馃攳
Section 7702 - What Do The Changes Mean? - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[0]
Section 7702 changes that can help you. In this聽
episode, I'm going to address section 7702,聽聽
[11]
what do the changes mean? If you're聽
a financial advisor or a consumer,聽聽
[19]
this can impact you. So, get ready. I'm going to聽
show you recent changes that can actually help you聽聽
[26]
with your max-funded indexed聽
universal life insurance contracts.
[42]
So, I'm Doug Andrew. I've聽
been a financial strategist聽聽
[46]
and a retirement planning specialist聽
now for more than 4 and a half decades.聽聽
[51]
I got my insurance license and my series one聽
securities license clear back in 1974. So, I've聽聽
[58]
been around the block a long time. And I witnessed聽
the emergence of universal life in 1980.And so,聽聽
[67]
section 7702 affects the way that you access money聽
and you fund a life insurance policy especially if聽聽
[77]
you're going to be using it for living benefits聽
more than just the death benefit. And so,聽聽
[83]
I'm going to do a little review here. But in聽
a nutshell, this new legislation that was just聽聽
[90]
recently passed in the last few days of the聽
year 2020 affects section 7702. And this has聽聽
[97]
not been touched since June 21st 1988. It's been聽
a long time. Basically, there are 3 advantages.聽聽
[107]
You will see that if you're maximum funding your聽
life insurance policy to be able to get the best聽聽
[113]
net internal rate of return as quick as possible聽
to use it for retirement income that's tax-free,聽聽
[120]
you will now be able to put in more money, you'll聽
be able to put it in at a faster pace which will聽聽
[128]
reduce the cost quicker. So, those are the 3 big聽
benefits and I'm going to illustrate these numbers聽聽
[135]
for you. So, especially if you're a financial聽
advisor, you're going to be very interested聽聽
[140]
in studying these examples as I proceed. Now, if聽
you're a consumer, if you're a policyholder, I'm聽聽
[146]
going to do a little review here in just a moment.聽
But please pay attention to the screen as I show聽聽
[151]
you what's going on here because this happened on聽
December 27th of 2020. It was really a surprise.聽聽
[157]
Changes were made to the U.S tax code as part聽
of the federal consolidated appropriations act.聽聽
[165]
And so, for life insurance policies聽
issued on or after January 1st 2021,聽聽
[171]
these changes may have modified some or all of聽
the tax-related premium limits in your policy.聽聽
[177]
People go, "what's going on?" So, the purpose of聽
this as as a result, this u.s tax code change,聽聽
[184]
the tax-related premium limits... And we call聽
these Tefra and Defra and Tamra the guideline聽聽
[191]
level and the guideline single premium. And I'll聽
review those in just a moment. So, they have been聽聽
[196]
updated accordingly. So, let's do a little review聽
so that you understand what I'm talking about.聽聽
[202]
For years, ever since universal life was first聽
created in 1980, it was the brainchild of EF聽聽
[209]
Hutton and they weren't an insurance company.聽
But they decided to introduce a life insurance聽聽
[214]
contract where you could take the least amount聽
of insurance the IRS would let you get away with聽聽
[220]
and you put in the most premium as the IRS would聽
allow as fast as they allow. And it turns into a聽聽
[226]
tax-free cash cow. So, back in 1980, I had about聽
3,000 clients I was responsible for in 13 western聽聽
[233]
states. And they were never happier than when聽
I got their money out of the market and into聽聽
[238]
these maximum funded universal life insurance聽
policies. Now, Indexed universal life didn't聽聽
[243]
come out to 1997 and that tweaked the rate of聽
return as interest rates started to come down.聽聽
[249]
I have averaged 8, 9.6, 10.07 percent聽
rates of return for the 40 years that聽聽
[256]
universal life has been out. When EF Hutton聽
first came out with it people were throwing in聽聽
[261]
big lump sums like 500,000. I had clients put in聽
500,000 back in 1980, '81, '82. They were earning聽聽
[270]
11 netting 10 because only one percentage point聽
paid for the insurance that the IRS had had to be聽聽
[276]
there in order for it to be tax-free. And so,聽
they're earning a net rate of return of 10%.聽聽
[281]
On 500,000, that's 50 grand a year. They started聽
pulling out $50,000 a year tax-free instantly. The聽聽
[288]
IRS came in and said, "What are you doing?" Hutton聽
said, "We're not doing anything wrong." They went聽聽
[291]
to court. EF Hutton won. Long story short, in 1982聽
under the tax equity fiscal responsibility act,聽聽
[299]
that spells the acronym Tefra and then 2 years聽
