Vanguard: Proof That You Can Be Rich & Ethical - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
Nowadays, index fund investing is one of the most popular and reliable ways to grow your
[4]
wealth over the long term.
[6]
And given the high diversification, the low volatility, and the extreme ease of index
[11]
funds, it’s no wonder they’re so popular.
[13]
But index funds aren’t a classic investment tool like you might think.
[17]
Just 30 years ago, index funds were largely avoided, and 50 years ago, index fund investing
[22]
wasn’t even a thing.
[23]
It wasn’t until 1972 that the world’s first index fund was created.
[28]
Vanguard entered the scene a few years later in 1975, and since then they’ve grown to
[33]
be the king of index funds.
[35]
The largest index fund today is actually the SPDR SPY ETF, but this is more of an anomaly.
[42]
If you look right below Spy, you’ll see that 5 out of the top 10 funds are from Vanguard
[47]
and that 31 out of the top 100 funds are also from Vanguard.
[50]
So, here’s how Vanguard became the second largest investment firm in the world by just
[55]
embracing average.
[57]
It all started with a man named John C Bogle who was born on May 8, 1929 right before the
[62]
great depression started.
[64]
John’s family, unfortunately, got annihilated by the great depression.
[68]
His parents lost all of their savings and they were forced to sell their house.
[71]
John’s father basically gave up on life and became an alcoholic which resulted in
[76]
John’s parents divorcing.
[77]
So, from a very young age, John was on his own and his clearest path to success was education.
[83]
John and his twin brother David both worked extremely hard at school to try to get ahead,
[87]
and this would end up paying off.
[89]
John’s stellar academic record earned him a spot at an elite boarding school named Blair
[93]
Academy on a full-ride work scholarship.
[96]
Today, Blair Academy charges $66,500 per year and they only have a total of 462 students.
[103]
So, I think it’s safe to assume that they don’t give these spots very easily.
[108]
Anyway, John continued to excel at Blair and he would eventually get accepted into Princeton.
[113]
At Princeton, John majored in economics and investments and it didn’t take him long
[117]
to delve into the world of mutual funds.
[119]
During his junior and senior years in college, John wrote a graduating thesis paper called
[123]
“The Economic Role of the Investment Company”.
[126]
This paper would actually get John his first job.
[129]
The story goes that Walter L Morgan, the founder of the Wellington fund read John’s 130-page
[134]
paper and that he hired John right after.
[137]
John quickly became a star at the fund and by 1955, John was promoted to being an assistant
[142]
manager of the fund.
[144]
John also pushed for the creation of a new fund that was less concentrated than Wellington’s
[148]
other funds.
[149]
Eventually, John would get his way and this new fund turned out to be a great success.
[153]
Soon enough, Walter Morgan would retire from the company in 1970 and he would choose John
[158]
to be his successor.
[159]
Things were going phenomenally for John.
[162]
He had become the leader of a well-respected fund at a rather young age of 41 years old.
[166]
But, unfortunately, John would make a fateful decision that would get him ousted from the
[170]
company.
[172]
In the 1970s, John approved a merger that turned out to be a disaster, and John would
[177]
be fired soon after.
[178]
Though this was likely a terrible experience, what’s surprising is that John never complained
[183]
about it or tried to make excuses.
[185]
In fact, he describes the mistake as quote “shameful and inexcusable and a reflection
[190]
of immaturity and confidence beyond what the facts justified.”
[193]
It’s crazy how down to earth and humble John was despite all of his success.
[198]
John decided to start his own investment firm named Vanguard in 1974 and that brings us
[202]
to the creation of the index fund.
[205]
John is often credited with inventing the world’s first index fund, but this isn’t
[209]
actually the case.
[211]
The first idea for an index funds dates back to two University of Chicago students.
[215]
Edward Renshaw and Paul Feldstein suggested the idea of creating an unmanaged investment
[219]
company way back in 1960, but the idea barely got any support and it didn’t go anywhere.
[225]
A decade later though, a company named Qualidex Fund Inc would make their vision a reality
[229]
by creating a fund that tracked the Dow Jones Industrial Average on July 31, 1972.
[234]
So, John was not the first to create an index fund, but he’s still no doubt the father
[239]
of index fund investing given that he was the one to popularize it.
