馃攳
Fiduciary Financial Advisor vs. Broker: Why Care? - YouTube
Channel: Prana Wealth
[0]
So why should you care about the
difference between a fiduciary financial
[5]
adviser and a stockbroker? Well if I told
you that there were hundreds of
[9]
thousands of dollars at stake
would you care then? Keep watching to
[12]
find out more.
[23]
Hey there folks
I'm Patrick King financial planner and
[26]
host of Transformative Television. On
this channel we have a soft spot for
[31]
people who are going through the divorce
process or have lost a spouse or a loved
[34]
one, but of course we work with anyone
who is ready to transform their
[38]
financial lives for the better. If that's
you, if you're going through a transition
[41]
in life, please consider subscribing for
more of these types of videos. And if you
[47]
need financial help through one of these
life changes, don't hesitate to give me a
[50]
call. But in today's episode: fiduciary
financial advisor vs. stock broker. What's
[57]
the difference? Why should you care? Well
there might be hundreds of thousands of
[62]
reasons - maybe even millions - for you to
give a damn. Here we go.
[70]
Alright folks, for today's episode what I
want to do is propose a thought
[74]
experiment. It's cold and flu season here
in Atlanta, so let's just say in this
[79]
scenario, you come down with a little
sniffle. You got a little scratch in the
[82]
back of your throat. You feel like you
might get.. come down with something. [Cough]
[87]
All right, so who do you go see? (That was
ridiculous) But who you can see in this
[92]
thought experiment? Let's just say you've
got a friend who is a pharmaceutical
[96]
sales rep. You could go to this friend
and say, "Hey bud, I feel like I'm coming
[101]
down with a little something. What you got for
me?" So in this scenario that friend only
[107]
has access to the drugs that are
available through the company that he or
[112]
she works for, right? So in this case they
go out to the car - because I'm just
[117]
assuming that all the samples are kept
in the trunk at all times - you know, he
[121]
gives you the samples and you take it
and you might feel better. It might
[125]
actually make you better, but it's
certainly not the best option. This
[130]
person doesn't have the years of
education, experience and wisdom that
[134]
comes along with being a doctor, to be
able to actually a diagnose your
[137]
situation. Not only that it's completely
illegal and unethical, but let's put that
[143]
aside for right now. We'll come back to
that one. So who else could you go see?
[149]
You can go see the doc-in-the-box, you
know, or go see your doctor, your family
[155]
physician, whoever it is. I like the doc-
in-the-box in this case. Hey Doc! [bam bam]
[161]
Right? You know, fill out the forms
because you got to fill out like eight
[164]
of these forms these days. You go in -
especially
the doc in the box - they've seen
[168]
everything, right? So, hey, we've got 200
people come through with these same
[171]
symptoms. Pretty sure it's this it's a
virus.
[175]
Get some sleep. Drink plenty of water.
Here's some Robitussin with, you know,
[179]
whatever they stick in it to knock you
out at night. And here's a Z-pack in case
[182]
it turns into a secondary bacterial deal.
Buh-bye. Come back in two weeks if you're
[187]
not better. Okay!
In this scenario - in our hypothetical
[191]
situation - this is a much, much better
solution. Is it the best solution?
[196]
Hey maybe not, but in this case at least
you know
[201]
that they know what they're doing,
they're working in your best interests,
[204]
they're not beholden to a particular
pharmaceutical company (unless the rep
[210]
has been taking them out every Friday
night for drinks or steaks or whatever but
[215]
let's put that aside). But for the most
part, this is a better solution. It may
[219]
not be an optimal solution, but it's much
better. That doctor's working to get you
[223]
from -1 (being sick) to 0 (to
not being sick). again All right, so that's
[228]
option number two in our thought
experiment. And option three, what I want
[232]
to propose, is let's say instead you
go to a doctor that practices
[237]
integrative medicine. All right, so not
only are they gonna work to get you better, to
[241]
help you get over this cold, but they're
like, "Hey, how do we improve your life all
[245]
the way around? You know, let's take a
look at your labs. Let's do some scans."
[250]
They're gonna ask you about what your
what your nutrition looks like. What's
[254]
your diet? What are you eating? Let's
tweak that a little bit. Hey how's your
[257]
sleep? Maybe they'll order a sleep study.
They're gonna ask you about exercise.
