🔍
Video tutorial: Efficiency in competitive markets - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[2]
8.5: 'Competitive equilibrium gains
from trade allocation and distribution'.
[8]
As economists, we always say competitive markets
are efficient, competitive markets are efficient,
[14]
but what do we mean by that? We mean that
the competitive markets maximise the mutual
[22]
benefits for the consumers and producers. Let me
explain. Let's focus on the benefits going to the
[30]
consumers. We call that consumer surplus. Let's
focus on the customer who is buying the 1,000
[38]
loaves of bread. When that customer is walking off
the bakery, he must have a smile on his face, why?
[46]
Because he bought that loaf of bread for €2 while
he was willing to pay a much higher price for
[54]
that bread. So that was a surplus going to that
consumer. Have you found yourself in a situation
[62]
that you purchased the product and secretly
you were willing to pay a much higher price
[68]
for that product? That was a consumer surplus
going to you. Let me give you another example.
[74]
Let's focus on the customers who purchased
the 3,000 loaves of bread. Again that customer
[81]
is happy when he's walking off the bakery, why?
Because he purchased the loaf of bread for €2
[88]
while he was willing to pay a higher price than
€2, but this time you see the consumer surplus
[95]
is smaller compared to the previous customer,
so this area represents all the surplus going
[105]
to the consumers, why? Because all the demanders
here, on our demand line, were willing to buy
[113]
bread a loaf of bread for a price higher than
€2 but in the end they end up just paying €2.
[122]
We can think about the same concept but from
a perspective of firms. We call that producer
[128]
surplus. Let's focus on the baker who's selling
the 1,000 loaves of bread. That baker must have
[137]
a smile at the time he's selling that bread, why?
Because he's selling that loaf of bread at a much
[144]
higher price than he was willing to supply that
bread at. Remember: this is the supply curve,
[154]
which in this case is the same as the marginal
cost curve, because we are operating on the
[159]
competitive market. So, just to repeat: that
baker is selling the bread at a much higher price
[169]
than he was willing to supply that bread at, and
that difference is a producer surplus - a benefit
[177]
going to the baker. So if we put these
two sides together, we realise that when
[185]
the baker was selling the 1,000 loaves of bread
and the customer was buying that loaf of bread,
[192]
they both benefitted from this transaction.
There was a surplus going to the consumer
[196]
and a surplus going to the producer. However,
this does not mean that both of these sides
[203]
equally benefit if, for instance, in the case
of the 1,000 loaves of bread you see that the
[208]
benefits going to the consumer is higher
than the benefits going to the producer.
[214]
But from an aggregate perspective, you see that
the competitive markets maximise this area.
[222]
They maximise the surplus going to the consumers
and producers. They maximize the joint surplus.
[233]
Finally, let me compare a competitive market
with the monopoly market from a perspective of
[238]
efficiency. Let me start with the monopoly market.
The most important thing here is that we have
[245]
wasted opportunities. We've got a deadweight loss
which we show in this graph by this area. Now,
[254]
let me explain to you how a monopoly ends
up hurting the consumers. At the moment,
[263]
Beautiful Cars is maximising their profits
by charging $5,440 for each of their cars.
[271]
Remember: they're pricing
each of their cars the same
[275]
and they are selling 32 cars overall and
this way they're maximising their profits.
[283]
Now let's assume we have a customer, an
additional customer who wants to buy the
[290]
33rd car and that customer is willing to pay
around $4,000, let's say, for that additional car.
[302]
At the same time, the cost of producing
another car, the marginal cost of the 33rd
[310]
car for Beautiful Cars is lower than the
price that that customer is willing to pay,
[317]
but Beautiful Cars never produces the 33rd
car, why? Because if they want to serve
[323]
that customer they have to lower their price
for all of their cars and they end up making
[331]
less profit on the other 32 cars and in this
way they end up making a lower total profit.
[341]
Because of that, Beautiful Cars stops at 32 cars
and they decide not to serve that 33rd customer
[350]
and in this way you see a wasted opportunity: a
consumer benefit that was never realised. This is
[359]
a good example of how a monopoly market is not
efficient. Now let me focus on the competitive
[367]
market. There you got no missed opportunities:
all the mutually beneficial transactions that
[375]
could have taken place between the consumers
and producers have actually taken place. There
[383]
is no deadweight loss. The competitive market
has maximised the surplus going to the consumers
[390]
and producers and in that sense we say that
competitive markets are Pareto efficient.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





