đ
Exposing the Drag Race UK Contract: Not Much Betta! - YouTube
Channel: Bussy Queen
[0]
Hi Ugly, Itâs me, Bussy! And welcome back
to my channel.
[5]
In todayâs video, weâll be dissecting
the Rupaulâs Drag Race UK Series 3 Contract
[9]
and comparing it to its US counterpart. Weâll
be addressing topics like contestant pay,
[14]
exclusivity periods, NDAs and more⊠OH MY!
And at the end of the video, Iâll be doing
[19]
my best to address some of yâalls lingering
questions and concerns about contract enforceability
[23]
and how we should proceed in supporting Drag
Race as a franchise.
[27]
And a quick message from todayâs video sponsor,
The premium global brand for menâs grooming
[31]
and hygiene products: Manscaped.
[33]
Letâs be honest, Some of us have spent a
little too much time at home alone recently
[37]
- myself included - and forgotten about the
importance of âGarden Maintenanceâ.
[39]
But IT IS OFFICIALLY HOT GIRL SUMMERâŠ. *ahh*
A.K.A it's getting really hot outside and
[44]
extra hair (down there) makes me sweat a lot
which isnât pleasant and thatâs TMI but
[50]
Manscaped is here to save the day. Theyâve
JUST launched the Lawn Mower 4.0 trimmer.
[54]
And the number one reason I love the lawn
mower? Itâs cordless AND waterproof.
[58]
Which means I can whack my weeds in the shower
without worrying about the cleanup of a full
[63]
deforestation.
[64]
And, the Lawn Mower comes with multiple guard
options,which means you can adjust to your
[68]
preferred trimming length.
[69]
Take care of yourself and Go from Bushy Queen
to Bussy Queen this summer.
[73]
Click the link in the description to get 20%
off plus FREE international shipping when
[77]
you use promo code BUSSY at manscaped.com.
[80]
Your family jewels will thank you.
[81]
Now, letâs get started. As a disclaimer,
Iâll be doing my best to interpret the dense
[86]
legalese of this document BUT youâve been
warned, I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal
[92]
advice, so please do not construe my opinions
as such.
[95]
General Overview
The Drag Race Series UK Series 3 Contract
[97]
is 44 pages in length; 9 pages shorter than
the US Season 14 Contract and is comprised
[103]
of the following sections which loosely align
with the sections in the US contract:
[107]
[Drag Race UK Series 3 Contract Sections]
The Rupaulâs Drag Race UK Participant Agreement
[110]
Form
The Rupaulâs Drag Race Production Protocols
[112]
Document
The BBC Editorial Policies & Protocol Document
[115]
An Emergency Medical Release Form
An Assumption of Risk and Release of Liability
[119]
The Actual Rupaulâs Drag Race UK Application
Questions
[122]
A Personal Disclosure Form - 2 Pages
And finally, a Non-Disclosure Agreement - 4
[125]
Pages
[126]
And for this video, Weâll mostly be focusing
on that Participant Agreement Form, as thatâs
[129]
where the juicy details about signing your
entire life away live.
[133]
There are basically no differences in the
beginning of this contract besides highlight
[137]
that they are producing the show for the BBC
and not VMN, Viacom Media Networks like in
[143]
the US. It also gives some basic definitions
that Iâll be using in the rest of the video
[147]
âProducerâ means World of Wonder
âSeriesâ means the potential reality television
[150]
program, sometimes referred to as the âProgramâ
âProjectâ means the Program, Interviews,
[155]
Additional Series Materials, and all elements
thereof and all ancillary and derivative materials
[156]
of any kidâŠ
And the word option, in this contract, although
[158]
it sounds like itâs optional means an irrevocable
requirement to require a contestant to appear
[163]
in a series or season of Drag Race.
[166]
One of the most shocking things we uncovered
in my US contract video was the right for
[171]
the Producer to have participants appear in
up to 5 additional seasons of drag race. That
[177]
same exact language exists in the UK contract.
[180]
âI hereby grant to producer five additional
exclusive, irrevocable options to have me
[184]
appear as a participant, subject to the terms
and conditions of this agreement in five additional
[190]
cycles of the series or Rupaulâs Drag Race:
All Stars - âAdditional Series Optionsâ.
