pointed out this language could theoretically lock a contestant into
[217]
a 20-year cycle of Drag Race. Which is terrifying and scary, but keep in mind: World of Wonder
[222]
is not going to exercise these additional options unless these queens want to return.
[228]
Forcing somebody back to compete on drag race likely would not make good TV. But, put a
[232]
pin in this idea because things get dicey when things like exclusivity periods come
[239]
into play.
[240]
Concerning Participation and FIlming the actual series:
[242]
The UK version has a section called called Working Hours.
[245]
“To the extent the provisions of the Working Time Regulations 1998 apply, I agree that
[251]
such hours worked may exceed the maximum weekly working time
”
[255]
This section is referring to a law in the UK basically guaranteeing workers a maximum
[259]
work week of 48 hours, 28 days paid holidays and so on.
[263]
Which, by the way, is AMAZING. Did y’all know that the US is the ONLY advanced economy
[267]
that does not federally mandate paid holidays? Ah
 The American Dream.
[272]
Anyways, this provision basically makes our UK queens sign away those rights to have fair
[277]
working conditions. Bringing them down to the American Standard.
[284]
But remember, filming usually only lasts 4-6 weeks. But don’t get me wrong - they could
[289]
be spending 12 to 14 hours a day in full drag.
[293]
Next up, The sections about filming contestants 24/7 and placing recording devices anywhere
[297]
they please are almost identical. With one small, notable difference?
[301]
Both sections have this line in them: “I agree that I shall have no expectation
[305]
of privacy in such locations.”
[307]
However, The UK agreement adds this line after that:
[310]
“And Accordingly I further agree that by doing so, Producer shall not infringe or violate
[315]
the rights of privacy of me or any other party.”
[317]
Basically, both agreements let you know not to EXPECT privacy 24/7 during the recording
[321]
process
 but the UK one at least says they’re not gonna violate that privacy. Whatever that
[325]
means?
[326]
Both require participants to be available for additional taping,
[329]
“Including but not limited to pre-records wrap-arounds and Additional Series Materials”
[333]
Which are “cram sessions, recap episodes, reunions, or best-of programs, remix episodes,
[337]
extended episode content, enhancement materials, voiceovers, mini-episodes, behind the scenes
[341]
content, promotional spots, gaming content, audio content
” and more.
[344]
Exclusivity Periods Next, please welcome to the staeeeege: Exclusivity
[349]
Period!
[350]
Both the UK and US agreements lock participants into a 12-month exclusivity period. It starts
[355]
when the agreement is signed and ends “12 months after the initial broadcast of the
[359]
last episode of the Program in which [the contestant] appears.”
[361]
“If i wish to appear on, authorize production of or participate in any project in any media
[367]
then I shall request the Producer’s permission in writing in advance and the producer shall
[371]
determine in its sole absolute discretion whether to grant its permission in each instance.”
[376]
And while both agreements require contestants to request permission to do pretty much anything
[380]
during this period, they do Both include exceptions for “Live Performances”, provided of course
[385]
those “Live Performances” do not constitute a tour.
[388]
From what I can tell, this language is designed to keep queens available for those World of
[393]
Wonder sanctioned tours. Like, the UK Series 2 one happening right now. They tried to get
[400]
away with casting like only the top queens and the fan base uproared online, and they
[405]
finally decided to graciously put everyone on this tour.
[409]
The UK agreement guarantees queens “One Thousand Pounds (1,000)” per show, while
[413]
the US agreement guarantees queens “One Thousand Dollars (1,000) per show”.
[417]
And while that is a lot of money and I’m sure the queens are thankful to have it, remember
[422]
these queens could be commanding a lot more on their own.
[425]
DragCon And DragCon attendance is also part of the
[427]
deal for both agreements. UK queens will receive one thousand pounds
[431]
per european con and three thousand pounds per non-european con.
