Why Do Our Brains Love Fake News? - YouTube

Channel: Above The Noise

[4]
- Hey, hey, come here.
[7]
Do you know that Rupaul claims
[8]
that Trump touched him inappropriately in the '90s,
[10]
or that Obama signed an executive order
[13]
banning the Pledge of Allegiance in schools nationwide?
[16]
Okay, we all know that that was some grade A,
[18]
top shelf, premium, fake news.
[23]
But you knew that, right?
[25]
You're way too smart and well-informed to fall for that BS.
[29]
But what if falling for fake news isn't about intelligence
[31]
or how much information you have?
[33]
What if we're hardwired to believe what we wanna believe,
[35]
regardless of the facts?
[42]
The 2016 presidential election
[44]
saw fake news come out of nowhere.
[46]
A Buzzfeed analysis showed that the top 20
[48]
fake news articles on Facebook generated
[50]
more clicks than the top 20 real articles
[52]
from every major publication combined.
[55]
They were shared millions of times,
[57]
and it's not that we're just sharing fake news.
[59]
We appear to be believing the stories, too.
[61]
A recent poll found that people believe
[62]
fake news articles were somewhat
[64]
or very accurate 75% of the time.
[67]
How can we be falling for fake news
[68]
when we have these things?
[70]
We have instant access to more information
[72]
than we've ever had before.
[73]
Debunking misinformation should be a piece of cake, right?
[76]
Decades of brain research say no.
[79]
Turns out, our brains have other plans,
[81]
a little something called cognitive bias.
[84]
Cognitive bias is defined as a limitation in our thinking
[87]
that can cause flaws in our judgment.
[89]
It's kind of like an annoying brain glitch
[91]
that can lead us to make faulty conclusions.
[93]
Fake news often exploits this and our brains love it,
[96]
even if we're not conscious of it happening.
[97]
Once we form conclusions, they're hella hard to change,
[100]
even if we're presented with facts or evidence
[103]
that directly contradicts those conclusions.
[105]
So, what exactly is going on in our brains
[107]
to make us think that fake news is real news?
[111]
Why can't facts change our minds?
[114]
There are many flavors of cognitive bias,
[116]
but one of the most researched is confirmation bias.
[120]
We seek out information that we believe
[122]
or want to believe is true.
[124]
It is also leads us to ignore or minimize facts
[126]
that threaten what we believe.
[128]
So here's a study that explains how it works.
[130]
Back in 2004 during the Kerry Bush election,
[133]
researchers studied a group of 30 people,
[135]
half Democrat, half Republican.
[137]
Both candidates did what politicians do,
[139]
they flip flopped on the issues.
[141]
Then, the study asked the participants
[143]
to analyze what the candidates said.
[145]
The participants let the candidate
[147]
in their own party off the hook,
[149]
but were super critical of the candidate in the other party.
[152]
When researchers looked at their brain scans,
[154]
they found that the area of the brain responsible for reason
[156]
the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, was inactive,
[160]
so people weren't using reason
[162]
when evaluating the candidates they liked,
[164]
but they were using the part of the brain
[166]
that processes emotion, the orbitofrontal cortex,
[169]
a classic case of confirmation bias,
[172]
and their brains were also rewarding them
[174]
with a rush of dopamine,
[175]
a neurotransmitter that makes you feel good.
[178]
So, is there an upside to confirmation bias?
[181]
Well, it could help protect us from ideas
[183]
that may threaten our social standing in our "tribe."
[186]
Dan Kahan, a law and psychology professor at Yale University
[189]
calls it identity protective cognition.
[193]
We humans are hypersocial,
[195]
so it's more important to protect our values
[197]
and our relationships with family and friends
[198]
than it is to risk losing that by adopting new beliefs.
[202]
Are you familiar with Tomi Lahren?
[204]
She's a conservative political commentator.
[206]
- A protest is a peaceful objection to a grievance.
[209]
A bunch of sore losers occupying a space
[212]
is called a tantrum.
[213]
- [Myles] But recently, she expressed
[215]
her pro-choice view on abortion.
[216]
- Now, I'm pro-choice, and here's why.
[218]
- As a result, members of her conservative tribe
[220]
turned on her.
[228]
Ouch.
[229]
So, how do we defeat confirmation bias?
[232]
Well, you really can't,
[234]
but our three step plan can help you get around it.
[240]
Step one is recognize.
[242]
Recognize that you have this bias in the first place.
[244]
We all do.
[245]
You made it this far in the video,
[247]
so you can check that one off.
[248]
Step two is consider.
[249]
Consider that you may not really understand
[251]
what you think you understand.
[253]
Researchers call it the illusion of explanatory depth.
[256]
Let's say I strongly believe that GMOs are bad for me.
[259]
If someone forces me to explain it,
[261]
I just might realize that I don't understand it
[263]
as well as I thought I did.
[264]
Now, I might be less confident in my belief
[267]
and more receptive to another point of view.
[270]
Step three is research.
[272]
Research and break down the opposing viewpoint.
[275]
You may realize that your understanding
[276]
of where they're coming from is a bit too shallow.
[279]
So now you know the perils of confirmation bias
[281]
and have some tools to beat it.
[283]
Let's try it out.
[284]
Without being a smart ass,
[286]
pick a controversial topic and use step three on it.
[289]
Don't try to persuade, but instead use research and facts
[292]
to lay out why the other side believes what it believes.
[294]
Put your dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
[297]
to good use, will you?
[298]
(upbeat music)