Brian Armstrong WARNS Crypto Investors of US Regulation (RIGHT NOW) - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
we're going to eventually end up with
[0]
some kind of a test that says is this
[3]
cryptocurrency a commodity a security a
[5]
currency or something else like artwork
[8]
and then maybe
[9]
maybe five more things we haven't even
[10]
thought of that it'll end up being in
[11]
the future hey hey welcome back
[13]
everybody to altcoin daily my name's
[15]
austin
[17]
brian armstrong ceo of coinbase spills
[20]
the beans on what to expect with crypto
[22]
regulation in 2022 on a recent episode
[25]
of the all-in podcast
[27]
now this episode is over one hour long i
[30]
will link it down below but in today's
[32]
video i want to play you three separate
[34]
clips that really illustrate what to
[37]
expect as a crypto investor listen to
[39]
this first clip of brian explaining that
[41]
cryptocurrency will be broken up into
[44]
different categories bitcoins different
[46]
than nfts it's different than
[48]
stablecoins and that's how this industry
[50]
will be regulated in his opinion now i
[52]
do want to preface that with this first
[54]
clip what brian says is nothing too
[56]
revolutionary i think we all could have
[58]
came to this sort of conclusion but i
[60]
liked this first clip because it does
[62]
sort of set up what we're about to hear
[64]
in clip number two and clip number three
[66]
anyway brian armstrong speaking about
[68]
regulation watch this
[71]
i think here's here's what i'm realizing
[72]
is that crypto is going to be many
[74]
different things it's not just going to
[75]
be one regulator um doing it so you know
[78]
think about cryptocurrencies like
[80]
bitcoin that's pretty clearly a
[81]
commodity or ethereum right like many of
[83]
these are commodities that probably
[85]
should be regulated by the commodities
[86]
regulators see the cftc now if people
[88]
want to raise money for their company a
[90]
security token that should be regulated
[92]
as a security by the sec that'd be great
[94]
to have more clarity on that let's have
[96]
we would love to keep working with the
[97]
sec to make that a well trodden path
[100]
that any company can go raise money and
[101]
that's how it would get listed on an
[103]
exchange like ours and we could register
[105]
as a broker-dealer or whatever license
[106]
is needed
[107]
um
[108]
separately there's also some
[109]
cryptocurrencies that are going to be
[111]
currencies like stable coins and you
[113]
know maybe the treasury should regulate
[115]
those and finally there's going to be
[116]
cryptocurrencies that are none of the
[118]
above their artwork or something that's
[120]
probably shouldn't even be regulated and
[122]
so
[123]
the u.s with various financial you know
[126]
international bodies like g20 and fatiff
[128]
and all these imf are probably going to
[131]
put some policy papers together we're
[132]
going to eventually end up with some
[134]
kind of a test that says is this
[136]
cryptocurrency a commodity a security a
[138]
currency or something else like artwork
[140]
and then maybe maybe five more things we
[142]
haven't even thought of that it'll end
[144]
up being in the future
[146]
all right like the video support this
[148]
content and give me your thoughts on
[150]
what brian just said down below in the
[152]
comment section
[154]
now in my opinion i think what brian
[156]
armstrong was saying was very reasonable
[158]
a stable coin is different than a
[160]
governance token is different than an
[161]
nft and thus they should be regulated
[164]
differently that's how i feel but then
[166]
we get to the more difficult or maybe
[169]
just maybe just more thought provoking
[170]
question if something is technically
[173]
labeled as a governance token for
[175]
example
[176]
what happens when eighty to ninety
[178]
percent of the investors in that
[179]
governance token are just using it as an
[181]
investment are just using it because
[184]
they view it as a speculative asset that
[186]
they hope will go up
[187]
anyway that's the next question here is
[189]
clip number two and brian armstrong is
[192]
asked this question directly watch this
[195]
what would you make the test for this is
[198]
a utility token versus specul
[200]
speculative
[203]
uh security because that seems to be the
[205]
one that's really hard for people to
[207]
figure out if 99 of people are buying a
[210]
token on coinbase because they want to
[213]
see it appreciate and they want to see
[214]
it gain value and only one percent are
[216]
using it for the actual utility of it is
[220]
it then a security is it by the
[221]
percentage of people who use it
[223]
how how would you as the the you know
[226]
the leader in this industry you know
[229]
uh actually define it what's your
[231]
definition
[232]
yeah so i think look i i don't want to
[234]
be presumptuous here i think that we can
[236]
we can put some policy papers together
[238]
but i don't want to be you know it's the
[240]
policy maker's job to to come up with
[241]
the policy so i don't want to step on
[243]
anyone's toes but that being said i
[244]
think there's some existing case law out
[246]
there like you know the howie test is
[248]
something from a long time ago we could
[249]
probably build upon that so the howie
[251]
test kind of says you know is this an
[253]
investment in a common enterprise with
[255]
an expectation of profit and that would
[257]
make it that would make it a security so
[258]
there's a lot of pieces to that you know
[260]
is it an investment well if you're just
[261]
giving the tokens away i guess people
[263]
aren't investing right is it a common
[265]
enterprise well maybe if it's
[266]
decentralized and you don't actually
[268]
control this entity like
[269]
um you own you know less than a majority
[271]
share or something maybe then that's not
[273]
a security right or if there's not an
[274]
expectation of profit people are using
[275]
it for something so every startup right
[278]
now in the space has basically had to
[279]
hire a bunch of expensive lawyers to go
[281]
tease apart these old old rules that
[283]
some of them were created in like the
[284]
1930s you know before the internet and
[286]
everything and try to understand where
[289]
they're falling and so i think building
[291]
upon that howie test but it could be
[293]
something that includes a commodities
[295]
definition something a currency
[296]
definition
[298]
