Interpreting correlation coefficients in a correlation matrix - YouTube

Channel: NurseKillam

[2]
A correlation matrix displays the correlation coefficients among numerous variables in a
[6]
research study. This type of matrix will appear in hypothesis
[10]
testing or exploratory quantitative research studies, which are designed to test the relationships
[15]
among variables. In order to interpret this matrix you need
[20]
to understand how correlations are measured. Correlation coefficients always range from
[25]
-1 to +1. The positive or negative sign tells you the direction of the relationship and
[32]
the number tells you the strength of the relationship. The most common way to quantify this relationship
[38]
is the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (Munro, 2005).
[42]
Mathematically it is possible to calculate correlations with any level of data. However,
[48]
the method of calculating these correlations will differ based on the level of the data.
[53]
Although Pearson’s r is the most commonly used correlation coefficient, Person’s r
[58]
is only appropriate for correlations between two interval or ratio level variables. When
[63]
examining the formula for Person’s r it is evident that part of the calculation relies
[68]
on knowing the difference between individual cases and the mean. Since the distance between
[73]
values is not known for ordinal data and a mean cannot be calculated, Pearson’s r cannot
[79]
be used. Therefore another method must be used.
[83]
Most other methods have been derived from Pearson’s. Please note that there are also
[88]
other methods for calculating correlations among more than two variables.
[92]
Recall that correlations measure the direction and strength of a linear relationship
[98]
among variables. The direction of the relationship is indicated by the positive or negative sign
[104]
before the number. If the correlation is positive it means that
[109]
as one variable increases so does the other one. People who tend to score high for one
[116]
variable will also tend to score high for another varriable.
[120]
Therefore if there is a positive correlation between hours spent watching course videos
[126]
and exam marks it means that people who spend more time watching the videos tend to get
[131]
higher marks on the exam. Remember that a positive correlation is like
[136]
a positive relationship, both people are moving in the same direction through life together.
[142]
If the correlation is negative it means that as one variable increases the other decreases.
[151]
People who tend to score high for one variable will tend to score low for another.
[156]
Therefore if there is a negative correlation between unmanaged stress and exam marks it
[162]
means that people who have more unmanaged stress get lower marks on their exam.
[168]
Remember that A negative correlation is like a negative relationship, the people in the
[173]
relationship are moving in opposite directions. Remember that The sign (positive or negative)
[179]
tells you the direction of the relationship and the number beside it tells you how strong
[184]
that relationship is. To judge the strength of the relationship consider the actual value
[190]
of the correlation coefficient. Numerous sources provide similar ranges for interpretation
[195]
of the relationships that approximate the ranges on the screen. These ranges provide
[201]
guidelines for interpretation. If you need to memorize these criteria for a course check
[206]
the table your teacher wants you to learn. Of course, the higher the number is the stronger
[211]
the relationship is. In practice, researchers are happy with correlations of 0.5 or higher.
[218]
Also note that when drawing conclusions from correlations the size of the sample as well
[223]
as the statistical significance is considered. Remember that the direction of the relationship
[229]
does not affect the strength of the relationship. One of the biggest mistakes people make is
[235]
assuming that a negative number is weaker than a positive number. In fact, a correlation
[242]
of – 0.80 is just as high or just as strong as a correlation of +0.80.
[250]
When comparing the values on the screen a correlation of -0.75 is actually stronger than a correlation
[258]
of +0.56. If a researcher was investigating the relationship
[264]
between several factors that may influence student marks on an exam the correlation matrix
[269]
may look like this. Notice that there are correlations of 1 on
[273]
a diagonal line across the table. That is because each variable should correlate perfectly
[278]
with itself. Sometimes dashes are used instead of 1s.
[283]
In a correlation matrix, typically only one half of the triangle is filled out. That is
[287]
because the other half would simply be a mirror image of it.
[291]
Examine this correlation matrix and see if you can identify and interpret the correlations.
[296]
A great question for an exam would be to give you a correlation matrix and ask you to find
[301]
and interpret correlations. What is the correlation between completed
[306]
readings and unmanaged stress? What does it mean?
[310]
Which coefficient gives you the most precise prediction?
[313]
Which correlations are small enough that they would not be of much interest to the researcher?
[318]
Which two correlations have the same strength? From looking at these correlations, what could
[323]
a student do to get a higher mark on an exam? Comment below to start a conversation.
[330]
To generalize conclusions from these correlations researchers need to assume a number of things.
[336]
Various measures exist to test these assumptions. To interpret the meaning of correlations researchers
[342]
also consider a number of other measures before drawing conclusions.
[347]
Thank you for watching. Please check out my related videos and subscribe below.