House Floor speech of Jenniffer Gonz谩lez in support of the US Territories Investor Protection Act - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
in this regard her long service public
[3]
service and particularly Dersch opinon
[6]
change in Puerto Rico
[8]
recently mr. speaker I had the
[10]
opportunity to take an all too quick
[14]
trip to San Juan to assess the current
[18]
economic conditions on the island to
[21]
brief in that it was less than a day
[23]
which seems completely unfair to any
[26]
visitor to the beautiful island of
[28]
Puerto Rico but I want to thank my host
[31]
our distinguished delegate from the
[34]
Commonwealth Jennifer Gonzalez for
[36]
hosting me on that visit I thank her for
[39]
her co-sponsorship on this bill her
[41]
leadership on the island here in
[44]
Congress and we're grateful to have you
[46]
as a new member of this body and I yield
[48]
to the delegate from Puerto Rico such
[51]
time as she may consume
[52]
the gentlelady from puerto rico is
[54]
recognized Thank You mr. speaker today I
[57]
rise in support of the u.s. territories
[59]
investor protection I've asked and thank
[62]
you my friend
[64]
French Hill for having me here I am a
[67]
co-sponsor of this bill and I thank
[69]
representative Velasquez for introducing
[72]
HR 1366 and the members who have joined
[77]
in supporting this important legislation
[79]
the US territories investor Protection
[83]
Act will close a loophole in the current
[86]
law by passing this bill Congress will
[89]
bring to Puerto Rico's investors the
[92]
same protections enjoy by investors
[95]
residing in the 50 states under current
[98]
law investment funds that are located
[102]
and organized in the US territories and
[105]
sell to only residents of the
[108]
territories are exempted from the
[111]
Investment Company Act of 1940 which
[115]
governs entities such as mutual and
[118]
exchange rates on funds because of these
[121]
exemptions investment companies located
[125]
in the US territories can sell their
[127]
products to territory residents while
[130]
not being subjected to the other side
[134]
disclosure and conflict of interest
[137]
requirements that govern investment
[139]
companies located in the States as a
[142]
result investors residing in Puerto Rico
[146]
and the other territories have
[148]
experienced investment losses some of
[151]
which likely will have been prohibited
[155]
had the 1948 apply to the territories
[159]
for example UBS operating in Puerto Rico
[163]
serve as an advisor to Puerto Rico's
[166]
Employees Retirement System and in 2008
[170]
lead the underwriting of a 2.9 billion
[174]
dollar bond issue for the government
[177]
pension agency u es then place 1.7
[183]
billion dollar of those funds into UBS
[187]
managed mutual funds the UBS then sold
[192]
exclusively to customers in the island
[196]
this investment will have been forbidden
[199]
by the investment company Act
[202]
if this fund were sold in the state the
[207]
Puerto Ricans investors holding these
[210]
bonds have suffered massive losses and
[214]
are claiming that the UBS did not
[217]
properly disclose the risk of this sort
[220]
on the island hundreds of these
[224]
customers have filed arbitration claims
[227]
with the Financial Industry Regulatory
[229]
Authority and they seek more than 1.1
[232]
billion in damages UBS continues to lose
[238]
these cases for failing it feels very
[241]
responsibilities today's vote on HR 1366
[247]
will help end such outrageous in beds
[251]
and abuse and give Congress another
[254]
opportunity to align the laws governing
[258]
Puerto Rico and the other territories
[260]
with the laws governing the 50 states
[264]
HR 1366
[267]
we'll remove the territories exemption
[269]
and make 1940 Investment Company Act
[273]
apply to companies that are located
[277]
organizing and sell to residents of all
[280]
territories I urge my colleagues to vote
[284]
in support of HR 3606 the US territories
[289]
investors Protection Act thank you and I
[293]
yield back the remainder of my time
[295]
gentlelady yields back