Rival and excludable goods - YouTube

Channel: Khan Academy

[0]
in this video we're going to do a bit of
[1]
a deep dive in classifying different
[4]
types of goods and before we even get
[6]
into the thick of things i'm going to
[7]
make some definitions so the first
[10]
definition is that of a rival good
[14]
now arrival good one way to think about
[15]
it is if one person uses it it impairs
[18]
the possibility of another person using
[20]
it or it impairs the ability of another
[22]
person using it so one person
[25]
one
[26]
person or party using it
[29]
using
[30]
it
[31]
impairs or oftentimes prevents
[35]
another party another
[38]
person
[39]
from using it or getting the benefit
[43]
using
[44]
it and we're going to talk a lot about
[46]
some goods that are rival goods versus
[49]
non-rival goods now another related idea
[52]
is that of excludability and as we'll
[55]
see sometimes these things go together
[57]
but sometimes they aren't
[59]
so excludable
[62]
excludable means that you could stop
[64]
someone from using it
[66]
can
[67]
stop
[68]
someone
[70]
someone from
[73]
using it you can exclude them
[75]
using it
[77]
so what i'm going to do is i'm going to
[78]
set up a a bit of a matrix where on one
[80]
axis i'm going to think about whether
[82]
something is arrival good or not and
[83]
then on another axis i'm going to think
[85]
about whether it's excludable or not so
[86]
let me just do a big
[88]
two by two matrix here
[91]
so
[93]
that looks big enough
[94]
for me
[96]
and then i said i would do two by two
[98]
that looks like about halfway
[100]
i always underestimate okay that looks
[102]
about halfway
[104]
then i'll do it here
[106]
as well
[107]
and so on this axis i'm going to think
[108]
about whether something is a rival good
[111]
or not
[112]
so
[113]
rival
[114]
good
[115]
question mark this row is it is a rival
[118]
good this row is it is not a rival good
[122]
and then for the columns i'm going to
[124]
think about whether something is an
[126]
excludable good
[128]
so
[129]
excludable
[132]
excludable question mark
[134]
yes
[135]
and no
[137]
so let's start in this first top left
[139]
cell so what are examples of things that
[142]
are both excludable
[144]
and rival goods pause this video and see
[147]
if you can think of any
[149]
well actually many of the things that we
[152]
imagine buying or using fall into this
[154]
top left category
[156]
things like
[158]
a so let's say bananas
[161]
bananas
[162]
are for sure excludable i could prevent
[165]
someone from taking my banana you have
[167]
to pay in order to have access to a
[169]
banana and it for sure is a rival good
[172]
if i have a banana especially if i eat
[174]
that banana well that's definitely going
[175]
to impair your ability to eat that
[178]
banana
[179]
another example is clothing
[182]
it's definitely a rival good if i'm
[184]
wearing this shirt it's going to be very
[185]
difficult for you to wear that shirt as
[187]
well and like bananas you can force
[189]
someone to pay money for that clothing
[191]
they're not just going to get as much
[192]
clothing as they want for free
[194]
you could think of housing
[198]
you can exclude someone from your house
[200]
or from an arbitrary house they have to
[202]
pay for it or pay for the rent and it's
[204]
a rival good if one person or one family
[206]
is using a house it definitely impairs
[207]
the ability for another family to use
[209]
the house and we could keep thinking of
[210]
more and more ideas in this top left in
[213]
general goods in this top left are
[216]
called private goods
[218]
private
[219]
private
[221]
goods
[222]
now let's imagine
[224]
going to things that are excludable but
[228]
maybe not as rivalrous
[231]
and there's
[232]
really a large spectrum of things and as
[234]
we'll see in the future and you can
[235]
imagine some things are kind of blurring
[237]
the line or depends on what context
[239]
you're using it but one example of
[242]
something that is excludable but is not
[244]
necessarily a rival good that one person
[247]
using it doesn't prevent the other
[248]
person from using it in theory something
[250]
like satellite television
[253]
satellite
[255]
satellite tv
[257]
why is that excludable well you can
[259]
force someone to pay to access satellite
[261]
television only if you have access to
[264]
some type of a device or some code you
[266]
might be able to watch the signal but
[268]
the reason why it's not a rival good is
[271]
you have these satellites in space
[273]
here's my little satellite
[275]
and it's beaming it's beaming the signal
[278]
down to earth
[279]
and in theory if i'm receiving the
[282]
signal here and i'm watching satellite
[283]
television it doesn't impair someone
[285]
else's ability to get to watch that
[287]
satellite signal but we have
[289]
artificially made it scarce
[292]
by perhaps making people pay for that
[294]
even though everyone else everyone could
[295]
use it without impairing the ability for
[297]
anyone else to use it and so that's why
[299]
this category of goods is often called
[302]
artificially scarce good
[305]
artificially
[307]
scarce
[309]
scarcity is artificially happening
[311]
because you're making it excludable but
[313]
it doesn't necessarily have to another
[316]
example could be something like a
[317]
private park
[319]
if i go by a bunch of land and i
[321]
landscape it nicely i might say that you
