Regulation A+ Tier 1 Offerings Do Not Preempt State Law - YouTube

Channel: Anthony L.G., PLLC

[7]
I am attorney Laura Anthony founding partner of Legal & Compliance, a full service corporate
[12]
securities and business transactions law firm.
[16]
Today is the continuation in a Law Cast series detailing Regulation A+, and in particular,
[24]
today I will discuss state law concerns.
[28]
Tier 1 offerings do not preempt state law and accordingly, any companies intending to
[34]
test the waters for a Tier 1 offering must comply with the individual state laws in which
[40]
they intend to qualify the offering.
[42]
This process can be expensive and tricky and is only practical for companies that only
[48]
intend to sell the offering in a small number of states.
[52]
The NASAA offers a coordinated review process that is helpful but I would still only advise
[59]
using Tier 1 if the offering is limited in geographic scope.
[64]
Although a Tier 2 offering does not require state registration and review, the individual
[71]
states specifically maintain the right and jurisdiction to investigate and bring enforcement
[76]
actions with respect to fraud or deceit, or unlawful conduct by an issuer, related party
[83]
or any broker, dealer or funding portal in any transaction.
[88]
Moreover, the states can require a notice filing and the payment of a fee.
[93]
The law specifically allows the states to require a copy of any document filed with
[98]
the SEC, together with annual or periodic reports of the value of securities sold, or
[105]
offered to be sold to persons located in the state as long as such filing is solely for
[111]
notice purposes and for the assessment or calculation of a fee.
[116]
States may also require the filing of a consent to service of process.
[121]
The timing and fees associated with blue sky notice filings vary.
[125]
Accordingly, even for covered securities, a review of state blue sky laws is necessary.
[132]
As a result of potential blue sky issues when testing the waters under Tier 2, I often use
[138]
an added disclaimer as follows: No offer to sell securities or solicitation of an offer
[144]
to buy securities is being made in any state where such offer or sale is not permitted
[150]
under the blue sky or state securities laws thereof.
[154]
No offering is being made to individual investors unless and until the offering has been registered
[160]
in that state or an exemption from registration exists.
[165]
Acme, Inc. intends to complete an offering under Tier 2 or Regulation A and as such intends
[172]
to be exempted from state registration pursuant to federal law.
[177]
Although an exemption from registration under state law may be available, Acme may still
[181]
be required to provide a notice filing and pay a fee in individual states.
[187]
Also, even when an offering is preempted from state blue sky laws, the ability to sell the
[192]
offering may not be.
[194]
In particular, the federal law offering preemption does not preempt broker-dealer registration
[200]
requirements associated with an offering.
[204]
Although most states offer an issuer鈥檚 exemption from broker dealer registration for those
[209]
companies selling their offering directly without a broker-dealer, five states do not
[215]
have such an exemption for public offerings such as Regulation A+.
[220]
In particular, Florida, New York, Texas, Arizona and North Dakota all require broker dealer
[227]
registration for companies who self-underwrite or self-place public offerings.
[232]
These states offer a limited broker dealer registration for companies and their officers
[238]
and directors that are selling the offering without the assistance of a FINRA member broker
[244]
dealer.
[245]
I am securities attorney Laura Anthony, founding partner of Legal & Compliance, and producer
[250]
of LawCast.
[252]
Should you have any questions about today鈥檚 topic, please visit Securitieslawblog.com
[258]
and LawCast.com, or contact me directly.
[261]
Inquiries of a technical nature are always encouraged.