Keynesian economics | Aggregate demand and aggregate supply | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy - YouTube

Channel: Khan Academy

[0]
Voiceover: What I want to do in this video
[2]
is start introducing and we've already talked about him
[4]
a little bit.
[5]
So actually they've already been introduced,
[6]
but maybe flesh out a little bit more Keynesian thinking.
[9]
This right here is a picture of John Maynard Keynes
[12]
and I often mispronounce him as Keynes,
[14]
because that's how it's spelled,
[15]
but it's John Maynard Keynes.
[17]
He was an economist who did a lot
[18]
of his most famous work during the Great Depression,
[21]
because in his view, classical models did not seem
[24]
to be of much use during the Great Depression.
[28]
To understand this a little bit better,
[30]
let's compare purely classical aggregate supply
[34]
aggregate demand models to maybe one
[37]
that's more Keynesian.
[38]
Some of what we've talked about -
[40]
Keynesian, I should say.
[41]
I already did my first mispronunciation.
[43]
One that's a little bit more Keynesian.
[46]
Keynesian right over here.
[48]
In some of the conversations, we've already begun
[50]
to introduce a little bit of Keynesian thinking,
[52]
but in this video we're going to try
[53]
to show the difference between the two
[56]
and it's not to say that one is right or one is wrong.
[58]
In fact, Keynesian felt that in the long run,
[60]
the classical model actually made sense,
[62]
but he also famously said,
[64]
"In the long run we are all dead."
[66]
I also want to emphasize that this isn't a defense
[68]
of Keynesian economics.
[70]
There are some points to what he has to say,
[72]
but there are other schools of thought.
[73]
Unfortunately, they often get very dogmatic,
[75]
but they also have some reasons to be wary
[78]
of Keynesian economics and we hope to go over
[79]
some of that in future videos.
[82]
In this one, we just want to understand
[83]
what Keynesian economics is all about
[85]
and how it really was a fundamental departure
[87]
from classical economics.
[89]
In classical economics, I'm going to use
[91]
aggregate demand and aggregate supply in both.
[95]
This is classical, this is price, this right over here
[98]
is real GDP and I'm going to do it
[102]
for the Keynesian case, as well.
[104]
This is price and this right over here is real GDP.
[111]
In both views of reality, or both models,
[115]
you have a downward sloping aggregate demand curve
[118]
for all the reasons that we've talked about
[119]
in multiple videos.
[121]
That's aggregate demand right over there.
[125]
We've already seen it, the classical view is that
[128]
in the long run, an economy's productivity,
[134]
or productive capacity, or its output shouldn't
[137]
be dependent on prices.
[139]
We've seen the long run aggregate supply curve
[142]
something like this.
[143]
This is the aggregate supply in the long run,
[146]
or sometimes you'll have long run aggregate supply.
[150]
Sometimes it'll be referred to that.
[152]
Saying, look, all prices are, they're a way to signal
[155]
what people want and demand and things like that,
[157]
but at the end of the day, prices and money,
[159]
they're just facilitating transactions.
[161]
You go to work and you get paid and all that,
[164]
but then you go and use that money to go and buy
[165]
other things that the economy produces,
[167]
like food and shelter and transportation.
[170]
All money is is a way of facilitating the transactions,
[173]
but the economy, in theory, based on how many people
[175]
it has, what kind of technology it has,
[178]
what kind of factories it has,
[181]
what kind of natural resources it has, it's just going
[183]
to produce what it's going to produce.
[185]
If you were to just change aggregate demand,
[188]
if the government were to print money
[192]
and aggregate demand were to -
[194]
and just distribute it from helicopters,
[195]
in this classical model, you would just have
[198]
aggregate demand shift to the right, but you have
[200]
this vertical long run aggregate supply curve
[202]
so the net effect is it didn't change the output
[205]
in this classical model.
[206]
All that happens is that the price goes
[208]
from this equilibrium price to this equilibrium price
[210]
over here.
[211]
You have the price would go up
[213]
and you would just experience inflation
[215]
with no increased output and there's multiple ways
[218]
you could've shifted that aggregate demand curve
[220]
to the right.
[221]
You could have a fiscal policy where the government,
[224]
maybe it holds its tax revenue constant,
[227]
but it increases spending, or it goes
[230]
the other way around.
[231]
It does not decrease, it doesn't change its spending,
[235]
but it lowers tax revenue.
