What's The Difference Between An Indexed Annuity And Universal Life? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
IUL is totally tax-free. In this episode, we are going to address the question,
[7]
"What's the difference between an indexed annuity and an indexed universal life
[13]
insurance policy?" You're going to be blown away.
[23]
So, my name is Doug Andrew.
[28]
I've helped people optimize their financial assets, minimize taxes and
[33]
empower their true wealth for more than 45 years. Helping people prepare for
[39]
retirement. I would off time show them different
[42]
savings vehicles and how they would rank based upon the key elements of a prudent
[47]
investment. Number one, liquidity. The ability to access your money when you
[52]
need it. May be with an electronic funds transfer or phone call. 2, would be
[56]
safety. Not only the safety of the institution but the safety of the
[61]
principle that when you set aside money, principle is protected. You don't want to
[64]
lose what you invested. And number 2, every year you make money, you want that
[70]
to become newly protected principal. You don't want to lose in future years the
[75]
money you made in past years. Does that make sense?
[77]
Number 3 would be predictable rates of return. They don't have to be
[81]
pie-in-the-sky rates of return. I have averaged 7 to 10 percent on my IUL
[86]
insurance policies for years. And there are critics out there that say, "Oh, I've
[90]
never seen one that does that." Well, then you haven't seen one structured
[95]
correctly. That is the worst reasoning I've ever heard. It's like you ever seen
[100]
your brain? Well, no. Well how do you know that exists? Come on. And then the last
[104]
feature would be tax advantages. Now, out of four different financial vehicles
[110]
that most people draw from for retirement, my favorite by far is the
[115]
tax-free bucket is what I call it. And among the tax-free buckets, you have
[119]
municipal bonds, you have Roths that are tax-free when you take out the money. But
[124]
what I call the Laser Fund which is a max funded IUL, indexed universal life
[129]
insurance policy, it knocks the socks off of Roths.
[134]
The laser fund has six benefits compared to Roths that have only 2 benefits.
[138]
Municipal bonds are usually low yielding. And some municipalities aren't as safe
[143]
as you may think they are. They've actually gone bankrupt many many times
[147]
throughout the country. And so, when we start looking at different financial
[151]
instruments, sometimes people are told to put money in an annuity. Now, an annuity
[157]
is simply a savings account with an insurance company. Why are they
[164]
recommended? Why do some state, government pensions guarantee income for life by
[170]
using an annuity? It's because of the safety of the multi trillion dollar
[176]
insurance industry in this country that is whether the Great Depression with
[180]
flying colors. We've also had many periods like 2008 where not one legal
[186]
reserve insurance company went under during those critical time periods when
[190]
some times banks were failing left and right or never opened their doors again.
[193]
So, I like the insurance company, the annuities or savings accounts. Life
[199]
insurance people think, "Well, that's just a death benefit. Why do i want the
[203]
expense of life insurance when I don't really care about the death benefit?" So,
[210]
they assume the annuity will perform better because it's cheaper. It doesn't
[215]
have the cost of insurance. Wrong. Let me tell you why. So, as I shoot straight with
[224]
you, an annuity is the same as account with an insurance company. I've never
[228]
owned an annuity. I don't think I will ever own an annuity. There are thousands
[234]
of them out there. And the vast majority I wouldn't touch with the 10-foot Pole.
[238]
If I were going to put money into an annuity, it would be for predictable
[242]
income so that if I ran out of money at age 85 in the annuity, the annuity would
[249]
keep paying me income and keep up with the cost of living increase if I live to
[255]
be 120. And there's only a handful of annuities that do that. And those
[260]
annuities have the average more like 9 10 and 11 percent. But the biggest reason
[265]
why I would not own an annuity is because it's only tax-deferred. If it's a
[271]
non-qualified annuity, one that's not an IRA or 401K, you're funding that annuity
[276]
with after-tax dollars. And it's accumulating tax deferred. But as soon as
[280]
you start taking income, now you're paying tax. And it's taxed LIFO. L-I-F-O.
[287]
Last in first out. I'll explain that. But if it's a qualified annuity, it's like an
[292]
IRA or 401K. And when you start taking the money out, you will pay tax on 100%
[297]
of it. Let's go back to the non-qualified deferred annuity. If I put in
[302]
$500,000 (let's say) into an annuity. And let's say I was earning
[306]
10%. And unfortunately most don't pay that. But let's say you were earning 10%.
[311]
10% of 500,000 would be 50 grand a year. If I start taking income out of that
[317]
annuity at 50,000 a year, that's taxable. Because the last money I'm earning is my
[322]
interest and that's the first money coming out. That's called LIFO tax
[326]
treatment. Unfortunately, most investments are taxed LIFO. There's only one vehicle
[331]
that I'm aware of in the Internal Revenue Code that is taxed FIFO. That
[335]
is life insurance. In other words, the first money in is the first money out.
