Fiduciary Financial Advisor vs. Broker: Why Care? - YouTube

Channel: Prana Wealth

[0]
So why should you care about the difference between a fiduciary financial
[5]
adviser and a stockbroker? Well if I told you that there were hundreds of
[9]
thousands of dollars at stake would you care then? Keep watching to
[12]
find out more.
[23]
Hey there folks I'm Patrick King financial planner and
[26]
host of Transformative Television. On this channel we have a soft spot for
[31]
people who are going through the divorce process or have lost a spouse or a loved
[34]
one, but of course we work with anyone who is ready to transform their
[38]
financial lives for the better. If that's you, if you're going through a transition
[41]
in life, please consider subscribing for more of these types of videos. And if you
[47]
need financial help through one of these life changes, don't hesitate to give me a
[50]
call. But in today's episode: fiduciary financial advisor vs. stock broker. What's
[57]
the difference? Why should you care? Well there might be hundreds of thousands of
[62]
reasons - maybe even millions - for you to give a damn. Here we go.
[70]
Alright folks, for today's episode what I want to do is propose a thought
[74]
experiment. It's cold and flu season here in Atlanta, so let's just say in this
[79]
scenario, you come down with a little sniffle. You got a little scratch in the
[82]
back of your throat. You feel like you might get.. come down with something. [Cough]
[87]
All right, so who do you go see? (That was ridiculous) But who you can see in this
[92]
thought experiment? Let's just say you've got a friend who is a pharmaceutical
[96]
sales rep. You could go to this friend and say, "Hey bud, I feel like I'm coming
[101]
down with a little something. What you got for me?" So in this scenario that friend only
[107]
has access to the drugs that are available through the company that he or
[112]
she works for, right? So in this case they go out to the car - because I'm just
[117]
assuming that all the samples are kept in the trunk at all times - you know, he
[121]
gives you the samples and you take it and you might feel better. It might
[125]
actually make you better, but it's certainly not the best option. This
[130]
person doesn't have the years of education, experience and wisdom that
[134]
comes along with being a doctor, to be able to actually a diagnose your
[137]
situation. Not only that it's completely illegal and unethical, but let's put that
[143]
aside for right now. We'll come back to that one. So who else could you go see?
[149]
You can go see the doc-in-the-box, you know, or go see your doctor, your family
[155]
physician, whoever it is. I like the doc- in-the-box in this case. Hey Doc! [bam bam]
[161]
Right? You know, fill out the forms because you got to fill out like eight
[164]
of these forms these days. You go in - especially the doc in the box - they've seen
[168]
everything, right? So, hey, we've got 200 people come through with these same
[171]
symptoms. Pretty sure it's this it's a virus.
[175]
Get some sleep. Drink plenty of water. Here's some Robitussin with, you know,
[179]
whatever they stick in it to knock you out at night. And here's a Z-pack in case
[182]
it turns into a secondary bacterial deal. Buh-bye. Come back in two weeks if you're
[187]
not better. Okay! In this scenario - in our hypothetical
[191]
situation - this is a much, much better solution. Is it the best solution?
[196]
Hey maybe not, but in this case at least you know
[201]
that they know what they're doing, they're working in your best interests,
[204]
they're not beholden to a particular pharmaceutical company (unless the rep
[210]
has been taking them out every Friday night for drinks or steaks or whatever but
[215]
let's put that aside). But for the most part, this is a better solution. It may
[219]
not be an optimal solution, but it's much better. That doctor's working to get you
[223]
from -1 (being sick) to 0 (to not being sick). again All right, so that's
[228]
option number two in our thought experiment. And option three, what I want
[232]
to propose, is let's say instead you go to a doctor that practices
[237]
integrative medicine. All right, so not only are they gonna work to get you better, to
[241]
help you get over this cold, but they're like, "Hey, how do we improve your life all
[245]
the way around? You know, let's take a look at your labs. Let's do some scans."
[250]
They're gonna ask you about what your what your nutrition looks like. What's
[254]
your diet? What are you eating? Let's tweak that a little bit. Hey how's your
[257]
sleep? Maybe they'll order a sleep study. They're gonna ask you about exercise.
