Who Is Satoshi Nakamoto!!? A Dark Conspiracy Revealed!! - YouTube

The story of Bitcoin is one of the biggest  mysteries this world has ever seen.  

It was created in response to the financial  crisis of 2008, and the creator or creators  

of it are still anonymous to this day. People have  speculated on who it could be years. Cyber punks,  

Hal Finndey, Craig Wright, government agencies,  and even your Mom. The last one’s a joke,  

but today we aren’t joking around.  Because it’s time for Chico Crypto!

Yup nearly 13 years ago, a programmer operating  under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto deployed a  

piece of code that would change the world forever.  January 3rd of 2009 Bitcoin was launched, and  

within the first block there was a secret message  sent from the creator. From the raw hex data,  

we can see Satoshi said “The Times 03/January/2009  Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”

This message came from a newspaper, The Times,  which had the headline Chancellor on brink of  

second bailout for banks. So satoshi was quoting  a british newspaper eh? Which got many to think  

he was british…but we have found out through  research, that this is most likely not the case.

December of 2020, Ungeared and their  researchers put together a research piece  

titled the strange story of Nakamoto’s spelling  choices. In the research, they analyzed Satoshi’s  

known writings-emails, posts, and the Bitcoin  white paper to a rigorous statistical analysis,  

and they found that he used majority American  English, over 52 percent of the time. British  

english about 35 percent of the time, and it was  misspelled about 23 percent of the time. They  

also found that their were inconsistencies with  his writing style throughout days of the week.  

Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays were  dominated by American spelling…Thursdays  

were dominated by British spelling,  and on Tuesdays, Fridays and Sundays  

were split evenly between the 2..but  all days had a batch of misspellings.

Now ungeared concluded through their analysis  this. “ If his spelling was indeed part of his  

operational security, why would it be so  inconsistent, why would he not use a spell  

checker throughout? We believe there are  several possible explanations for this.

Firstly, it is possible that this was part of the  plan all along – to throw us off his trail with  

irregular spelling. Another is that the Satoshi  team consisted of multiple team members who were  

accustomed to different versions of the English  language. Or perhaps, Satoshi was multicultural,  

someone who has lived in different  parts of the English-speaking world.

Soo if this was a sole person,  this was part of his plan,  

to speak in different English dialects  to throw people off the trail.  

Or this was because he was multicultural,  living in different parts of the world.  

Or because it was a team, who had members of  both American dialects and British dialects.

Soo let’s just look at the case that it was a  sole person, who was multicultural…living in  

different parts of the English speaking world. Who  could that be? Well there is Craig Wright. He has  

claimed he is Satoshi for the longest time. He is  of Australian Descent, has lived in Britain, and  

also America. Craig just partially won a trial,  where he was being sued for Satoshi’s fortune!

Decrypt covered it in an article titled  “Craig Wright Avoids $170 Billion Bitcoin  

Lawsuit Claim, Must Pay $100M”..the article  states “Craig Wright, who claims he is Bitcoin  

inventor Satoshi Nakamoto, is off the hook  for a multibillion-dollar payment to the  

estate of computer scientist Dave Kleiman, which  argued that the men created Bitcoin together.  

But Wright will still have to pay $100 million  to the company he and Kleiman founded after a  

federal jury in Florida found the nChain  chief scientist liable for conversion.

So Craig won, but also lost..does this  prove anything? Well the decrypto article  

continued…Wright says he won't appeal. If true,  this will bring to an end a long legal chapter  

that has failed to produce any clear answers as  to the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright told  

reporters that the verdict meant he was Bitcoin's  sole creator: "The jury has obviously found that  

I am because there would have been no award  otherwise." Yet neither Wright nor his defense  

were willing or able to provide private keys  belonging to Nakamoto that could prove his claims

Yes the Satoshi wallets, and private keys hodl at  least over 1 million Bitcoin. They bitcoin inside  

them have never been moved or touched…Craig  could automatically prove he is the creator,  

by moving some of the bitcoin and signing  the transaction, but this has yet to happen.  

If Craig want’s to fully prove he is Satoshi,  just do what everyone has been waiting  

for…Unlock the coins and sign the message.

Now the reason, I don’t think it’s a sole  person who is alive, is because how could  

someone resist that type of temptation? Billions  upon billions of dollars are at your disposal,  

and you won’t touch any of it? Greed is a  powerful thing, and if Satoshi was just a  

sole person who is alive…I don’t think they  would be able to resist that temptation.

Sooo, is it a sole person who is dead? Well the  #1 contender for this case is Hal Finney. Hal  

Finney was the first, besides Satoshi to adopt  Bitcoin, he stated on Twitter January 11th 2009,  

that he was Running Bitcoin just 8 days after  it was launched by Satoshi. Then there is this…  

Three months ago on the Bitcoin reddit there  was this post “Is Hal Finney Satoshi Nakamoto?  

