Ivanka Eyed In Probe? New Heat On Trump Kids After CFO Indicted - YouTube

Channel: MSNBC

[0]
we turn now to the latest on the trump
[2]
organization indictment
[3]
and new questions surrounding the former
[5]
president's children
[6]
new analysis of the indictment shedding
[8]
light on more trump organization
[10]
companies
[10]
that could be in legal peril the daily
[12]
beast reporting that
[13]
seven seven trump organization companies
[16]
exhibited a quote
[17]
pattern of paying a substantial portion
[19]
of year-end bonuses to weisselberg and
[21]
other executives
[22]
as if they weren't employees and the
[25]
prosecutors also claimed the company's
[26]
executives
[27]
knew the practice was wrong and at one
[29]
of those companies
[30]
ivanka trump held an executive role for
[33]
eight years
[34]
adding context to these statements by
[36]
mary trump that ivanka
[38]
may be the next to flip
[41]
there will be other people who might be
[44]
more willing to flip than allen
[46]
and i think among those might well
[48]
indeed be my cousins
[49]
oh interesting like the trump kids
[53]
ivanka also received i i don't
[57]
remember the amount of thousands of
[59]
dollars
[60]
right consulting fees that's not a thing
[63]
you're either an employee or you're not
[65]
an employee so
[67]
i think we're going to find a lot more
[68]
of that kind of thing going on
[71]
and uh she's much less likely to stay
[73]
loyal than ellen weisselberg
[77]
joining me now is daily beast political
[78]
reporter roger sollenberger he
[80]
wrote that trump article about trump's
[82]
seven other companies
[83]
and former new york assistant attorney
[85]
general tristan snell who prosecuted the
[87]
trump university case thanks so much
[89]
roger i'm going to start with you so
[90]
this is what i think is key
[92]
and your great art from daily beasts so
[95]
ivanka was in charge of one of these
[96]
companies
[97]
for eight years she was in the key
[98]
executive role what are the
[101]
chances that massive bonuses could be
[104]
handed out to executives at the end of
[106]
the year
[107]
that don't seem to square with finances
[109]
and she wouldn't know because that's
[110]
that's what this boils down to she's
[112]
going to claim she didn't know
[113]
or maybe she's gonna say that they were
[114]
grabbing her laundry for or something
[116]
else like that but
[117]
what are the chances that she could
[118]
claim complete ignorance
[120]
to those kinds of payouts at the end of
[121]
every year uh
[123]
that i actually can't answer because i
[126]
have
[127]
really no idea but what i can tell you
[130]
is that uh it's pretty likely that
[132]
they're going to
[134]
you know plead uh ignorance right take
[136]
the ostrich defense say their heads were
[138]
in the sand
[139]
that they were not involved with the
[141]
day-to-day
[142]
calls the you know the actual uh
[144]
dispensation
[145]
of the salaries you know whatever like
[148]
that
[149]
but um what we also know is that ivanka
[152]
trump was listed
[154]
as an executive on this company and on
[157]
dozens of companies and the
[158]
trump organization you know they tried
[161]
to sort of blur the line she says oh we
[163]
don't care about
[164]
about titles we're not big on the title
[165]
she said that in a 2016 deposition
[168]
she said earlier this year apparently
[170]
that she didn't quite know what allen
[172]
weisselberg's role was with the company
[174]
so you can sort of see that they're that
[176]
they're sort of paving that road
[178]
but you know it remains to be seen what
[180]
they would actually
[181]
see uh say if they were indicted or
[184]
questioned by investigators in this case
[187]
so tristan you prosecuted trump on the
[189]
trump university case
[191]
and here's the thing my understanding of
[192]
a lot of this is that part of the shell
[194]
game the house of cards
[196]
that trump often does in his businesses
[198]
and even in his organization
[199]
is you give a bunch of people a bunch of
[200]
different titles they can get paid five
[202]
ways even if they're not showing up
[203]
right so with that in mind interesting
[206]
is is
[207]
is it possible that that's what was
[210]
happening if with evan
[213]
companies and was collecting paychecks
[216]
from lots of locations
[217]
that she wasn't in and if that's the
[218]
case is that similar to kind of how
[220]
trump was running trump university
[223]
very much so i mean the key is that
[226]
trump the trump organization
[228]
is the holding company right and then
[230]
there are about
[231]
two or three hundred llc's that are all
[234]
these subsidiaries each one runs a
[236]
particular business
[237]
so the ones that were identified in the
[239]
indictment and that roger wrote about
[241]
uh those are all llc's each of which
[244]
probably each of which managed
[245]
one uh property uh or one business
[248]
and then had you know at most a couple
[251]
hundred employees
[252]
in each of those businesses so each of
[255]
these things was basically
[257]
treated as just another division of the
[259]
trump organization even though it was
[260]
supposed to technically be a separate
[262]
company
[262]
and we actually got a ruling in the
[265]
trump university case
[266]
we sued the trump organization and we
