🔍
Interpreting correlation coefficients in a correlation matrix - YouTube
Channel: NurseKillam
[2]
A correlation matrix displays the correlation
coefficients among numerous variables in a
[6]
research study.
This type of matrix will appear in hypothesis
[10]
testing or exploratory quantitative research
studies, which are designed to test the relationships
[15]
among variables.
In order to interpret this matrix you need
[20]
to understand how correlations are measured.
Correlation coefficients always range from
[25]
-1 to +1. The positive or negative sign tells
you the direction of the relationship and
[32]
the number tells you the strength of the relationship.
The most common way to quantify this relationship
[38]
is the Pearson product moment correlation
coefficient (Munro, 2005).
[42]
Mathematically it is possible to calculate
correlations with any level of data. However,
[48]
the method of calculating these correlations
will differ based on the level of the data.
[53]
Although Pearson’s r is the most commonly
used correlation coefficient, Person’s r
[58]
is only appropriate for correlations between
two interval or ratio level variables. When
[63]
examining the formula for Person’s r it
is evident that part of the calculation relies
[68]
on knowing the difference between individual
cases and the mean. Since the distance between
[73]
values is not known for ordinal data and a
mean cannot be calculated, Pearson’s r cannot
[79]
be used. Therefore another method must be used.
[83]
Most other methods have been derived from
Pearson’s. Please note that there are also
[88]
other methods for calculating correlations
among more than two variables.
[92]
Recall that correlations measure the
direction and strength of a linear relationship
[98]
among variables. The direction of the relationship
is indicated by the positive or negative sign
[104]
before the number.
If the correlation is positive it means that
[109]
as one variable increases so does the other
one. People who tend to score high for one
[116]
variable will also tend to score high for
another varriable.
[120]
Therefore if there is a positive correlation
between hours spent watching course videos
[126]
and exam marks it means that people who spend
more time watching the videos tend to get
[131]
higher marks on the exam.
Remember that a positive correlation is like
[136]
a positive relationship, both people are moving
in the same direction through life together.
[142]
If the correlation is negative it means that
as one variable increases the other decreases.
[151]
People who tend to score high for one variable
will tend to score low for another.
[156]
Therefore if there is a negative correlation
between unmanaged stress and exam marks it
[162]
means that people who have more unmanaged
stress get lower marks on their exam.
[168]
Remember that A negative correlation is like
a negative relationship, the people in the
[173]
relationship are moving in opposite directions.
Remember that The sign (positive or negative)
[179]
tells you the direction of the relationship
and the number beside it tells you how strong
[184]
that relationship is. To judge the strength
of the relationship consider the actual value
[190]
of the correlation coefficient. Numerous sources
provide similar ranges for interpretation
[195]
of the relationships that approximate the
ranges on the screen. These ranges provide
[201]
guidelines for interpretation. If you need
to memorize these criteria for a course check
[206]
the table your teacher wants you to learn.
Of course, the higher the number is the stronger
[211]
the relationship is. In practice, researchers
are happy with correlations of 0.5 or higher.
[218]
Also note that when drawing conclusions from
correlations the size of the sample as well
[223]
as the statistical significance is considered.
Remember that the direction of the relationship
[229]
does not affect the strength of the relationship.
One of the biggest mistakes people make is
[235]
assuming that a negative number is weaker
than a positive number. In fact, a correlation
[242]
of – 0.80 is just as high or just as strong
as a correlation of +0.80.
[250]
When comparing the values on the screen a correlation of -0.75 is actually stronger than a correlation
[258]
of +0.56.
If a researcher was investigating the relationship
[264]
between several factors that may influence
student marks on an exam the correlation matrix
[269]
may look like this.
Notice that there are correlations of 1 on
[273]
a diagonal line across the table. That is
because each variable should correlate perfectly
[278]
with itself. Sometimes dashes are used instead
of 1s.
[283]
In a correlation matrix, typically only one
half of the triangle is filled out. That is
[287]
because the other half would simply be a mirror
image of it.
[291]
Examine this correlation matrix and see if
you can identify and interpret the correlations.
[296]
A great question for an exam would be to give
you a correlation matrix and ask you to find
[301]
and interpret correlations.
What is the correlation between completed
[306]
readings and unmanaged stress? What does it
mean?
[310]
Which coefficient gives you the most precise
prediction?
[313]
Which correlations are small enough that they
would not be of much interest to the researcher?
[318]
Which two correlations have the same strength?
From looking at these correlations, what could
[323]
a student do to get a higher mark on an exam?
Comment below to start a conversation.
[330]
To generalize conclusions from these correlations
researchers need to assume a number of things.
[336]
Various measures exist to test these assumptions.
To interpret the meaning of correlations researchers
[342]
also consider a number of other measures before
drawing conclusions.
[347]
Thank you for watching. Please check out my
related videos and subscribe below.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





