China’s Next Financial Crisis: Shadow Banking - YouTube

Channel: China Uncensored

[0]
On this episode of China Uncensored,
[2]
China’s next financial crisis is lurking in the shadows...
[6]
of shadow banking.
[7]
It’s like China stacked up 9 trillion dollars...
[10]
on the edge of a cliff.
[16]
Hi, welcome to China Uncensored.
[18]
I’m Matt Gnaizda.
[19]
I’m in today for Chris Chappell,
[20]
who’s on vacation,
[21]
possibly in the South China Sea.
[23]
Today, we’re going to talk about shadow banking.
[26]
It’s like the evil twin of regular banking.
[30]
Shadow banking involves lots of money,
[32]
and lots of risk.
[33]
And it’s tied to China’s crazy investment boom.
[37]
China’s economic boom
[38]
and its reliance on shadow banking
[40]
is similar in some ways
[41]
to the US economic boom in 2007.
[44]
Remember:
[45]
A lot of great things happened in 2007.
[48]
Apple released the iPhone 1.
[50]
The last Harry Potter book was published...
[52]
which Chris still has not read.
[54]
And the US economy had its last...good...year.
[59]
Because then this happened.
[61]
“Stocks all around the world are tanking
[64]
because of the crisis on Wall Street.”
[67]
“The stock market is now down 21%”
[70]
“We have armageddon.
[71]
In the fixed income markets we have armageddon.”
[73]
“No, but...”
[73]
“We have armageddon.”
[75]
“Armageddon”—thanks Jim Cramer—
[77]
happened after the failure
[78]
of a single investment bank had a domino effect
[81]
on the entire global financial system.
[84]
Trillions of dollars were lost,
[85]
and so were millions of jobs.
[87]
Well, it’s been ten years since then.
[90]
These guys have recovered,
[91]
but these guys...not so much.
[94]
But now, this same kind of
[96]
boom and crash could happen in China—
[98]
and for the same reason.
[101]
As Bloomberg puts it,
[102]
China is playing a 9 trillion dollar game of chicken
[105]
called Shadow Banking.
[108]
And like a game of chicken,
[109]
some investors will get out in time.
[112]
But others will plunge off the cliff,
[114]
bursting into a ball of flames on the rocks below.
[118]
So what is this totally legit
[120]
and trustworthy sounding “shadow banking”?
[123]
To put it simply,
[124]
shadow banking is when banks—
[125]
or companies that are not banks—
[127]
lend money outside of the normal structure
[130]
of bank deposits and loans.
[131]
Here’s a simplified explanation.
[134]
In the traditional banking system,
[136]
if a business owner wants to grow his business,
[138]
he goes to a bank, and that bank loans him money.
[141]
Over time,
[142]
he repays that money to the bank,
[143]
plus interest.
[144]
Let’s say a single bank makes 100 loans.
[147]
It’s pretty careful about who it loans to.
[150]
But even so,
[151]
some of the businesses will fail,
[153]
so Chinese regulations require
[155]
that the bank set aside money
[156]
to cover potential losses.
[159]
But shadow banking operates
[160]
outside that traditional system.
[162]
Let’s say 100 businesses want loans.
[165]
A shadow bank packages those 100 potential loans
[168]
into what’s called a Wealth Management Product.
[171]
Then it goes to investors and is like,
[173]
“Hey, buy our Wealth Management Product.
[175]
It has a high interest rate.”
[176]
When the businesses repay,
[178]
the investors will get their investment back
[180]
plus a lot of interest.
[182]
This is shadow banking.
[184]
It can also get more complicated.
[186]
Because sometimes the bank isn’t a bank,
[188]
but just a regular company
[189]
that packages investments.
[191]
And sometimes the businesses
[193]
that want to borrow money
[194]
aren’t regular businesses.
[195]
They might even be a local government
[197]
that wants money to build a bridge or whatever.
[200]
All these things can be packaged
[202]
into Wealth Management Products,
[203]
or other types of financial products,
[205]
and then sold to investors—
[207]
or sold to investment companies,
[209]
which then re-package them
[211]
before selling to individual investors.
[214]
A lot of times,
[215]
shadow bank loans get so complicated
[217]
that no one understands
[218]
exactly what the risk is.
[220]
According to this article,
[222]
“The repackaging of credit is so complex
[224]
that bankers often have to resort to
[226]
line drawings that look like schematic plans
[228]
for a Rube Goldberg device
[230]
to explain to clients what's going on.”
[233]
A Rube Goldberg device.
[235]
Like when you pull a lever,
[236]
that sets a wheel in motion,
[237]
that knocks down some dominoes,
[240]
that ends up destroying the economy.
[243]
But all this shadow banking
[244]
and Wealth Management whatevers
[246]
are so complicated!
[249]
Investors don’t want to know details!
[250]
That’s why companies involved in shadow banking
[253]
put out feel-good ads like this:
[258]
“Everyone holds sunshine at their hearts
[263]
Everbright your life
[267]
China Everbright Bank”
[271]
See?
[272]
Give us your money,
[273]
and you’ll have sunshine in your heart!
[276]
That bank, Everbright,
[277]
is actually a legit commercial bank.
[279]
It makes regular loans, too.