[268]
sued donald trump in our case
[270]
and we did get an intermediate ruling in
[273]
that case
[274]
that said that the trump organization
[275]
and donald trump were liable for trump
[278]
university's misdeeds
[279]
so that even though trump university was
[281]
broke trump org and donald trump were
[283]
still going to have to pay up
[284]
personally so what you're saying
[287]
for in say layman's terms is imagine
[290]
like a mcdonald's
[291]
but they have a separate burger company
[293]
and a separate fries company
[295]
and a separate mcnuggets company but
[297]
they're all pretty much just handing
[298]
around the same finances whatever
[300]
so they can't get caught that's more or
[301]
less what how he tries to set these
[302]
things up
[304]
well yeah the kicker there is why does
[306]
he set it up this way it's so that one
[308]
of the businesses and this happened with
[309]
trump u
[310]
could go under and then they could just
[312]
be like well that went under
[313]
so we're not going to pay that things
[315]
expenses or even valid
[317]
debts anymore but to bring it back to
[319]
ivanka the kicker is
[321]
it's not necessarily a problem if she's
[323]
getting paid by a bunch of these
[324]
different entities
[325]
the problem is that she was an employee
[327]
and then also getting money as an
[329]
independent contractor
[330]
so that the trump organization could
[332]
avoid paying payroll taxes
[335]
on all of that employee comp that's the
[338]
problem here is the tax evasion
[340]
that went on here and it was clear that
[342]
it was rampant throughout the company
[344]
for well over a decade and that it
[347]
happened with weisselberg it probably
[348]
happened with jeff mcconney who we all
[350]
believe
[351]
now to be an unindicted co-conspirator
[353]
number one
[354]
and then the question is is ivanka one
[356]
of those other executives
[358]
so roger i want to go back to this you
[361]
know tristan just mentioned trump does
[363]
pay for things this is how they pay for
[364]
folks i want to play you just some quick
[365]
audio
[366]
of don junior talking about the
[368]
generosity of his father and i guess
[370]
trying to set the stage for
[371]
he was trying to put his kids to work
[373]
and trying to help people out as opposed
[374]
to hide money
[375]
get your thoughts on the other side my
[378]
father
[378]
after almost 50 years of employment
[382]
paid for his grandkids private school in
[384]
new york city my dad did that because
[385]
he's a good guy
[386]
takes care of his employees
[390]
i don't know if that's from cameo or
[392]
only fans i don't know why don does
[393]
these kinds of videos but but i got to
[395]
ask you roger like
[396]
you know is is that is that a real
[398]
defense like can you basically say
[400]
my grandpa was nice enough to pay for
[402]
his kids school and and that explains
[404]
how he plays for employees like
[406]
who who is don jr talking to when he
[408]
makes these sorts of defenses
[411]
well i mean just being generous doesn't
[413]
mean that you didn't commit a crime in
[414]
the name of generosity
[416]
right um so what we do have here is
[419]
what you could perhaps classify as
[421]
generosity
[423]
but what prosecutors say is a crime and
[426]
what we see
[427]
with the bonuses which is what my report
[429]
is about at the daily beast
[431]
that those bonuses uh appear to be have
[434]
been
[434]
improperly paid out to these employees
[437]
and we know weisselberg for sure
[439]
right but on the other side we have the
[441]
company's responsibilities for this
[443]
and they would be shirking their tax
[445]
duties and so yeah you could say it is
[447]
your bonus yeah
[448]
great great job you're being generous
[450]
you get a hefty bonus
[451]
but how did you give that bonus and why
[454]
did you choose this
[455]
method that is uh you know improper they
[458]
said the company's new it was improper
[460]
uh the the prosecutors also say the
[463]
indictment
[463]
this is key that it was a practice
[466]
across the trump
[468]
organization and then they named seven
[470]
of those companies they named them they
[472]
didn't have to do that they didn't name
[473]
all the companies is that there were
[474]
others too
[475]
but they named seven and one of those
[477]
companies
[478]
does have ivanka as a vice president the
[481]
others also have
[482]
different connections to the trump kids
[485]
and we already know that you know from
[487]
new york times reporting
[488]
last year that ivanka did take
[491]
consultant
[492]
fees when she was not an employee
[495]
or the times reported that and so if we
[497]
see this practice
[498]
across the board this new company is
[501]
different from the new york times report
[503]
it's connected to a hotel just like the
[505]
times was right
[506]
times reports was but this is a
[508]
different company and the setup
[509]
you know could be similar we don't know
[512]
if you're seeing the same pattern across
[514]
seven different companies that's that's
[515]
that's not just smoke that's fire that's
[517]
that's a tornado that's everything
[519]
roger sullenberger tristan snell thank
[520]
you guys so much for your time this
[522]
[Music]
[532]
evening
[537]
[Music]
[542]
you