[261]
They might put you in touch with a
personal trainer. They might recommend
[264]
that you go to the gym or go to yoga
once a week (or maybe one more than once
[268]
a week). But they're gonna look at
your whole life - every aspect of your
[273]
health - and they're gonna make
recommendations for that. It's not about
[277]
just getting you from negative one to
zero. That person is trying to get you
[280]
from negative one to positive one. All
right, so here in this in this thought
[288]
experiment,
you know, we've got option one: the
[291]
pharmaceutical sales rep, which isn't
a real option for your health.
[295]
You've got the doc-in-the-box and you've
got the integrative medicine doctor. So
[300]
how that applies to the financial
services industry would be that the
[304]
pharmaceutical sales rep would be your
stockbroker or insurance salesman. You
[308]
know, I use those interchangeably, but
they're basically the same type of
[313]
person:
they're salesmen. They're going to give
[315]
you a product and they're limited to the
product that their employer sells.
[318]
They've got an incentive to sell you
certain products over others and they're
[323]
not required to put your best interests
ahead of theirs. If you know that there's
[329]
a better option, why on earth would you
do that? That's why it's illegal in the
[333]
practice of medicine.
Why it is not required for the financial
[337]
planning profession or financial
services industry? I have no idea. All
[342]
right, so the integrative medicine doctor
in this case. I would call the equivalent
[348]
in financial services would be the
NAPFA financial advisor. National
[353]
Association of Personal Financial
Advisors. These are the fee-only
[357]
fiduciary financial advisors that are
dedicated to looking at every single
[361]
part of your financial life and making
sure you go from -1 to +1.
[365]
Or from 0 to +1. They're trying
to make your life better. They're not
[371]
just trying to slap a band-aid on things,
sell you a product. They are required by
[376]
law to put your interests ahead of
theirs. They are independent and they
[380]
have the universe of investments to pick
from so they can choose the best and
[385]
lowest cost ones for you. Right? So again,
why on earth wouldn't you work with
[390]
someone like that? Your normal family
doctor (or the doc-in-the-box as I like
[396]
to joke) a lot of times, they're they're
the getting you from -1 to
[401]
0. And there are plenty of there are
plenty of even fiduciary advisors out
[405]
there who aren't beholden to a to a
company and whatever those products are
[411]
that that company sells, but they don't
go the full distance when it comes to
[415]
looking at your entire financial health. So again, NAPFA is the place to look for
[422]
those folks who are really gonna look
after you, who are gonna look over your
[425]
entire financial situation. Who aren't
looking just to get you over this cold.
[429]
They're looking to make you healthy for
the rest of your life. Link to NAPFA in the
[433]
show notes. Look for an advisor in your
area there. Full disclosure, I am a
[437]
member as well - something I very much
believe in.
[444]
All right, so one last thought I want to
leave you with is that fiduciary
[448]
advisors tend to be so much more cheaper
than brokers anyway. How much are we
[454]
talking here? It's big bucks! Now,
depending on the advisor and the broker -
[459]
I've seen differences between 0.5%
to 1.5% even -
[464]
differences in their fees. So to give you
an idea, while 1.5% maybe
[471]
doesn't sound like a lot, to give you an
idea, let's say you retired with
[474]
$1 million and your money's growing
at 7% per year at both advisors. Equal
[480]
growth. The difference in fees over a
30-year retirement for that person ends
[486]
up being $1.6 million
in favor of the fiduciary financial
[492]
advisor who is less expensive. It's big
bucks!
[495]
In fact, I don't even know why I'm
still selling this. Like, if you guys
[501]
haven't figured this out by now I just
can't help you.
[504]
Again, check out NAPFA. The link is in
the show notes. And by the way, those
[510]
numbers don't even factor in
the additional return that most clients
[515]
see from working with one of those
holistic financial health advisors like
[521]
an NAPFA advisor. That's like a whole another
level that we're not even counting here.
[525]
I'll do another video on that at some
point soon.
[532]
All right folks, that's what I got for
today.
[534]
Thank you so much for watching. Click
"Like", click "Subscribe" below.
[538]
If you've got a comment, please leave
that. I'd love to hear from you. In the
[542]
meantime, I'm Patrick King. This is
Transformative Television. Until next
[547]
time, take a deep breath! You got this! Cheers.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





