How do carbon markets work? - YouTube

Channel: The Economist

[1]
Companies are driven by money
[3]
So putting a price on carbon emissions...
[6]
...should encourage businesses to stop polluting, right?
[10]
That’s exactly what carbon markets were designed to do...
[13]
...reduce emissions by charging polluters...
[16]
...but so far they haven’t achieved that aim
[19]
Here’s why:
[28]
Towards the end of the 1980s America had a problem
[33]
For years, its power stations...
[35]
...had been emitting large amounts of sulphur dioxide...
[38]
...which was falling back to Earth as acid rain...
[41]
...causing harm to plants, aquatic animals and infrastructure
[46]
But there was no incentive for the power plants...
[48]
...to stop emitting sulphur dioxide
[51]
Weather warnings, an acid-rain alert is in effect
[54]
So in 1990 the American government launched an experiment

[59]
...passing a law to force polluters...
[61]
...to pay for their emissions, by establishing a new kind of market...
[66]
...governed by a system called “cap-and-trade”
[71]
Eight years later, acid-rain levels over large regions...
[75]
...in eastern America had fallen by 20%
[79]
And a new way of cutting emissions was born
[82]
In 1997 the international climate-change treaty...
[87]
...known as the Kyoto protocol...
[89]
...suggested applying the concept of cap-and-trade to carbon
[94]
In the years that followed different countries and regions...
[97]
...set up their own carbon markets
[100]
Many of these used cap and trade
[102]
And this is how it works
[107]
A government sets a cap on the amount of CO2...
[109]
...that can be emitted by an industry
[112]
It splits the cap into permits...
[114]
...and either gives or sells these permits to firms
[118]
If a company doesn’t use up all of its allowance...
[121]
...it can sell what it doesn’t need
[123]
If it needs more permits, it can buy them from those with spares
[128]
Each year the cap gets stricter...
[130]
...and the shrinking pool of permits gets more expensive
[135]
The genius of cap-and-trade systems when they’re done properly...
[139]
...is that they both use a stick and a carrot
[144]
That gives them an incentive to innovate, to get cleaner and cleaner...
[148]
...it provides that carrot for innovation...
[150]
...and that trading mechanism...
[152]
The magic of the market unleashes those animal spirits...
[155]
...in favour of decarbonisation
[158]
While regulation can introduce a new industry standard...
[162]
...it doesn’t give firms an incentive to cut emissions below a certain level
[167]
But a carbon market creates a race in which companies...
[170]
...are motivated to cut emissions as fast as they can
[175]
The more they cut emissions, the fewer permits they have to buy...
[179]
...and the more excess they have to sell
[182]
So in theory in a cap-and-trade market...
[185]
...carbon-dioxide emissions should fall...
[188]
...but in reality, they’ve continued to rise
[191]
Because incentives work only if they’re big enough
[196]
Carbon markets are great in theory, but in practice...
[201]
...we run into a problem
[202]
Carbon prices have been far too low to motivate change...
[207]
...that’s needed to decarbonise the world economy
[211]
According to Joseph Stiglitz and Nicholas Stern, two economists...
[215]
...in order to meet the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming...
[219]
...to two degrees above pre-industrial levels...
[222]
...the price of carbon worldwide...
[224]
...needs to be between $50-100 per tonne by 2030
[229]
However, the majority of carbon prices still remain far below that figure
[235]
What’s more, even if carbon is priced appropriately...
[238]
...the fines for exceeding permitted levels...
[240]
...are sometimes ineffectively low
[244]
In the EU, a fine can be as low as €100 per excess tonne
[248]
Considering that’s not that much more than the price of a permit...
[251]
...it’s hardly a deterrent
[253]
And that’s if firms even get caught
[257]
Now in theory, regulators enforce carbon prices and permits...
[262]
...but in practice, it can be very challenging
[265]
There’s measurement problems...
[266]
...direct emissions versus indirect emissions
[269]
There’s questions of cheating, for example...
[271]
...you find in most markets around the world...
[273]
...enforcement is lax and punishment is not great
[276]
And even if some markets adopt effective deterrents...
[279]
...the ones next door may not
[281]
If you look globally...
[283]
...you have a mind-boggling variety of rules, systems...
[287]
...enforcement mechanisms
[288]
And so if you’re a company that’s based in multiple countries...
[292]
