đ
The Business Deception That Cost $60 Billion - YouTube
Channel: The Infographics Show
[0]
An American worker named George had his sights
set on a comfortable retirement, perhaps some
[5]
holidays in the sun, relaxing in the garden
with good novels and a gin and tonic by his
[10]
side. And then when the company he worked
for, the energy giant called the Enron Corporation,
[15]
collapsed in front of his eyes those plans
went up in smoke. Years later he was mowing
[19]
pastures when he should have been living on
his retirement savings, which had been mostly
[24]
tied up in Enron company stock. No one ever
thought such a behemoth of a company could
[29]
just go belly-up. It was a story that shocked
the world, one involving mismanagement, corruption
[34]
and greed. This is what happened.
[36]
In its heyday Enron was one of the largest
companies in the USA. At its peak its shares
[41]
reached $90.75, and when it declared bankruptcy
in 2001 they were worth $0.26. Few saw it
[49]
coming, and to this day the downfall is a
reminder to us all that indeed giants can
[54]
fall, and on top of that, giants arenât
always what they seem.
[58]
The story starts in 1985 when two companies
merged. They were Texas-based Houston Natural
[64]
Gas Company and Omaha-based InterNorth Incorporated.
At the beginning the new Enron was simply
[69]
a very big natural gas supplier, but then
in 1989 it turned a leaf in its book and began
[75]
trading natural gas commodities. In 1994 it
also began trading electricity. These changes
[81]
took place under its new CEO Kenneth Lay,
who had formerly been in the big chair at
[86]
Houston Natural Gas. At the time Enron was
said to be one of the most innovative companies
[90]
in the USA, but at the time of the downfall
the New York Times wrote, âEnron is a new-economy
[96]
company, a thinking-outside-the-box, paradigm-shifting,
market-making company.â It added to the
[101]
end of that paragraph, âIt is also, at this
point in time, a bankrupt company.â
[105]
As the story goes, before Enron got started
gas and electricity were produced and sold
[110]
by state-regulated monopolies. But then there
was deregulation, and as the Times writes,
[115]
âEnron used Wall Street magic to transform
energy supplies into financial instruments
[120]
that could be traded online like stocks and
bonds.â Prior to this, those energy monopolies
[125]
were always under government scrutiny, but
after deregulation Enron had more freedom
[130]
and so started trading energy online, such
as stocks and bonds, and also placing bets
[135]
on future energy prices. Enron started selling
contracts, called energy derivatives, to investors.
[141]
Soon Enron was called âAmerica's Most Innovative
Company", and it won that accolade for a number
[146]
of years. At the time this looked good for
the consumer, because with supply and demand
[151]
taking over fixed prices by monopiles, the
prices for customers seemed fair. It seemed
[156]
like a dream story for capitalism.
[159]
There was a problem, though, and something
didnât quite add up.
[162]
You see Enron thought that if it could trade
energy, then why not trade all kinds of other
[167]
things, such as insurance or advertising and
then turn these into contracts and sell them
[172]
as derivatives, too. The company poured billions
into these new trading ventures, but not everything
[177]
turned into gold. It later turned out that
while Enron was winning on some levels, it
[182]
was losing on others, but the problem was
it wasnât always coming clean about where
[187]
it was losing. It was kind of fixing its accounts
and reporting false trading revenues. As one
[192]
person pointed out, âSome of the schemes
traders used included serving as a middleman
[196]
on a contract trade, linking up a buyer and
a seller for a future contract, and then booking
[201]
the entire sale as Enron revenue. Enron was
also using its partnerships to sell contracts
[206]
back and forth to itself and booking revenue
each time.â It was in fact creating imaginary
[212]
revenues.
[213]
If that is confusing to you, The Wall Street
Journal gave an example of one such piece
[216]
of Enron subterfuge. Enron got into a deal
with Blockbuster, those guys whose stores
[222]
youâd go to in the past and rent out a movie.
