Change of disability definition used to deny long term disability benefits - YouTube

Channel: Dell Disability Law

[0]
GREG DELL: Hi, I'm attorney Greg Dell, here
[1]
with attorney Stephen Jessup.
[3]
And, Steve, I want to talk to you about something that's
[6]
probably one of the top five reasons
[7]
that we see claim denials.
[9]
And that has to do with the change in definition that
[12]
comes about in a long-term disability policy.
[16]
And that, obviously, has to do with the change
[20]
from an own-occupation definition
[22]
usually to an any-occupation definition.
[26]
Or it used to be that you're able to do your own occupation,
[29]
and then you can't do a job that pays you more than 60%
[32]
of what you used to make.
[33]
But, for the most part, they're usually,
[35]
it's from your own occupation to any gainful occupation, which
[37]
is very similar to the social security disability standard,
[41]
and very common in almost every group long-term disability
[44]
policy because all of these group disability
[47]
carriers, governed by ERISA, make you apply
[49]
for Social Security disability.
[51]
So they kind of tie that in to say, look, after 12 months
[55]
or 24 months of getting paid benefits,
[57]
your definition is going to change.
[60]
So we know that a big chunk of the calls we get every week are
[64]
either I've been denied because they changed my definition,
[66]
or they've notified me they're doing
[69]
an evaluation of my claim, and they're
[72]
saying that I'm going to have this change of definition
[74]
in four or five months.
[75]
What can I do?
[76]
So let's talk about, first, some things
[79]
that possibly people could do, to prepare
[81]
for the change in definition to help avoid a denial.
[84]
STEPHEN JESSUP: I think really it
[86]
starts from the beginning of the claim.
[88]
The vast majority of people are going
[90]
to have jobs that fall in a sedentary, light duty capacity.
[94]
So, when an insurance company is reviewing your ability
[98]
to do your own occupation during that initial 24 months,
[102]
at the end of the day, as much as they are supposed
[104]
to look at the actual material and substantial duties,
[106]
they usually try to just dumb it down
[108]
to what those physical demands are of the job.
[111]
So, in setting up, say you do have a desk-level job,
[114]
you do sedentary work--
[116]
from the get-go, you're not only trying to necessarily establish
[119]
that you can't do your particular job,
[121]
but you can't do anything else that will require
[123]
the same physical abilities.
[125]
A lot of people just kind of take it
[127]
for granted when the claim's approved
[128]
and think, oh, two years down the road, that's so far away.
[132]
But the reviews that the insurance companies are doing
[134]
start very soon on.
[135]
And then, within six to eight months before the change
[138]
full-blown, is when they're really
[139]
going to start looking at it.
[141]
So some of the things you really need
[142]
to be cognizant of-- what the medical records are saying,
[145]
and we've seen a lot where the doctors don't necessarily
[148]
document all the complaints that are happening.
[150]
Or there's this standardized software
[152]
where you click the boxes.
[154]
And there's maybe a little blurb about what's going on.
[157]
So, if there's any-- if there's contradictory evidence in those
[161]
records because of a data entry problem,
[163]
compared to what's written, insurance companies will look
[167]
at that, or if the records aren't documenting much
[170]
of anything, it sounds by--
[173]
acquiescence by sounds-- if it's not there,
[175]
it's not happening, kind of a thing.
[176]
So, first and foremost, the biggest for any claim,
[179]
and then long-term, longevity of it,
[181]
is going to be what is in those medical records.
[184]
GREG DELL: And so, like you said,
[186]
when I look at any claim-- and we help people apply
[189]
for benefits all the time, and then we help them manage
[191]
their claim--
[192]
I really look at the change of definition
[194]
as almost starting over again.
[196]
And often they send it to a new claims adjuster
[198]
because that's like the way the claims people are trained
[201]
is, OK, they got approved for this first thing.
[203]
And then we're going to look at their medical records
[206]
every couple months and see if they're still eligible.
[209]
Oh, in my training as a claim rep,
[211]
now I got this changed definition.
[214]
I'm going to re-evaluate the whole damn thing
[216]
and see if I can come up with a reason to not pay the claim.
[218]
And you were right.
[219]
The first place is in the medical records.
[222]
So what we do is, obviously, we're
[224]
regularly getting the medical records and reviewing them.
[227]
We're also consulting and advising our clients
[231]
as to how they should be communicating
[234]
from a medical/legal perspective with their doctor
[238]
to make sure things are documented appropriately
[240]
in their records because, like you said,
[241]
everything's automated.
[242]
I think it's required now by law to have the digital files.
[246]
And a lot of these things have software
[247]
that go through range of motion, levels of pain,
[252]
and then the dermatomes.
[254]
Do you have loss of sensation on a one through five scale?
[258]
And often it starts off-- it's not often.
[259]
It does start off that everything's normal.
