Does Trickle-Down Economics Actually Work? | Robert Reich - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
To the extent the Republican Party has
[1]
any economic platform at all,
[3]
it's trickle-down economics.
[5]
Now, unfortunately for the G.O.P.,
[8]
it's based on three giant myths.
[11]
It's time to debunk them, once and for all.
[24]
Tax cuts for corporations and the rich
[26]
create more and better jobs.
[30]
Wrong.
[31]
Corporations used Trump's giant tax cut
[34]
to buy back shares of their own stock
[36]
and boost share prices.
[38]
From 2017 to 2018, stock buybacks
[42]
increased by a staggering 50%.
[45]
Lowe's spent $10 billion on stock buybacks in 2018,
[49]
and then fired thousands of workers
[52]
with no notice or severance.
[54]
Walmart and AT&T also laid off thousands of workers,
[58]
and contrary to the claim
[59]
that the tax cut would boost wages
[61]
—"Around a $4,000 pay raise."—
[65]
a recent analysis found that
[66]
in the year after the Trump tax cut,
[69]
wages increased by about the same as they did before it,
[72]
and then slowed.
[74]
Tax cuts for rich individuals don't trickle down either;
[77]
the rich simply get richer.
[80]
Two years before Ronald Reagan's first tax cut,
[84]
the richest 1% of Americans
[85]
owned less than 23% of the nation's wealth.
[90]
A decade later, after two rounds of tax cuts for the rich,
[95]
they owned over 28%.
[97]
By 2019, after more tax cuts for the rich
[101]
by George W. Bush and Donald Trump,
[103]
people at the top owned almost 35% of America's wealth.
[109]
Meanwhile, average wealth barely budged for the middle class
[113]
and went negative for the bottom 10%.
[116]
It gets worse.
[118]
During the pandemic alone, America's 664 billionaires
[122]
added $1.3 trillion to their collective wealth,
[126]
and now own over $4 trillion.
[129]
That's almost double the wealth of the bottom half
[133]
—165 million Americans—
[136]
but nothing has trickled down.
[139]
Even before the pandemic, wages stagnated.
[144]
Tax cuts for corporations and the rich
[146]
spur more economic growth.
[150]
Baloney!
[151]
Not even Ronald Reagan's surging economic growth rate
[154]
was driven by tax cuts;
[155]
it was driven by low interest rates,
[158]
and humongous government spending.
[160]
George W. Bush promised his 2001 and 2003 tax cuts
[165]
would pay for themselves
[166]
—remember that?—
[168]
by spurring economic growth.
[170]
Well, that didn't happen.
[171]
A 2017 study led by one of Bush's former chief economists
[176]
found that the tax cuts had no significant effect on growth.
[180]
In fact, growth declined, slowing to just 2.8%
[185]
from over 3% during the Clinton years.
[188]
The economic expansion under Bush
[190]
was one of the weakest expansions since World War II.
[193]
Donald Trump claimed his tax cut
[196]
would be like rocket fuel for the economy, and
[198]
would spur annual growth of 3%.
[201]
After its first year, in fact, growth declined.
[206]
Finally, a recent study analyzing tax data
[209]
spanning 50 years from 18 advanced economies
[213]
found that tax cuts for the rich only benefited the rich,
[218]
and had no effect on job creation, or economic growth.
[222]
I, for one, am shocked.
[226]
Deregulation spurs economic growth.
[230]
Well, that's just more rubbish.
[232]
The cost savings from deregulation
[235]
go to corporate executives and major investors,
[238]
while the costs and risks land on the rest of us.
[242]
Trump's Environmental Protection Agency
[244]
rolled back regulations on everything
[246]
from clean air and water standards
[248]
to dangerous chemicals in products,
[250]
benefiting chemical and fossil fuel executives and investors
[254]
while forcing everyone else
[256]
to deal with polluted air and toxins.
[259]
His Labor Department loosened child labor laws
[261]
and scaled back the number of workers
[263]
eligible for overtime pay.
[265]
Companies raked in savings, while workers were exploited.
[269]
And with the help of Congress,
[270]
he rolled back banking regulations
[272]
put in place after the 2008 financial crisis
[276]
to the benefit of rich Wall Streeters,
[278]
and the detriment of everyone else.
[281]
Don't forget Ronald Reagan's deregulatory agenda
[284]
allowed for-profit healthcare companies to flourish,
[288]
contributing to the out-of-control healthcare costs
[291]
we are now saddled with today.
[293]
And remember deregulation of the financial sector
[296]
was a major cause of the 2008 crash,
[300]
as it allowed banks to make risky bets.
[303]
In other words, the Republican trickle-down claim
[306]
that deregulation helps us all is baloney.
[310]
Regulations that protect you and me
[312]
from being harmed or fleeced or shafted,
[315]
injured or sickened by corporate profits and services
[319]
are worth the cost.
[321]
So don't fall for trickle-down nonsense.
[324]
Making big corporations and the rich even richer
[327]
through tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks
[330]
doesn't make the rest of us any better off.
[334]
It just makes big corporations and the rich
[337]
even
[339]
richer!