Principal agent problems and industry structure - YouTube

Channel: Marginal Revolution University

[1]
Next I wanna talk about principle agent
[3]
problems and industry structure
[8]
Principle agent problem is the problem
[11]
you have when you delegate, so you ask
[15]
someone else to do something for you and
[18]
if you ever ask someone to do something
[20]
for you yknow sometimes they do it the way
[23]
you want to and sometimes they don't.
[25]
And thats the principle agent problem:
[27]
how to get them to do what you want them
[29]
to do. So in the mortgage industry
[32]
We can think of a very long chain of
[35]
delegation. we can say we start with
[39]
tax payers, they have some interest
[45]
apparently because we have government
[49]
involved in housing finance and they delegate to regulators who may
[52]
or may not have the interest of tax payers in mind or may or may not execute that
[61]
well. And then lets go from regulators to the government spots at enterprises Freddy
[68]
Mack and Fannie May. They in turn have employees but they also delegate but they
[78]
also delegate some of their responsibilities to others there
[85]
are people who sell mortgages sellers of mortgages and there are servicers.
[95]
People who service mortgages. those are the people who collect payments remember
[102]
that function. and then the sellers of mortgages in turn, the people who sell
[110]
them to Freddy Mack. The mortgage bankers who sell them might delegate some function
[115]
to brokers. They might delegate some functions to credit scoring companies, to
[127]
credit repositories, appraisers. there is a whole bunch of delegation going on and
[140]
at each stage, there may be cases where the delegation doesn't work well.
[148]
It's possible
[149]
that the agent who is the person who's had stuff delegated to does not do what
[160]
the principle wants--that's the person who does the delegating. So that's generic so
[169]
I just wanna talk about some of the issues as they apply to industry structure
[174]
in the mortgage industry. there are a lot of examples, but if we go back to the days
[182]
of the savings and loans process, the savings and loans and the so called
[191]
originate-to-hold model. The savings and loan originated the loan and then held it,
[200]
then, there's really no delegation of servicing or underwriting to an outside
[216]
party. That is you are not delegating those things to an outside party.
[225]
And so the principle agent problem is simply a matter of managing your employees
[233]
so you have employees and you have to worry about whether they're doing their
[238]
job the way you want them to, but once you've managed that, you've managed the
[244]
process. when you have securitization then we are talking about outside parties
[254]
getting involved. If lets say it's Freddy Mack doing the securitizing, someone else
[263]
is gonna originate and underwrite loans, so that's gonna be done by an agent.
[274]
And its gonna create principle agent problems. Somebody else is gonna service
[280]
the loans, and then again that's an agent that is gonna create principle agent
[284]
problems. when you have, but at least with Freddy Mack and Fannie May you have one
[298]
principle in some sense worrying about the servicing of the loans. When you have
[305]
private securitization, you have many owners of the security, so you have many
[313]
investors for whom the servicers is an agent, and these investors will differ in
[324]
how they want the loans serviced. Some of them might benefit from having the
[331]
servicer forgive a bad loan others would benefit if the servicer would
[337]
foreclose as quickly as possible. And so with the conflicts of interests you really
[343]
get very complicated principle agent problems. another point I'd like to make
[350]
on principle agent problems, is that credit scoring really changed the nature
[358]
of the problem because before when you had a human underwriter, the human underwriter
[370]
was an agent. So you had let's say Freddie Mack buying loans for a private label
[387]
securitizer, Private issuer buying loans. and they would have been dependent on a
[398]
human underwriter as an agent--that is an underwriter working at another firm.
[406]
That represents a challenge especially the private label issuer. There really wasn't
[412]
much use of private label issuing as long as they were dependent on human
[418]
underwriters because there are principle agent problems, you have to send careful
[424]
instructions to the underwriters, you have to do quality control on the underwriting
[429]
and so on. If you can bypass the human underwriter with credit scoring then you
[435]
have a different agent. You have a credit scoring company making use of the credit
[446]
repository. Of course the human underwriter would also make use of the
[449]
credit repository. And you are bypassing the human underwriter you are dealing with
[458]
a more automated system and so some of the principle agent problems go away.
[465]
And that's why private label issued securities took off once credit scoring
[473]
took over the industry. It became a possibility. It became less expensive to
[479]
manage the principle agent problem involving underwriting loans once
[485]
credit scoring took off.
[494]
And I think we may see a similar ability as the automated appraisals--
[502]
--sorts of things that you find on Zillow and so on. Automated
[507]
Autmomated appraisals
[510]
can resolve some of the principle agent problems that otherwise
[515]
would arise with human appraisers because with a human appraiser, the human
[521]
appraiser has to respond to the mortgage seller, whose interest is in y'know give
[533]
us the appraisal that will enable us to close the loan and the mortgage buyer, or
[542]
whoever is gonna be taking on the risk of the loan, who says y'know don't inflate
[547]
the value of the house. So the mortgage seller says do inflate the value of the
[551]
house. The mortgage buyer says don't. The human appraiser isn't gonna get work
[556]
if mortgage sellers don't hire them but if the human appraiser works too much against
[565]
the interest of the mortgage buyer and let's too many bad appraisals slip buy
[569]
then at some point the mortgage buyer is gonna have to do something to not allow
[577]
that human appraiser to work for him anymore.
[580]
But this whole issue can be bypassed to some extent if you have automated
[585]
appraisals that work. just as credit scoring allows you to change the role of
[593]
the human underwriter, so the point here is that the nature of the principle agent
[599]
problem can change as the technology of mortgage origination changes.