Bilateral Markets - Sustainable Energy - TU Delft - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
Welcome back!
[2]
Short-term electricity markets are necessary for matching supply and demand on a continuous
[6]
basis, but prices are difficult to predict and the recovery of fixed costs is uncertain.
[13]
Not all producers, nor all consumers, are willing to take these risks.
[18]
Long-term bilateral contracts are an important alternative to spot markets.
[22]
So now we will look at how these contracts are priced.
[26]
In many European countries, a majority of electricity is traded bilaterally between
[31]
producers and large energy consumers or retail companies.
[36]
These contracts reduce the investment risk for the generation companies and the risk
[41]
of electricity price changes for the consumers.
[45]
In European markets, most contracts don’t seem to last longer than 3 years, although
[50]
some contracts are as long as 10 years.
[53]
Because the contracts are private, there is no good overview of them.
[57]
Imagine you were a power producer.
[59]
How would you price your electricity in a long-term contract, say a three-year contract?
[64]
Let’s first have a look at your revenue stream throughout a year.
[68]
As the contract price is constant, your revenue is simply equal to the negotiated price … multiplied
[75]
by the volume of electricity that you sold.
[78]
As you can imagine, marginal cost pricing doesn’t make much sense here.
[83]
If you sold all your power at marginal cost for three years, you would not be recovering
[88]
any of your fixed costs during that time.
[92]
Such a long-term contract only makes sense to you if it covers all your costs, so also
[97]
your fixed costs.
[99]
This means that you need to make sure that the negotiated price per MWh is at least as
[104]
high as your average cost per MWh.
[108]
This way you ensure that your total revenues are at least as high as your total costs.
[115]
Is a consumer willing to pay this much?
[117]
The answer is yes, if he thinks that the negotiated price is equal to, or lower than, the average
[123]
electricity price that he would otherwise have to pay in the short-term market.
[129]
Similarly, you as a producer are willing to sell such a contract only if it pays as much
[135]
or more than what you would get in the spot market.
[138]
However, neither you nor the consumers can predict the electricity prices accurately.
[144]
Therefore, you may choose a long-term contract that is a bit lower than the average expected
[149]
spot price, as long as you recover all your costs.
[154]
This gives you the certainty that you will recover your costs as long as the contract
[157]
runs.
[159]
You may be willing to forgo some chance of higher revenues in exchange for this certainty.
[164]
Similarly, consumers may be willing to pay a bit MORE than the expected spot prices,
[170]
in order to reduce their risk of unforseen high prices.
[173]
As a result, there is some room for price negotiation.
[177]
Let‘s look at an example of a natural gas plant.
[181]
At which price would you sell a long-term bilateral contract?
[184]
Let's say that this plant has variable costs of 45 euro per megawatt-hour and annual fixed
[190]
costs of 25 million euros per year.
[194]
These fixed costs are capital costs - servicing debt payments - and the costs of personnel
[200]
etc.
[201]
The plant has a capacity of 500 megawatt and runs on average 2500 hours a year.
[208]
With this information we can determine the minimum price per megawatt-hour the producer
[212]
should ask for in order to cover all his costs.
[217]
We start with calculating the annual electrity production in MWh by multiplying the plant‘s
[223]
capacity with the operating hours.
[225]
On average, this plant produces 1,250,000 megawatt-hours a year.
[232]
Next, we determine the average fixed costs per megawatt-hour of electricity.
[238]
This can be done by dividing total annual fixed costs by total annual electricity production.
[245]
Total average costs are the sum of the variable costs and the average fixed costs.
[251]
So you would want to receive at least 65 euros per megawatt-hour in a bilateral long-term
[256]
contract.
[258]
We purposely used a fossil-fuel plant for this example.
[262]
Taking a wind farm would make it even more obvious: with almost all expenses being fixed
[266]
costs and very low operating costs, the owner would be silly to sell all its output at variable
[272]
costs - namely, for nearly nothing - for any duration.
[277]
So to summarize: In bilateral markets, long-term electricity contracts are useful for reducing
[282]
risks for both generation companies and consumers.
[286]
Generation companies try to sell their electricity for a price that is at least as high as their
[290]
total average costs.
[293]
Long-term bilateral contracts reduce investment risk for generation companies while consumers
[299]
avoid the uncertainty of short term price variations.