House Prices Are a Con (The Murky World of House Prices, Inflation, and CPI) - YouTube

Channel: Daily Insight

[0]
We all know that house prices in Australia are broken.
[3]
This chart from the Reserve Bank of Australia shows that house prices as a ratio to household
[9]
disposable income, is increasing on average.
[12]
That means it’s becoming increasingly more difficult for the average Australian to afford
[16]
a house as time goes on.
[18]
Obviously, the more expensive housing becomes relative to income, the more debt people need
[24]
to get into to afford said housing.
[27]
It’s a disturbing trend.
[29]
I guess it’s no surprise that the established house price index has been going up at a greater
[34]
rate than the CPI.
[36]
The blue line represents the weighted average of the house price indexes of Australia’s
[41]
eight capital cities.
[42]
This is using the latest data that I could find from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
[48]
The red line represents the CPI, the Consumer Price Index.
[52]
According to the ABS, the CPI measures the average change over time of the prices paid
[57]
by consumers for a fixed basket of goods and services.
[61]
So essentially, it’s a measure of inflation.
[64]
CPI also only represents residents in Australia’s eight capital cities, so this graph is valid
[70]
– it’s comparing apples with apples.
[72]
House prices have been going up at a much greater rate than inflation.
[77]
So my first instinct was, house prices are simply not included in inflation data.
[83]
I mean, if they were, then surely CPI should be rising at a much greater rate.
[88]
So I consulted the ABS’s Consumer Price Index FAQ.
[92]
Scrolling through, there’s tonnes of questions about Cost of Living, CPI Construction, Interpreting
[98]
CPI Results, Analytical Measures of Inflation, Further Information, Introduction of Carbon
[104]
Pricing, and the very last question (and I’m not joking here), What Role Does Housing Play
[109]
in the CPI?
[111]
Yes, that’s the very last question.
[113]
Either it was the most recent question that the ABS added to this FAQ, or they simply
[118]
don’t want people to easily find the answer to this important question.
[122]
In my opinion, shouldn’t Further Information be at the bottom?
[126]
Wouldn’t that make more sense?
[127]
Anyway, in answering the question, “Does the ABS include housing in the CPI and/or
[132]
Living Cost Indexes?” – the least important question apparently – they reply, “Housing
[138]
plays an important role in the calculation of the CPI with almost 23 per cent of all
[143]
spending by Australian households being directed towards housing”.
[147]
I like how they answered a yes/no question with a non-yes/no question response.
[151]
Anyway, continuing, “Almost 8 per cent of all household spending is directed towards
[156]
the purchase of a new dwelling, while rents attract around 7 per cent of total spending
[161]
by households”.
[162]
Then they talk about electricity, gas and water making up almost 8% of spending.
[167]
This all sounds a little bit like beating around the bush to me.
[171]
Onto the next paragraph, “Of note, land is excluded from the calculation of the Australia
[176]
CPI”.
[178]
Why?
[178]
Because, “the purchase of land is considered an investment rather than consumption”.
[183]
And apparently, this is in accordance with “international statistical standards”.
[188]
So in summary, only new dwellings are included in the CPI calculations, but not the land
[193]
they sit on.
[194]
And importantly, established dwellings are also not included!
[199]
So if you buy a secondhand house that has risen in price over the last year by say 15%,
[204]
that massive increase in price is not reflected in the Consumer Price Index.
[210]
This information (or should I say, misinformation) is corroborated by the Reserve Bank of Australia
[216]
in their Statement on Monetary Policy – May 2019.
[220]
They state, “The new dwelling purchase component of the CPI captures the cost of adding to
[225]
the housing stock – newly built dwellings and major renovations.
[229]
It is measured as the price of a new dwelling, excluding the value of the land.
[234]
Purchases of established dwellings are not captured in the CPI, because they are treated
[239]
as transfers of existing assets.
[242]
As a result, the price of established dwellings has no direct influence on CPI inflation.”
[248]
So yes, this makes a lot of sense now.
[250]
CPI doesn’t include established dwellings.
[253]
It doesn’t include land.
[255]
Essentially, it only includes the material cost and labour of your NEW house which you
[260]
will probably only ever buy once in your lifetime.