[193]
And the most important thing in that little
paragraph is that it can require them to appear
[197]
in âRupaulâs Drag Race All Starsâ, just
like the US contract does.
[201]
It tells me world of wonder is potentially
working on a way to incorporate contestants
[206]
from around the world in the same series,
instead of making a spin-off of all stars
[211]
for every country.
[212]
I do want to highlight that this language
appears to apply only to participation in
[213]
actual Cycles of the show, not guest appearances
in episodes of other seasons.
[214]
In my last video, I pointed out this language
could theoretically lock a contestant into
[217]
a 20-year cycle of Drag Race. Which is terrifying
and scary, but keep in mind: World of Wonder
[222]
is not going to exercise these additional
options unless these queens want to return.
[228]
Forcing somebody back to compete on drag race
likely would not make good TV. But, put a
[232]
pin in this idea because things get dicey
when things like exclusivity periods come
[239]
into play.
[240]
Concerning Participation and FIlming the actual
series:
[242]
The UK version has a section called called
Working Hours.
[245]
âTo the extent the provisions of the Working
Time Regulations 1998 apply, I agree that
[251]
such hours worked may exceed the maximum weekly
working timeâŠâ
[255]
This section is referring to a law in the
UK basically guaranteeing workers a maximum
[259]
work week of 48 hours, 28 days paid holidays
and so on.
[263]
Which, by the way, is AMAZING. Did yâall
know that the US is the ONLY advanced economy
[267]
that does not federally mandate paid holidays?
Ah⊠The American Dream.
[272]
Anyways, this provision basically makes our
UK queens sign away those rights to have fair
[277]
working conditions. Bringing them down to
the American Standard.
[284]
But remember, filming usually only lasts 4-6
weeks. But donât get me wrong - they could
[289]
be spending 12 to 14 hours a day in full drag.
[293]
Next up, The sections about filming contestants
24/7 and placing recording devices anywhere
[297]
they please are almost identical. With one
small, notable difference?
[301]
Both sections have this line in them:
âI agree that I shall have no expectation
[305]
of privacy in such locations.â
[307]
However, The UK agreement adds this line after
that:
[310]
âAnd Accordingly I further agree that by
doing so, Producer shall not infringe or violate
[315]
the rights of privacy of me or any other party.â
[317]
Basically, both agreements let you know not
to EXPECT privacy 24/7 during the recording
[321]
process⊠but the UK one at least says theyâre
not gonna violate that privacy. Whatever that
[325]
means?
[326]
Both require participants to be available
for additional taping,
[329]
âIncluding but not limited to pre-records
wrap-arounds and Additional Series Materialsâ
[333]
Which are âcram sessions, recap episodes,
reunions, or best-of programs, remix episodes,
[337]
extended episode content, enhancement materials,
voiceovers, mini-episodes, behind the scenes
[341]
content, promotional spots, gaming content,
audio contentâŠâ and more.
[344]
Exclusivity Periods
Next, please welcome to the staeeeege: Exclusivity
[349]
Period!
[350]
Both the UK and US agreements lock participants
into a 12-month exclusivity period. It starts
[355]
when the agreement is signed and ends â12
months after the initial broadcast of the
[359]
last episode of the Program in which [the
contestant] appears.â
[361]
âIf i wish to appear on, authorize production
of or participate in any project in any media
[367]
then I shall request the Producerâs permission
in writing in advance and the producer shall
[371]
determine in its sole absolute discretion
whether to grant its permission in each instance.â
[376]
And while both agreements require contestants
to request permission to do pretty much anything
[380]
during this period, they do Both include exceptions
for âLive Performancesâ, provided of course
[385]
those âLive Performancesâ do not constitute
a tour.
[388]
From what I can tell, this language is designed
to keep queens available for those World of
[393]
Wonder sanctioned tours. Like, the UK Series
2 one happening right now. They tried to get
[400]
away with casting like only the top queens
and the fan base uproared online, and they
[405]
finally decided to graciously put everyone
on this tour.
[409]
The UK agreement guarantees queens âOne
Thousand Pounds (1,000)â per show, while
[413]
the US agreement guarantees queens âOne
Thousand Dollars (1,000) per showâ.
