Investing in Forestry Assets – why invest? What are the benefits, risks, and ways to go about it? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
Hello I’m Alex Davies, founder of Wealth Club. Today I’m with
[4]
Paul Atkinson of Par Equity to talk about investing in forestry assets.
[9]
[Music]
[20]
Why should experienced investors consider investing in forestry?
[24]
I think there’s a few good reasons. One, the historic long-term returns
[27]
in forestry have been extremely good. At one point there was an independent index,
[32]
IPD index, which showed 9.2% [annualised total return] over 25 years.
[38]
More recently I think it’s been slightly better than that. It’s also completely
[43]
uncorrelated with other capital markets, a pretty good hedge against inflation,
[48]
and of course at the moment there’s increasing interest in the asset class
[52]
because of the climate change, carbon sequestration and other factors.
[58]
It’s also very tax efficient isn’t it? Can you tell me about that?
[61]
It is, yes – so there’s no capital gains on timber, although there is on the
[69]
underlying land, and there’s no income tax on timber assets being sold,
[74]
and there’s no inheritance tax after holding the asset class for two years.
[77]
So a lot of investors in forestry are looking into it as inheritance tax planning.
[82]
And who typically invests in forestry?
[85]
Typically, it’s high net worth investors – professionals at the
[89]
top of their careers, partners in law firms and so on,
[92]
and wealthy business families, and some smaller family offices. But we’re also
[97]
seeing increasing investment from financial institutions now.
[101]
And also companies, as you’ll see with the recent acquisition
[105]
by Brewdog of the site at north Lomond.
[108]
And how do investors make a return?
[110]
Well, first they make a return from the felling of forestry and selling to the market.
[117]
Earlier in the forest’s lifetime we also do some thinning, which produces
[121]
some modest return. Obviously the sale of capital assets, either at the
[125]
end of the fund life or during the fund’s lifetime, which will be free, largely
[131]
free of capital gains tax. And then there’s additional returns, potentially,
[136]
from things like selling woodland carbon credits,
[139]
there’s a potential development upside – hydro, peatland restoration, and so on.
[145]
And forestry’s had a very strong number of years performance,
[149]
what’s driving that return?
[152]
It’s a combination of demand for timber for construction, and globally that’s
[156]
increasing. Of course there was a bit of an abeyance during Covid lockdown, but
[159]
the resurgence has come back with the demand. Long-term demand for timber,
[166]
everyone’s saying that’s going to continue, more and more timber being used for
[170]
construction. You’ve got more and more uses for the forestry product itself,
[174]
and more and more institutional interest. And finally carbon, and carbon credits
[178]
is now a key factor in terms of driving returns, we believe.
[182]
And what do you mean by carbon credits – how does that work, how do you make money?
[185]
So when you buy a new planting site, you have the opportunity to register it
[190]
for woodland carbon code credits. On day one you’re offered what are called
[195]
provisional units, and there’s an audit five years in, then ten years in,
[198]
and a further ten years in. And over that time period you’re allocated
[202]
carbon credits related to the amount of carbon being captured by
[205]
the growth of the trees. And those carbon credits have a value.
[209]
The current government guarantee scheme is in the range of £17–£25 per carbon unit.
[216]
Most of the long-term forecasts are more upside than that,
[221]
but it’s obviously a relatively new market, so everyone’s still
[224]
getting used to how this is going to work.
[226]
And Brexit, has that been a bonus or a negative for forestry?
[231]
Well, there’s a few implications of that, so Brexit impacted currency,
[236]
currency is a key aspect of timber demand, so when the UK looks cheap
[244]
in terms of pounds sterling, foreign money comes into buy our asset.
[251]
For us to buy things on the international market is more expensive, because
[255]
sterling’s low. So that was one effect. I mean, the UK imports better than
[261]
two-thirds of all the timber it uses every year, so we’re a net consumer
[264]
internationally, and although we export, we import huge amounts of timber.
[271]
And how risky is it?
[273]
The main risks around forestry are to do with tax risk,
[277]
will the government change the tax regime? There’s no indication they will,
[282]
but that’s always a risk. There’s political risk around land use
[285]
and access to land for amenity as well, I think.
[288]
Especially if it’s all in Scotland?
[290]
Yes, potentially, albeit that the Scottish government is actually very
[295]
pro investment in forestry, and has very aggressive new planting targets,
[298]
which they can’t achieve without supporting private investors coming into the market.
[303]
So I wouldn’t say it’s any more politically risky than the rest of the UK in that respect.
[309]
And then you’ve got climate change risks, so drought conditions are not good
[313]
for forestry, potentially. Drought conditions stress trees, so disease risk becomes
[318]
a more important factor. On the other hand, we get lots of rain in Scotland,
[322]
for example, and the North, so it’s not been that much of a risk so far
[326]
but you could see it over the next 30 years becoming a bigger risk.
[331]
[Music]