The real problem with GMO Food - YouTube

Channel: Our Changing Climate

[0]
this video is sponsored by audible on a
[3]
crisp
[3]
day in early august 50 activists
[6]
tore down a fence they stormed through
[9]
that barricade in the bikehole region of
[11]
the philippines
[12]
and ran towards a rice field beyond it
[15]
then to the shock of onlookers the group
[17]
began to tear out rice plants
[19]
by the handful they did this not because
[22]
they were hungry
[23]
or had any desire to eat the grain in
[26]
fact their motive
[27]
was the opposite the activists sought to
[30]
destroy the crops because the plants
[32]
were part of a field test of the
[33]
genetically modified plant
[35]
golden rice a strain that scientists
[38]
claim would help
[39]
cure blindness in young children by
[41]
supplying them with needed vitamin
[43]
a if this genetically modified golden
[45]
rice was so beneficial
[47]
why then was that group of protesters in
[49]
the philippines angry enough to rip it
[52]
from the ground
[53]
today we're not only going to figure out
[55]
exactly why genetically modified
[57]
organisms like golden rice have inspired
[59]
such
[60]
hatred and have devolved into polarized
[62]
debates like this
[64]
ideological reasons
[68]
but we're also going to dig down
[69]
underneath this debate to understand the
[71]
real consequences of gmos
[73]
in our modern food system
[77]
gmo or genetically modified organisms
[80]
can refer to
[81]
a lot of things but in the case of food
[84]
it refers to crops that have had their
[86]
genes specifically altered to express a
[88]
certain trait
[89]
in very simple terms this means taking a
[92]
certain gene from one
[93]
organism like repelling insects and
[96]
transferring that trait into
[98]
a plant's dna sequence so that the plant
[100]
expresses an
[101]
insect repelling trait as it grows while
[104]
genetic modification
[106]
of crops has existed since the birth of
[108]
agriculture this new form of genetic
[110]
engineering
[111]
is a bit different in the past if a
[114]
farmer wanted to create a sweeter apple
[116]
for example
[117]
they would need to breed two apple trees
[118]
with sweet traits and
[120]
hope the next generation might produce
[122]
even sweeter fruits
[124]
this process requires luck and years of
[127]
persistence
[128]
gene editing on the other hand is much
[130]
more precise
[131]
it uses specific genes from one organism
[134]
to modify the genetic code
[136]
of another you know exactly what trait
[139]
will be
[140]
expressed but the process of gene
[142]
editing in organisms
[143]
is not new in fact it's been honed and
[146]
tested for more than
[147]
40 years and over those years genetic
[150]
modification has become easier
[152]
and more precise as technology advances
[155]
so then
[156]
why has genetically modified food
[158]
becomes so controversial
[161]
exactly if you look at look at brazil
[163]
look at argentina
[168]
statistics
[170]
that conversation on the indian news
[172]
network ndtv
[174]
epitomizes the gmo debate full of
[177]
passion and at times
[178]
hyperbole often it seems like there's
[180]
very little common ground in the genetic
[182]
modification debate
[184]
indeed in 2015 a pew research poll found
[187]
that in just the u.s
[189]
only 30 percent of adults believed that
[191]
gmos were safe to eat
[193]
a percentage which stands in stark
[195]
opposition
[196]
to 88 of scientists from the american
[199]
association for the advancement of
[201]
science who believe gmos are safe
[204]
how does a gap like this happen in part
[206]
misinformation
[208]
and politicization but also as we'll see
[211]
a little later on fear of gmos can also
[214]
be a fear of a much
[215]
larger problem first though let's
[217]
quickly look at the general outlines of
[219]
the gmo debate on the anti-gmo side of
[222]
the conversation
[223]
lies those who view genetically modified
[226]
food as mutated
[227]
franken food poisonous crops that will
[229]
harm humans
[230]
if we eat them we're going to see foods
[232]
with toxins in them
[234]
and these foods are going to be more
[235]
allergenic than normal foods
[237]
while on the other side gmo advocates
[239]
claim that genetically modified foods
[241]
can help
[242]
