Residual Dividend Model - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
In this video I discuss the residual dividend model. under the residual
[6]
dividend model a company pays out whatever income it doesn't need to
[12]
invest in new projects and keep its current capital structure; therefore,
[17]
dividends equal the net income minus retained earnings to finance new
[22]
projects. The retained earnings to finance new projects is going to be
[27]
calculated by the target capital ratio times their
[33]
new capital budget. This is commonly written as the equity fraction (ws) for
[38]
the company times the capital budget (CB). The company's equity fraction (ws)
[44]
plus the debt fraction (wd) must add up to 1.
[47]
Dividends can also, of course, be calculated as net income minus retained
[52]
earnings. For example we are going to consider a company with a net income of
[59]
$10,000,000 with a target equity fraction of 60% and a capital budget of
[68]
$3,000,000. Their retained earnings that is required is therefore
[74]
going to be the 0.6 times the $3,000,000 or $1.8 million dollars. The dividends that can then be paid out will be the net income
[84]
of $10,000,000 minus the retained earnings of $1.8 million or
[91]
$8.2 million can be paid out in dividends. If this is the number of
[97]
shares the company has outstanding, then the dividends per share will merely be
[102]
the dividends divided by the number of shares, or 82 cents per share.
[109]
Since economic conditions vary from year to year, the net income of the company
[115]
tends to fluctuate. What if it was $10 million the first year but goes up to $12
[123]
million the next year, and down to $7 million the year after that.
[129]
Under each of these conditions the company would need
[133]
$1.8 million in retained earnings to finance new
[137]
projects, but the dividends paid out would fluctuate quite a bit because the
[144]
net income has changed and the extra money the company does not need to
[149]
finance expansion changes. If the net income goes up to $1.2 million
[155]
the retained earnings stays the same, but the dividends (which again are going to
[161]
be net income minus retained earnings) now go up to $10.2 million or a
[169]
$1.02 a share. In the final case the net income has dropped
[175]
substantially, the retained earnings stay the same, so the dividends decrease again
[181]
and reduce net income minus retained earnings to $5.2 million are only $0.52
[189]
per share. Time period to time period what a dividend recipient
[196]
receives changes drastically. You can see this on the graph. Dividends go up or
[202]
down. People commonly invest in dividends for the purpose of income to retire off
[209]
of -- paying their rent are their daily living expenses. There really is no
[214]
clientele for a drastically fluctuating dividend payout. This is why companies
[222]
tend to not use the residual dividend policy, but they might calculate it to
[229]
figure out (based on past earnings) what the minimum dividend they can
[235]
easily pay out. Then they might look around that range and keep that as a
[241]
constant dividend. I thank you for watching this video.