The new deal with Blockbuster was to do this
[226]
online. But it didnât work out, and in eight
months the business was a total flop. While
[231]
this was going on Enron had made a deal with
a Canadian bank. If the bank loaned Enron
[236]
$115 million, Enron would then hand over its
video deal profits for the first ten years
[242]
to the bank. As you know, Enron made no cash
from this online video renting business with
[247]
Blockbuster, but it still wrote the $115 million
down as part of its revenue, not a massive
[253]
loss. The Canadian bank was owed money, but
on paper things didnât look bad for Enron.
[258]
According to the New York Times, Enron did
a fair bit of shady accounting and still Wall
[263]
Street bankers at J. P. Morgan, and others,
were gung-ho about the company and its stock.
[268]
Some people, however, began to smell a rat.
[270]
The thing was, Enron was also seen as a fairytale
winner in the years when deregulation and
[275]
online trading, embodied by a get rich quick
culture, were admired by everyone. Leave the
[281]
innovators alone, this is the future. But
things got out of hand, as they tend to do
[285]
when in Hobbesian terms the âLeviathanâ
goes missing and no one is watching over the
[289]
people to ensure nothing terrible is happening.
Enron also invested heavily in high-speed
[294]
broadband telecom networks, but the company
saw no profits from that, either. The most
[299]
innovative company in America was on a losing
streak, but still those losses were not reported.
[305]
It was hiding all its financial losses, using
something called mark-to-market accounting.
[310]
Investopedia explains that like this, âThis
technique measures the value of a security
[314]
based on its current market value instead
of its book value. This can work well when
[318]
trading securities, but it can be disastrous
for actual businesses.â
[322]
Another example given of the Enron way of
hiding losses is this. If the company bought
[327]
a power plant it would first put the projected
profit on its books. Thatâs a projected
[332]
profit, meaning nothing has actually been
made. If then Enron actually didnât make
[336]
a profit but a loss, it would transfer the
loss to an off-the-books corporation somewhere
[341]
no one would find it. This way Enronâs bottom
line didnât look affected and everyone still
[346]
thought the company was booming, when in fact
heavy losses were being incurred and then
[351]
hidden like soiled underwear at the bottom
of a laundry basket. Enron used something
[356]
called off-balance-sheet special purpose vehicles
(SPVs) to hide these failures, but all you
[361]
need to know is that this is a technique that
can be used to fool investors and creditors.
[366]
The experts tell us this is not illegal, but
it can be dangerous. At the same time, not
[371]
everyone understands how they work, so it
could be said to be slightly unethical if
[375]
companies are not completely transparent about
it.
[378]
And then the bubble burst, as bubbles tend
to do. By April 2001 analysts were on to Enron,
[384]
they saw what was happening, realizing that
accounting wizardry had been creating a company
[388]
not unlike the fantasy city of Oz. Behind
the screen Enron was crumbling, and by summer
[394]
2001 the company was in freefall. Its stock
was downgraded, sinking like a stone into
[399]
the abyss. By 2000 it was revealed that Enron
had losses of $591 million and $628 million
[407]
in debt. In 2001 the company filed for bankruptcy,
and a lot of poor folks whose pensions were
[412]
tied up in company stock were going to have
to cancel their dream vacation in the Caribbean.
[417]
From 2004 to 2011 the company paid $21.7 billion
to its creditors. Itâs said shareholders
[423]
lost in total around $74 billion and employees
lost billions in pension benefits, with one
[430]
such person being the guy we mentioned at
the beginning of this story. There were many,
[434]
many more like him.
[435]
Some of the executives were charged with conspiracy,
insider trading, and securities fraud. The
[440]
CEO we mentioned died of a heart attack before
he could face any prison time. Others did
[445]
time for facilitating corrupt business practices.
Another CEO, Jeffrey Skilling, was only just
[450]
released from prison.
[452]
Do you think government regulation of markets
is good or bad after watching this video?
[457]
Let us know in the comments! Also, check out
our other video How Jeff Bezos Gets His Money
[461]
From Amazon. Thanks for watching, and, as
always, donât forget to like, share and
[466]
subscribe. See you next time.
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





