Ex: Determine the Probability of a Union Using a Table - Not Mutually Exclusive - YouTube

Channel: Mathispower4u

[0]
the table summarizes results from 976
[3]
pedestrian deaths that were caused by
[5]
automobile accidents notice how the
[7]
table indicates whether the pedestrian
[9]
was intoxicated
[11]
as well as whether the driver was
[12]
intoxicated if one of the pedestrian
[14]
deaths is randomly selected find the
[17]
probability that the pedestrian was not
[19]
intoxicated or
[21]
the driver was intoxicated
[24]
so in this case we're trying to
[25]
determine the probability
[27]
of a union of two events
[29]
and because these two events can occur
[31]
at the same time
[32]
the two events are not mutually
[34]
exclusive and therefore we'll apply the
[36]
probability formula given here below
[39]
where if it is possible for two events
[41]
to occur at the same time
[43]
the events are not mutually exclusive
[45]
and therefore the probability of a or b
[48]
equals the probability of a plus the
[51]
probability of b
[53]
minus the probability of a and b
[56]
and we'll see in this problem why
[58]
we have to subtract this probability
[60]
here
[61]
so to set this up
[62]
we'll say the probability the pedestrian
[65]
was not intoxicated
[66]
or the driver was intoxicated
[69]
is equal to the probability the
[72]
pedestrian was not intoxicated plus
[75]
the probability that the driver was
[77]
intoxicated
[78]
and then minus the probability the
[81]
pedestrian was not intoxicated and the
[83]
driver was intoxicated
[87]
now we'll determine each of these
[88]
probabilities so to begin
[90]
we'll determine the probability
[92]
the pedestrian was not intoxicated
[95]
and notice how we can determine that
[96]
information from this column here
[99]
this column indicates
[100]
the number of pedestrians that were not
[102]
intoxicated
[104]
and since 82 plus 606 is equal to 688
[110]
the probability that the pedestrian was
[113]
not intoxicated
[114]
would be 688
[116]
divided by
[117]
the total number of deaths which is 976
[122]
and then we have plus
[124]
the probability that the driver was
[125]
intoxicated
[127]
and notice how this row here indicates
[130]
the number of drivers that were
[132]
intoxicated
[137]
and therefore the probability that the
[139]
driver was intoxicated would be equal to
[142]
62 plus 82 which is 144
[147]
divided by
[148]
976
[150]
but notice how in these two
[151]
probabilities we counted these 82 depths
[154]
twice
[158]
and these 82 deaths were when the
[160]
pedestrian
[161]
was not intoxicated and
[163]
when the driver was intoxicated and this
[166]
is the reason why
[168]
we have to subtract this last
[169]
probability
[170]
which again is the probability
[172]
that the pedestrian was not intoxicated
[174]
and the driver was intoxicated which
[177]
would be 82
[179]
divided by
[181]
976.
[183]
now let's go and express this
[184]
probability
[186]
as a simplified fraction decimal and
[188]
percent
[189]
so let's go to the calculator
[193]
notice how we already have a common
[194]
denominator
[195]
so the numerator is going to be
[197]
in parentheses 688
[200]
plus 144
[203]
minus 82
[205]
and all this is divided by
[209]
976
[211]
so we'll press enter
[213]
this gives us a decimal approximation
[215]
but if we press math enter enter
[218]
this gives us a simplified fraction
[220]
which is 375
[222]
over 488
[225]
so this would be the exact probability
[231]
but the directions do ask us to enter a
[233]
percentage rounded to one decimal place
[235]
so we'll first convert this to a decimal
[238]
and because we want the percent to be to
[240]
one decimal place
[242]
we'll have to round the decimal to three
[244]
decimal places
[245]
so going back to the calculator notice
[247]
how this would be approximately 0.768
[252]
so approximately 0.768
[256]
converting to a percentage we multiply
[258]
by 100 and add a percent sign
[260]
or move the decimal point to the right
[262]
two places giving us approximately
[265]
76.8 percent
[270]
i hope you found this helpful