[262]
So, if you have a doctor who is not very detailed
[264]
and leaves a person who's saying, I've got numbness
[266]
in my fingers, numbness running down my arm,
[269]
and I have weakness in my hands, the doctor
[271]
has five out of five for all of the symptoms saying,
[273]
there's nothing wrong with you.
[275]
And then, where it says musculoskeletal area,
[277]
do you have any discomfort in the neck, the back,
[279]
the shoulders, and it says none, but yet you
[282]
do, the insurance companies eat that up.
[284]
And the doctor will get it back later after the fact
[287]
and go, no, I know you told me about this and that.
[289]
Sorry, it was my program that defaults to normal.
[292]
So that's a big thing.
[294]
It's very important to review the records.
[296]
And often, without representation, the doctors
[299]
are hesitant to give the records to the claimants
[301]
because they don't want the patients analyzing
[304]
all of the records.
[305]
But when they have a lawyer and they realize the importance
[308]
of that, of somebody guiding them and helping
[311]
to avoid a denial, it's also less work
[313]
for the doctor down the road.
[317]
The other things-- talk about, very often, we
[320]
see the company might change the definitions coming,
[322]
and they want to come see me.
[324]
What is that about?
[325]
And what should a person be aware of?
[327]
I know we've done a lot of videos on that.
[329]
But in a nutshell, why are they doing that?
[331]
STEPHEN JESSUP: They want to put eyes on you.
[333]
They want to see what you look like,
[335]
how you're presenting, especially if it's
[336]
a pain-related condition.
[339]
The people that come out are trained to interview
[342]
and investigate.
[343]
If you're saying you have a bad back and you can't sit,
[346]
but you sit for a two-hour field interview
[348]
without much signs of discomfort,
[350]
these types of things will be noted.
[352]
Depending on the insurance company,
[354]
they may have already done video surveillance
[355]
prior to coming to see you.
[357]
And then they're going to see if you're
[359]
going to, basically, contradict what they
[360]
captured so they can catch you looking like you're lying.
[364]
And if you're lying about this, then their whole claim review
[367]
is going to be within that guise that you're
[369]
going to lie to them because most of the problems
[371]
that you're going to have, especially
[373]
in the pain-related conditions, are subjective in nature.
[375]
So they're looking for ways to show that you're not being
[378]
truthful more than anything.
[381]
And, really, it's just to put eyes on you
[383]
to determine that level of veracity.
[386]
GREG DELL: And, when we are representing clients,
[388]
we participate in that conference.
[390]
We prep the claimants for the conference.
[392]
We limit the scope of that conference.
[394]
We make sure that the claimant doesn't sit there and feel
[398]
uncomfortable, answering what they need to answer
[401]
and not answering what they shouldn't answer.
[403]
Also, sometimes they hire these third-party outside companies
[406]
who don't know anything about the claim.
[408]
And they come there and ask you 100 things
[409]
that they shouldn't be asking.
[412]
The other thing we see before the change in definition
[416]
is those extensive activities of daily living questionnaires.
[421]
How important is it, the manner in which
[423]
those forms are filled out?
[424]
STEPHEN JESSUP: Crucial, especially some companies,
[426]
the ones that they'll send to the doctors at that point--
[430]
when you look through the answers they provide
[432]
to the doctor, they basically corner the doctor
[437]
to write that you have some level of functional ability
[440]
to work.
[441]
They'll have boxes.
[441]
This person could do this-- sedentary, frequently,
[444]
occasionally.
[445]
They never give the option for the doctor saying, no,
[447]
they can't do this on the form.
[449]
They're specifically engineered to basically give
[452]
a result that is, a lot of times, different than what
[455]
the doctor actually believes.
[457]
We speak to people who read the denial letter.
[459]
I had one just the other day.
[461]
And I said to the client, I said,
[464]
did your doctor really say this?
[466]
She's like, I don't know.
[467]
I can't believe he would say this because he was telling me
[471]
X, Y, and Z.
[472]
So they are really focused on extracting
[475]
what piece of information they want to go into this idea of we
[479]
had a reasonable basis to deny the claim,
[481]
or to give their reviewing doctors a really nice something
[485]
they can just clamp onto to also try to steamroll the denial.
[488]
So those forms are very, very important
[490]
because they're going to be looking
[492]
to see if it's been consistent with what's been there.
[495]
Also, you also sometimes get weird situations,
[498]
where a person has been out of work for a little while,
[500]
so certain things should be improving, from the rest,
[505]
and stuff like that.
[506]
So, if the medical objective evidence isn't supporting
[510]
a worsening of conditions, a worsening of problems,
[513]
but the person's reporting much harder restrictions
[517]
and inability to do things, that's
[519]
also going to raise an eyebrow with the insurance company.
[521]
So it's really a continuity of information that's required.
[524]
GREG DELL: The other thing I find
[526]
important is educating the doctor that they're
[528]
going to get this random call from a nurse or a doctor
[531]
to go ahead and discuss the claimant's claim.
[534]
And that's kind of like behind the back of the claimant.
