Teachers could face $5,000 fine for saying wrong thing - YouTube

Channel: 12 News

[0]
we start with what supporters label the
[2]
unbiased teaching
[3]
act it carries five thousand dollar
[5]
penalties for teachers
[6]
school districts and charter schools if
[8]
they handle the subject of race in the
[10]
wrong way
[11]
or present what the bill defines as
[13]
controversial issues
[14]
without sharing all viewpoints the
[16]
legislation was unveiled and passed by
[18]
the state house of representatives last
[20]
week in a matter of hours
[22]
the bill could come to a final vote in
[23]
the senate as soon as this coming week
[26]
joining us is the sponsor republican
[28]
state representative
[29]
michelle udall of mesa she's also chair
[31]
of the house education committee welcome
[33]
to square off
[35]
thank you it's great to be here so uh
[37]
the question i like to ask
[39]
about most bills is what is the problem
[42]
you're trying to fix here
[45]
the problem that we're hearing from a
[46]
lot of parents and have been hearing
[48]
from some time
[49]
is that there are a handful of teachers
[52]
and it's not all teachers
[53]
it's not a ton of teachers but it is
[56]
happening
[57]
around the state that are teaching
[59]
things in a very biased way
[60]
instead of teaching students how to
[63]
think they're teaching them what to
[64]
think
[65]
and many times very biased political
[68]
leanings
[69]
one way or the other it actually happens
[70]
on both sides of the aisle
[72]
unfortunately and that's just not
[74]
appropriate in the classroom
[76]
and we're also hearing a lot about um
[79]
things like critical race theory project
[81]
1619
[82]
things like that in the classroom that
[84]
parents really object to
[86]
and don't feel is appropriate in the
[88]
classroom can you
[90]
name a specific school or school
[92]
district where
[94]
the 1619 project something created by
[97]
the new york times a few years ago
[99]
or what's called critical race theory uh
[103]
is actually being taught yeah this there
[106]
was some news
[106]
recently i think it was i don't want to
[109]
say the wrong district i think it was
[110]
alhambra was teaching the
[111]
1619 project and
[114]
very publicly you know it there was
[118]
quite a bit of controversy of it
[119]
i know that cusd has taught critical
[123]
race theory and continues to
[124]
chandler university school district in
[126]
some of their teacher trainings
[128]
let's talk about another piece of the
[130]
bill which is uh which is very
[132]
interesting
[132]
um limits on classroom discussions on
[135]
what the bill defines
[137]
as controversial issues that's a
[139]
specific term used in the bill
[141]
controversial issues
[143]
here's some language when discussing
[145]
controversial issues
[146]
teachers have to present diverse
[148]
perspectives without giving preference
[151]
to
[151]
any one perspective controversial issues
[154]
do not include
[155]
accurate portrayals of historical events
[157]
so
[158]
if one thing to get back to is if
[160]
teachers do any of this wrong schools do
[162]
anything that's wrong
[163]
the attorney general might investigate
[164]
and they might be fined five thousand
[166]
dollars so
[167]
can you talk to all the social studies
[170]
and history teachers out there right now
[172]
and tell them
[173]
how they can present all perspectives
[175]
equally
[176]
in discussions about slavery the
[178]
holocaust
[179]
the us government's treatment of native
[181]
americans
[182]
without breaking the law and getting hit
[185]
with a five thousand dollar fine
[187]
absolutely couple things first of all
[190]
it's knowingly
[191]
breaking the statute that puts you in
[193]
jeopardy so if you are knowingly
[194]
breaking this
[195]
statute if you're intentionally teaching
[197]
in a biased way
[198]
that's where you would be in jeopardy of
[200]
facing the fight who does
[202]
who decides whether a teacher is
[204]
intentionally teaching in a biased way
[208]
well i think in general the way that
[210]
that works out in the ag's office
[212]
or the county attorneys is first you
[215]
have
[215]
a situation where teacher teaches this
[217]
way and then it's addressed
[219]
it's addressed at the teacher level it's
[221]
addressed at the school level
[222]
and if you have a teacher that continues
[225]
teaching that way after they've been
[226]
told
[227]
you know this is a really biased way of
[229]
teaching let's try and even things out a
[230]
little bit
[231]
if they continue to intentionally do
[233]
that then that's where
[234]
they will find themselves in jeopardy of
[236]
facing that fine but getting back to the
[238]
the question i ask how can they present
[241]
all perspectives equally when it comes
[242]
to the holocaust
[244]
so again accurate portrayals of
[246]
historical events are not considered
[248]
controversial and so there would be no
[250]
need to teach that from diverse
[251]
perspectives
[252]
if you're teaching history and making an
[254]
effort to teach it accurately and to
[256]
teach it honestly