...divisions of your company making the same product in the same way...
[295]
...will face a mind-boggling patchwork of rules, regulations that differ
[300]
Worse than that, you have leakage, among these markets as well
[304]
The direct result of this patchwork of systems...
[307]
...is known as “carbon leakage”
[309]
A business or an industry relocates from an area...
[312]
...with high environmental regulations...
[315]
...to somewhere where the rules are more relaxed
[318]
Which means it can avoid having to pay for its carbon emissions
[322]
But these problems have solutions
[327]
The role of regulation is important because absent regulation...
[331]
...nobody would pay for carbon emissions or pay a penalty for emitting carbon
[335]
So almost by definition, government has to create the market...
[339]
...set the rules, enforce penalties, set a carbon cap...
[343]
...for example, the maximum amount a company or industry can emit
[347]
If governments limited the number of permits, it would drive their price up
[352]
Setting a minimum price that rises over time...
[355]
...would mean the price would never fall too low...
[358]
...and governments could enforce more stringent deterrents...
[361]
...for potential rule-breakers
[363]
Getting serious about regulating carbon markets...
[366]
...really involves regulators making it clear to industry...
[370]
...that they will not tolerate cheating
[372]
They will not tolerate leakage or obfuscation...
[375]
...and ultimately that they will hold corporate executives to account...
[379]
...for their carbon emissions
[381]
I think we’re getting there, particularly in the European Union...
[383]
...we’re seeing much more seriousness...
[385]
...that this is not a frivolous greenwashing exercise...
[388]
...nudge, nudge, wink, wink, but rather that this is as serious as safety...
[392]
...or other regulations. This is not yet the case in many other parts of the world
[398]
It would help if the world had more integrated carbon markets...
[401]
...but as that’s unlikely to happen in the short term...
[404]
...one solution to help prevent carbon leakage is a border tax
[410]
The EU has recently proposed to tax the carbon emitted...
[413]
...in goods produced outside its carbon market
[417]
Importers would have to pay the same amount...
[419]
...as if the goods had been made in the EU
[422]
Meaning it wouldn’t be any cheaper...
[424]
...to source goods from a region with less regulation
[429]
If we’re going to get serious about dealing with climate change...
[432]
...within the next few years, we must...
[434]
...achieve something like a global carbon price...
[437]
...and some form of harmonisation amongst economies
[441]
Now we’re getting to something like momentum in this direction
[446]
The big kahuna is China because it’s such an industrial powerhouse...
[450]
...it’s so carbon intensive
[451]
If it doesn’t get serious and work with other economies...
[454]
...to harmonise carbon pricing and carbon-trading systems...
[458]
...then most of the world’s efforts will probably be undermined...
[461]
...by the fact that countries like China...
[464]
...are producing heavily carbon-intensive goods
[467]
And we’ll see multinationals shifting production...
[469]
...to those places even more than they have in the past
[473]
As climate change has moved up the political agenda...
[476]
...governments are starting to improve how their carbon markets work
[481]
Since 2019, the EU has been taking steps...
[485]
...to reduce the number of permits it hands out
[488]
Partly as a result, carbon prices in the EU...
[491]
...are now hitting record highs of over €60 per tonne
[495]
Carbon prices in other markets are also rising...
[498]
...as regulators look at ways to make them more effective
[502]
If it seems that money can be made...
[504]
...other countries might create their own markets
[509]
We have seen just in the last 12 to 18 months...
[512]
...a dramatic take-off in carbon markets
[514]
This is a really exciting time for people...
[518]
...who believe that there is a good marriage...
[521]
...between public policy and regulators and markets and innovators
[525]
If prices stay high enough

[528]
...helped by commitments from governments and regulators

[531]
...then greener industrial processes would become more attractive
[535]
And carbon markets could start to achieve their original goal
[539]
...of helping to decarbonise the world
[545]
I’m Vijay Vaitheeswaran...
[546]
The Economist’s global energy and climate innovation editor
[551]
To keep up to date with all of our climate-change coverage...
[554]
...please click on the link
[555]
Thanks for watching and don’t forget to subscribe