DEFI 2.0 - A New Narrative? OlympusDAO, Tokemak Explained - YouTube

So what is DeFi 2.0 all about? Is this just a new, temporary narrative or a paradigm shift?

What are some of the most interesting DeFi 2.0 protocols? And what does this all mean

for the already existing DeFi projects? You’ll find answers to these questions in this video.

Before we begin, if you want to learn more about decentralized finance and the technology

behind it make sure you subscribe to my channel, hit the bell icon and enable all notifications.

You can also consider supporting us on Patreon and joining our community on Discord.

The crypto space loves new narratives. DeFi Summer, Layer 1 Summer or “jpeg” Mania

to name a few. It seems like “DeFi 2.0” is the new kid on the block and has recently

been gaining more and more traction.

Although the ideas behind DeFi 2.0 are still crystallising, in general, the concept refers

to a new breed of DeFi protocols that try to solve some of the main pain points of the

already existing projects by experimenting with the protocol design and tokenomics.

The experimentation centres around the innovation in the liquidity mining design and is very

often associated with protocols owning their own liquidity instead of temporarily renting

it out via liquidity mining incentives.

Now, let’s unpack what it all means.

One of the biggest problems that DeFi protocols struggle with is how to attract long-lasting

liquidity in a sustainable way.

To bootstrap themselves, most protocols decide to allocate a big chunk of their native tokens

into the liquidity mining incentives.

This usually attracts a lot of capital and can accelerate the growth of a protocol quickly.

Main problem? The vast majority of liquidity is not loyal and can move to the next project

if it offers better incentives. It also creates huge selling pressure for the native token.

And unfortunately, the token price is very often associated with the overall quality

of the project and can sometimes make it or break it.

Some protocols tried to mitigate this problem by adding vesting to their liquidity mining

rewards, but this is usually just kicking the can down the road and the same issues

will still have to be confronted in the future.

Each protocol that offers liquidity mining programs hopes that after the liquidity mining

is over the protocol can remain appealing to the users by establishing a reputable brand,

differentiating itself from its competitors and attracting long-lasting liquidity. This

is also often called building a “moat” around the protocol.

If it’s a decentralized exchange, the protocol aims at having deep liquidity, so the users

can execute their trades at the best prices.

When it comes to a lending protocol, they aim at having an attractive and sustainable

lending market for both the lenders and the borrowers.

Uniswap is one of the best examples when it comes to a protocol with a “moat”. At

the time of making this video, Uniswap had a 67% market share of all decentralized exchanges

on Ethereum. The market share remains extremely high despite the protocol not offering any

extra incentives in the form of the UNI tokens for almost a year now.

The reason for that? A strong brand and a lot of trading volume that allows liquidity

providers to earn good yield just from the trading fees themselves. Uniswap also, of

course, benefited from being one of the first protocols in its own category which is harder

and harder to replicate with time.

These days, we see a lot of protocols attracting millions if not billions of dollars of liquidity

only to lose traction in the long run as the capital moves to a new, shiny protocol that

pays better.

All new protocols are facing a big dilemma. How to bring users and liquidity in a sustainable

way instead of just attracting mercenary capital. To make things even worse, the liquidity mining

programs are usually limited to a certain amount of tokens, so the protocols are standing

up against the wall and they either make it during the time when the liquidity mining

program is on or break it and become irrelevant over time.

To solve this problem, a new group of DeFi protocols decided to come up with an innovative

protocol design that changes the usual liquidity mining programs to something more sustainable.

To better understand how this new design works, let’s talk about a few protocols that initiated

this movement and are now riding the DeFi 2.0 wave.

OlympusDAO is a good place to start.

Olympus is a decentralized reserve currency protocol that is based on the OHM token. Each

OHM token is backed by a basket of assets stored in the Olympus treasury. This in turn

creates a floor price for OHM that the actual price shouldn’t fall below.

In order to participate in Olympus, the users can either stake their existing OHM tokens

and get new OHM from the rebase rewards or trade different assets in exchange for discounted

OHM.

The latter process, also called bonding, is one of the main concepts that allows the protocol

to own its own liquidity.

The bonding process works in the following way.

The protocol sells its own tokens (OHM) at a discount to their market value in exchange

for other assets. The discounted OHM is vested over a period of a few days, usually 5.

At the moment, the protocol supports bonding of 2 main asset types: the LP tokens that

represent liquidity added to decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap or SushiSwap and

single assets such as DAI, FRAX, wETH or LUSD.

