🔍
What is R-Squared - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[1]
ConnectCubed: Understand Your People Through
Data
[6]
ConnectCubed helps you predict candidate performance
using statistical models.
[11]
Statistical models take data and predict an
outcome.
[15]
Let's consider an example.
[17]
Here are all of the houses sold in your town
last year.
[22]
If we look at all the houses on a graph, we
can see that in general,
[26]
larger houses have a higher price,
[29]
and smaller houses have a lower price.
[32]
In fact, we can draw a line that approximates
this relationship.
[37]
This line is our model.
[40]
With this model, we can pick a size for a
house,
[42]
and the model will predict the price for that
house.
[46]
But no model is perfect.
[48]
The model predicts that this size house should
cost this much
[53]
but a house this size sold last year for more.
[57]
Because the model is not perfect, we want
to know how accurate our model's predictions
[62]
are.
[63]
To measure accuracy, we use R-squared, which
runs from zero to 100%.
[70]
R-squared tells us how much of the difference
in outcome is explained by the model.
[77]
In this case, we want to know how much of
the total difference in price is explained
[81]
by our model, which uses data on house size.
[85]
Some houses sold for a very low price, some
sold for a very high price.
[90]
How much of that difference can be explained
by differences in size?
[94]
If our model has an r squared of 70%, we can
say that the size of the house explains 70%
[102]
of the difference in price.
[104]
But what about that other 30%?
[107]
The other 30% comes from all the factors we
don't know about.
[111]
Remember, all we know is how big the house
is.
[114]
We don't know about whether the house is in
a nice neighborhood, if the house needs significant
[119]
repairs, the style of the house, or even the
number of bedrooms.
[124]
So while the model tells us that bigger houses
have a higher price, because of all the other
[128]
factors we don't know about, it's prediction
will never be exactly correct.
[134]
Using models to understand your employees
and candidates faces similar constraints.
[139]
There are many other factors about your candidates
that may have an impact on work performance.
[144]
Things like…
[145]
Teamwork, creativity, previous work experience,
and other skills.
[151]
So what does this mean for you?
[153]
Let's consider your company.
[155]
Assume that you have 2 employees, Bob and
Jane.
[158]
Bob and Jane are customer service agents.
[161]
Bob received an interview score of 48.
[164]
Jane received an interview score of 85.
[167]
When we look at your company, we notice that
employees in customer service with higher
[172]
interview scores tend to get higher performance
reviews.
[176]
Here we have an r squared of 30%.
[179]
That means that if you know an employee's
interview score, you can explain 30% of the
[184]
difference you observe in work performance.
[187]
Being able to explain 30% of the difference
in performance is a huge help!
[192]
We have figured out 30% of what makes a good
customer service employee.
[196]
But what about the other 70%?
[199]
Let's look at Bob and Jane.
[202]
Here we can see Bob on the graph
[204]
and here we can see Jane.
[206]
Jane's work performance is higher than we
would predict using the interview score.
[210]
Why?
[211]
Maybe she's very experienced, maybe she's
helpful and mentoring to colleagues.
[216]
And what about Bob?
[217]
He performs even worse than just the interview
would predict.
[221]
Why?
[222]
Maybe he hates his boss.
[224]
Maybe he arrives late to work.
[226]
Those behaviors are not captured in the interview
and they make up the 70% the interview cannot
[232]
explain.
[233]
How much of the total difference among the
employees was explained by the interview?
[239]
Here we can see the total difference predicted
by the model using interview scores.
[244]
When we compare what the model predicts to
the total difference in performance in reality,
[249]
we see that the interview explained 30% of
the total difference in work performance`.
[256]
That 30% is...r squared.
[259]
For most companies, interviews have an R-squared
of about 30%.
[263]
When hiring, you select the candidates with
the best interview scores.
[268]
Unfortunately, with an R-squared of 30% some
candidates who interview well are low performers.
[275]
Even though you can avoid some low performing
candidates with your interview process, many
[280]
low performing candidates will still sneak
through.
[283]
But let's look at what happens when you combine
an interview with a ConnectCubed assessment.
[288]
By using both an assessment AND an interview,
your total R-squared will increase.
[295]
This means that when you now choose the top
candidates, you will have fewer low performers
[300]
and more high performers.
[302]
In fact, large scale studies have shown that
combining an assessment with a structured
[307]
interview can increase your R-squared by 24%.
[312]
Increasing your R-squared by collecting additional
information through assessments means an improved
[318]
ability to distinguish top performers from
low performers BEFORE making a hiring decision.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