later because they didn't know what they were聽聽
[303]
doing, they passed under the deficit reduction聽
act, defra. This Tefra, defra corridor dictated聽聽
[310]
the minimum amount of life insurance, death聽
benefit. You had to have attached to it okay聽聽
[317]
so that it qualified as tax-free under section 72e聽
and 7702 and 101.8 in the internal revenue code.聽聽
[325]
72e says money inside of a life insurance聽
policy will grow tax-free with the interest聽聽
[329]
and dividends. 7702 talks about how you can聽
access the money tax-free for retirement income.聽聽
[335]
101a says that when you finally die, it blossoms聽
in value and transfers income tax-free. Nothing聽聽
[341]
else in the internal revenue code does that.聽
And so, in order to fall under that definition,聽聽
[346]
you had to stay out of the category of being聽
defined as an investment because investments are聽聽
[354]
taxed sooner or later. And they're usually subject聽
to market volatility. We don't want to be under聽聽
[360]
that definition. So, in order to stay tax-free,聽
you have to comply with Tefra and Defra. In 1988,聽聽
[367]
the technical and miscellaneous revenue act was聽
passed, June 21st. And this affected section 7702.聽聽
[374]
And this is how fast you can put the money in. So,聽
Tefra and Defra relate to the amount of insurance.聽聽
[381]
Tamara relates to how you can access your聽
money tax-free. If you've watched any of聽聽
[387]
my educational videos I usually compare this聽
to a bucket as a metaphor. So, let me show you聽聽
[393]
the metaphor of a bucket and then I'm going to聽
give you some quick examples of what this means.聽聽
[398]
I would often compare a life insurance policy to聽
a bucket. This is a repository. It is a container聽聽
[405]
that holds your money. So, you're determining how聽
much money you want to put into the bucket. So,聽聽
[410]
let's say you want to put in 500,000 over聽
5-year period, 10-year period, 20-year period,聽聽
[416]
30... It doesn't matter. So, you determine the聽
amount of money you want to be grandfathered聽聽
[422]
to be able to put into the bucket. And you聽
want all your compound interest to be tax-free.聽聽
[428]
So, in order to do that, under Tefhra and Defra,聽
you had to determine the least amount of insurance聽聽
[435]
that you had to attach in order to qualify as聽
tax-free under those 3 sections of the code.聽聽
[441]
So, for a 60-year-old, if you wanted to put in聽
$500,000, you had to have a minimum death benefit聽聽
[449]
of $1,250,000, okay? You could buy way more life聽
insurance than a million two-fifty for 500 grand.聽聽
[456]
That's not the point. What you want is the least聽
amount of insurance that you can get away with.聽聽
[461]
You want to be able to fill it up with money and聽
earn a rate of return of 11 back in 1980. People聽聽
[467]
were earning 11 up to 15 percent. But they were聽
netting 1% less than that. If they earned 11 they聽聽
[474]
netted 10. That was the objective, not the death聽
benefit. So, Tefra and Defra dictated the minimum聽聽
[480]
amount of insurance for a 60-year-old. It was a聽
million two-fifty. For a young 20-year old, they聽聽
[486]
had to have more because their life expectancy聽
was greater. But an 80-year old, they could get聽聽
[491]
away with less insurance. But Tefra and Defer聽
gave parity. So, parity means the older you are聽聽
[499]
and even if you're unhealthy, you can squeeze聽
down the death benefit under Tefra and Defra.聽聽
[504]
So, if your objective is the greatest net internal聽
rate of return. A 60-year old can earn 11 and net聽聽
[511]
10 just like a 22-year-old athletic marathon聽
running female or an 80-year old. We had a聽聽
[518]
79-year-old friend of our family and he had聽
three blocked arteries adult-onset diabetes聽聽
[522]
a prostate cancer episode. He was able to聽
earn 11 and net 10 and he only had to have聽聽
[528]
a little bit more insurance than the amount he聽
was putting in. Because the objective was tax-free聽聽
[533]
income not the death benefit, okay? That was Tefra聽
and Defra. Now, if you're earning 11 and netting聽聽
[540]
10, this spigot right here on the bucket is the聽
cost of the insurance that the IRS says has to聽聽
[545]
be there in order for it to be tax-free. It's聽
actually watering a nice money tree at the end聽聽
[549]
of the day that's going to blossom. If you put聽
in 500,000 and you die, it's going to blossom聽聽
[554]
to a million two-fifty and transfer tax-free,聽
okay? So, it's really not a cost it's a benefit.聽聽
[560]
But that has to be there or it moves away from聽
tax-free insurance in the internal revenue code聽聽
[566]
over to taxable investments. We don't want that.聽
In 1988, a lot of brokerage firms banks, and聽聽
[572]
