The Rise of INDUSTRIAL CAPITALISM [APUSH Review Unit 6 Topic 6] Period 6: 1865-1898 - YouTube

Channel: Heimler's History

[0]
Well hey there and welcome back to Heimler’s  History. We’ve been going through unit 6 of  
[2]
the AP U.S. History curriculum and in this video  we’re going to talk about the rise of industrial  
[7]
capitalism in America. So if you’re ready to  get them brain cows milked, let’s get to it.
[12]
So as I said in the last video, industrialism  describes the change in the way things are made  
[16]
for sale, specifically the move toward mass  production and mass consumption of goods.  
[21]
And generally, historians call this period of  American history The Gilded Age. If something is  
[25]
gilded that means it’s covered in gold. But to say  something is gilded tells you nothing about what’s  
[30]
underneath the gold. In my estimation, the Gilded  Age was something akin to a gold covered turd. In  
[35]
this video we’re going to talk about the gold, and  in the next video we’ll talk about the turd below.
[40]
So during the Gilded Age in the late 1800s  small, locally owned businesses basically became  
[45]
obsolete and defunct due to the rise of large  corporations and trusts that eventually dominated  
[51]
entire industries, especially the railroad,  steel, and oil industries. Now I talked a good  
[55]
deal about the railroads in the last video,  so here let me just focus on oil and steel.
[59]
In the oil industry, the name you need to  know is John D. Rockefeller. He was the  
[63]
owner of Standard Oil, and as the company grew  he made many shrewd business moves that forced  
[68]
his competitors to sell their companies to him,  thus eliminating the competition. By the late  
[73]
1880s Standard Oil controlled almost 90% of the  oil industry. Now this particular practice of  
[79]
consolidation was called horizontal integration,  and by definition, this just means that one  
[84]
company eventually buys out all its competitors  until there is effectively no competition left.
[89]
In the steel industry, the name you need to  know is Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie was, like  
[92]
Rockefeller, a shrewd businessman and grew his  company to the point where it dominated the steel  
[97]
industry, except Carnegie didn’t consolidate  his interests through horizontal integration,  
[102]
he was more of the vertical integration  persuasion. Vertical integration is when  
[105]
a company acquires all the complementary  industries that support its business. For  
[109]
example, over time Carnegie was able to buy  up companies that handled all parts of steel  
[114]
production from mining companies to processing  companies to distribution companies. Again,  
[118]
that means complete domination of the  industry with little room for competition.
[122]
Now these industries and others like them  grew so big and so powerful that they  
[126]
began increasingly looking outside the United  States to gain control over foreign markets and  
[131]
resources. At the end of the century American  is going to have the opportunity to become an  
[135]
empire by acquiring overseas territories,  and we’ll talk an awful lot about that  
[138]
in another video. But here it's enough to  know that many Americans had no interest  
[143]
in America becoming an empire since, after  all, no small part of our birth narrative  
[147]
as a country had to do with breaking away from  an empire. However, that was not the case with  
[152]
these industry leaders. They looked abroad  into places like the Pacific Rim and Asia  
[155]
and Latin America and could see the opportunity  to acquire new markets to sell stuff to people  
[160]
and new places from which they could acquire  natural resources. So the impetus for empire  
[165]
in America is going to include a significant  influence from these leaders of industry.
[170]
At this point you can start to see the gold  wearing thin and the turd is starting to peek out,  
[174]
but we’re going to cover that right back up  and deal with it in the next video. Now both of  
[178]
these men, and the others who followed similar  practices grew fabulously wealthy during this  
[183]
time. And there were several reasons they were  able to get away with these kinds of practices.
[187]
The first reason was the proliferation of  laissez faire government policies. As I’ve  
[190]
mentioned before, laissez faire, when  being translated, means something like  
[194]
“let alone.” And so politicians during this  time almost had an allergic reaction to any  
[198]
government intervention or regulation over these  business practices. And it could be that these  
[202]
politicians really believed that government  regulation was harmful to the noble principles  
[207]
of free enterprise. Or maybe it was that guys  like John D. Rockefeller kept stuffing buttloads  
[212]
of money in their pockets to keep them from  passing regulations. You know, potato, potahto.
[216]
The second reason these men were able to grow  so wealthy is because they relied heavily on a  
[220]
large pool of underpaid laborers like immigrants,  women, and children. I mentioned in a previous  
[225]
video that during this period there was  a huge influx of immigrants from Europe,  
[228]
and while some of them settled in the west,  the vast majority of them streamed into  
[232]
urban industrial centers looking for work. They  were vastly underpaid, and again, there was no  
[237]
governmental regulation on wages, and they weren’t  able to ask for higher wages because if they did,  
[241]
there were ten other immigrants looking for jobs  who would work at the lower wage. Additionally,  
[246]
factory owners realized that in this age of  unskilled labor they could employ women and  
[250]
children to work the machines as  well. And they didn’t hire women  
[253]
because they were all progressive and  waving the flag of gender equality. No,  
[257]
they discovered that they could employ women and  pay them about a quarter of what they paid men.
[261]
The third reason these kinds of business  practices were tolerated was because of  
[264]
the application of Social Darwinism  to economics. Now in case you forgot,  
[268]
Social Darwinism is similar to biological  Darwinism. In nature, the strong eat the  
[273]
weak and it’s all survival of the fittest. Social  Darwinism argued that if that’s how nature works,  
[279]
why not apply that to society? Strong nations  should eat weak nations. And in this case,  
[283]
strong companies should eat weak companies, as is  the way of nature. And in that way, these folks  
[288]
argued, the world’s wealth would be concentrated  into the hands of those who were deemed fittest.
[294]
Now all of these were standard practices  for men like Rockefeller and Carnegie,  
[297]
and those who followed their example. However,  Carnegie mitigated these brutal practices  
[303]
through what he called the Gospel of Wealth.  Carnegie argued that those with extraordinary  
[307]
wealth had a duty from God to invest their  wealth back into society through generous  
[311]
acts of philanthropy. And this wasn’t just a  philosophical argument for him: Carnegie gave away  
[315]
something like $350 million to build libraries and  concert halls and universities. So in that way,  
[321]
Carnegie had a little more gold than  turd, and you know, small victories.
[325]
Now you’ll often hear guys like Carnegie  and Rockefeller and Collins Huntington  
[329]
and Mark Hanna referred to by one of  two titles. Some folks refer to them  
[333]
as captains of industry. And, of course,  that title presupposes a favorable opinion  
[338]
of them and their practices. On the other  hand, you might hear them referred to as  
[340]
robber barrons. And that would be the more  negative connotation of their contributions  
[344]
to American society. And the decision on which  label is more appropriate, I’ll leave to you.
[349]
Thanks for watching, and if  you need more help on Unit 6,  
[351]
then click right here. Additionally if you need  more help getting an A in your class and a five  
[354]
on your exam in May, you can click here and  grab my Ultimate Review Packet. And lastly,  
[358]
if you want to consolidate Heimler’s History  as the industry of your APUSH review world,  
[362]
then go ahead and subscribe and I shall  keep making videos for you. Heimler out.