[417]
And while that is a lot of money and Iâm
sure the queens are thankful to have it, remember
[422]
these queens could be commanding a lot more
on their own.
[425]
DragCon
And DragCon attendance is also part of the
[427]
deal for both agreements.
UK queens will receive one thousand pounds
[431]
per european con and three thousand pounds
per non-european con.
[435]
Remember, our US queens similar numeric amounts,
but with the exchange rate considered, the
[440]
UK queens are actually winning out here.
[442]
However, as nice as those payments sound I
do want to point out that Willam said in a
[445]
recent episode of The Beat Down reacting to
my first contract video, said that queens
[450]
actually have to pay for their booths.
[452]
[WILLAM]
They will also make you pay for your booths.
[455]
And electricity in that booth if you want
electricity. Wi-Fi if you want sales. They
[460]
will make you pay for it all. That money they
pay you wonât amount to anything.
[464]
Both contracts stipulate WoW as the de-facto
manager of the queens, have provisions for
[469]
requiring access to all digital media made
and used by the queens, and have the same
[474]
stipulations for sponsor activity and press
appearances - all required without additional
[479]
pay.
[480]
However, we have seen apparently lenient enforcement
of this language, at least in the UK. Aâwhora,
[485]
Bimini Bon Boulash, and Tayce for example,
are all signed to modeling agencies. And both
[490]
Bimini and Lawrence are signed to Bimini Bon
Book deals. Congrats to both of them and everyone
[496]
else in that series- yâall are so amazing.
[498]
But, it begs the question. Is there just a
lack of book deals and modeling agencies knocking
[504]
at their doors? Or, are we just seeing a tighter
enforcement of that exclusivity period in
[509]
the US?
[510]
Regardless, I would speculate World of Wonder
is probably giving our queens more free reign
[514]
in general, in light of the, you know, world-wide
pandemic - that stifled so many of their incomes.
[521]
ESPECIALLY in the UK with that 7 months (filming)
period break.
[524]
Ellie diamond experienced homelessness during
that period. And Joe Black sold all of his
[529]
unused runways so that he could pay his rent.
[531]
And then Rupaul of course, had the nerve to
yell at hiim for wearing an H&M dress when
[535]
he returned to the competition.
[537]
That said, the exclusivity period presents
an interesting conundrum for queens that are
[541]
either invited back to the show right after
their original season like Veronica Green,
[547]
Cynthia Lee Fontaine, and Eureka and queens
that are immediately invited to All Stars
[551]
after their initial season.
[553]
In their positions, I imagine it would be
extremely difficult to say no to such an invitation
[558]
or technically ârequired optionâ because
knowing if you said ânoâ, World of Wonder
[563]
technically has all of this over power over
you. They could potentially make your life
[569]
hell if they wanted to.
[571]
Jan recently tweeted, âSome of you donât
understand the entertainment industry and
[574]
the importance of taking opportunities and
it shows.â Which sort of exemplifies how
[578]
when WOrld of Wonder asks you to do something,
like return to their show, you kinda have
[583]
to say âYesâ, or you may never see that
opportunity again.
[587]
Okay, now the section youâve all been waiting
for. Letâs talk about MONEY and copyright.
[592]
The UK contestants sign over the same âideas,
gags, suggestions, themes, plots, stories,
[598]
characters, characterizations, dialogue, text,
designs, graphics, titles, drawings, artwork,
[602]
merchandise,â - âdigital works, songs,
musicâŠâ and more collectively known as
[606]
âMaterialâ.
[607]
And in this section, thereâs also a fun
little paragraph that I left out in my US
[611]
video that I think will interest you.
âI acknowledge that producer may depict
[615]
or portray my Likeness, and/or my life story
either accurately or with such libertities
[620]
and modifications...for the purposes of fictionalization,
dramatization or any other purposes, including
[624]
without limitation to achieve a humorous or
satirical effectâŠâ
[628]
UK queens also sign away the same merchandising
rights, allowing World of Wonder to forever
[632]
profit off of their likeness as it relates
to the show. So - all of that is the same.
[636]
Payment
Unfortunately, the biggest difference in these
[639]
two agreements is rights payments.