[243]
John launched Vanguard’s first index fund called the First Index Investment Trust on
[246]
December 31, 1975.
[249]
The success of Vanguard didn’t just happen overnight though because there was a massive
[254]
problem.
[255]
In the 1970s, there was very little respect for index fund investing within wall street.
[259]
Fund managers thought that the idea of index funds was whimsical and utterly pointless.
[264]
It wasn’t just fund managers saying this either, most investors held a similar belief
[268]
due to 2 key reasons.
[270]
First of all, investors felt that they could just do it themselves if they wanted to.
[275]
All an index fund is doing is splitting the money you invest across dozens or hundreds
[278]
of companies depending on what the fund is tracking.
[281]
Investors could easily just do that themselves.
[285]
They could call up their brokerage and tell them to split their money across Nasdaq stocks
[288]
or S&P 500 stocks.
[291]
The investor wouldn’t even have to go through the tediousness of buying 500 different stocks,
[295]
that was the brokerages’ problem.
[297]
The second argument against index funds was that it was quote and quote unamerican and
[301]
counterintuitive.
[302]
People invest with fund managers to beat the market, not to match the market.
[307]
This is why the chairman of Fidelity Edward Johnson said that he couldn’t believe that
[311]
the great mass of investors would be satisfied with receiving just average returns.
[315]
And these fund managers were right about Vanguard at least at the start.
[320]
The launch of the First Index Investment Trust was a massive disappointment.
[324]
John was hoping to raise $150 million during the IPO but they only ended up raising a measly
[329]
$11 million.
[331]
Now, you might be thinking $11 million isn’t that bad.
[335]
But the thing to keep in mind is that Vanguard is just a manager of assets which means that
[340]
they’re only paid a very small percentage of what they manage.
[343]
Even if they charged 1% which is super high for a passive fund, they would only make $110,000
[349]
per year.
[350]
And that money isn’t just for John, that money needs to support the operations of the
[354]
entire company.
[355]
Fortunately, Vanguard was just a group of three people including John and two analysts,
[360]
so the overhead costs were that large.
[362]
Nonetheless, the IPO was extremely disappointing.
[366]
The banks that helped John complete the IPO advised that he should shut down the fund
[369]
given the poor reception, but John refused.
[373]
John strongly believed that index fund investing would become more popular for two of his own
[376]
reasons.
[377]
His first argument was that the fees of an index fund just had to be low enough for it
[381]
to be worth investors’ time.
[383]
The S&P 500 adds companies and kicks out companies on a quarterly basis.
[387]
So, if you’re trying to track the S&P 500 on your own, you would have to rebalance your
[391]
portfolio every quarter.
[393]
Also, every time you wanted to add money in or take money out of your portfolio, you would
[397]
have to buy or sell the stocks of 500 different companies.
[401]
And whether it’s the investor doing it or the broker doing it on behalf of the investor,
[405]
someone has to spend the time and money to accurately track the desired index.
[409]
If you were able to offer this service for a silly low price, investors and brokers may
[413]
very well be interested.
[415]
Since the start of Vanguard, one of the key characteristics has been their stupid low
[418]
fees.
[419]
The annual fee on their S&P 500 fund VOO for instance is only 0.03% per year.
[426]
This means that for every $10,000 you invest, Vanguard only charges $3 per year.
[431]
I think you can see why this is quite attractive.
[433]
John’s second belief was that over the long term, actively managed funds would lose to
[438]
the market.
[439]
And over time, we’ve seen that this is indeed the case with most funds.
[443]
But in the late 1970s, John’s low fees and long-term outlook weren’t very convincing.
[448]
At the end of the first year, the index fund had only grown to $17 million.
[453]
But eventually, when the bull market started in 1982 after the inflation crisis of the
[458]
1970s, the indices finally started to grow at a substantial rate.
[462]
This significantly boosted the interest in index fund investing, but index funds were
[466]
still largely avoided.
[468]
Something that did help Vanguard though was the start of the 401k era in the 1908s.
[472]
Instead of directly targeting investors and brokerages with their index funds, Vanguard
[476]
switched its focus to companies.
[478]
Unlike investors and wall street who were concerned about beating the market and generating
[482]
the greatest returns possible, companies were more concerned about giving their employees
[486]
a low-cost, reliable, and stable investment option, and index funds were perfect for this.
