Millions of Distressed Properties Stuck in 'Shaky' U.S. Housing Market - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
bjbjLULU JEFFREY BROWN: The troubled U.S. housing market got a bit of good news today
[4]
with word that some prices are rising, but full recovery remained a long way off. Four
[10]
cities, Chicago, Minneapolis, Washington and Boston, posted the largest increases in the
[16]
latest Case-Shiller home price index. But prices in Detroit, Cleveland, Las Vegas and
[22]
Phoenix were selling at the same levels as January of 2000, more than 10 years ago. What's
[28]
more, the survey of 20 cities found overall home prices have actually fallen over the
[34]
last 12 months. And home sales for this year are on track to be the worst in 14 years.
[40]
And things could get worse yet, once banks pick up the pace on millions of foreclosures,
[46]
as expected. They have been delayed by a government investigation into mortgage lending practices.
[52]
PROTESTERS: Prosecute the criminals! Attorney generals, prosecute the criminals! JEFFREY
[61]
BROWN: Amid anger over the banks' handling of foreclosures, 36 state attorneys general
[62]
and the Obama administration have been trying to negotiate a settlement with the five largest
[67]
mortgage servicers. It could include a lump sum settlement of more than $20 billion that
[73]
states could then use to modify mortgages. Meanwhile, the futures of mortgage giants
[78]
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still to be determined, with a new plan from the Obama
[84]
administration reportedly in the works. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac still back most home loans
[89]
in the U.S. And for a closer look at all this, we turn to Nicolas Retsinas, who teaches housing
[96]
finance and real estate at Harvard Business School, and Guy Cecala, publisher of "Inside
[101]
Mortgage Finance," a housing industry research publication. Nic Retsinas, we will start with
[106]
you. So what do you see in the latest numbers? Is there any sign of hope there? NICOLAS RETSINAS,
[112]
Harvard Business School: Well, there's always a sign of hope, but the signs are very slim.
[116]
It's amazing. Interest rates are at a 50-year low, and yet we have such a tepid housing
[122]
market. And, yes, prices have gone up in a number of cities over the last couple months,
[127]
but they're down from a year ago and really down from where they were almost at beginning
[131]
of the decade. So it's still a very difficult, sort of shaky time in the housing market.
[137]
JEFFREY BROWN: Guy Cecala, the uptick, such as it is, was -- or came in the second quarter.
[143]
The quarter was up, but the year is down. I mean, that's why the -- it was a little
[147]
-- it was interesting to read the reports this morning, just to parse it. GUY CECALA,
[151]
"Inside Mortgage Finance": Yes, it's a little bit -- and emphasis on little bit -- of good
[155]
news. Most people would say the real number to look at is the year-over-year change. And
[160]
as long as we keep declining, that's bad news. I think, cumulative, we have already seen
[164]
a 30 percent or so decline, according to the Case-Shiller index. So, this is just more
[170]
bad news. JEFFREY BROWN: And just to help us with it a little bit more, this seasonal
[174]
adjustment idea, explain that concept, because that plays in to how we read these numbers,
[178]
rights? GUY CECALA: Well, if you look at -- typically, the housing season is the summer months, so
[183]
you would expect to see an increase in the summer months if it was just not adjusted.
[188]
So the difference between the first quarter and the second quarter, the second quarter
[191]
would generally always be more active than the first quarter. When you factor in the
[196]
seasonal adjustment, it tends to flatten out the differences a little more. JEFFREY BROWN:
[201]
Now, Nic Retsinas, fill in the picture a little bit behind the big numbers. Talk about -- you
[205]
mentioned some of the differences in regional and in different cities. What do you see there
[210]
when you look out? NICOLAS RETSINAS: Well, it's a big country. And some markets are in
[215]
better shape than other markets. Clearly, in the markets such as the Southwest, south
[221]
Florida, parts of California, there was such substantial overbuilding that we have a huge
[225]
excess inventory. In other parts of the country, like the Upper Midwest, that have faced severe
[230]
economic problems, you have struggles on the demand side. So while there are some silver
[236]
linings, parts of Texas, parts of the Northeast, where you think we're probably at or near
[241]
a bottom, as long as this foreclosure cloud is hovering overhead, a recovery is going
[247]
to be in the distance. JEFFREY BROWN: But just to fill us in a little bit more, Nic,
[249]
do you -- is it correct to talk about a national housing market at this point, or is it better
[257]
to think in terms of regional housing markets? NICOLAS RETSINAS: Well, it's better to think
[261]
in terms of regional, because people buy homes in particular neighborhoods, not in the United
[265]
States of America. However, we do have a national housing finance system. And that national
[271]
housing finance system is tightening credit, requiring higher down payments. So it is discouraging
[277]
people who might want to buy. And for those who have the means to buy, they're discouraged
[282]
because what they see is a possible downfall in prices. JEFFREY BROWN: What do you see
[286]
in terms of looking at regionally vs. the nation? GUY CECALA: Well, generally, there's
[289]
a lot of difference, as Nic pointed out, between different regions of the country. I guess
[294]
what's so disturbing about the housing trends now is, we're seeing no region of the country
[299]
posting any increases. And it's just a question of which are posting the largest declines
[304]
year over year? And, also, as Nic pointed out, it tends to be the areas that had the
[308]
boom and now they're having the bust. Some of the other areas are a little bit flatter
[312]
in terms of slower declines, but generally every area has seen a decline, and they have
[316]
seen a decline this year. JEFFREY BROWN: Now, we have all mentioned the foreclosure issue.
