Millions To Lose Safety Net Benefits As Trump Redefines Poverty - YouTube

Channel: The Ring of Fire

[0]
A few weeks ago, we talked about the fact that the Trump administration is actually
[4]
trying to redefine who is living in poverty here in the United States.
[10]
They want to be able to kick people off their benefits, say that our poverty numbers are
[14]
decreasing but not by helping people, by making them make more money, but by just changing
[21]
a how we count people who are in poverty.
[24]
Part of that involves you know, inflation and chained CPI.
[28]
I explained it all in the previous video if you want to go back and check that out.
[33]
But here's the thing, the uh, center for budget and policy priorities.
[37]
So a liberal think tank when ahead and crunched the numbers on how many people would be effected
[45]
if the Trump administration is successful, which it appears they likely will be in changing
[50]
who is counted as living below the federal poverty line.
[55]
And here is the list of what's going to happen in this country.
[60]
If they changed this definition, more than 250,000 adults would lose health insurance
[66]
through Medicaid, more than 300,000 children and some pregnant women would lose health
[72]
insurance through the CHIP program.
[75]
Millions of people would receive fewer subsidies for purchasing health insurance on the Obamacare
[79]
marketplace, making it too expensive for them to afford anymore more than 250,000 seniors
[86]
and people with disabilities would lose or receive less access to the Medicare Part d
[90]
subsidy program, forcing them to pay more for prescription drugs, more than 150,000
[96]
seniors and people with disabilities with lose premium assistance for Medicare part
[100]
B, meaning they'd have to pay over $1,500 to see a doctor, uh, nearly 200,000 people
[106]
would lose food stamp benefits.
[108]
More than 100,000 students would become ineligible for free or reduced price lunches.
[114]
And more than a 100,000 extra would lose free meals.
[117]
And about 40,000 infants and young children would lose access to care such as breast feeding
[122]
support and healthy food through the special supplemental nutrition program for women,
[127]
infants and children.
[129]
And that's just a start folks.
[134]
That's what would happen when you add up all the numbers to millions of people in this
[138]
country.
[140]
If this administration does the sinister move of simply changing the definition of who lives
[146]
in poverty and the only reason they would want to change this definition is to boast
[154]
about their numbers because suddenly if they change it, and these people who are in poverty
[159]
are no longer considered to be living in poverty, Trump gets to come out and say, hey, we just
[164]
reduce the poverty in this country by 10% overnight.
[167]
Quite literally aren't I the best?
[169]
I'm so great and wonderful.
[171]
Everybody should vote for me in 2020 because no other president's been able to do that.
[176]
Yeah, because no other president was stupid enough and heartless enough to do that.
[182]
But this also goes along with the long held Republican belief of let's cut all the benefits.
[187]
Let's kill social safety net programs.
[190]
You know, force women to have babies.
[193]
But if there are too poor to be able to afford any kind of a prenatal care or post birth
[199]
care, oh well that's your fault.
[202]
Too Bad.
[203]
You couldn't fix the problem because we passed a law saying you had to have the baby, but
[210]
we're not going to help you out even though you were raped or even though this was a case
[214]
of incest.
[215]
Yep.
[216]
Sorry, that's all on you because that's who the Republican Party is as who they've always
[222]
been, at least throughout my entire lifetime.
[224]
I understand that.
[225]
At some points in American history, they were different.
[229]
This is not who they were, but it's damn sure who they are now, and this is exactly what
[235]
they want to do to this country.
[237]
Kick millions of people, all federal assistance programs by tweaking a few numbers here, changing
[244]
a definition there, and then taking all the credit for supposedly lowering the poverty
[250]
numbers in this country.
[253]
Meanwhile, millions of people starve.
[256]
They die early because they can't get medical care, but those aren't things that Republicans
[261]
care about.
[262]
All they care about is saving a little bit of money because eventually that money is
[267]
going to have to make its way back to the wealthy elite in the form of probably in another
[271]
tax cut.