[236]
Either of those, it tries to pump money into the economy
[239]
and pushes that aggregate demand curve to the right.
[241]
In this purely classical view, it says in the long run,
[243]
that's not going to be any good, just will lead to inflation.
[246]
The only way that you can increase the output
[248]
of economy is by making it more productive.
[251]
Maybe making some investments in technology,
[254]
make the economy more efficient,
[256]
maybe your population grows.
[258]
The only way is to really shift this curve to the right
[261]
on the supply side right over here.
[266]
Keynes did not disagree with that, but he sitting here
[269]
in the middle of the Great Depression, saying,
[271]
"Look, all of a sudden people are poor in the 1930s.
[274]
"Factories did not get blown up, people didn't disappear.
[277]
"In fact, there are factories that want to run,
[280]
but they are being shut down, because no one
[281]
"is demanding goods from them.
[282]
"There are people who want to work, but no one
[284]
"is asking them to work.
[286]
"They could work and produce wealth that could then
[288]
"be distributed to -
[289]
"But no one's demanding for them to do it."
[292]
He suspected something weird was happening
[295]
with aggregate demand, especially in the short run.
[298]
In a very pure, very, very short run model,
[301]
I know we have talked about a short run
[304]
aggregate supply curve that is upward sloping.
[307]
Something that might look something like that.
[310]
That is actually starting to put some
[312]
of the Keynesian ideas into practice.
[315]
What I like to think of is something in between,
[318]
but if you think in the very, very, very short term,
[321]
Keynes would say prices are going to be very sticky.
[323]
Especially in the short run, and I'll call it
[328]
the very short run, you have,
[332]
especially if the economy's producing well below
[336]
its capacity, like it seemed to be doing
[338]
during the Great Depression, prices are sticky.
[344]
That makes intuitive sense.
[346]
If the economy's trying to get overheated,
[348]
people are being overworked, you want them
[349]
to work more, hey, I want overtime.
[351]
You want factories to operate faster, people are going
[353]
to start -
[354]
The utilization is high, people are going to start charging
[356]
more and more, but if I'm unemployed and I'm desperate
[359]
to work, I'm not going to ask for a pay raise.
[361]
If my factory is at 30% utilization and someone wants
[364]
to buy a little bit more, that's not the time that I'm going
[366]
to say, "Hey, I'm going to raise prices on you."
[368]
I'll say, "Yeah, exact same price.
[370]
"You want another 5% of my factory to be utilized?
[372]
"Sure, that sounds great."
[374]
In the very short run, it has the opposite view
[376]
of the aggregate supply curve than the classical model.
[379]
It says at any level of GDP in the short run,
[383]
prices won't be affected.
[385]
It won't be affected.
[387]
So in this model right over here, this is aggregate supply
[390]
I'll call it, in the very short run.
[394]
You can debate what short run or very short run means,
[397]
whether we're talking about days, weeks, months,
[399]
or even a few years here, but once you start looking
[402]
at the world this way,
[404]
then something interesting happens.
[405]
In this model right over here, the only way to increase
[408]
GDP was on the supply side.
[411]
In this model right over here, the only way to increase
[414]
GDP is on the demand side, to actually either
[418]
through monetary policy, print more money,
[421]
or through fiscal policy, lower taxes
[424]
while holding spending constant or maybe do both,
[429]
essentially deficit spending.
[430]
Someway, without holding taxes constant,
[432]
but the government's spending more, whatever.
[434]
Shift the curve to the right and that might be a way
[440]
to increase the overall output.
[444]
Keynes' real realization was that, look,
[446]
the classical economist would tell you if you have
[448]
a free and unfettered market, the economy will just get
[452]
to its natural, very efficient state.
[454]
Keynes says, "Yes, that is sometimes true,
[456]
"but that's sometimes not true."
[458]
We'll talk about different cases.
[460]
By no means do I think the Keynesian model
[461]
is the ideal and I don't think even Keynes
[463]
would have thought the Keynesian model
[465]
describes everything.
[466]
Depends on the circumstance.
[468]
Keynes would say, "Look, let's think
[469]
"of a very simple idea."
[472]
You have person A, person B, person C, and person D.
[477]
Let's say person A sells to person B, person B sells
[481]
to person C, person C sells to person D,
[484]
and person D sells to person A.
[486]
Let's say that they're all selling two units
[488]
of whatever good and service that they offer.