When users exchange LP tokens for discounted OHM tokens, the LP tokens essentially become

controlled by the protocol itself. As we know, the owner of LP tokens always has total control

over the underlying liquidity. In the case of Olympus, the protocol owns LP tokens of

the most common OHM pairs such as OHM-DAI, OHM-WETH, OHM-FRAX or OHM-LUSD which in turn

means that the protocol owns its own liquidity.

At the time of making this video, Olympus owned over 99.5% of its own liquidity across

all markets and exchanges.

The bonding mechanism used by Olympus opened a lot of new possibilities not only for Olympus

itself but also for other protocols via Olympus Pro.

Olympus Pro, recently launched by the Olympus team, allows other protocols to leverage the

same bonding mechanism that made Olympus successful and offer it as a service.

Olympus Pro started attracting more and more protocols seeking a more sustainable way for

bringing long term liquidity. Some of the protocols participating in Olympus Pro include

Alchemix, Frax, StakeDAO and Pendle.

Olympus Pro also launched a dedicated marketplace for selling bonds. Investors will be able

to use this marketplace to buy tokens of different protocols at a discount in exchange for other

assets that can then become a part of the protocols’ treasuries.

Olympus is also about to release a V2 of their protocol that improves and optimises some

of the existing features. One of them improves the bonding mechanism where bonded OHM will

now be also staked in the protocol during the bonding time.

Olympus is clearly one of the most interesting new protocols and maybe it should be fully

explained in a separate video.

Another protocol iterating on the concept of liquidity mining is Tokemak.

Tokemak focuses on creating sustainable liquidity in DeFi through a decentralized market making

protocol.

In Tokemak, each asset has its own pool called a reactor, where the protocol token, TOKE,

is used for directing liquidity.

Liquidity providers supply only 1 token to a dedicated reactor and TOKE holders become

Liquidity Directors, who decide where the liquidity should flow.

This design should democratize access to liquidity and create incentives for both the liquidity

providers and the liquidity directors.

After successfully bootstrapping the liquidity in its ETH and USDC Genesis pools, the Tokemak

community has now begun to vote on the projects for which reactors will be initiated. Soon

these reactor assets will be paired with the assets from the Genesis pools and deployed

across DeFi.

Tokemak, OlympusDAO and the protocols leveraging Olympus Pro are only some of the new protocols

innovating in the area of liquidity mining. It will be interesting to see other protocols

experimenting with their protocol design even further.

DeFi 2.0 might seem like a temporary narrative, but the core concepts behind it will most

likely stay with us and make liquidity mining more sustainable.

New DeFi protocols will have a way of attracting long-lasting liquidity without being stuck

in the neverending cycle of subsidising the users with liquidity mining rewards and competing

with new forks of their own protocol that can launch with a new token in a matter of

days.

It doesn’t necessarily mean that liquidity mining is going away anytime soon, rather,

the projects will have a way of enabling it for a quick bootstrapping phase or to attract

initial capital to a new chain or L2. At least this will be a choice and not the only possible

way forward.

So do we really need a new name for all of this? Maybe, whatever we name it, it’s not

going to change the fact that there are protocols experimenting with new designs and improving

upon the previous things that didn’t work as well as expected.

A good thing about creating a new narrative is that it can surely inject some fresh excitement

into this space and allow more people to discover the potential of DeFi.

One question that comes up very often when discussing DeFi 2.0 is what happens to the

already existing DeFi protocols? Will they become obsolete over time?

I don’t think so.

One of the main benefits of open source development is that things that prove themselves to be

working well can be adopted by the already existing protocols. Maybe it will be bonding

liquidity via Olympus Pro, maybe redirecting liquidity using Tokemak or maybe something

else. I wouldn’t be surprised to see some of the established DeFi protocols adopting

DeFi 2.0 concepts in the future.

Besides this, new protocols will be able to take more risk and experiment with protocol

design as they won’t have as much capital at stake as the already established protocols.

This will be beneficial for the whole DeFi space allowing both the new and the existing

protocols to evolve together.

It’s important to notice that the whole DeFi space hasn’t achieved even a fraction

of its potential and at this point we should just focus on growing the whole pie together.

So what do you think about DeFi 2.0? What are some of your favourite protocols in this

category? Comment down below.

And as always, if you enjoyed this video, smash the like button, subscribe to my channel

and check out Finematics on Patreon to join our community.