Our Nuclear Alternate Future? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
(music)
[4]
In the 1950s, as the Cold War was heating up and children were being urged to “duck
[10]
and cover” from nuclear weapons, car companies seriously proposed powering their cars using
[17]
lead-lined nuclear reactors.
[20]
It seems like madness today, but while the world saw the threat of nuclear war, they
[25]
also saw the seemingly limitless potential from nuclear power.
[30]
Just how were these vehicles supposed to work and how far did they get to reality?
[36]
This is the Nuclear-powered car story.
[40]
(music)
[47]
The atomic bomb raised the spectre of a new devastating kind of war, but also the hope
[53]
of almost limitless, cheap power.
[57]
With the cold war gathering apace, in 1955 the US launched its first submarine with a
[63]
nuclear propulsion plant – the USS Nautilus.
[67]
It was launched by First Lady Mamie Eisenhower with the traditional bottle of champagne,
[72]
and soon she began sea trials.
[75]
That is the submarine, not Mamie Eisenhower!
[78]
Nuclear power was perfect for submarines.
[81]
Internal combustion engines were loud which meant they could be more easily be detected
[86]
with sonar, and they gave off fumes which limited their use underwater.
[91]
Electric propulsion using batteries allowed for limited underwater operations before having
[97]
to be recharged, whereas nuclear powered submarines could stay silently underwater for months.
[104]
The nuclear reactors can create power, potable water, air and electricity.
[109]
As one ex-sailor put it - it could last until the coffee ran out!
[114]
So, by the mid to late 50s the public was captivated by the potential for almost limitless
[120]
power; we’d entered the “atomic age”!
[124]
The public was promised that nuclear power stations would produce electricity that would
[128]
be “too cheap to meter”.
[131]
Small nuclear reactors would soon be available that could be put to a myriad of practical uses.
[138]
The USSR started looking at nuclear powered trains, but the USA was in love with the automobile,
[144]
so thoughts turned to how cars could use small nuclear reactors, helped of course with grants
[149]
from the US Government to stimulate growth.
[153]
Concept cars allow car makers to show its forward thinking, and to fire the public’s imagination.
[160]
Ford showed off its “Nucleon” concept in 1958.
[164]
The occupants sat up front, with the nuclear reactor at the back, not so much to minimise
[169]
the radiation exposure although there would be lead shielding, more to distribute the
[173]
weight of the incredibly heavy reactor.
[177]
Like with nuclear power stations, the reactor would be used to superheat water, which would
[183]
then turn turbines – one to drive the wheels and one to power ancillary equipment.
[188]
The water would then condense starting the cycle all over again.
[193]
This, in effect, made the Nucleon a steam car, returning to 19th century technology
[200]
with a 20th century twist.
[202]
Each reactor would be good for 5,000 miles (8,000 km) before it needed to be swapped
[207]
out at the atomic equivalent of a petrol station.
[210]
Want more performance?
[212]
Just plump for the sporty reactor next time you swap it out!
[216]
The Nucleon’s designer was Jim Powers.
[219]
He’d make another pie in the sky design – quite literally – a flying car called
[224]
the Volante.
[226]
His most practical automotive creation was the 1961 Ford Thunderbird, but the cold Michigan
[233]
winters finally got the better of him and he moved to California to start his own design company.
[239]
Also jumping on the nuclear bandwagon, presumably with the same Government funding was Studebaker
[244]
& Packard with their Astral prototype also in 1958.
[249]
It seems more removed from reality than the Nucleon, using a “protective curtain of
[254]
energy” to prevent accidents.
[257]
It balanced Segway-like on a single gyroscopic ball under the vehicle and could hover over water.
[264]
It was designed by Studebaker-Packard’s interior design chief, which shows it was
[270]
more an intention to show off what could be done with the interior and glass-reinforced
[274]
plastic than as a serious vehicle.
[277]
Despite this, the designers claimed it could use a nuclear or ionic engine – whatever
[283]
that might be – in the dim and distant future when they would be available.
[288]
Unfortunately, neither Studebaker or Packard would see that future, with the Packard name
[293]
disappearing just a year later, and Studebaker quitting automobile production in the 1960s.
[300]
Ford was still pushing nuclear powertrains into the early 1960s at the Century 21 Exposition
[307]
in Seattle with the “Seattle-ite XXI” – named after the new interest in space.
[314]
Under the new Space Needle almost 10M visitors wowed at this 6-wheel creation with a front
[321]
end that could be swapped out for economical or performance driving.
[325]
And, of course it included the option of a fuel cell or nuclear powertrain – just as
[330]
soon as the boffins invented them!