credit unions were complaining because these were聽
safer. They paid higher interest. They have better聽聽
[577]
rates of return and they blossom when you die.聽
There's not a bank or credit union around that聽聽
[581]
will do that. And so, they wanted to slow the flow聽
because they were imploding. But they didn't want聽聽
[586]
to kill these because this is where a lot of banks聽
and credit unions put your money that you put in聽聽
[591]
the bank, did you know that? You put your money in聽
a bank, they pay 1%. They turn around and put it聽聽
[595]
in these and earn 5%. They earn 50,000 on every聽
million and they only have to pay you 10,000.聽聽
[601]
Hello? They're making 5 times what they're聽
paying you by bypassing and putting your money in聽聽
[609]
the insurance companies which are safer. So,聽
Tamra was passed in 1988 and it said, "Oh,聽聽
[615]
if you want tax-free income, you cannot put in all聽
the money all at once." I've been using 500,000聽聽
[622]
as an example. You could only put in about a fifth聽
with universal life. With whole life, you had to聽聽
[627]
take 7 years. But universal life is my favorite聽
because it was designed for living benefits. So,聽聽
[633]
you can fill up the bucket faster. I can put in a聽
hundred thousand the first day of the first year聽聽
[638]
and another 100,000 the first day of the聽
second year. So, in the fifth year which is聽聽
[642]
actually 4 years in one day, I can finally聽
put in the 100,000 and my bucket is full.聽聽
[648]
Now, it turns into a cash cow. And聽
anytime I take income, it's tax-free.聽聽
[653]
If I violate Tamra, it still grows tax-deferred.聽
But if I take money out, it's now taxable,聽聽
[659]
LIFO like an annuity. I don't want that. So,聽
that's Tamra. That's 7702. So far so good?聽聽
[666]
Now, I'm going to gift you a copy of my most聽
recent best-selling book at the end of this.聽聽
[671]
And if this is intriguing you already, share this聽
video, put a comment, please like. But subscribe聽聽
[679]
to this channel because i post an in-depth answer聽
to a financial question almost on a daily basis on聽聽
[684]
this channel. And at the end, I'm going to gift聽
you a copy of my most recent bestselling book,聽聽
[689]
300 pages where you can learn more about聽
this, okay? So, let's talk about 7702. What聽聽
[697]
it basically said is that for a million-dollar聽
death benefit, we'll just use the same example.聽聽
[703]
If you're a 65-year-old male, okay? You can now聽
put in $624,000, okay? This number down here,聽聽
[713]
54,000, you can put in 54,000 every year you want聽
for the rest of your life. But the most you can聽聽
[717]
put in to the policy during the first 11 years or聽
so is 624,000. This down here is called the Tamra.聽聽
[724]
You can put in 107,000 a year and be able to take聽
out tax-free income. You don't violate Tamra,聽聽
[732]
what I just talked about. So, what did it used聽
to be like? Under the previous, okay? Before the聽聽
[739]
changes, you could only put in 497,000. So, you're聽
able to put in more money, you're able to put it聽聽
[746]
in faster you could only put in 82,000. Now,聽
you can put in 107. So, let's just do a summary.聽聽
[752]
After this law was passed, I could now put in聽
for a million dollars of life insurance 624,000,聽聽
[759]
I can put in more money. I can put it in as聽
much as 107,000 a year instead of 82,000 a year.聽聽
[766]
I can get more money in there tax-free and聽
that will perform better. And the cost,聽聽
[772]
the spicket on that bucket will get smaller聽
faster. This is an advantage, okay? So,聽聽
[779]
let's look at somebody age 65. See after? Now,聽
you can put in this, before you can only put聽聽
[785]
in this. That's a 25 increase in the amount聽
of money that you can sock away tax-free.聽聽
[790]
This is again the guideline level premium what聽
you could put in every year the rest of your life.聽聽
[794]
That's gone up. Tamra, you can put in 107 instead聽
of 82. That's a 31% increase. The Tamara limit聽聽
[801]
down here went up as far as the ratio between聽
that and how much you can put into the bucket.聽聽
[808]
So, pretty much all around, it's a better聽
situation. Well, that's for a 65-year old.聽聽
[814]
How about a 75-year old? This is after you can聽
put in 837 versus 728. So, let's summarize that聽聽
[822]
one. After this law was passed ,a 75-year聽
old can put in 837,000. Now, people say,聽聽
[829]
"Why would you pay 837,000 into a million-dollar聽
life insurance policy because you want 837,,000聽聽
[836]
to generate tax-free income forever after. That's聽
why. You're not doing it for the death benefit.聽聽
[842]
In fact, the net amount at risk if you put聽
that much money in, the insurance company聽聽
[846]
