This is what happens when you deposit a fake cheque from a spam email - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[2]
What’s that?
[2]
My check finally came!
[4]
This Nigerian prince said if I sent him my social
[6]
security number he’d write me a check equal to my number!
[9]
But I ain’t stupid!
[10]
No!
[11]
See little does he know that my social
[13]
security number isn’t 50 billion hehehehe.
[16]
From now on, coffee's on me buddy!
[18]
I’m in the big money now!
[19]
No.
[20]
What?
[20]
It’s fake.
[21]
Aww

[22]
Although

[35]
If you’ve ever actually skimmed through your
[36]
piles of junk mail, you may have seen fake checks
[39]
promising huge returns on investments once or twice.
[43]
Often, they’re marked with a “non negotiable” or
[45]
“void” to indicate that you can’t really cash them.
[48]
But there was often a nagging little question that worked
[51]
its way into the heads of those who saw these things.
[54]
Namely,
[55]
“What would happen if I actually deposited this?”
[58]
But first

[59]
Today’s topic involves financial decisions and legal matters.
[63]
We’re not financial experts, nor are we lawyers.
[66]
We’re just taking a look at a
[67]
topic from an unbiased perspective.
[69]
It’s best to look into any checks you receive by
[71]
mail and ensure they’re from a trusted source.
[74]
And with that out of the way

[75]
Let’s get into it!
[86]
1995, a man by the name of Patrick Combs
[89]
received the usual junk mail just like many of
[91]
us, including one of the prevalent fake checks.
[94]
It was like any other, listing an insane amount
[96]
of money, in this case just over $95,000.
[100]
But unlike many of us, Combs actually deposited it.
[104]
You’re saying I could cash my check?
[106]
You can certainly try, but don’t expect to get anything.
[109]
Aww...
[109]
In fact, Combs himself didn’t
[111]
expect anything when he deposited.
[113]
Or in his words,
[114]
“What I expected to happen next was
[116]
a short phone call from my bank.
[118]
Or a letter informing me of what I already
[120]
knew, that the check I deposited was not real.”
[123]
Did that
 Not happen?
[125]
No, not exactly.
[127]
Not intentionally, at least.
[128]
The bank at first put the deposited money in his account
[131]
under hold—which is standard operating procedure.
[134]
Only so much of it is accessible
[136]
until the bank can verify the deposit.
[138]
Combs expected it to vanish any day, but the
[141]
money was released, so Combs put it on a banker’s
[144]
check and placed it in a safety deposit box.
[146]
Well either they have quite the sense of
[148]
humour, or they were about to get real mad.
[150]
Very mad.
[152]
A month after depositing the check
[153]
the bank demanded the money back.
[155]
But others - including financial and legal
[158]
experts - told him that he was in the clear.
[160]
Wait, but how could he be in the clear?
[162]
Isn’t that like fraud or something?
[163]
Eh come on.
[164]
The bank waited too long to realize their mistake.
[167]
Potentially, let’s look a little closer at that.
[169]
Take us away magic coffee man!
[171]
Come on gang let’s go.
[174]
Po—
[174]
It’s Howard.
[175]
Howard, query.
[176]
How long does a bank have to catch an error?
[177]
Banks have a period of years to spot errors in payments,
[180]
and they can correct them without notifying the customer.
[182]
Taking the money can be considered a serious crime.
[185]
A good example here is the case of Hui “Leo” Gao, a New
[189]
Zealand man whose bank accidentally gave his business
[191]
account an overdraft of 10 million New Zealand dollars,
[195]
instead of 100 thousand New Zealand dollars in 2009.
[199]
Once he realized what had happened, Gao fled New
[201]
Zealand and transferred 6.78 million dollars from
[204]
his account, which in turn clued the bank in to the
[207]
error and allowed them to recover 3 million dollars.
[210]
Gao and his then-partner Kara Hurring fled to Hong Kong,
[214]
with the local press dubbing the two “runaway millionaires”.
[218]
Gao himself spent two years on the run, but Hurring
[221]
returned to New Zealand voluntarily in February 2011
[224]
after having a son and then breaking up with Gao.
[227]
She was sentenced to nine months’ home detention and
[229]
ordered to pay 11,800 New Zealand dollars in reparations
[234]
on charges of money laundering, attempted fraud, and theft
[237]
despite claims that Gao had told her he’d won the lottery.
[241]
And as for Gao, he was arrested by Interpol in
[243]
Hong Kong in September 2012, and was sentenced
[246]
to four years and seven months in jail for
[248]
money laundering, attempted fraud, and theft.
[251]
That said, if an error is made in the bank’s favor,
[254]
you generally only have 30 days to notify the bank.
[257]
Well That seems
 unfair.
[260]
So does that mean Mr.
[261]
Combs really was in danger of being arrested?
[264]
Well, no, actually.
[266]
In this case, Combs kind of lucked out.
[269]
Despite the “non-negotiable” written in small print in the
[272]
corner of the check, the fake check issued by Association of
[275]
Certified Liquidators had been made to look so realistic that
[279]
it met nine of the ten criteria used to verify a real check.
[282]
Apparently, the fake check looked so
[284]
real, that it had legally become so.
[287]
And not only that, but it took the bank over a month
[290]
to realize what had happened, which,unlike a banking
[293]
error, is past the legal deadline to inform Combs
[296]
that the check he deposited was a “non cash item”.
[299]
Even so, they asked him to give them permission to
[302]
drill open the safety deposit box and reclaim the check.
[305]
Combs did not give permission.
[307]
And, um, how did the bank take that?
[310]
Well, through a long process of patience
[312]
and reflection
 Sued him, they sued him.
[314]
But let’s back up a bit.
[321]
Whoa, too far.
[323]
The threat of legal action started early on,
[325]
when the bank called in a furor, but it was
[327]
one particularly aggressive phone call from a
[330]
security officer that pushed things over the edge.
[332]
Amusingly, at the time Combs had been willing to just
[335]
give the cash back but following the attitude of the
[338]
officer and legal threats, Combs asked for a letter
[341]
from the bank exonerating him before he did anything.
[344]
The bank refused, so Combs didn’t give them the money.
[348]
According to Combs, he had been told by no less than
[350]
six lawyers that he had a legal right to the money.
[353]
In the meantime, Combs took his story to the media.
[356]
First he approached the Wall Street Journal, and then
[359]
when the story got out he soon found himself invited on
[361]
Good Morning America, and a slew of other talk shows.
[365]
And in the end, it seems like he won.
[367]
In his own way.
[368]
Combs and the bank came to an agreement after entering
[371]
into a legal battle with Combs returning the money