[340]
Using that same example. If I put in $500,000 into a max-
[345]
funded IUL. And you can't do it all at once now if you want to have tax-free
[349]
income. But let's just simplify this. Once I get my 500,000 in there,
[353]
if I was earning 10%, 50 grand and I started taking that 50,000 out, the
[359]
first money in is the first money out. So, the 50,000 is part of my basis,
[364]
my original 500,000. I already paid tax on that. So, it's tax-free. I could
[368]
take 10 years of income of 50 grand a year and not pay any tax because I'm
[373]
recovering my basis first instead of last with the annuity. But see, insurance
[379]
contracts allow you to continue to take out money tax-free forever.
[385]
You want to know why? So, with indexed universal life insurance, what you're
[391]
allowed to do under Tefra, Defra and Tamra tax citations and subscribers to
[397]
this channel often have questions about those tax
[401]
citations and the sections of the Internal Revenue Code as it relates to
[405]
indexed universal life. And so you can search through my channel and get
[410]
answers to those questions. The point I'm making is right now is that you're
[415]
allowed to put in more money into the IUL and cut the cost or expenses down.
[422]
People say, "What? I thought you had to pay for the cost of the insurance and the
[426]
annuity doesn't do that?" Yeah, there's a handful of annuities that will increase
[430]
in value a little bit if you happen to die. But see most annuities don't blossom
[434]
with life insurance proceeds when you die. And so people assume that's a cost.
[438]
Well, when you're using indexing, most annuities have to keep the caps very low.
[446]
And so, usually they might cap it at maybe 8 or 9 percent, maybe. But
[453]
we're the same insurance company and there's some huge companies that offer
[457]
both indexed annuities and indexed universal life. You will notice that caps,
[462]
the most you can earn on the indexed annuity in a given year might be 7% or
[468]
8% or 9% whereas indexed universal life with the same company that caps our 11,
[474]
12, 16. How come? Because they are able to structure the life insurance in a more
[481]
optimal fashion than they can with an annuity which is simply a savings
[485]
account. And so, you're able to take the money, the cash value that is totally
[490]
tax-free in the insurance policy. Not just tax-deferred. And you're able to
[495]
accumulate that money so that when at the end of the day, if you've been
[499]
averaging 10%, 10% on a million dollars in an IUL would generate about
[505]
100,000 a year of tax-free cash flow. You will be very hard-pressed to
[509]
find an annuity that even comes close to that kind of predictable income. We have
[516]
run illustrations all day long for years showing the difference between indexed
[521]
annuities that are taxed LIFO and totally tax-free indexed universal life.
[527]
They're more flexible. The caps are higher. The costs are actually less even
[532]
though there's an insurance component because
[533]
the insurance component gets cheaper as you get older. If it's structured
[537]
correctly and subscribers through this channel find out the answer to that
[540]
question on some of other YouTubes. But when you understand this, you'll
[545]
realize, "Why would I ever owned an annuity when I can have the few benefits
[552]
of an annuity, indexing with higher caps and it's totally tax-free instead of tax
[558]
deferred? And at the end of the day if I die and there's a million the million,
[563]
blossoms to 2.5 million." See if I died right now, every million in my
[567]
IUL would blossom to about 2.5 million tax-free. People say,
[571]
"Well, that has a cost." Well it's not free. But I'm not paying for it. It's being
[576]
paid for with a minuscule portion of tax that you would pay on an annuity when
[582]
you took out your money. So, why don't you redirect some of that otherwise payable
[585]
tax and have a death benefit? It's not really costing me at the end of the day.
[590]
It is required. And that's what qualifies it to be totally tax free. So, the message
[596]
is in the key takeaways, what's the difference between an indexed annuity
[601]
and an indexed IUL? The best way is to have somebody who really understands
[606]
that 2. And take the same insurance company that offers both. And put in the
[612]
amount of money you want illustrated in an indexed annuity. And look at the
[617]
income stream and the indexed options that are available to you. Then look at
[622]
the index options and the caps that are afforded in the IUL with the same
[628]
insurance company and create the maximum income that you can till age 120. And you
[636]
will see you will have higher income. Now, if you want absolute guaranteed income,
[640]
even if you run out of money, maybe an indexed annuity and only a handful would
[647]
be recommended for that situation if you want guaranteed income. That's fine for
[652]
some people. But most people are like me. They want to have the highest payout
[658]
instead of having 70,000 a year, they want 90 or 100 thousand a year of
[662]
income. And they know based upon historic averages that that will last if they're
[667]
120. But if all heck broke loose, maybe an annuity would give you peace of mind for
[674]
a base. But the difference is the flexibility, the indexing options and
[679]
it's totally tax free. I mean the IUL. Whereas annuities are taxable and their
[686]
tax LIFO. If you want to understand the difference
[689]
and see a comparison, you will learn a lot from reading this book The Laser
[694]
Fund. I'll gift one of these to you for free. It's 300 pages. And it has also 62
[700]
actual clients stories because it's actually 2 books in 1. This is for
[703]
the left brain. You know, the charts graphs and explanations. This is for the
[707]
right brain. You read it this way. And in this, we talk about liquidity, safety,
[710]
rates of return and the tax advantages. You'll see that most annuities on a
[715]
scale of one to ten in these 4 scores. Four usually only around 18 to 22. And
[720]
IUL will score 34, 35 ,36. It totally dwarfs and indexed annuity.