Evidence thus far” The post stated “NSA and  other very talented investigators/engineers  

have concluded that Satoshi Nakamoto hid his  tracks too well. The only remaining way to know  

who created Bitcoin is stylometry (using writing  style to compare two like-minded entities in hopes  

of discovering a better version of a person's  fingerprint). The researcher found, Both Satoshi’s  

and Hals writings have a double-space after every  sentence. Both are written, according to AI,  

the same exact way. All of it, everything, is  written in the same tone, sentence structure, etc.

More evidence that might help: Dorian Nakamoto  lived on the same street as Hal. He picked his  

last name in addition to a Japanese first name  to look anonymous. Hal writes in British English  

quite often. So does Satoshi. Hal got immobile  from Lou Gehrig's Disease and stopped contributing  

to the internet at the exact time that Satoshi  said goodbye. Hal died and we haven't seen Satoshi  

since. Hal had two IP's connected to his house  through a PRISM analysis. One was connected to  

an 'internet freedom' forum and one posted on  the same one only 'twice' -- so did Satoshi  

with the proof of this below and then…Hal's IP  and Satoshi's are possibly on the same street.  

Satoshi didn't use a VPN for a POST request to  a forum. Neither did Hal with the proof below….

Sooo a sole person that is alive? Very unlikely…a  sole person that is no longer living like Hal…i  

believe is more likely. But  what about the possibility,  

that this was conjured by a group of people? Going  back to the daily spelling habits of Satoshi,  

we can see it was different for each day of the  week. Was it a different person writing each day??

Well Hal was actually part of  a group called the Cypherpunks.  

From this 2018 medium article by PetriB  titled “The untold history of Bitcoin:  

Enter the Cypherpunks” we can get early insights  into this group. Under the section Early Attempts  

we can see The first attempt at an anonymous  transacting system was made by Dr. Adam Back  

in 1997 when he created Hashcash. The second  attempt came the next year in 1998 from Wei Dai  

with his proposal B-Money. Then in 2004, Hal  Finney created Reusable Proofs of Work which  

borrowed from the principles of Backs’ Hashcash  and in 2005 Nick Szabo published a proposal for  

Bitgold which built on the ideas developed  by Hal Finney and various other projects.

Now going to the Bitcoin Whitepaper, we can see  many of these previous attempts referenced. Of  

course proof of work is used, but then searching  by Adam Backs’s hashcash it is in the paper,  

as well as the references, and  also wei dai’s b-money is there.

Could it have been this group, working together  to finally complete what they all had been  

attempting to do? Could this have been their  end game? Putting all their powers together?

Or could Bitcoin be created by the powers that be?  Like a government agency?? Just a couple days ago,  

the current director of the CIA William Burns,  said the agency was deep into cryptocurrency  

with a number of different  projects focused on cryptocurrency.

Could Bitcoin be their original and first  one?? Well the CIA has insights into Bitcoin  

and Satoshi that no one else does. In June of  2018, Vice Motherboard author Daniel Oberhaus  

put out this article “The CIA ‘Can Neither Confirm  Nor Deny’ It Has Documents on Satoshi Nakamoto”.  

The article states “In 2016, Alexander Muse, a  blogger who mostly writes about entrepreneurship,  

wrote a blog post that claimed the NSA had  identified the real identity of Satoshi Nakamoto  

using stylometry, which uses a person’s writing  style as a unique fingerprint, and then searched  

emails collected under the PRISM surveillance  program to identify the real Nakamoto. Muse  

said the identity was not shared with him by his  source at the Department of Homeland Security”.

NSA knows who Nakamoto is. The author continues  “As of February, Muse said he had submitted a FOIA  

request to the DHS to learn more about the case.  While recently filing some unrelated FOIA requests  

of my own, I figured it couldn’t hurt to ask some  other three-letter agencies what they know about  

Nakamoto. My request with the FBI is still open,  but a month after I filed my FOIA request with  

the CIA, I received a terse reply that informed  me that “the request has been rejected, with the  

agency stating that it can neither confirm nor  deny the existence of the requested documents.”  

This is known as a “Glomar response,” and  the CIA is famous for wielding this turn  

of phrase to avoid releasing information about  open investigations. In fact, the CIA’s very  

first tweet paid homage to the agency’s notorious  opacity and wrote that “We can neither confirm  

nor deny that this is our first tweet.” So if  the government actually knows who Nakamoto is,  

it isn’t too keen on sharing  that information just yet…

The Glomar response, which means  they know. The NSA knows, the CIA  

knows….is that because it’s them? Or do  they have evidence it’s Hal, it’s Craig,  

it’s the Cypher Punks, or maybe Elon Musk?  Cheers viewers I’ll see you next time!