Is TQQQ the New Millionaire Maker?!? 3x ETFs - YouTube

Channel: Adventurous Investor

[0]
Fifty Eight percent return a year. That  sounds silly doesn’t it? A ponzi scheme  
[5]
for sure. Right? What if I told you  
[8]
it’s possible. With an ETF. Of course it has  to be in tech. And leveraged tech at that.  
[14]
Allow me to introduce: TQQQ. I’m Skyler James,  welcome back to the channel. TQQQ is a leveraged  
[22]
3x bull ETF offering investors triple the  returns - up or down - of the Nasdaq 100.  
[31]
But what questions should investors  ask before jumping into this one?  
[36]
And is this ETF a big time buy? Or  a big time bubble about to pop?  
[46]
Just like ETFs you already own, leveraged ETFs  offer positive or negative returns to investors,  
[54]
but at two or three times the percent of  the underlying stocks. In the case of TQQQ,  
[60]
investors will see their capital move three  times as much as the underlying Nasdaq 100. 3x  
[67]
up, 3x down, each and every day. Over time, this  leverage can deliver gigantic outsized returns.  
[75]
It can also deliver financial ruin. The Nasdaq  100 has been one of the best performing indexes  
[81]
of the last decade, and surely is worthy  of holding using leverage, isn’t it?  
[86]
I’ve developed a framework of questions investors  should ask themselves before buying into leveraged  
[92]
ETFs. in the process of answering these questions,  you’re going to learn ALOT about the ETF itself,  
[99]
in this case TQQQ. This format will give you the  nuts and bolts of the investment, and hopefully  
[105]
by the end of this video, you - the investor,  will have a pretty good idea if leveraged ETF  
[112]
are part of your risk appetite or not. Kicking things off, the first question to be  
[117]
answered, does this sector have strong economic  headwinds or tailwinds? How are things looking  
[124]
on a macro level for the stocks inside TQQQ?  Let’s look at the performance first, like I said,  
[130]
it’s has generated north of fifty percent returns  annually, compounding, every year - for the last  
[137]
ten years. Things must be going prettttty  good on a macro level for the holdings to  
[141]
generate that kind of return. Right? Another way to evaluate the macro question, is to  
[146]
look at the recent performance of the underlying  ETF. That ETF is the Invesco QQQ Trust, which  
[153]
tracks the Nasdaq-100, and is also called “The  Q’s.” The Q’s have generated phenomenal returns  
[160]
in the last ten years, thanks in part to many  business’s growing reliance on technology.  
[165]
Remember that the three-up three-down volatility  of leveraged ETFs makes their long-term returns  
[172]
cloudier than an unleveraged ETF. Sometimes  the price action will be up and to the right,  
[178]
and sometimes it will be bouncing all over the  place. That’s part of the leveraged ETF ballgame.  
[183]
Remember in my U-Bot video, we saw that U-Bot -  a leveraged robotics ETF - has UNDER-performed  
[189]
its unleveraged counterpart - the BOTZ ETF. So  it's always a smart idea to check both leveraged  
[196]
and unleveraged performance before  answering the macro question.  
[200]
To roundout the macro analysis, let’s look at the  top ten holdings and maki a ballpark judgement.  
[206]
I know it sounds silly, you’re thinking, it’s  the Nasdaq stupid. But seriously are we cool  
[212]
with it’s top top 10. 53% of The Q’s is the likes  of Adobe, Google, Amazon and Tesla. So yeah,  
[219]
the top ten of the Q’s and therefore of TQQQ  are big-time tech titans, with enough weight  
[226]
allocated to them inside this ETF that they can  steer the whole fund with their performance.  
[231]
So take a look at those big hitters and make  sure you want extra exposure to them.  
[237]
Here’s an example of a bad top ten, and a bad  candidate for a leveraged ETF. The ETF is QQEW,  
[245]
and it’s a billion dollar ETF from First Trust.  QQEW gives investors an equal-weighted approach  
[252]
to those same Nasdaq 100 stocks. But look at  this top ten! Marriot? Dollartree? Both QQEW  
[259]
and The Q’s track the Nasdaq 100 right?  Fundamentally the same stocks. But by using a  
[265]
market-cap-weighted approach, Dollar Store  stays in the strip mall while the tech  
[270]
titans steer us toward outsized gains. Let’s summarize what we’ve covered so far.  
[276]
You’ll want a heavy focus on macroeconomics of  the holdings of the underlying index, in this  
[282]
case QQQ. Does it justify using 3x leverage?  And we saw TQQQ has done incredibly well,  
[289]
the Q’s have done very well too. The top ten  holding of those funds are built in a way  
[294]
that should lead to steady gains for investors.  See how we’re answering big-picture questions and  
[300]
learning about the ETF at the same time? Hit the  like button if this is your kind of video.  
[306]
Question TWO before investing in a leveraged ETF  like TQQQ: would you allocate a large portion of  
[312]
your investing capital to a NON-leveraged version  of the same holdings? Would you hold it long-term?  
[318]
In this case, would I allocate a large  portion of my holdings to the Q’s?  
[323]
Well, regardless of how me or you answer  that, many people DO invest in the Q’s!  
[328]
In fact the Q’s is the fifth largest ETF  in existence. What’s especially intriguing,  
[334]
is that the four ETFs with a higher AUM than  the Q’s, ETFs with hundreds of billions in AUM,  
[341]
are all more-or-less indiscriminate broad market  ETFs. They are the STANDARD of investing.  