[263]
To be fair, lots of people NEVER buy a new house, so according to this data, you are
[268]
never experiencing housing inflation.
[271]
I call BS on that.
[273]
The CPI simply does not represent the actual cost of housing.
[277]
So why does any of this matter?
[279]
Well, one reason, according to the ABS’s FAQ, “The CPI affects almost all Australians
[285]
because of the many ways it is used.
[288]
It is used by the government and economists to monitor and evaluate levels of inflation
[293]
in the Australian economy, and for adjusting fixed payments, such as pensions and contracts”.
[299]
So if you’re a pensioner (or a JobSeeker, or a JobKeeper, or whatever the hell they
[304]
call it nowadays, your payments are simply not going to keep up with the cost of housing.
[309]
The system has been inherently designed that way.
[311]
House prices will always rise faster than the CPI because of the way it’s been designed.
[317]
Anything that is based on the CPI will lag behind house prices.
[322]
If we go back to the ABS FAQ, they also included one important note here, “Land and the dwelling
[328]
for both new and established houses are included in the calculation of the ABS Selected Living
[334]
Cost Indexes (SLCIs)”.
[338]
So of course, I wanted to take a look at this SLCI.
[341]
I think they would have been better offer naming it SLIC — SLICK — but that’s
[345]
just my humble opinion.
[347]
So we’re met with this giant table with a whole host of living cost indexes for various
[352]
goods and services.
[354]
If I zoom up here and look at Housing, the LCI for most groups is 0.4, but the CPI is
[361]
not all that much different at 0.3!
[364]
I thought these SLCIs were supposed to include all housing price information.
[368]
But looking next to the word “Housing”, we can see they have a small letter “a”,
[373]
which obviously refers to a footnote.
[375]
Looking at the footnote it says, “New dwelling purchases by owner-occupiers are included
[381]
in the CPI but EXCLUDED from the Selected Living Cost Indexes”.
[386]
They just can’t help themselves.
[388]
They just can’t seem to bring themselves to include all housing data in a single index.
[393]
It’s just absurd!
[394]
So why are the government doing this?
[396]
Why are they so desperate to exclude housing from inflation?
[400]
I’ll tell you why, because if inflation increases, house prices will go down.
[405]
And guess what?
[406]
The Government don’t want house prices to go down.
[409]
How do I know any of this?
[410]
Because I can see it on the RBA’s website.
[413]
You see, the RBA have a target inflation range of 2-3%.
[417]
If they included housing, then inflation would skyrocket!
[421]
What happens when inflation skyrockets?
[423]
Again, according to the RBA, consumers’ purchasing power goes down.
[427]
Consequently, workers may then seek larger wage increases.
[431]
Of course, we don’t want that to happen.
[433]
We don’t want workers being able to afford housing.
[436]
How do the RBA offset high inflation?
[439]
They do it by increasing the cash rate.
[441]
When inflation is too high for too long, the RBA increases interest rates.
[446]
What effect does increased interest rates have on the economy?
[449]
Well, first of all, savers are rewarded.
[452]
They get more interest when they put money in the bank.
[455]
Consequently, economic activity goes down because people are less likely to spend and
[460]
more likely to save.
[462]
Secondly, because interest rates are high, people are less able to afford a mortgage,
[468]
and house prices go down.
[470]
Obviously, that’s not what the Australian Government want.
[473]
They want the opposite.
[474]
Consequently, we’ve found ourselves in a situation where interest rates have steadily
[478]
been going down over the last 30 years.
[481]
Why?
[482]
To keep house prices inflated.
[484]
As interest rates go down, house prices go up.
[488]
And that’s exactly what’s happened over the same time period.
[491]
This is why inflation data does not include housing, at least, not in its entirely.
[496]
The system is being manipulated by the powers that be to keep Australian house prices at
[501]
some of the most expensive and unaffordable levels in the world.
[505]
This keeps rich people rich.
[507]
This keeps you in debt.
[509]
And when you’re in debt, you’ll keep working in a job that you probably don’t like, which
[513]
makes you a good little citizen who does what they’re told.
[517]
And thanks to all this government manipulation that keeps house prices higher than they should
[521]
be, that’s why I titled this video, “House Prices Are a Con”, because they are.
[527]
And that’s all I have to say on this matter.
[529]
Thanks for watching.