[537]
The doctor gets cold called and doesn't know about it.
[539]
So we often prep our clients to have that conversation
[543]
with the doctor to say, look, you really
[545]
shouldn't speak to this person because--
[548]
a couple reasons, one, the doctor from the insurance
[550]
company will often call, have a meeting,
[552]
and write up whatever that doctor wants without sending
[556]
a confirmation to the doctor.
[558]
So, if that does happen, we always advise our clients,
[560]
make sure that, if the doctor does
[562]
speak to the insurance company, that there's
[564]
a confirmation sent back to the doctor
[565]
that the doctor can comment on.
[567]
What I see is sometimes there is this confirmation sent.
[570]
And it's a random fax.
[571]
It comes in and says, we spoke.
[573]
This is what was said.
[574]
Half the time, it's not what was said.
[575]
And, if you don't reply in 24 hours,
[577]
we'll assume that you agree with everything that's in here.
[580]
And it's always written pro-insurance company,
[583]
meaning that the claimant basically
[585]
doesn't have the restrictions and limitations
[587]
that the claimant actually has.
[590]
And those are very commonly used.
[592]
So we're always advocating, when we're involved,
[595]
don't let that conversation happen.
[597]
Make the doctor from the insurance company
[599]
send the questions in writing.
[601]
Then the doctor can prepare answers
[602]
which can be reviewed by the claimant
[604]
to make sure they accurately reflect what's going on.
[607]
So that's another tool that's used by the insurance companies
[610]
all the time to deny the claims.
[615]
Another technique we see often by Sun Life,
[617]
and some of the other companies are doing this,
[619]
is, hey, your definition of disability is changing.
[622]
We're going to offer you six months of benefits
[624]
because we're probably going to cut you off anyhow.
[626]
And, if you take those six months,
[628]
then your policy is over.
[629]
And they try to scare you into accepting a settlement.
[632]
Have you ever encouraged anyone to take one of those?
[634]
STEPHEN JESSUP: No, no.
[635]
Unless the person is planning on trying to do something,
[639]
or going back, or there's some life situation,
[642]
no, they're just selling themselves short.
[644]
I've seen people who've signed it.
[646]
And then I've been contacted.
[647]
And Sun Life's the biggest one.
[648]
It's a strong arm buyout.
[650]
And then they want to withdraw it.
[651]
But they've already signed off on it, accepted the money.
[654]
And there's really nothing that can be done at that point.
[656]
So a lot of times people will call and like,
[658]
hey, I got a buyout offer from Sun Life.
[660]
And my first question is, how long have you been on claim?
[663]
And if it's been under two years,
[664]
I know that's probably what they're looking to do,
[667]
is to deny them after it.
[668]
And so, all right, we'll pay the remainder now
[670]
and give you a couple months and let you go on your merry way.
[674]
GREG DELL: And some of the other things that we'll do to prepare
[677]
is we'll do additional testing.
[681]
If it's a psych thing, we might do updated neuropsychological
[684]
testing.
[685]
We may encourage a doctor to send
[686]
a claimant for a functional capacity exam
[688]
because we know they're going to do that.
[691]
So we need to do it before they do it
[693]
so that we have the better objective data, the more
[696]
current data, as to what's going on
[697]
at the time of the change in definition
[699]
because we know all the tools that they're going to use
[701]
to try to cut off a benefit.
[704]
And that becomes a problem.
[706]
So you really need to be aware of all
[708]
of these things that can go on at the change of definition.
[710]
Or, often it's not just before.
[712]
It might be a couple months after.
[714]
And the video surveillance you touched on before
[716]
is absolutely gigantic at that change.
[718]
STEPHEN JESSUP: Very much so.
[720]
GREG DELL: And they're going to try
[721]
to make-- they're going to try to get you
[722]
on video for a couple of days.
[723]
Or I've seen them go for a month here, a month there.
[727]
They come back a couple days at a time.
[729]
And if they're sending you for an IME exam at that time--
[731]
we didn't talk about that--
[733]
that's very common that they'll want to hire an outside doctor.
[737]
They call them IMEs, which stands for Independent Medical
[740]
Exam.
[740]
We call them compulsory medical exams
[742]
because you have to go to them and there is
[744]
nothing independent about them.
[746]
So we have other videos about how to prepare for that.
[748]
And if you are dealing with all of these situations,
[751]
between having to do new paperwork,
[753]
possibly being interviewed, having
[755]
to deal with video surveillance, having
[756]
to be sent to a compulsory medical exam,
[760]
having to deal with your doctor, who may be challenging
[762]
and not supporting the claim or understanding
[764]
what it means to have this change of definition,
[769]
these are all things that we're here to help you with
[771]
and that we deal with on a daily basis.
[773]
We encourage you to call us.
[775]
We're always going to offer you a free consultation.
[777]
Any of the lawyers here at our firm
[779]
are available to help you anywhere in the country.
[781]
And we look forward to the opportunity to speak with you.