[435]
Remember, our US queens similar numeric amounts, but with the exchange rate considered, the
[440]
UK queens are actually winning out here.
[442]
However, as nice as those payments sound I do want to point out that Willam said in a
[445]
recent episode of The Beat Down reacting to my first contract video, said that queens
[450]
actually have to pay for their booths.
[452]
[WILLAM] They will also make you pay for your booths.
[455]
And electricity in that booth if you want electricity. Wi-Fi if you want sales. They
[460]
will make you pay for it all. That money they pay you won’t amount to anything.
[464]
Both contracts stipulate WoW as the de-facto manager of the queens, have provisions for
[469]
requiring access to all digital media made and used by the queens, and have the same
[474]
stipulations for sponsor activity and press appearances - all required without additional
[479]
pay.
[480]
However, we have seen apparently lenient enforcement of this language, at least in the UK. A’whora,
[485]
Bimini Bon Boulash, and Tayce for example, are all signed to modeling agencies. And both
[490]
Bimini and Lawrence are signed to Bimini Bon Book deals. Congrats to both of them and everyone
[496]
else in that series- y’all are so amazing.
[498]
But, it begs the question. Is there just a lack of book deals and modeling agencies knocking
[504]
at their doors? Or, are we just seeing a tighter enforcement of that exclusivity period in
[509]
the US?
[510]
Regardless, I would speculate World of Wonder is probably giving our queens more free reign
[514]
in general, in light of the, you know, world-wide pandemic - that stifled so many of their incomes.
[521]
ESPECIALLY in the UK with that 7 months (filming) period break.
[524]
Ellie diamond experienced homelessness during that period. And Joe Black sold all of his
[529]
unused runways so that he could pay his rent.
[531]
And then Rupaul of course, had the nerve to yell at hiim for wearing an H&M dress when
[535]
he returned to the competition.
[537]
That said, the exclusivity period presents an interesting conundrum for queens that are
[541]
either invited back to the show right after their original season like Veronica Green,
[547]
Cynthia Lee Fontaine, and Eureka and queens that are immediately invited to All Stars
[551]
after their initial season.
[553]
In their positions, I imagine it would be extremely difficult to say no to such an invitation
[558]
or technically “required option” because knowing if you said “no”, World of Wonder
[563]
technically has all of this over power over you. They could potentially make your life
[569]
hell if they wanted to.
[571]
Jan recently tweeted, “Some of you don’t understand the entertainment industry and
[574]
the importance of taking opportunities and it shows.” Which sort of exemplifies how
[578]
when WOrld of Wonder asks you to do something, like return to their show, you kinda have
[583]
to say “Yes”, or you may never see that opportunity again.
[587]
Okay, now the section you’ve all been waiting for. Let’s talk about MONEY and copyright.
[592]
The UK contestants sign over the same “ideas, gags, suggestions, themes, plots, stories,
[598]
characters, characterizations, dialogue, text, designs, graphics, titles, drawings, artwork,
[602]
merchandise,” - “digital works, songs, music
” and more collectively known as
[606]
“Material”.
[607]
And in this section, there’s also a fun little paragraph that I left out in my US
[611]
video that I think will interest you. “I acknowledge that producer may depict
[615]
or portray my Likeness, and/or my life story either accurately or with such libertities
[620]
and modifications...for the purposes of fictionalization, dramatization or any other purposes, including
[624]
without limitation to achieve a humorous or satirical effect
”
[628]
UK queens also sign away the same merchandising rights, allowing World of Wonder to forever
[632]
profit off of their likeness as it relates to the show. So - all of that is the same.
[636]
Payment Unfortunately, the biggest difference in these
[639]
two agreements is rights payments.
[641]
UK series 3 contestants will receive two hundred and fifty pounds per regular episode that
[645]
they film. Which, is quite a bit less than their US counterparts even after taking into
[649]
account the currency conversion.