[641]
UK series 3 contestants will receive two hundred
and fifty pounds per regular episode that
[645]
they film. Which, is quite a bit less than
their US counterparts even after taking into
[649]
account the currency conversion.
[651]
For additional series materials, however,
which as a reminder include things like reunions
[655]
and behind the scenes stuff, they will get
paid 200 pounds per day of work which is a
[660]
little bit more than the 250 dollars per day
of work those queens will receive.
[665]
But the main rights payment that they receive
on a per episode basis feels SO low. Especially
[670]
when you take into consideration that there
is no prize pool for winning the season, and
[675]
there is no episodic prize for winning challenges
either. Well, you know, other than that valuable
[680]
Ru Peter Badge.
[681]
And this is all compounded by the fact that
UK series are shorter than the US ones overall.
[686]
Series 2 was only 10 episodes in length compared
to USâ season 13âs 16 episode monster
[693]
season.
[694]
A queen making it halfway through a US season
with one win might walk away with, letâs
[697]
say: nine thousand dollars.
[699]
while a queen with one win making it halfway
through a UK series will walk away with about
[703]
1,250 pounds - and a ru-peter badge.
[706]
And by the way, there are no cash prizes on
the UK series not because, like, the BBC is
[711]
too cheap to pay them or anything, but because
the BBC is a publicly funded network.
[715]
This means the general population of the UK
pays for programming on the BBC. This however
[721]
is made worse by the fact the BBC does not
accept sponsors. Which makes sense to keep
[726]
news outlets impartial, but it clearly puts
certain programs (like drag race) at a disadvantage
[731]
to their other country counterparts.
[733]
Other Projects
The biggest win for UK contestants, in my
[736]
opinion, is found in the Other Projects clause
which says,
[739]
âIf from the effective date of this agreement
until 12 months after the initial broadcast
[743]
of the last episode of the program in which
I appear, I desire to render services in connection
[747]
with another television program, motion picture,
internet productionâŠâ etcetera, etcetera,
[750]
âI shall give the producer written notice
of that intention and I will negotiate with
[755]
ProducerâŠâ
[756]
So, either way it does kinda suck to have
that in your contract, BUT the US version
[760]
has that other projects clause for 24 months
instead of the UKâs 12.
[764]
And another big win for UK queens is found
in the NDA section of their contract. For
[769]
breaking it, UK queens agree to pay a sum
of five hundred thousand pounds. And Ÿ of
[773]
a (USD) Mil is still a LOT, however, Leeja
Miller a lawyer that reacted to my US contract
[779]
video brought up the point that these numbers
are astronomically high compared to what they
[784]
actually pay these contestants.
[786]
[LEEJA MILLER]
If you are on the other side of this NDA trying
[788]
to defend yourself from having to comply with
it, I still think you might be able to make
[793]
an argument saying that that amount of damages
even though the contract says its not a penalty,
[799]
still amounts to a penalty, especially given
how little that they are paid generally speaking.
[804]
Like- thatâs the biggest number Iâve heard
in this whole video.
[807]
On top of that, thereâs not a lot of precedent
for networks suing their reality TV contestants.
[812]
One notable example involves Luke Parker from
a season of bachelorette, who was ordered
[816]
to cough up $100,000 for breaking his exclusivity
period.
[820]
And speaking of lawyers and lawsuits⊠UK
contestants are also a little bit better off
[824]
here as well.
[825]
The US contract has a Mediation/Arbitration
clause that the UK one does not stating, âI
[831]
UNDERSTAND THAT EXHIBIT D WAIVES MY RIGHT
TO SUE PRODUCER, VMN, AND ANY OTHER ASSIGNEE
[836]
IN A COURT OF LAW ⊠I KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY
WAIVE MY RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL OR COURT TRIAL
[841]
AND FREELY CONSENT TO THE TERMS OF EXHIBIT
D...â
[844]
Instead they agree to use an arbitrator, which
is supposed to be an impartial third party,
[848]
to settle disputes.
[849]
And Finally, weâll take a look at production
protocols.
[851]
While the US and UK World of Wonder production
protocols documents are almost the exact same
[856]
with some small insignificant differences,
the UK contract has a specific BBC production
[863]
protocols document included.
