Scientists Are Corrupting Their Own Experiments, Here's How - YouTube

Channel: Seeker

[0]
The first scientific method acronym I was ever taught was: SHE-OC. This was middle school.
[5]
State the Problem.
[7]
Hypothesis.
[8]
Experiment.
[9]
Observation.
[10]
Conclusion.
[11]
It seems pretty straightforward, and I didn’t know it at the time.
[13]
But that fourth one?
[14]
That’s a doozy.
[16]
Contemplate this classic story
 when a tree falls in the forest with nothing or no one
[20]
around, does it make a sound?
[23]
It would seem so, but if no one can hear it does it matter?
[27]
What if I’m standing next to it?
[29]
What if I put a camera or a microphone nearby?
[33]
Surely a falling tree makes sound!
[35]
Right?
[36]
Sure, it probably does.
[38]
But there’s really no answer, it’s just a thought experiment.
[41]
It really exists to illustrate a really huge problem with science.
[45]
The act of observation changes whatever you observe!
[49]
Famous chimp researcher Jane Goodall -- lived among chimpanzee tribes for years, providing
[53]
food and learning about their behavior.
[56]
Her observation and presence affected her results -- and yet, what she learned taught
[62]
us heaps about chimps, and ourselves.
[65]
So, does it matter that she affected them?
[68]
Yes.
[69]
Did it affect the science?
[70]
YES, for sure!
[71]
Did we still learn a lot?
[74]
Abso-chimpin’-lutely.
[75]
We still do these chimp studies, even knowing we’re changing their behavior.
[80]
A new study found even if researchers stay away from them, just knowing they’re being
[85]
watched will change chimp hunting behavior.
[87]
We’re not saying observation is negative!
[90]
It’s just -- out there.
[92]
The act of doing it changes what you’re observing.
[95]
In the 1920s, American factories wanted workers to be more efficient and productive.
[100]
At one Hawthorne, Illinois factory, sociologists were testing different rest periods, working
[105]
hours, lighting in the work areas
 and every change made workers more productive.
[112]
Even if they changed something, and then changed it back --- both increased productivity!
[117]
It turned out, it wasn’t the changes, but simply observing the workers changed their
[122]
behavior.
[123]
They felt someone was interested in their well-being, and that was enough.
[127]
Sociologists have dubbed this the Hawthorne Effect.
[129]
And this exist throughout science

[131]
In computer science, the problem with observation is called a Heisenbug.
[135]
Basically if a programmer tries to figure out where the bug is in their software, it
[139]
won’t show up because they’re looking for it.
[141]
In physics they call this problem the Observer Effect – and it’s super obvious: because
[146]
light is both a wave and made of photons, but depending on how you observe it it will
[151]
only behave as one or the other!
[153]
So frustrating.
[154]
And, this might have you wondering, how can observation be part of science if the act
[159]
of observing changes the results?!
[161]
Can we really know what a black hole, amoeba or atom does when it’s alone?
[167]
We can’t 
but

[170]
NASA says on their website, “The ideal observer is one who causes no unnecessary perturbations
[177]
to the system being observed.”
[179]
Observation is a big deal, but less so if we know there’s an effect.
[183]
In knowing the Observer Effect exists, we can try to account for it.
[188]
For example, researchers watching chimps have tried using drones -- so there are no humans
[192]
around!
[193]
And
 well, I’ll just let you see what happened.
[196]
The chimp prepared ahead of time, and used a stick to take out the drone invader.
[200]
No really, that’s what happened.
[201]
We changed its behavior
 even in trying not to.
[204]
In the end, there’s no “do this and the observer effect goes away” instead, scientists
[209]
learn what the observer effect is for their discipline, and then try and design experiments
[214]
to minimize it.
[215]
That’s why double-blind studies are important, and repeatability, and coming at problems
[220]
from different angles.
[221]
There are even studies of the observer effects in studies!
[225]
The SHEOC scientific method requires we get information from the source, to draw conclusions,
[232]
and ask new questions.
[235]
Even though some problems can be solved without ever going into the field, if we don’t observe,
[239]
how will we know?
[242]
Special thanks to our sponsor, Domain dot com.
[244]
When you buy a domain name from Domain Dot Com, you’re taking the first steps in creating
[248]
an identity and vision for your brand.
[250]
No domain extension will help tell your story like a DOT COM or DOT NET domain name.
[254]
Get 15% off Domain Dot Com’s already affordable domain names and web hosting when you use
[259]
coupon code SEEKER at checkout.
[261]
Observer Effects also come into play if you could travel significant portions of speed
[265]
of light.
[266]
This handsome devil here has a video all about time dilation!
[269]
Watch it!
[270]
You’ll like it.
[271]
How do you think we could get around the observer effect?
[273]
Take a crack at it, why not?
[275]
Let us know in the comments, tell me on twitter, and subscribe for more Seeker.