đ
The formula for selling a million-dollar work of art - YouTube
Channel: Vox
[0]
In September of 2008, something unheard of happened in the art world.
[5]
A British artist, Damien Hirst, took 223 pieces of his new work to Sothebyâs auction house
[12]
and sold every single piece.
[15]
Iâll start the bidding here at ÂŁ2,500,000.
[20]
It was a 2 day event, and the total sale was about $200 million.
[25]
It broke the record for single artist auction
of $20 million back in 1993.
[30]
Hirstâs work included things like this
zebra, this unicorn, and this painting made
[35]
from butterflies.
[36]
So how did he â how do artists â do this?
[41]
Well for the most part, the artists aren't
the ones behind it.
[45]
Okay, so obviously money isnât the only value
[48]
that defines a work of art, and who knows how history will remember this unicorn.
[54]
But order to sell a million-dollar artwork, you need strong market valueâ and you
[59]
need extremely high demand.
And a ton of work goes into creating that.
[63]
As Don Thompson describes in his book, the formula for art pricing goes something like this.
[69]
The bigger the work, generally the more expensive it is.
[73]
But, the biggest variable is the reputation
of the artist. Sometimes youâre world-famous,
[77]
and sometimes youâre not.
[79]
What?
[79]
But when a new artist steps into the art market,
[82]
the reputation of the artist heavily relies
on the name of the dealer.
[86]
This shark by Damien Hirst is a good example. Hirst first began working with an art industry
[91]
giant, Charles Saatchi, in the 1990s.
Saatchi commissioned Hirst to make anything
[96]
he wanted for ÂŁ50,000 after seeing this cowâs head at a show shortly after Hirstâs graduation
[102]
in 1990. Hirst bought a shark for ÂŁ6000 from an Australian
[106]
fisherman and created this, injecting it with tons of formaldehyde.
[111]
Later in 2004, it was sold for $12 million to a billionaire hedge fund manager,
[116]
Steve Cohen.
It was roughly 130 times the original price
[120]
but it makes sense considering Saatchiâs reputation. And it makes more sense when you think about
[125]
how it was bought â dealers can use selective information to get potential buyers to pay more.
[131]
Hirstâs huge auction I mentioned beforeâŠ
[136]
For dealer-sold work, everything is private,
including the prices, which gives dealers
[141]
the upper hand in pricing.
In 1988, New York City tried to ban this by
[145]
reinforcing the Truth in Pricing law, and
galleries fought back HARD, paying fines and
[150]
protesting saying that showing prices will
be âgetting in the way of the enjoyment
[155]
of the exhibition.â
By keeping the price private, art dealers
[158]
can rely more on their reputation to make
the artwork feel more valuable to the buyer.
[163]
Outside this equation, the basic laws of economics also apply. The next step of operations for
[169]
the dealer is creating scarcity.
In 1999, when Jenny Saville, a new emerging
[175]
British artist became affiliated with Charles Saatchi, he convinced her to cut her work down to only
[181]
6 paintings per year. He sold them for $100,000 each.
[185]
So what does this all result to?
According to Artnet, the estimated size of
[189]
the art market was $64 billion in 2015.
And market is growing outside of traditional
[195]
sales of galleries and auction houses.
This chart shows the art world might be learning
[200]
the lesson Saatchi taught Jenny Savile âthe total value of the art thatâs being sold
[205]
is growing faster than the number of pieces. Sell less of it, for more.
[209]
But to sell that million-dollar artwork, youâll need reputation bigger than Hirstâs, or
[213]
Charles Saatchiâs.
The dealer model still dominates the fine
[217]
art world, but for the rest of us, selling
art online has never been easier. The prices
[222]
are open and itâs accessible for a broad
group of people.
[225]
And for one thing, now you know where to start:
[228]
think big.
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





