SEC Amends Definition of “A Smaller Reporting Company” - YouTube

Channel: LawCast

[2]
I’m attorney Laura Anthony founding partner of Legal & Compliance, a full service corporate,
[15]
securities, and business transactions law firm.
[18]
Today is the first in a LawCast series talking about the new amendment to the SEC definition
[24]
of a smaller reporting company.
[26]
On June 28, 2018, the SEC adopted the much anticipated amendments to the definition of
[34]
a smaller reporting company as contained in Securities Act Rule 405, Exchange Act Rule
[40]
12b-2 and Item 10(f) of Regulation S-K.
[45]
The amendments come almost two years to the day since the initial publication of proposed
[50]
rule changes.
[51]
Among other benefits, it is hoped that the change will help encourage smaller companies
[56]
to access US public markets and go public via IPO.
[61]
The amendment expands the number of companies that qualify as a smaller reporting company
[67]
and thus qualify for the scaled disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K and Regulation
[73]
S-X.
[74]
The SEC estimates that an additional 966 companies will be eligible for SRC status in the first
[82]
year under the new definition.
[85]
As proposed, and as recommended by various market participants, the new definition of
[91]
a smaller reporting company will now include companies with less than a $250 million public
[97]
float as compared to the $75 million threshold in the prior definition.
[102]
In addition, if a company does not have an ascertainable public float or has a public
[108]
float of less than $700 million, a smaller reporting company will be one with less than
[115]
$100 million in annual revenues during its most recently completed fiscal year.
[120]
The prior revenue threshold was $50 million and only included companies with no ascertainable
[126]
public float, and not a revenue figure.
[129]
Once considered a smaller reporting company, a company would maintain that status unless
[134]
its float drops below $200 million if it previously had a public float of $250 million or more.
[142]
The revenue thresholds have been increased for weak requalification, such that a company
[147]
can re-qualify if it has less than $80 of annual revenues if it previously had a $100
[153]
million of revenues or more and less than $560 million of public float if it previously
[159]
had $700 million of public float or more.
[163]
The SEC also made related rule changes to flow through the increased threshold concept.
[169]
In particular, rule 3-05 of regulation SX has been amended to increase the net revenue
[177]
threshold in the rule from $50 million to $100.
[182]
As a result, companies may omit financial statements of businesses acquired, or to be
[187]
acquired from the earliest of the three fiscal years otherwise required by rule 3-05 if the
[194]
net revenues of that business are less than … furthermore, the conforming changes include
[201]
changes to the cover page for most SEC registration statements and reports, including forms S-1,
[210]
S-3, S-4, S-11, 10-Q and 10-K.
[214]
The new rules did not change the definition of either accelerated filer or large accelerated
[221]
filer.
[222]
As a result, companies with $75 million or more of public float that qualify as a smaller
[229]
reporting company will remain subject to the requirements that apply to accelerated filers,
[235]
including the accelerated timing of the filing of periodic reports and the requirements that
[241]
accelerated filers provide the auditors attestation of management’s assessment of internal controls
[248]
over financial reporting as required by Section 404-B of the smaller reporting company Sarbanes-Oxley
[253]
Act.
[254]
However, chair Clayton has directed the SEC staff to make recommendations for additional
[260]
changes to the definitions to reduce the number of companies that would qualify as accelerated
[266]
filers and thus have to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley’s section 404B.
[270]
I’m securities attorney Laura Anthony, founding partner of Legal & Compliance, and producer
[276]
of LawCast.
[277]
Should you have any questions about today’s topic, please visit SecuritiesLawBlog.com
[283]
and LawCast.com, or contact me directly.
[287]
Inquiries of a technical nature are always encouraged.