[651]
For additional series materials, however, which as a reminder include things like reunions
[655]
and behind the scenes stuff, they will get paid 200 pounds per day of work which is a
[660]
little bit more than the 250 dollars per day of work those queens will receive.
[665]
But the main rights payment that they receive on a per episode basis feels SO low. Especially
[670]
when you take into consideration that there is no prize pool for winning the season, and
[675]
there is no episodic prize for winning challenges either. Well, you know, other than that valuable
[680]
Ru Peter Badge.
[681]
And this is all compounded by the fact that UK series are shorter than the US ones overall.
[686]
Series 2 was only 10 episodes in length compared to US’ season 13’s 16 episode monster
[693]
season.
[694]
A queen making it halfway through a US season with one win might walk away with, let’s
[697]
say: nine thousand dollars.
[699]
while a queen with one win making it halfway through a UK series will walk away with about
[703]
1,250 pounds - and a ru-peter badge.
[706]
And by the way, there are no cash prizes on the UK series not because, like, the BBC is
[711]
too cheap to pay them or anything, but because the BBC is a publicly funded network.
[715]
This means the general population of the UK pays for programming on the BBC. This however
[721]
is made worse by the fact the BBC does not accept sponsors. Which makes sense to keep
[726]
news outlets impartial, but it clearly puts certain programs (like drag race) at a disadvantage
[731]
to their other country counterparts.
[733]
Other Projects The biggest win for UK contestants, in my
[736]
opinion, is found in the Other Projects clause which says,
[739]
“If from the effective date of this agreement until 12 months after the initial broadcast
[743]
of the last episode of the program in which I appear, I desire to render services in connection
[747]
with another television program, motion picture, internet production
” etcetera, etcetera,
[750]
“I shall give the producer written notice of that intention and I will negotiate with
[755]
Producer
”
[756]
So, either way it does kinda suck to have that in your contract, BUT the US version
[760]
has that other projects clause for 24 months instead of the UK’s 12.
[764]
And another big win for UK queens is found in the NDA section of their contract. For
[769]
breaking it, UK queens agree to pay a sum of five hundred thousand pounds. And Ÿ of
[773]
a (USD) Mil is still a LOT, however, Leeja Miller a lawyer that reacted to my US contract
[779]
video brought up the point that these numbers are astronomically high compared to what they
[784]
actually pay these contestants.
[786]
[LEEJA MILLER] If you are on the other side of this NDA trying
[788]
to defend yourself from having to comply with it, I still think you might be able to make
[793]
an argument saying that that amount of damages even though the contract says its not a penalty,
[799]
still amounts to a penalty, especially given how little that they are paid generally speaking.
[804]
Like- that’s the biggest number I’ve heard in this whole video.
[807]
On top of that, there’s not a lot of precedent for networks suing their reality TV contestants.
[812]
One notable example involves Luke Parker from a season of bachelorette, who was ordered
[816]
to cough up $100,000 for breaking his exclusivity period.
[820]
And speaking of lawyers and lawsuits
 UK contestants are also a little bit better off
[824]
here as well.
[825]
The US contract has a Mediation/Arbitration clause that the UK one does not stating, “I
[831]
UNDERSTAND THAT EXHIBIT D WAIVES MY RIGHT TO SUE PRODUCER, VMN, AND ANY OTHER ASSIGNEE
[836]
IN A COURT OF LAW 
 I KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY WAIVE MY RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL OR COURT TRIAL
[841]
AND FREELY CONSENT TO THE TERMS OF EXHIBIT D...”
[844]
Instead they agree to use an arbitrator, which is supposed to be an impartial third party,
[848]
to settle disputes.
[849]
And Finally, we’ll take a look at production protocols.
[851]
While the US and UK World of Wonder production protocols documents are almost the exact same
[856]
with some small insignificant differences, the UK contract has a specific BBC production
[863]
protocols document included.
[864]
Here are some of the more interesting protocols in that document:
[867]
“For the avoidance of doubt, you will not be miked or recorded in your hotel room.”
