Multinational Corporations Aren’t About To Give Up on Global Business | The Red Pen | GZERO Media - YouTube

Channel: GZERO Media

[0]
HI, everbody.
[0]
Ian Bremmer here with your latest edition
[3]
of The Red Pen.
[8]
Today we are talking about the impact
[10]
that increasing geopolitical tensions could have
[13]
on big, multinational coorporations.
[16]
In a recent op-ed for the Financial Times,
[19]
Elisabeth Braw of the American Enterprise Institute, AEI,
[23]
argues that we could be entering a distinctly
[26]
new chapter in global business,
[28]
one in which where a company comes from
[32]
matters much more.
[33]
In other words, a move away
[35]
from borderless companies and toward nationalism.
[39]
She cites CEOs like Ramon Laguarta of Pepsi
[42]
and Satya Nadella of Microsoft,
[44]
both foreign-born executives
[46]
leading American companies,
[47]
as a positive trend of globalization
[50]
that may come to an end
[52]
in the current political reality.
[54]
It’s an extremely interesting and provocative piece.
[57]
You should definitely read it.
[58]
We are not convinced.
[59]
Let’s get out the Red Pen.
[62]
First, Braw writes that
[64]
“the era of borderless enterprise may be past”
[67]
and argues that
[68]
“suddenly companies’, and executives’,
[70]
nationalities matter again.”
[73]
So question, when did nationalities stop mattering?
[78]
Governments have long supported
[80]
their national champions.
[81]
In the wake of the 2008-09 financial crisis,
[84]
the German government spent 1.5 billion euros
[87]
to bail out their auto industry.
[90]
BMW, for one, might have had non-German higher ups,
[93]
but when the rubber met the road,
[96]
what mattered the most was that BMW
[98]
was a German company.
[99]
The era of the globalization never meant an
[102]
end to national pride or responsibility
[104]
when things got tough.
[105]
Secondly, the number of foreign CEOs
[109]
of Global Fortune 500 companies has remained
[112]
pretty constant since the 2008 financial crisis.
[115]
I’d also point out that as of 2019,
[118]
the last date we could find good numbers for,
[121]
45% of the companies on that list
[124]
were founded by immigrants or the children of immigrants.
[127]
No real change.
[128]
Next, Braw suggests that Western corporate titans
[132]
may now conclude that the companies they run
[134]
“should be loyal not just to their shareholders
[136]
but to the company’s home country
[138]
if it provides democracy, rule of law
[141]
and a safe business environment.”
[143]
I’m not ready to bet on that.
[145]
Western companies have long done business
[147]
in nondemocratic countries,
[149]
and some major US businesses
[150]
haven’t blinked twice in recent years
[152]
even on issues like Uighur forced labor.
[154]
In fact, China overtook the United States last year
[158]
as the top recipient of new foreign direct investment.
[162]
Goldman Sachs just announced an expansion
[165]
of its staff there by 2024.
[167]
Amazon, Apple, Nike, Gap …
[168]
the list goes on.
[170]
Still doing business and expecting growth in China.
[174]
Finally, Braw writes that
[175]
“executives may consider themselves
[177]
citizens of nowhere,
[178]
but a business can be harmed
[180]
because of where it is based.”
[181]
That’s true.
[182]
But is that risk new?
[185]
There were boycotts of German companies
[187]
in the 1930s, of course,
[188]
and the same in South Africa during Apartheid in the 1960s.
[191]
Yes, Apple and Google are
[193]
enthusiastic citizens of nowhere.
[195]
But not so much for Microsoft and Amazon,
[198]
which are increasingly US national champions.
[200]
In conclusion, do rising tensions between, say,
[203]
the United States and China
[205]
mean that a new era of business
[207]
with borders is on the horizon?
[209]
A Standard Chartered report,
[211]
just from a couple of months ago, back in March,
[212]
found that of multinational corporations
[215]
based in the United States, the United Kingdom,
[217]
France, and Germany,
[218]
42% “see their best growth opportunities
[222]
outside of their home market.”
[224]
That’s actually “5% higher than six months ago.”
[227]
So, no.
[228]
That’s your latest edition of The Red Pen.
[231]
Thanks for watching, everyone.
[232]
Stay safe and avoid fewer people.
[234]
Talk to you soon.