solve world hunger mitigate climate
[244]
change create more durable drought
[246]
resistant plants
[248]
and increase yields i believe gmos are a
[250]
great technology to help us not only
[252]
improve global food security but
[254]
also help us save the environment these
[256]
are extreme cases
[257]
of a more nuanced conversation but they
[260]
are some of the core through lines
[262]
of the debate some of these claims
[264]
though are just
[265]
false for one gmos are not bad for your
[268]
health and they are not mutated
[270]
frankenfood
[271]
a meta-analysis of 698 studies found
[274]
that all of the research concluded that
[276]
in terms of health there have been no
[278]
observable differences between
[280]
genetically engineered and conventional
[282]
foods and yes while genetic engineering
[285]
might help create more durable crops or
[287]
drought resistant varieties they're by
[289]
no means a panacea for world hunger
[292]
or climate change there are only a
[294]
handful of drought resistant crops on
[296]
the market right now
[297]
and most like bayer's dt crops only
[300]
perform a couple
[301]
of percentage points better than
[303]
conventional crops
[304]
and that's only in specific drought
[306]
scenarios
[307]
also as a whole most gm crops in the u.s
[310]
are commodity crops
[312]
used to create ethanol to feed cows
[315]
or as base ingredients for products like
[317]
high fructose corn syrup
[319]
so most of these crops are not solving a
[321]
food shortage problem
[323]
instead they're adding unneeded products
[325]
to the market
[326]
like corn syrups and considering that we
[328]
waste
[329]
one third of the food we produce every
[332]
year
[332]
world hunger is not an issue of more or
[335]
better
[335]
food it's about infrastructure and
[338]
logistics
[339]
genetically engineered crops have been
[341]
used to do
[342]
good however like in the case of the
[344]
hawaiian papaya from the 1950s to the
[347]
1990s hawaiian papaya farms
[349]
suffered a 50 drop in production
[352]
as a result of the ring spot virus farms
[355]
were decimated and their owners
[357]
were reeling but in 1998 a new breed of
[360]
papaya genetically modified to withstand
[363]
the virus hit the market
[364]
called the rainbow papaya it began to
[366]
replace conventional papaya plants for
[368]
its durability in the face of the
[370]
disease
[371]
and after a decade of use accounted for
[374]
75 percent of all hawaiian papaya
[376]
production
[377]
[Music]
[379]
so we know that gmos are safe to use and
[382]
in some instances can be applied in
[385]
beneficial ways
[386]
then what's the issue the real problem
[388]
with gmos
[390]
is not actually gmos themselves but the
[392]
industrial farming
[394]
system behind them we're using gm foods
[397]
to bolster
[398]
an unsustainable system one of the more
[401]
popular gm varieties of crops in the u.s
[404]
monsanto's roundup ready seed
[406]
exemplifies this
[407]
interwoven nature of gmos and industrial
[410]
agriculture
[411]
from corn to soybeans to sugar beets the
[413]
roundup ready plants are
[415]
resistant to the herbicide glyphosate
[417]
which is commonly referred to
[419]
as roundup this resistance means that
[421]
farmers can indiscriminately spray
[423]
over their fields without worrying about
[425]
damaging their crops
[427]
as a result glyphosate use has
[429]
skyrocketed in the u.s
[431]
toxic runoff from overspraying is
[433]
causing dead zones throughout u.s
[435]
waterways
[436]
and monsanto which is now owned by the
[438]
german company
[439]
bayer not only profits off their roundup
[442]
ready seeds but receive
[444]
bumper profits from the additional
[446]
increase in
[447]
glyphosate demand to top it off
[449]
companies like bayer
[450]
patent and restrict seed saving claiming
[453]
that the research and development of
[455]
these seeds takes time
[457]
and money this means that not only are
[459]
seeds more expensive
[461]
because one company has monopoly on them
[463]
but also
[464]
once a farmer has bought seed they're
[466]
not allowed to practice seed saving to
[468]
cut
[469]
costs in the next year the problem with
[471]
gmos then
[472]
is that it allows for a system in which
[475]
just a few
[476]
companies hold immense power over our