[321]
Let me start with you, Guy Cecala, on this. It seems as though it's somewhat in limbo
[325]
at this point, given what the attorneys general are doing, what states are doing, legal proceedings.
[329]
What's going on? GUY CECALA: Yes, backing up a little, one of the things that is pushing
[332]
housing prices lower is the fact that we have so many distressed property or foreclosed
[338]
properties that make up housing sales. They tend to have lower prices. And if you compare
[343]
those to what we saw several years ago, it's naturally going to result in price declines.
[349]
The issue going on now is that foreclosures have slowed down. And you might think, gee,
[354]
isn't that good news? But it's not slowing down because unemployment has improved and
[358]
a lot of people are catching up on their mortgages. It's slowing down because there's this big
[363]
settlement that the federal government and mostly the state attorney generals are trying
[367]
to work out with the largest mortgage servicers in this country. And it's bogged down the
[372]
whole foreclosure process, to the point where legitimate foreclosures are being kept out
[377]
of the market. And that's going to create a backlog going forward. JEFFREY BROWN: And
[380]
the point is that we need this process to take place. As painful as it's going to be,
[386]
we need the foreclosures to go forward. GUY CECALA: Yes. We have somewhere in the neighborhood
[390]
of four million distressed properties out there. Those are either seriously delinquent
[395]
mortgages or ones already in the foreclosure process. And most of those loans have to be
[400]
pushed through the system at some point. And the longer we take to get through that, the
[405]
longer the housing market is going to take to recover. JEFFREY BROWN: So, Nic Retsinas,
[408]
what is the holdup with the -- in trying to resolve this issue, particularly with what's
[414]
going on at the state level? NICOLAS RETSINAS: Well, the state attorney generals are suggesting
[419]
that, because of malfunctions and a dysfunctional servicing system, banks have to be held accountable,
[426]
have to modify loans and make payments. And the banks on the one hand are willing to do
[430]
that, as long as they know that's the end of the litigation. But there are some attorney
[435]
generals, like the attorney general of New York, who suggest, no, it's not just the robo-signing,
[440]
it's not just the bad paperwork, but there are other issues, and we should be able to
[445]
follow up on those issues also. All of that leads to stagnation and sluggishness. And
[451]
as Guy said, the pipeline isn't clear anymore. JEFFREY BROWN: And, so, Nic, staying with
[455]
you, what difference would it make once a settlement comes through? What difference
[459]
would it make to consumers and to these banks? NICOLAS RETSINAS: Well, in the short term,
[464]
it would probably even more properties on the market. And in the very near term, it
[469]
might further depress prices. But once we're through with this, we can start dealing with
[473]
the excess inventory. And when we clear the excess inventory, we can have a supply-demand
[478]
balance. And that's when you can see a recovery begin. JEFFREY BROWN: Now, Guy, the administration
[483]
also has talked about its sort of hoped-for plan for new foreclosure settlements. What's
[489]
going on with that? GUY CECALA: Well, they're also trying to work this through. And I think
[494]
there's a of pressure on the administration now to do something to revive the morbid housing
[500]
market. One of the few things they see as necessary is resolving the foreclosure crisis.