[324]
have to spend a thousand dollars to get
[326]
entry to that park well that is very ex
[328]
that's very exclusive and i'm clearly
[331]
excluding people from that park but in
[333]
theory if i go and enjoy that park and
[335]
if it's large enough well it doesn't
[337]
necessarily impair the ability for
[339]
someone else to enjoy the park as well
[341]
now if if all of a sudden thousands or
[343]
millions of people tried to
[345]
enjoy the park then it might become a
[346]
little bit more rivalrous
[349]
now let's go on the other side things
[350]
that are not so excludable
[353]
well if we think about things that are
[355]
rival goods but not excludable the
[358]
classic example here is fish stocks
[361]
fish
[362]
stocks we're talking about fish talks
[364]
we're talking about let's imagine
[366]
some body of water here and there are
[368]
fish in this body of water
[372]
and let's say that everyone could you
[375]
can't exclude people from it so anyone
[377]
can go and stick their fishing rod into
[379]
this into this pond or into this lake
[382]
and get fish
[384]
but the problem is is that if i get a
[386]
fish that's going to make it hard for
[388]
someone else to get fish you can imagine
[389]
an extreme if enough people are grabbing
[392]
the fish it is impairing the ability for
[394]
other folks to get fish and so this type
[398]
of
[399]
resource or i should say this type of
[400]
good is known as a common resource
[404]
common
[405]
common resource
[408]
and it's prone to what is known as
[410]
tragedy of the commons and we have a
[412]
whole video on tragedy of the commons
[415]
but the tragedy of commons which happens
[417]
for common resources is when every
[419]
individual person acts in their own best
[421]
interest they might say hey i'm just
[422]
going to get as much fish as i need to
[424]
support my family i can even make a
[425]
business out of it i can sell it at the
[427]
end of the day you might do something
[428]
that's not in the common interest and
[431]
it's actually not even in your own
[432]
personal interest long term because if
[434]
enough people fish in the short term and
[436]
get that benefit you might deplete all
[438]
the fish and they're not able to
[439]
reproduce and at some point there are no
[441]
fish left so in the medium to long run
[444]
you have hurt everyone including
[446]
yourself so that would be the tragedy of
[447]
the commons which is typical for a lot
[450]
of things that are common resources
[452]
another thing that you could view as a
[453]
common resource is
[456]
timber
[457]
or wood that's on land that anyone could
[460]
access a lot of cases clean
[462]
clean water
[464]
fresh water i should say not salt water
[466]
fresh water
[468]
now on some level if there's a lot of
[471]
folks doing it it's definitely going to
[473]
be rivalrous but if there's only one or
[475]
two people and your your source of fresh
[478]
water is huge well then it might feel a
[481]
little less rivaller so once again we
[483]
can debate it might be under different
[484]
circumstances
[486]
now last but not least let's think about
[489]
what are examples of things that are
[491]
neither rivalrous nor excludable and
[494]
that whole category is referred to as
[497]
public
[498]
public goods
[500]
pause this video and see if you can
[501]
think of any
[503]
well one thing that is often considered
[505]
a public good is
[508]
air
[509]
now you could debate at some extreme
[511]
level if the air is really used up or
[513]
something you might start to feel like
[515]
it's rivalrous but for most cases when
[518]
one person is breathing air it's not
[520]
impairing the ability for someone else
[523]
to use the air and it's very hard to
[524]
exclude someone from breathing people
[527]
just need to take a breath so it sits
[529]
out here in public goods
[532]
you can imagine something like national
[534]
defense
[535]
national
[537]
defense
[539]
if you are benefiting from national
[540]
defense because of aircraft carriers and
[542]
missile systems and planes and the
[544]
military that the nation has
[546]
does that exclude me your neighbor from
[549]
also benefiting from it no and in fact
[551]
it would be very difficult to exclude
[552]
you'd have to kick me out of the country
[554]
for me to not benefit from the national
[556]
defense so in general we would consider
[557]
it to be non-excludable and then is it a
[560]
rival good well if you are feeling safe
[563]
because of national defense that doesn't
[565]
impair my ability to feel safe from
[568]
national defense so it's also a
[569]
non-rival good at least in most general
[572]
circumstances so i would consider that a
[574]
public good as well now when we talk
[576]
about public goods there's the notion of
[578]
the free writer problem
[581]
free
[582]
writer and that's because you can't
[584]
exclude folks from using it it's usually
[587]
not in the incentive of any entrepreneur
[590]
to try to make these public goods happen
[593]
and so this is typically the domain of
[596]
government and in general when thinking
[598]
about this whole column of things that
[599]
are non-excludable this is a domain
[601]
where the government tries to get
[603]
involved so so we don't have the tragedy
[605]
of the commons with fish stocks or
[607]
timber or fresh water they might put
[609]
some regulation in or some permitting
[611]
process