i you know i think we should basically
[299]
it's on us and the other crypto
[301]
companies out there to go hire a really
[302]
smart lawyer who has drafted legislation
[305]
before and a bill and actually get a
[307]
draft of it out there and then we can
[309]
start to circulate it with various
[310]
policy makers and get their feedback and
[312]
maybe they take it and run with it maybe
[313]
they say thanks we have it we've got it
[314]
from here but that's our next step
[317]
all right great perspective and i
[320]
especially liked what brian said at the
[321]
end that we need to be helping steer the
[324]
policy however big or small that is the
[327]
hodlers need to be the ones setting the
[329]
precedence here not these regulatory
[331]
bodies that don't get it it being crypto
[335]
and finally that brings us to our third
[337]
clip sort of the culmination of what
[339]
we've been building to in today's video
[342]
and by the way i do want to thank you
[343]
for sort of bearing with me my voice
[345]
sounds a little bit hoarse
[347]
it is because i was at good times with
[349]
davey wayne's last night which is a it's
[351]
a bar in out here in los angeles
[354]
but please hit the like button help heal
[356]
my voice i'm gonna get better but this
[359]
last clip i thought to be the most
[361]
insightful answering the question well
[363]
why do we even need regulation wasn't
[366]
crypto invented to get away from these
[368]
middlemen i really liked what david
[371]
friedberg i believe that's his name one
[372]
of the hosts of the all-in podcast i
[375]
really liked what he said offering some
[377]
perspective on how regulation came about
[380]
back in the 1920s i'm just going to let
[383]
the clip play as is it's about two
[384]
minutes then i want to share with you my
[386]
thoughts my opinion on this at the end
[389]
watch this
[391]
well some perspective's important which
[393]
is you know go back to kind of the 1920s
[396]
in the united states and there were
[399]
pre-1920s
[400]
folks would go around and tell tall
[403]
tales about interesting business ideas
[405]
or business concepts or things that they
[407]
were going to do if they got a bunch of
[409]
money from investors and investors gave
[410]
them money and they didn't actually
[412]
deliver on what they said they were
[413]
going to do and they got swindled and
[415]
there was swindle story after swindle
[417]
story that you can read about
[419]
and we saw this even with the ico craze
[421]
of a few years ago right where people
[423]
tell a tall tale you expect some value
[425]
or some
[426]
asset that you're kind of putting
[427]
capital into that will pay off over time
[430]
and there's a swindle behind it and
[431]
that's really the origin of securities
[434]
laws
[435]
in large part is to protect the
[436]
individual from being swindled to
[439]
protect the storyteller that can take
[440]
money away from people and figure out
[442]
how to kind of rip them off um and
[445]
create a set of laws that the government
[447]
can then enforce through the risk of
[449]
imprisonment against doing those things
[451]
the challenge becomes when there's this
[454]
more thoughtful way of running capital
[456]
markets on the other side and how do we
[459]
actually resolve to some medium ground
[461]
here i'm not sure that you're going to
[463]
have as quick of a resolution to say
[464]
well let's go back to the old way where
[466]
anyone can say anything to anyone they
[468]
want and anyone can put money into any
[470]
project that they want because the role
[472]
of the arbiter is to protect those from
[474]
being taken advantage of if 85 of those
[477]
projects are great and 85 percent of the
[479]
investors are intelligent to know what
[480]
they're doing it's the 15 it doesn't
[482]
matter it's the 15
[484]
that the government is here to protect
[486]
and that's the reason we have an
[488]
institution called the government is to
[490]
create systems of protection for those
[493]
who are otherwise unable to protect
[494]
themselves now a free market libertarian
[497]
might say
[498]
we should have at it but the problem is
[500]
we all have we all feel as a group at
[503]
some point a moral obligation to protect
[506]
those who are unprotected and that's why
[508]
these systems emerge over time and
[510]
that's why these institutions exist
[512]
that's why the government exists and
[513]
it's why these securities laws exist and
[515]
so it's difficult to assume that we can
[517]
just go back to the kind of
[520]
you know um
[521]
prototypical days of you know let me
[523]
raise money for anything with any story
[525]
without any regulation and assume that
[527]
it's going to work out well because all
[528]
it's going to take is a few of these
[530]
stories before you have folks standing
[532]
up in congress saying this is
[534]
unbelievable we can't let this happen
[535]
anymore let's go shut down the miners
[537]
let's go shut down the data centers
[538]
let's go after every asset we can
[541]
all right
[542]
really thoughtful perspective in my
[544]
opinion
[546]
and to me this sort of says the
[547]
regulation for this reason is inevitable
[551]
there's no getting around it just
[553]
because even if 85 percent of the
[555]
industry is sound is solid that 15
[559]
could and probably would ruin it for the
[562]
rest of us i don't know if you disagree
[564]
you can always you can always have the
[566]
power to let me know but that brings me
[568]
to my thoughts on regulation in general
[570]
for crypto
[572]
i think it should be harder for these
[574]
companies for these token creators it
[576]
should be harder for them but it should
[578]
be much easier for the individuals
[581]
meaning give individuals average people
[583]
like you like me give them all the power
[585]
meaning and example number one get rid
[588]
of the accredited investor rule that
[590]
gatekeeps wealth creation to already the
[593]
wealthy so get rid of regulation for the
[596]
individuals but make regulation much
[599]
harder for these companies in terms of
[602]
selling snake oil or making promises
[604]
that they can't deliver right if you're
[606]
a company that lies if you try and
[607]
swindle the regulation should be to
[610]
protect us from you but it should not
[612]
punish the individuals
[614]
that's my view
[616]
alrighty
[617]
i guess that's it that's the video like
[619]
always have a great day and i will see
[622]
you tomorrow
[624]
gonna be a great week