[346]
BUT the strategy of The Q’s is the MOST VALIDATED  by investors AFTER the S&P 500. That’s what this  
[353]
table shows. Are you with me on that? Do you  see how I reached that conclusion? The only  
[357]
other investing strategy that has lured more  money in ETF-land than the Q’s are market-wide,  
[363]
broad index funds. So if the Q’s are  THAT respected by investors as a whole,  
[368]
they answer YES for our second question: would  the underlying index be worthy of holding long  
[373]
term. So far, TQQQ is passing all the tests. Question 3 is the most important question for  
[380]
any leveraged ETF holder to answer. That is: am  I willing to stick with this thing through ANY  
[386]
downturn? TQQQ lost more than two thirds of its  value during the covid crash. Poof. Vaporized.  
[394]
That’s called a drawdown in  investor-speak. And it’s painful.  
[398]
Far more painful with leveraged products. But TQQQ was back to making new all time highs  
[406]
again just five months later. So leveraged ETF  holders need to ask themselves. What would you  
[411]
have done? Would you have had the stomach to  hang on as a ten thousand dollar investment  
[416]
dwindled down to thirty five hundred?  Would you have sold on the way down?  
[421]
This is a good time to mention that I have MANY  leveraged ETF videos in my channel, and you  
[427]
probably know this if you’re a subscriber. Be sure  to hit subscribe if you like this kind of content.  
[433]
Likes and subscribes tell me which  kinds of videos to make more of. But  
[437]
it's a good time to mention that many of you have  left comments on other videos, highlighting the  
[442]
confusion around holding leveraged ETFs for a  single day versus over a longer horizon.  
[448]
Let’s take a look at the prospectus, here’s  how it looks to me. First, the fund has a  
[453]
stated objective of delivering 3X the return  of the underlying index, on a single day.  
[459]
Emphasis on “single day.” They bolded it for us  here. The second thing it says is that the fund’s  
[466]
performance will be different over longer  periods of time than its stated goal of 3x  
[471]
the daily return. Or, said another way, they can’t  make any promise or prediction of performance  
[477]
for anything more than one single day. Step outside of leveraged ETFs for a second. Think  
[483]
about the fine print of an S&P 500 index fund,  how is it different? It isn’t really. The goal  
[490]
is to closely track the S&P 500 index. So  if VOO for example underperformed the S&P  
[497]
by ten percent every year, investors might leave,  because Vanguard is clearly not meeting its stated  
[502]
objective. I think the leveraged ETFs are the same  thing. These ETF issuers are basically saying,  
[507]
look, these are built for an objective that only  occurs in one single day. Anything after that,  
[513]
it's on you! They aren’t saying don’t  invest, don’t hold, just - don’t look to us  
[518]
for a performance predictions. They go on to say, well look if the  
[522]
market is flat for a year this leveraged ETF  will be negative. Okay, thanks, ETF issuer! And  
[529]
they say that performance over time will vary  in returns and even the direction of returns  
[535]
compared to a single day performance. Let me give you an analogy. Ice cream scoopers.  
[539]
They’re kind of this exaggerated spoon shape,  right? That’s all they are. But they’re really  
[544]
good at scooping perfect balls of ice cream.  Now, just imagine that the ice-cream scoop  
[549]
packaging said something like, this spoon is  only intended to scoop ice cream and scoop  
[553]
ice cream very well. If you use it as a cereal  spoon, we make no guarantee that it will work,  
[558]
because this is strictly designed to scoop  ice cream. Haha ok silly I get it, but could  
[563]
you eat cereal with an ice cream scooper?  Sure. It might not be as good as a spoon,  
[568]
OR in some cases it might be better! Depends on  how thick you make your cereal I guess haha.  
[573]
We’ve covered alot, so quick recap. TQQQ leveraged  ETF offers investors 3X the daily returns of QQQ.  
[582]
The Q’s is a technology-focused fund, and has  done remarkably well over the last decade and  
[588]
it’s one of the biggest ETFs in existence. We also noted that selling low KILLS leveraged  
[594]
ETF returns for long-term holders. And finally, we  dug into the fine print of the prospectus - just a  
[600]
little - to investigate why there’s confusion  in the leveraged ETF messaging.  
[617]
I have one last thing to touch on. This is NOT  one of my normal three questions for leveraged  
[622]
ETF investing, but it’s worth noting. Have you  asked yourself: how do these ETFs actually deliver  
[627]
3X the results using just 1X the capital? It’s  through derivatives. It’s through swaps. We said  
[633]
earlier in this video, we can’t look directly  at the holdings of TQQQ to know what stocks are  
[638]
inside, we have to look at the good-old-fashioned,  UN-leveraged Q’s for that answer. Do you know why?  
[644]
Because here’s what the TQQQ holdings look  like. The biggest holdings are billions and  
[649]
billions of dollars in derivatives. THIS  is how TQQQ and Proshares are delivering  
[655]
3x returns each day. We don’t need to  dive too deep into this, but investors  
[660]
should probably ask themselves: do I care? Does  this matter to me? Do I look at this and think:  
[665]
swaps - yikes. I’m outta here. This looks like  black magic. Or do I look at this and think:  
[670]
okay whatever, give me those 3x returns! This is  the final piece of the puzzle. Whether or not the  
[676]
“how” of leveraged ETFs is important. I hope you learned something about TQQQ  
[682]
today. And don’t forget to give me 3X on the like  button. Thanks for watching and I’ll see you on  
[688]
the next one! -- END