[374]
and the bank handing him the letter that he wanted.
[377]
Aw, what?
[378]
He just gave it back?
[379]
Well Grill, you can’t
 You can’t just
[381]
take money that isn’t yours like that.
[382]
It might have been legal because it kind
[384]
of was his, I guess, but
 But morally-
[386]
Morality?
[387]
Malarkey!
[387]
Banks can shove it, He shoulda kept the cash!
[390]
Well, that is what a number of people suggested
[393]
he do, and Combs himself commented that he
[396]
did struggle with the ethics of it to a point.
[398]
Though he doesn’t seem too broken up about it.
[400]
Or in his words,
[402]
"It's hard to give back $95,000 when six
[404]
lawyers have told you it's legally yours.
[407]
Now, I'm giving it back, and it's a wonderful feeling."
[410]
Besides, Combs may have made the
[412]
more profitable decision in the end.
[414]
Combs took his experiences and turned them into a
[417]
number of ways to earn himself a comfortable living.
[420]
He started off by putting the story on
[421]
his website with a link for donations.
[424]
And that worked?
[424]
Not until he posted a piece of
[426]
hate mail he’d received next to it.
[428]
Then the tips started pouring in.
[430]
Since then he’s written a book called “Man 1, Bank 0” and
[434]
hosted a pair of one man theater shows recounting the tale.
[437]
One named “Man 1, Bank 0” as well,
[440]
the other titled “Cash me if you can”.
[442]
And did he get to keep his bank account?
[444]
Well, after getting the letter from his bank, he was told
[448]
“First Interstate isn't asking you to close your account,
[451]
but it would please First Interstate if you did.” Oh snap.
[455]
Since then, Combs has changed banks, but even with the
[459]
irritation of opening an account with a new institution,
[462]
I think it’s safe to say that he really cashed in.
[465]
Brew, you don’t have to end every single
[467]
one of your videos with a stupid pun.
[470]
You know that, right?
[471]
Like, they’re not funny, it’s not even cute anymore.
[474]
To be honest, it’s just sad.
[476]
Like, do you think you’re funny?
[478]
Cause if you do, you should really get your head “checked”.
[481]
Ha hoo!
[483]
You should’ve seen your face haha.
[490]
Oh God.