[333]
One element of the car that was visionary was the view screen that would show engine
[338]
information, road and weather conditions and a map along with estimated time of arrival.
[345]
The designer was Alex Tremulis.
[347]
He was no stranger to show cars, creating this view of what cars in the year 2000 would
[352]
look like just 4 years earlier, sadly without a nuclear powertrain.
[357]
If you’re at all into vintage space, he also designed the cancelled 1960s Dyna-Soar
[363]
military space plane that was a forerunner of the 1980s Space Shuttle.
[368]
But he also made more practical designs, like the 1978 Subaru BRAT.
[374]
All three prototypes clearly showed the sense of optimism in the rapid progress for nuclear
[380]
energy and other technologies of the time such as computers, glass and plastics technology.
[387]
But the excitement around nuclear powered cars disappeared almost as soon as it had appeared.
[392]
It soon became clear that nuclear power won’t be “too cheap to meter”, but was about
[398]
the same price as coal, oil or gas.
[401]
Those small submarine reactors were expensive, required constant maintenance and proved tricky
[407]
to miniaturise.
[409]
Over time people discovered that not just the nuclear waste, but ancillary waste like
[414]
protective clothing not only cost a lot to dispose of but hung around being all “radioactivy”
[421]
for a heck of a long time.
[423]
By the time of the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor radiation leak in 1979, public opinion
[430]
on nuclear power had well and truly soured.
[434]
With radioactive material being transported by rail, the UK Central Electricity Generating
[440]
Board felt it needed to calm public nerves by staging a dramatic test in 1984 where a
[446]
nuclear flask was crashed to prove it wouldn’t leak.
[451]
Thankfully the test was a success and went some way to dispelling the public’s worries,
[456]
but just two years later the radioactive disaster that was Chernobyl spewed radiation over the
[463]
surrounding area – turning it uninhabitable, and creating a radioactive dust cloud that
[468]
swept over Europe.
[470]
In the process they achieved what alchemists had been trying for centuries to achieve – turning
[476]
parts of the lead-lined roof into gold.
[479]
Lovely, highly radioactive gold

[483]
So, by the 1980s it was laughable that a nuclear reactor could be installed in fast moving
[489]
vehicles that regularly crashed into one other.
[493]
We were having enough problems getting stationary nuclear reactors to be safe!
[497]
But this didn’t stop others from dreaming about nuclear-powered cars.
[501]
In 2009 Cadillac introduced its vision of what a 100-year maintenance free car would look like.
[509]
Instead of using uranium, it would use thorium to power a laser that would again create steam,
[515]
this time to generate electricity that would power the car.
[519]
But despite promises that nuclear powered devices could become small enough to fit into
[524]
vehicles, nothing practical has ever been demonstrated.
[529]
The latest thorium reactor designs, although being touted as safer than previous uranium
[534]
designs, still fit into several large buildings.
[538]
And no one has yet figured out how to safely store all that radioactive waste for 10,000
[544]
years or more.
[545]
As humans who are lucky to live 1/100th of that time, we simply aren’t willing to cost
[552]
in the impact to those future generations.
[555]
It’s always somebody else’s problem.
[558]
There is one atomic powered vehicle that’s been driving around since 2012.
[563]
Thankfully, it’s on another planet!
[566]
The Mars Curiosity rover uses a radioisotope thermoelectric generator that generates heat
[573]
from the decay of radioactive isotopes.
[576]
The heat is converted into electricity that powers both the instruments and the wheels.
[582]
Curiosity was joined by fellow atomic rover Perseverance in February 2021.
[589]
Back on Earth, if you want a nuclear-powered car, you can buy one today.
[594]
Sort of.
[595]
In France over 10% of all cars sold at the end of 2020 were electric, and over 70% of
[602]
the energy to power them comes from a nuclear power station, so in a sense they’re powered
[608]
by nuclear energy.
[609]
It’s just the reactor isn’t sitting behind the driver in a lead-lined box.
[614]
Nuclear-powered cars have always been a dream – either fuelled by Government funding that
[620]
spurred car companies to produce outlandish designs, or pie in the sky ideas trying to
[626]
show a bankrupt company is forward thinking.
[630]
But although you might scoff at those crazy impractical show cars, they plant a seed as
[636]
to what might be.
[638]
The 1962 Ford Seattle-ite promised something very similar to today’s trip computers that
[644]
appeared in the 1980s, and satellite navigation that appeared in the 1990s.
[650]
We wondered at the flat panel screens and tablets in Star Trek and realised we wanted
[656]
them, so LCD screens were invented and refined into today’s technology.
[661]
Nuclear-powered cars might have been a terrible idea, but we must continue to dream.