[870]
the US contract makes no mention of that so I guess US queens should assume that they’re
[876]
being recorded in there.
[877]
“The portrayal of any individual’s life story will be accurate and fair and in accordance
[882]
with BBC guidelines.”
[885]
Which really sounds nice, but remember both contracts have the clause that we read early
[888]
which says that they can misrepresent contestants to an even satirical or humorous effect. That’s
[895]
directly at odds with what this BBC document says, so I don’t know which one would win
[900]
out here.
[901]
Or maybe this is even some like little loophole for our UK queens to break their contracts
[905]
- but y’all didn’t hear that from me.
[907]
Other protocols say, “The BBC will not include any product placement
[911]
or sponsor identifications in the BBC programme.”
[914]
I mentioned this earlier as a disadvantage to our UK queens ‘cause on one hand, it
[919]
means they’re not going to get those cash prizes from the likes of Coach, but on the
[924]
positive hand I suppose they’re not going to be forced to carry Coach bags down the
[929]
runway. Personally, I’d rather carry that Coach bag down the runway and win that cash
[932]
prize.
[933]
“The BBC takes very seriously their duty of care to you and together with World of
[938]
Wonder will ensure that you get the appropriate support throughout the process and will be
[942]
providing a point of contact who you can get in touch with about any concerns relating
[946]
to emotional harm/injury, interaction with other participants, and any concerns relating
[950]
to your personal finances.”
[952]
In practical application, I don’t know how that would play out but I suppose it sounds
[956]
nice that you can have somebody you can call who would be like, a neutral third party,
[960]
if you were experiencing some grievances.
[962]
In summary, We saw the US and UK contracts are largely the same. It surprised me that
[966]
they were like - equally as restrictive in terms of what these contestants are [giving]
[971]
up to participate on the show.
[972]
However, There was a lot of discussion in the comment section about the enforceability
[975]
of these contracts.
[976]
Of course, that is the whole reason we have legal systems. Lawyers are hired to interpret
[981]
contracts and law, and then its up the jury or judge to decide which lawyer interpreted
[986]
those things best. May the most money, WIN!
[990]
Another common concern I saw in the comment section of my previous video was, “Should
[993]
we continue to support Drag Race, now knowing how restrictive these contracts can be?”
[998]
My answer to this is- of course. These queens give up a lot -willingly- to participate on
[1002]
Rupaul’s Drag Race and they deserve our support.
[1005]
Sometimes seeing how the sausage is made, *gasp* can be scary... but I think its important
[1009]
to be an informed consumer.
[1011]
As of today, the reward of participating on the show highly outweighs the risk of what
[1016]
they’re giving up. And the reward for queens that do well in the competition is extremely
[1020]
high.
[1021]
For example, the founder of Voss events - the company that manages Aquaria - said in a 2019
[1025]
Forbes interview that Aquaria earned over $1 million dollars in sponsor and talent fees
[1030]
after winning Drag Race.
[1031]
But at the same time, I doubt the early outs of her season earned half or a quarter as
[1038]
much
 and they gave up the same rights she did.
[1041]
So yeah, its a bit of a gamble to go on Rupaul’s Drag Race
 but there is a net positive,
[1045]
I think for queens that are willing to make the most of their time on the show.
[1049]
With that said, make sure to support local drag with the same veracity that you support
[1053]
your favorite drag race queens.
[1055]
As a reminder, my channel is made possible by my generous patrons - and sponsors.
[1059]
And My patreon subscribers get exclusive member benefits like early access to my videos, exclusive
[1064]
videos, access to the Bussy Queen discord server, and more!
[1067]
I’ve also made the US and UK contracts available publicly on my patreon. Join my Patreon to
[1072]
day to support my channel at: Patreon.com/BussyQueen
[1075]
I wanna say thanks to you for watching this video and give a special shoutout to:
[1097]
[Patreon Shoutouts]