[491]
Vanguard became a top choice for employee retirement funds and 401k plans which allowed
[495]
Vanguard to finally gain some traction.
[498]
Vanguard didn’t stop targeting direct investors either though.
[500]
They actually came out with more options for direct investors.
[503]
In December of 1986, Vanguard launched their second fund which was the Total Bond Fund.
[509]
In December of 1987, Vanguard launched the extended market index fund which tracks the
[513]
entire stock market.
[514]
Since then, Vanguard has continuously launched fund after fund each with a different focus
[519]
such as small market cap companies and commodities.
[522]
All of these new funds combined with the rise of retirement funds, Vanguard blew up during
[526]
the 1980s and they ended the decade with $55.8 billion in assets under management.
[532]
For most funds, this would be a fantastic amount but given Vanguard’s extremely low
[536]
fee structure, they needed much more to make the same amount of money as a regular $55.8
[541]
billion funds.
[542]
With a 0.03% fee, for instance, Vanguard would only be pulling in $16.7 million per year
[548]
despite managing $55.8 billion.
[550]
Fortunately, though, Vanguard’s assets would continue to grow exponentially throughout
[554]
the 1990s.
[556]
The key development in the 1990s and early 2000s was the rise of tech companies and the
[560]
dot-com bubble.
[561]
Tech companies paid their employees extremely well which made managing their retirements
[565]
funds extremely lucrative.
[566]
By 2005, Vanguard’s assets under management grew to just under $1 trillion.
[571]
In the meantime, John retired from Vanguard in 1999 as he reached the mandatory retirement
[576]
age at the company of 70.
[579]
Since John’s retirement, the new leaders of Vanguard have placed more focus on actively
[582]
managed funds, but ironically, this is when the popularity of index funds went through
[587]
the roof.
[588]
In the late 2000s, Warren Buffett made his famous bet against hedge funds, and retail
[592]
investors have been more than happy to take it easy and simply enjoy market returns.
[597]
This newfound retail interest has skyrocketed Vanguard’s total assets under management
[601]
to a whopping $7.5 trillion.
[604]
But what I think is even more impressive than their crazy balance sheet is their ethics.
[609]
Wall Street often gets a bad rep for terrible ethics and most of the criticism they get
[613]
is well deserved.
[614]
But the same cannot be said about Vanguard.
[617]
The only profit Vanguard makes is the measly fees they charge on their funds.
[621]
Now, of course, they manage trillions, so they make plenty of money.
[625]
But what I’m referring to is the fact that Vanguard doesn’t actually have any investors.
[630]
John strongly believed that it was a major conflict of interest to offer stock in a company
[634]
that was meant to generate the best returns possible for their fund investors.
[638]
Every dollar the company makes is one less dollar that could’ve been paid out to the
[641]
fund investors.
[642]
So, John decided that Vanguard would have no ownership whatsoever.
[647]
Vanguard doesn’t have any stock and it’s not privately owned.
[650]
Instead, Vanguard likes to say that the company is owned by all the investors of their funds.
[655]
To put in perspective how much Vanguard is giving up with this decision, let’s take
[659]
a look at Blackrock.
[661]
Blackrock is the largest asset manager in the world and they manage over $9 trillion
[665]
worth of assets.
[666]
Blackrock does have stock and its market cap is $138 billion.
[671]
Even if we said that Vanguard was only valued half as much as Blackrock, that would be about
[675]
$70 billion.
[677]
John could’ve easily held onto 25% of the company which would’ve given him a net worth
[681]
of $17.5 billion.
[684]
But instead, John died with a net worth of only $80 million.
[688]
Obviously, that’s not a bad amount, but for someone who literally created trillions
[693]
of dollars of value for American investors, that’s an awfully modest salary.
[697]
Something else I wanted to note is that John gave half of his salary to charity.
[701]
Truly quite an inspiring story, but we’ll have to see how long Vanguard upholds John’s
[706]
ethics because John, unfortunately, passed away 2 years ago in 2019.
[709]
I’m sure his legacy with Vanguard, however, will live on forever.
[714]
What do you guys think about Vanguard’s business model?
[716]
Comment that down below.
[717]
Also, drop a like if John’s ethics inspire you.
[721]
And of course, consider joining our discord community to suggest future video ideas and
[725]
consider subscribing to see more questions logically answered.