[479]
food supply
[480]
through that power these companies
[482]
perpetuate a food system
[484]
wherein highly toxic chemical sprays are
[486]
the only solution to pests and weeds
[489]
just a few quote unquote perfect and
[491]
uniform crops
[493]
trump a variety of diverse plants and
[496]
size
[496]
is valued over taste
[501]
at the end of the day gmos are just a
[503]
technology
[505]
they're not a food system so gmos like
[508]
most technologies
[509]
can do good when used in a just ethical
[512]
and sustainable
[513]
manner but unfortunately in our modern
[515]
agricultural system the history of gmos
[518]
is fraught with unsustainable
[520]
applications
[521]
and they most often fall into the wrong
[524]
hands
[524]
just four companies control sixty
[527]
percent of the seed market
[528]
and thus can influence what food is
[531]
grown
[531]
gmos however might be able to help us
[534]
tackle issues like climate change by
[536]
transferring traits from the american
[538]
chestnut a carbon storage powerhouse
[540]
into other plants or crops but they are
[543]
a small part of a much larger needed
[546]
overhaul of our food system gmos are not
[549]
a silver bullet to climate change hunger
[551]
or
[552]
drought and while it is important to
[554]
continue exploring genetic engineering
[557]
it's equally essential to re-learn and
[559]
foster
[560]
a more ethical relationship with our
[562]
land and
[563]
food in fact for many of the problems
[565]
that gmos
[567]
seek to solve we already have solutions
[570]
agroforestry integrated weed and pest
[573]
management systems
[574]
no-till and polycultural systems
[577]
represent just a few of the diverse
[579]
paths forward and not only are these
[582]
techniques
[582]
sustainable but they can also increase
[585]
yields
[585]
create more durable crops and suck
[588]
carbon from
[589]
the air within these systems gmos might
[592]
have a place
[593]
but not until they are produced as
[595]
public goods
[596]
untethered from the bonds of patents and
[599]
large multinational corporations
[602]
genetically engineered plants should be
[604]
seen as just one
[605]
small addition to the collection of
[607]
thousands of other
[608]
rich varieties of crops in the world it
[611]
is a technology that can be used to
[614]
perpetuate
[614]
a destructive and extractivist system
[617]
but it also has the potential to do
[619]
better it has the potential to create
[621]
crops that work in conjunction with
[623]
a sustainable food system that produces
[626]
nutritious
[627]
diverse and tasty food
[630]
i love learning and reading about
[632]
environmental issues but sometimes i
[634]
find it hard to sit down and read a
[636]
dense non-fiction book about climate
[638]
change which is why i've turned to
[640]
audiobooks recently
[642]
and there's no better place to listen to
[643]
your favorite audiobook
[645]
than audible with thousands of audio
[647]
books podcasts
[649]
and even guided meditations audible has
[652]
been a treasure for me
[653]
i recently started listening to hope
[655]
jaron's new book the story of
[657]
more and i've been blowing through it
[659]
it's an emotionally packed
[660]
narrative about climate change that does
[663]
a great job blending personal struggles
[665]
with global issues and what's even more
[668]
awesome
[668]
about the audiobook is that hope jiren
[671]
is the narrator so you get to hear
[673]
exactly how
[674]
she intended the book to sound i can't
[676]
recommend it enough
[677]
so if you want to listen to the story of
[679]
more or browse through
[681]
thousands of other audiobooks then
[683]
definitely go to audible.com
[685]
our changing climate or text our
[687]
changing climate to 500
[689]
500 and sign up for a free 30-day
[692]
trial and with that trial comes an
[694]
audiobook of your choice
[696]
absolutely free hey everyone charlie
[699]
here thanks for making it all the way to
[701]
the end screen
[702]
if you want to support this channel
[703]
directly consider supporting our
[705]
changing climate on patreon patreon has
[708]
given me the financial consistency to
[710]
make more and more ambitious videos
[712]
so every little bit counts thanks again
[715]
for watching and i'll see you
[716]
in two weeks