[864]
Here are some of the more interesting protocols
in that document:
[867]
âFor the avoidance of doubt, you will not
be miked or recorded in your hotel room.â
[870]
the US contract makes no mention of that so
I guess US queens should assume that theyâre
[876]
being recorded in there.
[877]
âThe portrayal of any individualâs life
story will be accurate and fair and in accordance
[882]
with BBC guidelines.â
[885]
Which really sounds nice, but remember both
contracts have the clause that we read early
[888]
which says that they can misrepresent contestants
to an even satirical or humorous effect. Thatâs
[895]
directly at odds with what this BBC document
says, so I donât know which one would win
[900]
out here.
[901]
Or maybe this is even some like little loophole
for our UK queens to break their contracts
[905]
- but yâall didnât hear that from me.
[907]
Other protocols say,
âThe BBC will not include any product placement
[911]
or sponsor identifications in the BBC programme.â
[914]
I mentioned this earlier as a disadvantage
to our UK queens âcause on one hand, it
[919]
means theyâre not going to get those cash
prizes from the likes of Coach, but on the
[924]
positive hand I suppose theyâre not going
to be forced to carry Coach bags down the
[929]
runway. Personally, Iâd rather carry that
Coach bag down the runway and win that cash
[932]
prize.
[933]
âThe BBC takes very seriously their duty
of care to you and together with World of
[938]
Wonder will ensure that you get the appropriate
support throughout the process and will be
[942]
providing a point of contact who you can get
in touch with about any concerns relating
[946]
to emotional harm/injury, interaction with
other participants, and any concerns relating
[950]
to your personal finances.â
[952]
In practical application, I donât know how
that would play out but I suppose it sounds
[956]
nice that you can have somebody you can call
who would be like, a neutral third party,
[960]
if you were experiencing some grievances.
[962]
In summary, We saw the US and UK contracts
are largely the same. It surprised me that
[966]
they were like - equally as restrictive in
terms of what these contestants are [giving]
[971]
up to participate on the show.
[972]
However, There was a lot of discussion in
the comment section about the enforceability
[975]
of these contracts.
[976]
Of course, that is the whole reason we have
legal systems. Lawyers are hired to interpret
[981]
contracts and law, and then its up the jury
or judge to decide which lawyer interpreted
[986]
those things best. May the most money, WIN!
[990]
Another common concern I saw in the comment
section of my previous video was, âShould
[993]
we continue to support Drag Race, now knowing
how restrictive these contracts can be?â
[998]
My answer to this is- of course. These queens
give up a lot -willingly- to participate on
[1002]
Rupaulâs Drag Race and they deserve our
support.
[1005]
Sometimes seeing how the sausage is made,
*gasp* can be scary... but I think its important
[1009]
to be an informed consumer.
[1011]
As of today, the reward of participating on
the show highly outweighs the risk of what
[1016]
theyâre giving up. And the reward for queens
that do well in the competition is extremely
[1020]
high.
[1021]
For example, the founder of Voss events - the
company that manages Aquaria - said in a 2019
[1025]
Forbes interview that Aquaria earned over
$1 million dollars in sponsor and talent fees
[1030]
after winning Drag Race.
[1031]
But at the same time, I doubt the early outs
of her season earned half or a quarter as
[1038]
much⊠and they gave up the same rights she
did.
[1041]
So yeah, its a bit of a gamble to go on Rupaulâs
Drag Race⊠but there is a net positive,
[1045]
I think for queens that are willing to make
the most of their time on the show.
[1049]
With that said, make sure to support local
drag with the same veracity that you support
[1053]
your favorite drag race queens.
[1055]
As a reminder, my channel is made possible
by my generous patrons - and sponsors.
[1059]
And My patreon subscribers get exclusive member
benefits like early access to my videos, exclusive
[1064]
videos, access to the Bussy Queen discord
server, and more!
[1067]
Iâve also made the US and UK contracts available
publicly on my patreon. Join my Patreon to
[1072]
day to support my channel at: Patreon.com/BussyQueen
[1075]
I wanna say thanks to you for watching this
video and give a special shoutout to:
[1097]
[Patreon Shoutouts]
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage