Are We in a Bear Market and is Robinhood a Bank? - YouTube

Channel: The Motley Fool

[0]
Chris Hill: It's Wednesday, December 19th. Welcome to MarketFoolery! I'm Chris Hill.
[3]
Joining me in studio today, it's Bill Mann! Bill Mann: Hey, Chris!
[6]
Hill: Good to see you, man! Mann: Glad to be here! How are you?
[9]
Hill: I'm doing better than some of the businesses we're going to be talking about today.
[15]
Mann: All of the businesses we're going to be talking about?
[17]
Hill: I don't know about all. Let's start with FedEx, which is having its worst dayin 10 years.
[22]
Mann: You're doing better than them.
[23]
Hill: I'm doing better than them. Mann: You've had many worse days than today
[26]
over the last 10 years. Hill: Yeah. Second quarter profits for FedEx
[31]
came in higher than expected. I think it's fair to say that nobody cares about that.
[35]
Mann: No! Hill: Because Fred Smith, the CEO, came out
[39]
on the call, cut guidance for 2019, and did not mince words.
[44]
Mann: Brought the Molotov cocktails with him. How is this not a golden age of FedEx?
[53]
Hill: Well, for a good stretch of time... look, this is a bad day to be a shareholder
[58]
of FedEx. But in general, if you've been a shareholder of FedEx for the last
[63]
10 years, you're doing well. Mann: Yeah,聽you're doing great, but the stock
[66]
is down 25% this year before today's drop. I believe that's right. Maybe including today's drop.
[73]
Hill: You talk, I'll do the math.
[75]
Mann:聽We could get a math guy on this. Fred Smith came out and he did not take too many prisoners.
[81]
He basically has said that globally, there have been a bunch of bad political choices
[87]
that have hurt FedEx all around the globe. He talked about the weakened Chinese economy
[93]
due to the tariffs. He talked about the immigration crisis in Germany. I'm having a hard time
[99]
figuring out how that ties in, but he went there. A bad tax decision, Brexit. And he said
[105]
this is all causing a lot of macro-economic slowdown. Then, he came out and said that
[112]
they expected their earnings were going to be much lower next year, between $15.50-$16.60
[118]
a share down from about $18.聽Record shipments, profits rose, margins were down a little bit.
[126]
But they're worried that bad times are coming. Hill: With today's drop, the stock is down
[133]
about 34% year to date. Mann: That's amazing!
[137]
Hill:聽We talked about this few weeks ago when Toll Brothers had their quarter.
[142]
Part of the statement from Toll Brothers was essentially blaming the media.
[145]
Mann: [laughs]聽Did they blame Brexit? Hill: Well, no, they blamed the media for
[148]
publicizing that there's a housing slowdown. It's like, hey, that's not this.
[153]
This is Fred Smith laying a good chunk of the blame at political leaders in the United States and
[160]
outside of the United States.聽 Mann: Yeah. He took himself off of a lot of
[163]
Christmas card lists.聽I mean, he did. And I can't say that he's wrong. I mean, obviously,
[170]
you're talking about a company that is truly the canary in the coal mine for how people
[174]
are feeling right now. Those things are all making people feel worse, making them think
[180]
maybe they need to batten down the hatches a little bit.
[184]
One of the things that FedEx is doing also is, they announced a buyout of their employees.
[192]
They think they're going to save around $250 million per year during this. Again,
[199]
they've hired a tremendous number of new employees this year. They're battening down the hatches.
[206]
Hill: We've seen other large manufacturers -- I'm thinking primarily of General Motors
[213]
-- earlier this year offering a voluntary buyout, and when not enough people stepped forward,
[218]
they announced the layoffs. It seems reasonable to expect that it's not off the
[224]
table that FedEx would have layoffs in maybe the first half of 2019.
[229]
Mann: Yeah. Layoffs are possible. Keep in mind that FedEx's employee base is a little
[237]
more seasonal than, say, GM's would be. I'm sure layoffs will be a much later down the
[243]
road decision for them, depending on how the buyouts go, because just through attrition
[249]
and seasonal adjustments, they'll be able to change their mix quite a bit.
[254]
Hill:聽FedEx is one of those businesses that I think of -- look, no single company is a
[262]
"bellwether" of the economy at large. But I would put FedEx on the list of
[269]
bellwether contributors, if you will. Mann: Bellwether-esque.
[272]
Hill: Yeah. And I'm curious, one, if you agree with that, and two, are there other companies
[278]
that you look at and you think, "As much as any other single company, this is a good indication
[284]
of the broader economy?" Mann: That's a great question! FedEx is probably
[289]
the top of the list. I would say Amazon聽because they simply have such a broad base of things
[295]
that they're selling. Of course, their growth rates have been such that they're taking away
[302]
from a lot of聽other competitive sources. Also, companies like聽Macerich, the Class
[309]
A mall operators. People have said malls are in huge trouble. The malls that are really
[315]
in trouble are the Class B and C ones. The Class A ones have done quite well. But those,
[320]
if they start showing weakness, that's probably a pretty good sign that the economy is struggling.
[328]
Hill:聽FedEx is down, but it is not a small-cap. The Russell 2000 index, essentially the small-cap index,
[336]
officially became our first bear of the year. Here in the United States,
[340]
officially in bear market territory. Mann:聽Yeah. Since August, it's dropped 20%.
[345]
So, by definition, that means that small-caps in the U.S. are in a bear market. The Russell
[351]
2000 is a basket of 2,000 companies, as the name might suggest, with a median market cap
[358]
of about $964 million. A lot of people think that small-caps are a little bit more sensitive
[369]
to the U.S. economy, so fluctuations in the economy would make them more sensitive.
[375]
I happen to kind of think that that's garbage. [laughs]聽I mean, over the last five years,
[382]
the S&P 500 -- I won't make you do this math, I actually looked it up -- has gained 16.5% per year.
[388]
The Russell has gained only 5%. I think a lot of that has to do with the FAANG stocks.
[394]
I also think it has to do with indexing. I think that, probably, the Russell is a little bit
[400]
more levered to people who are making actual bets on a company-by-company basis.
[408]
So, where are you going to go when you're nervous? You're going to pull away from that first.
[415]
Hill: The Russel 2000 down 20%, does that
[419]
get interesting to you at all as an investor? Mann: Well, yeah. When you think about what
[425]
a market of 2,000 companies being down 20% means, that means some are down 5%
[433]
and some are down 50%. Some of those that are down 40% and 50% also happen to be companies that have
[440]
done very, very well over the last few years. I mean, really, really good companies
[445]
like聽Align, for example, is down around 40% since the peak in August. These are great companies.
[456]
If you believe that they will continue to be great companies, the time that you would
[461]
like to buy them is when they are under a little bit of pressure. So, yes, I am very,
[467]
very interested in some of the opportunities that this type of disruption, and the gradual
[474]
and inevitable rise of the market, gives us. Hill: This is a nuts-and-bolts question.
[479]
Does the Russell 2000 rotate those stocks on a quarterly basis?
[487]
Mann: The Russell Corporation is very CIA-like in how they do things. You're perfectly welcome
[496]
to pay them for their data. But, yes, in actuality, they do reconstitute, I think it's every six months.
[506]
I might be wrong about that. It'll get reconstituted again sometime soon.
[515]
Hill:聽I'm not paying you for your appearance here, so I'm certainly not going to pay the
[517]
Russell Corporation for the answer to that question.
[520]
Mann: [laughs]聽Yes. I gave it my best shot, and it's worth what you paid for it. But yes,
[526]
they do reconstitute. Hill: Over the last two to three years,
[530]
we've gotten a lot of questions about Robinhood, particularly from younger investors. Robinhood
[537]
is an app that appeals to younger investors. It's usually some version of the same question,
[543]
which is: "Hey, what do you guys think of Robinhood?" Robinhood is a startup fintech company.
[550]
It made some headlines recently because they announced they were offering -- I think
[554]
I may have heard this on the radio when I was driving around last week. And I remember
[560]
hearing it and thinking, "Wait, is that true? Is that real?" They announced last week that
[566]
they were going to start offering Checking & Savings accounts with zero fees and a 3% interest rate.
[574]
And I thought, "Wait a minute!"
[575]
Mann: That's hard.
[576]
Hill: "If that's true,聽I might want to move my checking account to them, if they're going
[581]
to give me 3%." And then, immediately, I thought, "Wait a minute, is that sustainable?"
[587]
So, where does it go from there? Mann: Not only is it not sustainable,
[590]
but it turns out that Robinhood's not a bank, so they can't offer either checking or savings accounts,
[598]
or what they offered, which was "Checking & Savings" accounts,
[602]
ostensibly one account that was checking and savings. Matt Levine, who's a fantastic columnist for
[609]
Bloomberg, described that as "the magic ampersand," because it meant it was perhaps neither a checking
[614]
account nor a savings account, it was this new thing. But the SIPC, which is
[620]
the Securities Investors Protection Corporation, came out and said, "No, you cannot do that.
[625]
You're not a bank. Everything about what you're doing is a little bit weird, and perhaps illegal,
[632]
so we would suggest that you make another choice. And, by the way, 3% and zero fees
[639]
in this rate environment, that seems pretty tough."
[644]
This is really a story of what happens when a financial technology company runs fast and
[649]
break things. It turns out, one of the things that you can't break is your regulator. [laughs]
[656]
So, they came out, and they gave what I would describe as a half-hearted "We're sorry,
[663]
we didn't quite get this right." But in actuality, they got swatted pretty hard by the regulators.
[674]
I love this story, because I wonder if it was almost the New Coke story, if they knew
[679]
in advance that they couldn't do this, but they just wanted to get a lot more attention
[684]
for things that they can do, or for whatever they're going to be releasing next; or,
[691]
if they really, truly didn't know. I don't know which is more likely. The conspiracy theorist
[698]
in me likes to think that they knew exactly what they were doing, and that they couldn't do this.
[702]
Hill: I don't know. We've certainly seen --
[707]
one example that comes to mind is Urban Outfitters.
[712]
Mann: Also not a bank. [laughs]
[713]
Hill: Also not a bank. Every couple of years, Urban Outfitters will have some article of
[717]
clothing that sparks outrage. That, to me, is different. In those situations, I'm more
[724]
willing to believe, "OK, we're going to get backlash for this, but we're going to get
[729]
a lot of attention for it." Mann: That's true.
[737]
Hill: It's one thing to get the attention of the public. It's another thing to get the
[740]
attention of regulators. Mann: [laughs]聽That's right. It鈥檚 like
[742]
the Starbucks Christmas cup controversy vs. actually making your regulators think that
[750]
you're bozos. That may not be something that's long-term sustainable. You don't want to ring
[757]
the dinner bell at your regulators, ever. Hill:聽Every once in a while, I will swing
[763]
by the desk of our chief legal counsel here at The Motley Fool, Lawrence Greenberg, when something
[770]
like this is happening. Mann: Great guy!
[771]
Hill:聽And I'll just say to him, "I don't know what kind of day you're having,
[775]
but look on the bright side, at least you're not a lawyer for [insert name.]" In this case, it's like,
[781]
"Hey, at least you're not the head lawyer at Robinhood, because they're having a hell of a week."
[784]
Mann: [laughs]聽That's right. They're having
[787]
some excitement, which lawyers will generally tell you is not the kind of thing that they like to have.
[793]
Hill: Before we wrap up, we're less than a week
[795]
before Christmas. But today, special day in your family.
[799]
Mann: It is a special day in my family. I wanted to actually give a shout out to you.
[802]
My daughter, Hannah, is 19 today.聽 Hill: Happy birthday, Hannah!
[807]
Mann: Happy birthday, Hannah! If listeners out there want to come wish her a happy birthday,
[812]
come to my Twitter feed at @TMFOtter, and tell her hi and happy birthday. I would love that,
[817]
and she would love it. But, Chris Hill has a very important role
[821]
in my very early fatherhood, a conversation that happened 19 years ago today. It turned
[828]
out to be the night that Hannah was born. Your daughter was born July of '99.
[836]
Chris came up to me, and you said, "I'm going to tell you something that no one else will tell you.
[842]
No one else. The first two weeks of being a parent is hell. You're going to feel bad,
[849]
and you're going to wonder why you're feeling bad, because nobody's telling you. And I am
[852]
the one who's here to say, you're not crazy." I've told this story, I've said this to people
[860]
more times than I can count. It was a really, really valuable conversation, because it was spot-on.
[868]
[laughs]聽Happy birthday to Hannah! The remaining 18 years and 50 weeks have been pretty good.
[874]
Hill:聽I suppose that could have been worse.
[876]
I could have said, "You're in for the worst Christmas of your life."
[880]
Mann: [laughs] "Bet you didn't think your millennium New Years was going to be spent like this."
[886]
Hill: Thanks for being here!
[887]
Mann: Thanks for having me, Chris! Hill: As always, people on the program may
[890]
have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations
[893]
for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. That's going
[896]
to do it for this edition of MarketFoolery. The show is mixed by Dan Boyd. I'm Chris Hill.
[900]
Thanks for listening! We'll see you tomorrow!