馃攳
Residual Dividend Model - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[0]
In this video I discuss the residual
dividend model. under the residual
[6]
dividend model a company pays out
whatever income it doesn't need to
[12]
invest in new projects and keep its
current capital structure; therefore,
[17]
dividends equal the net income minus
retained earnings to finance new
[22]
projects. The retained earnings to
finance new projects is going to be
[27]
calculated by the target capital ratio
times their
[33]
new capital budget. This is commonly
written as the equity fraction (ws) for
[38]
the company times the capital budget (CB).
The company's equity fraction (ws)
[44]
plus the debt fraction (wd) must add up to
1.
[47]
Dividends can also, of course, be
calculated as net income minus retained
[52]
earnings. For example we are going to
consider a company with a net income of
[59]
$10,000,000 with a target equity
fraction of 60% and a capital budget of
[68]
$3,000,000. Their retained
earnings that is required is therefore
[74]
going to be the 0.6 times the
$3,000,000 or $1.8 million dollars. The dividends that can
then be paid out will be the net income
[84]
of $10,000,000 minus the retained
earnings of $1.8 million or
[91]
$8.2 million can be paid out in
dividends. If this is the number of
[97]
shares the company has outstanding, then the dividends per share will merely be
[102]
the dividends divided by the number of
shares, or 82 cents per share.
[109]
Since economic conditions vary from year
to year, the net income of the company
[115]
tends to fluctuate. What if it was $10
million the first year but goes up to $12
[123]
million the next year, and down to $7
million the year after that.
[129]
Under each of these conditions the company would need
[133]
$1.8 million in
retained earnings to finance new
[137]
projects, but the dividends paid out
would fluctuate quite a bit because the
[144]
net income has changed and the extra
money the company does not need to
[149]
finance expansion changes. If the net
income goes up to $1.2 million
[155]
the retained earnings stays the same, but
the dividends (which again are going to
[161]
be net income minus retained earnings)
now go up to $10.2 million or a
[169]
$1.02 a share. In the
final case the net income has dropped
[175]
substantially, the retained earnings stay
the same, so the dividends decrease again
[181]
and reduce net income minus retained
earnings to $5.2 million are only $0.52
[189]
per share. Time period to time
period what a dividend recipient
[196]
receives changes drastically. You can see
this on the graph. Dividends go up or
[202]
down. People commonly invest in dividends for the purpose of income to retire off
[209]
of -- paying their rent are their daily
living expenses. There really is no
[214]
clientele for a drastically fluctuating
dividend payout. This is why companies
[222]
tend to not use the residual dividend
policy, but they might calculate it to
[229]
figure out (based on past earnings)
what the minimum dividend they can
[235]
easily pay out. Then they might look
around that range and keep that as a
[241]
constant dividend. I thank you for
watching this video.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





