Why White-Collar Criminal Enforcement Is Falling Apart - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
>> So we've been talking about the New York聽 investigation, obviously there are a number聽聽
[5]
of different investigations into Donald Trump.聽 And his inner circle, particularly around for聽聽
[9]
instance, January six and I've been very聽 frustrated. I think a lot of people have聽聽
[14]
with the fact that Merrick Garland seems to be聽 scared of a shadow in taking any action here.
[20]
The January six committee members are a little聽 bit more active but they announced just a week聽聽
[26]
or two ago. That they weren't gonna be bringing聽 in any Congress people to testify in a number of聽聽
[30]
other people have defied them so far. What do you聽 think about some of these other investigations?
[35]
And how many of the people that聽聽
[38]
are in positions to potentially investigator聽 provide some sort of consequences that seem聽聽
[42]
very worried about, taking particular actions? >> Well, I think that we are seeing a real聽聽
[49]
breakdown of white collar criminal enforcement,聽 something I've written about for 30 some years.
[57]
And that's a fundamental core problem. Now Donald聽 Trump has other investigations that he's facing.聽聽
[63]
The Westchester County New York District Attorney聽 who is a former federal prosecutor is looking into聽聽
[68]
him for property tax fraud. The District Attorney聽 in Fulton County, Georgia, which overlays Atlanta聽聽
[76]
has a special grand jury over Donald聽 trump's infamous call to Brad Ratzenberger.
[81]
The Georgia chief elections official聽 then there are civil investigations by聽聽
[86]
the Attorney General in Washington D C.聽 Which could morph into a criminal case聽聽
[90]
and by Letitia James, the Attorney General of聽 New York is an independently elected officials.聽聽
[98]
Donald trump is gonna be involved聽 in litigation until the day he dies.
[101]
But it is really remarkable the lack of resolve聽聽
[106]
to pursue this. Now Merrick Garland as attorney聽 general, faces a problem that we do need to give聽聽
[113]
some thought in respect to. If he indicts聽 the former president of the United States,聽聽
[118]
it invites the indictment of future former聽 presidents by other administrations.
[124]
That's a can of worms that we need to think聽 about in France in Israel and India we've had,聽聽
[131]
the former heads of the government indicted,聽 but we've never done that in the United States.聽聽
[137]
And I think Merrick Garland's fervent hope is聽 that the states will take care of this, which聽聽
[142]
makes it all the more important that Kathy聽 Hockel come under so much public pressure.
[148]
But she has to assigned this case to Letitia聽 James, the attorney general to be reopened.聽聽
[154]
All she has to do is write a letter. And I merely聽 point out my piece, it has to be a broad enough聽聽
[158]
investigation because the Mueller investigation聽 was hampered by the very narrow grounds.
[165]
That which was written and almost nobody reported聽 that because they didn't read the letter. I mean,聽聽
[170]
there's a fundamental problem here that most聽 journalists accurately tell you what their聽聽
[174]
sources tell them, but they don't know聽 the law. They don't know regulations,聽聽
[178]
they don't read economics, they don't do their own聽 calculations because most of them are enumerate.
[183]
>> And it's common practice to, say we'll go to聽 an accounting firm and they'll do the numbers聽聽
[188]
for you. And then of course all you know is what聽 the accounting firm told you. So really is there聽聽
[195]
are lots of things coming down on Donald Trump's聽 head. But the one that's most important I think聽聽
[201]
is the New York criminal investigation that for聽 the moment is dead but can absolutely be revived.
[208]
Just enough people contact Kathy Hockel聽聽
[211]
and we put a number up at DCReport.Org. >> Everyone should definitely do that. And聽聽
[216]
the peace that David's alluding to is available at聽 DC report, everyone should go take a look at it.聽聽
[220]
I did wanna ask you one more question though聽 because you talked about the potential聽聽
[224]
precedent that could be set if we start聽 investigating or indicting past presidents.
[229]
Obviously Donald Trump is in this very聽 interesting middle ground right now where he聽聽
[232]
is no longer president, but he is in seemingly聽 if you believe him incredibly likely to run聽聽
[238]
again very soon. So thank you for enumerating聽 all of the different investigations of him.聽聽
[244]
What do you think will happen to聽 those if they haven't been resolved?
[248]
Certainly by the time the election聽 happens. But even theoretically,聽聽
[251]
once he's a declared candidate again, could聽 he use that as some sort of legal shield.聽
[255]
>> Well, no, he only if he gets into office,聽 the Republican National Committee is paying聽聽
[262]
a lot of Donald Trump's legal bills and Don聽 Junior's or conduct before he became president.
[267]
Why would they do that? Because they're afraid he聽 will bolt and run as a third party and if he does,聽聽
[271]
the Democrats win the White house and no matter聽 who they run. But if the Republicans nominate聽聽
[276]
Donald Trump, if all of these cases come to not聽 given the money he has and more more importantly.
[283]
The voter suppression which we're seeing聽 this year and which two years from now will聽聽
[288]
be radically worse. If we don't vote out the聽 people behind this, then goodbye democracy.聽聽
[295]
The only reason we still have a聽 democracy is Donald Trump's incompetence.聽聽
[299]
Something I've been documenting for almost 34聽 years and I mean you should be very worried.
[305]
What happens if instead it's a wannabe dictator聽 other than Donald, Ron DeSantis, the governor聽聽
[312]
of Florida Rick Scott, the U S. Senator who聽 should be in prison for stealing a billion聽聽
[317]
and a half dollars from Medicare, Josh Hawley from聽 Missouri or Tom Cotton or Ted Cruz or Greg Abbott.
[326]
Any one of those people is competent. You聽 may not like them, but they are competent,聽聽
[331]
they know how to use the levers of government聽 and they will do everything they can聽聽
[336]
to make the end of our democracy.聽 and to make sure that we are a white聽聽
[340]
males, white supremacist male dominated聽 society for as long as they possibly can.
[347]
>> Exactly yeah, we won't have any, we already聽 know that we won't have any norms to defend us.聽聽
[352]
We won't have a proto dictator who so easily gets聽 distracted and undermines his own efforts. I share聽聽
[358]
that same fear. And so everyone, you could聽 potentially be a part of the solution.
[362]
Go to DC report, read the report and聽 then get involved. Try to get this聽聽
[366]
investigation back online and, David, I聽 appreciate your ongoing work in trying聽聽
[371]
to protect us from that future, but also聽 for joining us on the damaged board. Thank聽聽
[374]
you as always. >> Thank you.