[261]
They might put you in touch with a personal trainer. They might recommend
[264]
that you go to the gym or go to yoga once a week (or maybe one more than once
[268]
a week). But they're gonna look at your whole life - every aspect of your
[273]
health - and they're gonna make recommendations for that. It's not about
[277]
just getting you from negative one to zero. That person is trying to get you
[280]
from negative one to positive one. All right, so here in this in this thought
[288]
experiment, you know, we've got option one: the
[291]
pharmaceutical sales rep, which isn't a real option for your health.
[295]
You've got the doc-in-the-box and you've got the integrative medicine doctor. So
[300]
how that applies to the financial services industry would be that the
[304]
pharmaceutical sales rep would be your stockbroker or insurance salesman. You
[308]
know, I use those interchangeably, but they're basically the same type of
[313]
person: they're salesmen. They're going to give
[315]
you a product and they're limited to the product that their employer sells.
[318]
They've got an incentive to sell you certain products over others and they're
[323]
not required to put your best interests ahead of theirs. If you know that there's
[329]
a better option, why on earth would you do that? That's why it's illegal in the
[333]
practice of medicine. Why it is not required for the financial
[337]
planning profession or financial services industry? I have no idea. All
[342]
right, so the integrative medicine doctor in this case. I would call the equivalent
[348]
in financial services would be the NAPFA financial advisor. National
[353]
Association of Personal Financial Advisors. These are the fee-only
[357]
fiduciary financial advisors that are dedicated to looking at every single
[361]
part of your financial life and making sure you go from -1 to +1.
[365]
Or from 0 to +1. They're trying to make your life better. They're not
[371]
just trying to slap a band-aid on things, sell you a product. They are required by
[376]
law to put your interests ahead of theirs. They are independent and they
[380]
have the universe of investments to pick from so they can choose the best and
[385]
lowest cost ones for you. Right? So again, why on earth wouldn't you work with
[390]
someone like that? Your normal family doctor (or the doc-in-the-box as I like
[396]
to joke) a lot of times, they're they're the getting you from -1 to
[401]
0. And there are plenty of there are plenty of even fiduciary advisors out
[405]
there who aren't beholden to a to a company and whatever those products are
[411]
that that company sells, but they don't go the full distance when it comes to
[415]
looking at your entire financial health. So again, NAPFA is the place to look for
[422]
those folks who are really gonna look after you, who are gonna look over your
[425]
entire financial situation. Who aren't looking just to get you over this cold.
[429]
They're looking to make you healthy for the rest of your life. Link to NAPFA in the
[433]
show notes. Look for an advisor in your area there. Full disclosure, I am a
[437]
member as well - something I very much believe in.
[444]
All right, so one last thought I want to leave you with is that fiduciary
[448]
advisors tend to be so much more cheaper than brokers anyway. How much are we
[454]
talking here? It's big bucks! Now, depending on the advisor and the broker -
[459]
I've seen differences between 0.5% to 1.5% even -
[464]
differences in their fees. So to give you an idea, while 1.5% maybe
[471]
doesn't sound like a lot, to give you an idea, let's say you retired with
[474]
$1 million and your money's growing at 7% per year at both advisors. Equal
[480]
growth. The difference in fees over a 30-year retirement for that person ends
[486]
up being $1.6 million in favor of the fiduciary financial
[492]
advisor who is less expensive. It's big bucks!
[495]
In fact, I don't even know why I'm still selling this. Like, if you guys
[501]
haven't figured this out by now I just can't help you.
[504]
Again, check out NAPFA. The link is in the show notes. And by the way, those
[510]
numbers don't even factor in the additional return that most clients
[515]
see from working with one of those holistic financial health advisors like
[521]
an NAPFA advisor. That's like a whole another level that we're not even counting here.
[525]
I'll do another video on that at some point soon.
[532]
All right folks, that's what I got for today.
[534]
Thank you so much for watching. Click "Like", click "Subscribe" below.
[538]
If you've got a comment, please leave that. I'd love to hear from you. In the
[542]
meantime, I'm Patrick King. This is Transformative Television. Until next
[547]
time, take a deep breath! You got this! Cheers.