is only charging you for the difference between聽
that and the million dollars of life insurance聽聽
[851]
because 837,000 of it is your own money now.聽
The cost of the insurance has gone down quicker.聽聽
[858]
So, you come out ahead because you can聽
put in more money than you used to be聽聽
[862]
able to put in as a 75-year old. Well, let's聽
go to the younger ones. Here is a 55-year old聽聽
[869]
after, okay? You can put in 439, you used to聽
only be able to put in 314. Wow! So, that is聽聽
[877]
40% increase. You can put in 40% more money聽
and have it grow tax-free under this new law.聽聽
[885]
You can put it in faster. You can put in 50%聽
faster money, you can put in more money quicker.聽聽
[891]
That makes it perform better and makes the cost go聽
down. That's the net result of all of this. Let's聽聽
[897]
look at a 45-year old. Here's after, here's聽
before, okay? You can put in 310 versus 198.聽聽
[905]
That's a 56% increase in what you're allowed to聽
set aside tax-free. Under Tamra, okay? You're able聽聽
[913]
to put it in again faster. 77% increased under聽
Tamra. What about a 35-year old? Here is after.聽聽
[921]
You can put in 221. Golly! Versus 128. Notice聽
you can only put in this much money because聽聽
[931]
you're younger. The insurance that's required is聽
higher because your chance of living a long time聽聽
[936]
is much greater. The net of this is you can put聽
in 221 whereas before you can only put in 128.聽聽
[944]
72% more faster money into your insurance policy.聽
It's going to turn into a tax-free cash cow聽聽
[952]
faster because you're getting money in聽
quicker. You're able to put in under the聽聽
[956]
Tamra substantially more money. 62 instead of聽
30 000 a year. This is incredible, okay? Now,聽聽
[963]
could you take less life insurance? Yeah. But聽
frankly, I think most people are going to want聽聽
[969]
to put in more money because most of my clients聽
ended up opening new insurance policies every 2 or聽聽
[974]
3 years that was a nice problem because they had聽
more money. Now, you can put more money into your聽聽
[979]
existing policy instead of being stopped. Because聽
if you put in one dime more then the limits,聽聽
[986]
the insurance company was forced to refund it to聽
you. So, let's take a 25-year old, last example.聽聽
[993]
This is after you put in 158. Before,聽
you could only put in 83,000, okay? Into聽聽
[999]
a million dollar life insurance policy. I can聽
put in way more money, nearly 90% more money.聽聽
[1007]
I can put it in faster. I can put in 52,000 a year聽
instead of 21,000 a year and still have tax-free聽聽
[1013]
access to my money down the road. This means聽
that bucket I showed you that usually took 4聽聽
[1020]
years and 1 day or 5 years to fill up, this young聽
25-year old can fill that up in 2 years and 1 day.聽聽
[1028]
Doesn't take 5 years. You can fill up the bucket聽
with money and preserve tax-free accumulation and聽聽
[1036]
tax-free access in as little as 2 years and 1 day.聽
For the older people, 3 years and 1 day instead聽聽
[1043]
of 4 years in 1 day which is what it was for 60,聽
65, 70 year olds. This is very, very exciting and聽聽
[1052]
a lot of people don't understand the impact. Your聽
insurance company is probably making these changes聽聽
[1057]
right now. But I wanted to be on the cutting edge聽
and share this with you. If you want to learn more聽聽
[1064]
about max-funded indexed universal life insurance聽
policies, I want to gift you a free copy of my聽聽
[1069]
most recent best-selling book. Here's how you can聽
claim your free copy. So, if this is intriguing聽聽
[1075]
you, my most recent best-selling book, book聽
number 11 is flying off of our warehouse shelves.聽聽
[1081]
And I've been sending out nearly 1,000 a week.聽
I want you to claim your free copy. If you go to聽聽
[1087]
laserfund.com, again, laserfund.com. And you just聽
contribute a nominal amount towards the shipping聽聽
[1094]
and handling. I'll cover the rest. I'll pay for聽
the book. And it is actually 300 pages of charts聽聽
[1100]
graphs and information and also it contains 62聽
actual client stories of how a max-funded indexed聽聽
[1108]
universal life insurance policy is the dream聽
solution, the financial swiss army knife for聽聽
[1113]
all kinds of financial goals not just retirement聽
to do what? Accumulate your money tax-free聽聽
[1120]
and then be able to access your money tax聽
free if you're in compliance with section聽聽
[1124]
7702. And when you ultimately die, anything in聽
there blossoms and transfers income tax-free聽聽
[1131]
to your heirs. It is an incredible financial聽
tool. Learn about it. Go to laserfund.com.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