[257]
the holocaust should not be taught from
[259]
two perspectives there's not a good side
[260]
to the holocaust there's not a good side
[262]
to slavery
[263]
that's why that sentence is in there
[265]
that accurate portrayals of historical
[267]
events are not
[268]
included in this controversy okay but
[270]
then there are a whole bunch of
[271]
other controversial issues that aren't
[273]
named
[274]
in there so can you now speak to those
[276]
same teachers again and tell them
[278]
which controversial issues they should
[281]
treat very carefully
[283]
i think any controversial issue that's
[285]
not a historical event
[288]
you know it lists three different types
[289]
of things that are not considered
[290]
controversial
[291]
issues historical events abuse
[295]
reporting and recognizing abuse and sex
[298]
education we deal with those in other
[299]
statutes
[300]
that seems to me you're on a really
[302]
slippery slope here
[304]
has anybody told this bill was
[306]
introduced at the last minute
[307]
it's had no public debate
[310]
and won't have any public debate if it's
[312]
passed by the senate because it's going
[314]
straight to the senate
[316]
why did that happen well the language
[319]
came
[320]
once it was passed the introduction date
[322]
on bills so the language
[324]
uh this is something that has concerned
[326]
a lot of people for a long
[327]
time a lot of time and however we saw
[330]
this language in a bill
[331]
uh in another state um and really
[334]
appreciated the language and felt like
[335]
that this is language that we could
[337]
craft edit and craft as arizona statute
[340]
and so
[341]
that's why it happened in the timing it
[342]
did um just because it happened after
[345]
the bill introduction
[346]
deadlines has has anybody told you this
[348]
bill might be con of any of the house
[350]
lawyers told you this bill might be
[351]
unconstitutional no
[355]
note have they reviewed this bill yes
[358]
they have they have and they say it's
[359]
constitutional
[361]
yes you're sure about that yes
[365]
okay governor doug ducey rarely comments
[368]
about bills that haven't reached his
[369]
desk
[370]
here's what he told reporters late last
[372]
week about this legislation please
[374]
please listen to this clip we're going
[376]
to play here it is
[378]
we don't want to be punishing or
[381]
punitive with teachers we want to be
[383]
rewarding our teachers but we also want
[385]
to make sure that we're having the
[387]
proper lessons learned and taught inside
[389]
our classroom
[391]
were you able to catch that entire sound
[393]
bite yes i was
[395]
i think as you know the governor rarely
[396]
comments on legislation
[398]
he clearly thinks a five thousand dollar
[400]
fine is going too far
[402]
it's unclear what he thinks about the
[403]
rest of the bill have you been told by
[405]
the governor's office that he won't sign
[407]
this bill
[408]
i have not but that's a pretty strong
[410]
message he just sent there isn't it
[413]
well remember that the fine is if you
[416]
knowingly and intentionally continue
[419]
doing this
[420]
and frankly fines like this are rarely
[423]
used
[424]
it's really if you have no enforcement
[427]
mechanism
[428]
then what is the what is the way that
[430]
you keep teachers
[431]
but the teachers accountable why is the
[434]
state
[435]
getting into the business of defining
[437]
what a controversial issue
[439]
is or isn't because our children deserve
[443]
a classroom where they can feel
[445]
respected
[447]
where different views are handled in a
[449]
balanced manner
[450]
they deserve not to be in a classroom
[452]
where propaganda
[453]
is the rule of the day where's
[457]
propaganda the rule of the day
[459]
in arizona unfortunately in
[462]
a handful of classrooms it is so we need
[465]
a bill defining all this where the state
[467]
steps in to define
[469]
controversial issues and how you can
[471]
treat race because of
[472]
a handful of classrooms is that right
[478]
sorry just a second um absolutely
[481]
any time that we are pushing a teacher's
[485]
ideas onto a student
[486]
a teacher's controversial beliefs onto a
[489]
student
[490]
any time that we are teaching a student
[492]
that they should
[493]
judge others based on the color of their
[495]
skin that needs to stop if you're using
[497]
public resources
[499]
if you're using classroom time to do
[501]
those things
[502]
that is a misuse of public funds that's
[504]
a misuse of the public trust that is
[506]
given to teachers as parents
[508]
we send our kids into t into classrooms
[511]
and we trust teachers with most of our
[513]
children's day
[515]
we trust them to guide and direct our
[517]
children
[518]
and there's a huge amount of trust that
[520]
needs to be there and we need to trust
[522]
that teachers are doing their absolute
[524]
best
[525]
to ensure that children are learning in
[527]
an unbiased and in a fair manner
[529]
all right state representative michelle
[530]
udall thank you so much for joining us
[533]
thank you