[491]
For whatever reason, let's say C, all of a sudden,
[496]
just got a little bit pessimistic, had a bad dream,
[498]
woke up on the wrong side of the bed and says,
[499]
"You know what?
[500]
"I'm not feeling so good about the economy.
[501]
"I'm going to hold off from my purchase from B.
[504]
Instead of two units, I'm going to purchase one unit.
[507]
Well, B says, "Well, gee, my business is bad.
[510]
"Now I'm only going to purchase one unit."
[513]
A does the same thing for the same reason,
[515]
D does the same thing.
[516]
Now it all came back to C and now C says,
[518]
"Wow, I was right, that dream was predictive."
[521]
It was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
[523]
Now they're going to operate in this state
[525]
and there might not be any natural way to get them
[526]
bumped up to that state where they're all buying
[529]
two units from each other without maybe some outside,
[533]
especially some government act
[534]
or maybe all of a sudden saying,
[536]
"Hey B, if C doesn't want to buy two, I'm going
[538]
"to buy two temporarily."
[539]
There are dangers to this, huge dangers,
[541]
and we'll talk about that in future videos,
[543]
but then someone else, let's say the government,
[545]
tries to shift the aggregate demand curve
[547]
through fiscal policy and they say,
[548]
"Hey, I'll buy one from you, B."
[552]
Then B says, "Okay, now I can buy two again,"
[554]
and A can buy two again and then D can buy two again
[557]
and then C can buy two again.
[559]
Then in an ideal world, and this is the danger
[561]
of the government, the government would step back
[562]
and say, "Okay, everything is fine again.
[564]
"I don't have to buy this."
[566]
As we know, it's very hard once the government
[568]
starts spending money in some way, to actually cut
[571]
this spending right over here.
[573]
This was the general idea behind the Keynesian
[576]
versus the classical.
[577]
He says, "Look, there are circumstances,
[579]
"like the Great Depression, where the economy
[581]
"is operating well below its potential
[584]
"and in those circumstances, you need to have
[586]
"a stimulus on the demand side, not just a supply side."
[590]
The correct answer, as with all things,
[592]
is probably something in between.
[594]
A probably more accurate model is something like this.
[598]
Let's draw ...
[599]
This is price, this is real GDP right over here
[605]
and we'll still draw our downward sloping
[608]
aggregate demand curve and the more accurate thing
[612]
might look something like this.
[614]
Let's say that this is the absolute
[615]
theoretical maximum output, if everyone in the country
[619]
isn't sleeping, the factories are just being run
[620]
to the ground, that's the absolute theoretical output.
[623]
Let's say that this is its potential.
[625]
Just a healthy state where the economy
[628]
might be operating.
[629]
The real medium run supply curve or short run
[633]
aggregate supply curve.
[635]
This is aggregate supply in the very long run.
[638]
This is the long run aggregate supply.
[641]
The best model would be something that's in between
[644]
and might look something like this.
[645]
Our aggregate supply curve might look something like -
[648]
I want to do it in a different color.
[650]
Let me do it in magenta.
[651]
It might look something like this.
[656]
For whatever reason, maybe someone has a bad dream
[660]
or a bunch of people have a bad dream
[661]
or something scary happens, aggregate demand -
[664]
The stock market crashes, something happens,
[666]
aggregate demand shifts over there.
[669]
When we're out here, now all of a sudden
[671]
our output is well below potential, we have a lot
[673]
of excess capacity and now the Keynesian ideas seem
[676]
maybe they'll make sense.
[677]
Maybe there should be
[678]
some outside stimulus happening.
[681]
On the other side, if we're performing well at potential,
[683]
then all of a sudden the government wants to do
[686]
Keynesian policies and we'll see in future videos,
[688]
the government will always want
[689]
to do Keynesian policies, even if they're not justified.
[691]
It will push aggregate demand out here
[696]
and then the net effect is,
[697]
especially the more vertical this is, the more
[699]
this net effect will be true, that you really just get
[701]
more inflation and you don't really get a lot
[704]
of increase in output.
[705]
It really depends on the circumstance,
[708]
but an aggregate supply curve that starts flat
[710]
at low levels of output and then gets higher
[713]
and higher slope and becomes almost vertical
[715]
in your high levels of output, this is probably
[717]
a better model that takes into consideration
[720]
both the classical and the Keynesian ideas.