馃攳
Attorney Laura Anthony Talks Form 8-K and Pipe Transactions - YouTube
Channel: LawCast
[10]
I'm attorney Laura Anthony founding partner
of Legal & Compliance, a full service corporate,
[15]
securities, and business transactions law
firm.
[18]
Today is the continuation in a LawCast series
talking about Form 8-K. On September 26, 2016,
[27]
and again on the 27th, the SEC brought enforcement
actions against issuers for the failure to
[33]
file Form 8-K鈥檚 associated with corporate
finance transactions and in particular PIPE
[40]
transactions involving the issuance of convertible
debt, preferred equity, warrants and similar
[46]
instruments.
[48]
During a conversion process, the number of
issued and outstanding shares of common stock
[54]
can increase dramatically, causing dilution
to existing shareholders and a decrease in
[60]
stock price from large selling pressure.
[64]
In an action against Connexus Corporation,
the SEC noted that the unreported issuances
[70]
of securities increased the amount of total
outstanding common stock by more than 600%
[77]
from the last reported number.
[79]
The ability of an investor in a PIPE transaction
to convert and trade responsibly makes the
[86]
difference between a successful financing
relationship with the investment community
[90]
and one that can cause long-term damage to
a company.
[94]
To be clear, I do not think that there is
anything inherently wrong, illegal or improper
[99]
with these corporate finance transactions.
[102]
The exact same structure is used for PIPE
investments in companies big and small, whether
[107]
traded on the OTC Markets, NASDAQ or the NYSE.
[111]
However, smaller companies, especially those
on the OTC Markets.
[116]
often do not have the volume and liquidity
to bear the effect of sudden enormous selling
[122]
pressure.
[123]
Larger companies are not immune to issues,
though.
[126]
Nuanced provisions negotiated in these convertible
derivative instruments can be problematic
[131]
as well, such as the recent use of the Black-Scholes
put option in warrants.
[137]
Vapor Corp. provides the prime case study
example of what can happen when the financing
[142]
provisions are not fully understood and vetted
by the parties.
[146]
Vapor Corp. lost its listing on an exchange
as a result of such a PIPE transaction.
[152]
When considering a PIPE transaction, companies
are often presented with numerous term sheets
[158]
and investors to choose from.
[160]
The terms will only vary slightly and many
investors will match terms from a competitor.
[166]
In choosing a transaction it is incumbent
upon the company to conduct due diligence
[171]
on the investor, including their reputation
in the industry and trading history associated
[177]
with other investments and conversions.
[179]
I am securities attorney Laura Anthony, founding
partner of Legal & Compliance, and producer
[185]
of LawCast.
[186]
Should you have any questions about today鈥檚
topic, please visit SecuritiesLawBlog.com
[192]
and LawCast.com, or contact me directly.
[196]
Inquiries of a technical nature are always
encouraged.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