[281]
But recently it’s also been selling
[283]
a lot of shadow banking products to investors,
[286]
because that allows Everbright
[287]
to maximize profit without putting
[289]
so much of its own money on the line.
[291]
Basically, it sells the risk to investors.
[294]
But a lot of Chinese investors
[296]
don’t think risk matters that much,
[298]
because the Chinese government will probably
[299]
bail everyone out if things go badly.
[301]
Like this investor in this Bloomberg article,
[304]
who explains that the Chinese government
[306]
would never let a big wealth management product fail,
[309]
because it’s just not Chinese culture.
[312]
Sounds like wishful thinking, right?
[314]
But the Chinese government has
[315]
bailed out banks in the past.
[318]
Like the $45 billion dollar bailout in 2004.
[322]
So assuming they’ll do it again seems reasonable.
[324]
Although if you’ve ever read the terms and conditions
[327]
on any investment product ever,
[329]
you’ve seen that “past performance
[331]
is no guarantee of future results.”
[333]
Sure, the Chinese government may have done
[335]
a small 45 billion dollar bailout in the past.
[339]
But it doesn’t want to do a 9 trillion dollar bailout now.
[343]
Besides, back then,
[344]
there was almost no shadow banking in China.
[347]
It only started happening on a large scale
[349]
after the global financial crisis ten years ago.
[353]
Authorities tried to stimulate China’s economy
[354]
by having banks lend more money.
[357]
But soon, demand for borrowing got so high
[360]
that banks didn’t have enough money to lend people.
[363]
So banks started packaging loans
[364]
and selling them to investors to get the cash.
[367]
And it became such a big market,
[369]
other companies that aren’t even banks
[370]
got into the game.
[372]
According to a 2016 report,
[374]
shadow bank loans now make up
[376]
57 percent all loans in China.
[379]
In other words,
[380]
more than half of all lending in China now
[382]
is actually done through shadow banking!
[385]
And this is a big problem
[386]
because shadow bank loans are usually
[388]
a lot riskier than traditional loans.
[390]
Once companies start packaging and repackaging,
[392]
it’s easy to lose track of what the risk actually is.
[397]
It even starts to seem like a good idea,
[399]
like jumping out of a plane without a parachute.
[403]
The problem is,
[404]
it only works if you’re you’re Keanu Reeves, dude.
[407]
Oh, and there’s another problem.
[410]
Shadow banking loans don’t get recorded
[412]
on banks’ balance sheets.
[413]
That makes banks look
[414]
healthier than they actually are—
[416]
and that also increases the risk.
[419]
And guess what?
[420]
That’s exactly what happened in the US
[422]
leading up to the 2007 crisis.
[425]
Banks had been packaging
[426]
and repackaging home loans,
[428]
then selling and reselling the packages,
[431]
and eventually even the nerds at Lehman Brothers
[433]
had no idea how to calculate the risk anymore.
[437]
Shadow banking in the US was the lever
[439]
that set the global financial crisis in motion,
[442]
and ironically, its domino effect
[444]
is what led to the rise of
[446]
shadow banking in China.
[448]
And now Chinese authorities are getting worried
[450]
about what’s coming next.
[452]
In fact,
[453]
“Zhou Xiaochuan, the head of China’s central bank
[456]
has openly warned that authorities
[458]
need to curb financial risks
[459]
that might lead to a ‘Minsky Moment’—
[462]
a sudden collapse of asset prices,
[464]
sparked by debt or currency pressures,
[466]
after a long period of growth.”
[468]
Basically, bad debt in shadow banking
[471]
could end up wrecking the Chinese economy.
[473]
And if the Chinese economy gets wrecked,
[475]
it could lead to serious consequences
[477]
for the Chinese Communist Party.
[478]
You know, because no one
[480]
believes in that communism stuff anymore,
[482]
so they tell people to go make money
[484]
and don’t talk about politics.
[486]
But if people start losing their money
[487]
on a massive scale,
[489]
people might start talking about politics again—
[492]
like who’s to blame.
[493]
That’s why, at a top level conference in July,
[497]
Xi Jinping declared that financial security
[499]
was vital to national security.
[501]
“National security” is of course code for the CCP
[504]
securing its power over the nation.
[507]
But it’s not 2007 anymore.
[509]
It’s 2018.
[511]
We have iPhone 10s,
[513]
Johnny Depp is a Harry Potter villain,
[515]
and Chinese shadow banking has swelled
[517]
to more than $9 trillion.
[520]
The Chinese government can’t afford
[522]
to bail everyone out
[523]
when things go south.
[525]
They’re trying to rein in shadow banking.
[527]
But once you let the tiger out of the cage,
[529]
well, it...
[530]
I guess it runs around and eats people.
[533]
So what do you think of China’s shadow banking?
[535]
Leave your comments below.
[537]
Once again I’m Matt Gnaizda.
[539]
Now it’s time for that thing we do at the end.
[543]
You’re still here?
[544]
Good.
[545]
Don’t worry,
[546]
I haven’t taken over China Uncensored.
[548]
Chris will be back soon.
[550]
In the meantime,
[551]
if you like this show,
[552]
we hope you can click on this orange button
[553]
and support us by pledging
[555]
a dollar or more per episode.
[557]
We'll invest it in a Chinese wealth management product.
[560]
Click to go to our fundraising website Patreon.