[505]
As we said, everybody is sort of in agreement now that there's a huge pipeline that has
[509]
to start moving through the process. And if you keep that backlog, you're not talking
[514]
about a recovery for two or three more years. So the sooner you can do it, the better. And
[518]
that's why I think the administration is trying to goose along this settlement as much as
[523]
they can. They just haven't had a lot of luck. JEFFREY BROWN: Are there things they can do
[526]
beyond the settlement, various proposals they're looking at? GUY CECALA: Well, keep in mind
[532]
that they have to -- any proposal they look at can't cost much money -- or any money -- which
[536]
makes it very difficult. One of the few things you hear a lot of talk about these days is
[540]
utilizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and particularly all the mortgages that they control,
[547]
and somehow creating an environment where borrowers who are current on their mortgages,
[552]
but can't refi because of tough underwriting or a lack of equity, could suddenly be allowed
[557]
to capitalize on historically low rates. That would pump some more money into the economy
[563]
and certainly help tens of thousands of people lower their mortgage payments. JEFFREY BROWN:
[568]
Nic Retsinas, what are you hearing in that regard in terms of what proposals might be
[574]
on the table for dealing with the for dealing with the foreclosure settlements? NICOLAS
[580]
RETSINAS: Well, a couple weeks ago, the administration put forth a request for information, a request
[585]
for ideas dealing with the foreclosed properties. They seemed to indicate they were open to
[590]
investors buying large pools of foreclosed properties and perhaps convert them into rental
[595]
housing, somewhat similar to the Resolution Trust Corporation over 20 years ago. So that's
[600]
what they're looking at because they too come to that same conclusion. Until we get the
[605]
foreclosures through the pipe, we're not going to be able to establish what the market clearing
[609]
price is. JEFFREY BROWN: Now, Nic, one last big issue hanging out there -- and we just
[612]
heard you mention Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Clearly, the administration -- there's a lot
[616]
of conjecture about their future. But clearly, Nic, the administration is treading carefully
[622]
here as well, right? NICOLAS RETSINAS: Absolutely. And, in some ways, ironically, there is consensus
[628]
on both sides of the aisle that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can't continue in any way,
[632]
shape or form similar to their current structure. But on the other hand, the housing finance
[637]
system and the housing market is so fragile, these entities are providing life support.
[642]
So they're between a rock and a hard place in determining how to proceed and when to
[645]
proceed. JEFFREY BROWN: Is that what you see happening, Guy? GUY CECALA: Yes. In the first
[649]
half of this year, we tracked numbers, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were accounting
[652]
for 70 percent of all new mortgages being made. JEFFREY BROWN: Still that high? GUY
[657]
CECALA: Still that high. And when they're doing... JEFFREY BROWN: Even after all these
[659]
years of the problems? GUY CECALA: Exactly. And when they're doing that, you really can't
[663]
talk about dialing them back or changing them dramatically. And I think it really puts that
[667]
-- a serious debate on that on hold for a year or two. There's really nothing you can
[672]
do. JEFFREY BROWN: So -- but are there serious proposals on the table, or, literally, at
[676]
this point, it's just got to get to the next step before we can think about that? GUY CECALA:
[680]
I think we have to get to the next step. Also, when you talk about serious proposals, the
[684]
biggest complaint is what Fannie and Freddie did in the past. I don't think anybody is
[688]
complaining what Fannie and Freddie are doing now. And so do we want to create new entities
[693]
or authorize private companies to do what Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are doing well
[698]
right now? It makes it a very difficult decision. JEFFREY BROWN: So, Nic Retsinas, just to bring
[702]
it full circle here, now we're looking -- now we're in the fall season. What do you look
[707]
at normally in the housing market? What is supposed to happen? What do we need to happen
[712]
next? NICOLAS RETSINAS: Well, I need -- again, I go back to foreclosures, foreclosures, foreclosures.
[718]
As long as foreclosures, distressed sales, short sales are 30, 40 percent of the market,
[723]
there is going to continue to be downward pressure on prices. So, I'm afraid the silver
[728]
linings we saw in the numbers today may only be temporary. JEFFREY BROWN: Closing word?
[732]
GUY CECALA: I agree 100 percent with what Nic said. You know, the foreclosure situation
[738]
is the real nut that has to be cracked. And that's going to take time to do it. And we're
[742]
not making any progress on it. In fact, we're delaying it. JEFFREY BROWN: All right, Guy
[745]
Cecala, Nic Retsinas, thank you both very much. GUY CECALA: You're welcome. NICOLAS
[748]
RETSINAS: Thank you. h4~! gdpE gdpE gdpE urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags place urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags
[749]
country-region urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags City urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags
[750]
State urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags
[751]
PlaceType JEFFREY BROWN: The troubled U Normal Microsoft Office Word JEFFREY BROWN: The troubled
[752]
U Title Microsoft Office Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8